[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 180 KB, 936x1302, 1209573114428.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392042 No.6392042 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.naturalnews.com/030228_puberty_chemicals.html
>The researchers found that among 1,000 girls, the average age of breast development was nine years and 10 months
It's over, paedophilia is ruined forever.

>> No.6392048

I don't think you understand how /jp/ works.

>> No.6392054

What? Did you read Lolita? Bitch had tits. She was just like 15 or so years old.

>> No.6392057
File: 173 KB, 600x500, 33ad0ca4c5b8fd4a4b913ebc9b97d000.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392057

Well yeah, all the boosted hormones coursing through our food and drink nowadays has been leading to bigger breasts and children hitting puberty much earlier.

>> No.6392058

I liked Mii from Popotan and Mira from Star Mine Girl, so I guess it's not the end of the world. I still enjoy DFC, though.

>> No.6392059
File: 5 KB, 126x126, patchouli smile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392059

>3D

Good thing that's not what I'm interested in.

>> No.6392060

Small breasts are the best.

Also, holy fuck is that article pushing an agenda. Tons of wild animals reach sexual maturity faster when well fed and in good health. It's the same thing in humans.

>> No.6392061

>>6392054
>What? Did you read Lolita? Bitch had tits. She was just like 15 or so years old.

Irony. Her breasts were never mentioned and she was a teenager in the movie, not the book.

>> No.6392062

>>6392054
She was 12 when Humbert fell in love with her, and that was written 50 years ago.

>> No.6392063
File: 342 KB, 1920x1200, 1267242091345.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392063

My niece is a completely flat chested 12 year old. She turns 13 soon too.

Delicious.

>> No.6392065

Disgusting flat chest, only good for rubbing dick.

>> No.6392069

>>6392063
How do you know she is completely flat? Did you look down her blouse? She could have breast buds.

>> No.6392072

I wonder how they researched it, did they start flipping shirts in public or something.

>> No.6392074

I'll just wait for investment banker.

>> No.6392079

I have a cousin who's fourteen but she still looks about ten. Probably an outlier though. Puberty is happening sooner and sooner for some reason.

>> No.6392081
File: 53 KB, 296x450, 751969_m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6392081

>>6392042
In the 19th century, puberty didn't start in girls until about 15; but it wasn't rare to be married as early as 12.

In the modern day puberty starts at 9, but you can't even think about even looking until she turns 16/18/insert-social-norm-here.

>> No.6392091

>>6392081
What a silly statement. Arranged marriages were done at that age, but it wasn't consummated until much, much later. It was all about politics, so who cared what the children themselves thought?

>> No.6392108

>>6392091
Don't be stupid. Muhammad himself consummated a marriage when the wife was 9.

What's odd about consummating a 12 year old?

>> No.6392118

I hit puberty at eight. Felt bad, man.

>> No.6392119

>>6392108
He was a prophet of God, he could do whatever he wanted.

>> No.6392123

>>6392081
>In the 19th century, puberty didn't start in girls until about 15
Probably not true, by the way. They didn't do scientific studies on these sorts of things back then, so it was probably just based on when most people considered a girl to be sexually mature, whereas the study in OP was based on the very earliest signs of puberty.

>> No.6392153

>>6392123
> They didn't do scientific studies on these sorts of things back then

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.6392175

>>6392119
Mohammad is said to be a paragon of virtue, and an example for all people on Earth until the end of time.

>> No.6392184

Small breasts are as fine as no breasts.
However, hair on the field is an instant STOP

>> No.6392190

>>6392153
Sorry, but I don't believe for a second that anyone in the 1800s got away with examining the breasts and genitals of a sample of 9-15 year old girls sufficiently large and diverse enough to draw any serious scientific conclusions.

>> No.6392191

>>6392175
He was an insane, child-molesting psychopath.

He is to religious founders what Hitler was to politicians.

>> No.6392197

>>6392191 insulting Mohammad
Kaffirs gon' kaf.

>> No.6392201

>3D
Get out of here you sick fuck. 3D, even in little girl form, has always been an abomination.

>> No.6392243

>>6392190
Stop trying to apply a morality that has only developed in the last 20 years to events 200 years ago.

That said, it's highly doubtful that anyone would have considered studying this back then.

>> No.6392327

>>6392243
It's always been a rule to not let random guys touch your children. It's been exaggerated lately, but that feeling has always existed, and it would've been a hell of a lot harder to convince someone you were doing it for science in the 1800s.

>> No.6392333

>>6392201
Retard.

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action