So, I've been thinking of getting a sexy anime figurine. I don't really want to drop more than $100 on something that is non-functional, so I'm trying to find the hottest figure out there. Any suggestions? Busty figures only please, no flat chests.

File: 46 KB, 500x493, 51uteeU4nbL._SL500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:13:14 2010 No.6368178 [Reply] [Original]

So, I've been thinking of getting a sexy anime figurine. I don't really want to drop more than $100 on something that is non-functional, so I'm trying to find the hottest figure out there.

Any suggestions? Busty figures only please, no flat chests.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:14:14 2010 No.6368183 >>6368178 >no flat chests. GET OUT

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:15:14 2010 No.6368184 Any Ikkitousen or Queen's Blade series.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:15:14 2010 No.6368186 >so I'm trying to find the hottest figure out there. >Busty figures only please, no flat chests. You contradict yourself.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:17:14 2010 No.6368190 >>6368183 >>6368186 trying too hard to enforce the /jp/ stereotype so they can feel better about themselves. Plenty of losers like healthy chests as well.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:18:14 2010 No.6368192 >>6368190 I don't see how the debate between flat chests and blobs of fat chests relates to feeling better about oneself.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:20:14 2010 No.6368196 >no flat chests Please die.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:21:14 2010 No.6368197 >>6368190 >trying too hard That's such a normalfag phrase, so is "loser". I don't believe you belong here.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:23:14 2010 No.6368201 Loli - flat - normal - busty (aka healthy) The further to the right equals decline in superiority.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:25:14 2010 No.6368206 >Busty figures only Stopped reading there.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:26:14 2010 No.6368209 true breast lover, all kinds, etc.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:30:14 2010 No.6368214 Oh my god, are you guys all pedophiles here?

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:31:14 2010 No.6368218 >>6368214 You must be new here.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:32:14 2010 No.6368219 I'm not, but I don't know shit about figurines. Don't expect much from /jp/ except samefags. The people that like big chests are just mostly watching the show.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:32:14 2010 No.6368220 As a Saeko fan, it was a simple choice. Also the other HSOTD figures are beyond horrible

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:33:14 2010 No.6368226 File: 65 KB, 546x980, 10080180a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6368220 Whoops.

>>	ZUN !barYV1VtIA Sat Oct 30 05:35:14 2010 No.6368228 >>6368209 Same here. Either loli or healthy is fine to me. OP already got answered in >>6368184 anyways. Search on Amiami or something.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:48:14 2010 No.6368248 File: 14 KB, 435x580, chie_cast_off_figure_j79.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Here's what I recommend, OP. http://www.jlist.com/product/YYN719

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:55:14 2010 No.6368262
File: 61 KB, 460x690, kanSummer01[5].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I like this one a lot. I don't know if you can still buy it or not. I'm too poor to buy figures to hotglue so I just look at pictures of them. that giant kosmos that's like 600 bux is good too.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:56:14 2010 No.6368264 File: 82 KB, 452x556, shizuka_11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I think this is probably the best queen's blade one I've seen

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:57:14 2010 No.6368265 File: 67 KB, 600x600, FIG-MOE-1446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I think this is an original character but it's pretty fappable.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 05:58:14 2010 No.6368268 File: 51 KB, 600x900, 1281364869664.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:04:14 2010 No.6368281 File: 208 KB, 600x900, vskos-mos016.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] anyway just get this

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:04:14 2010 No.6368283 Oh my god, those are ridiculously hot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:05:14 2010 No.6368287 inb4 the cloud spooge whirlwind

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:11:14 2010 No.6368326 >>6368268 She actually looks like crap IRL. Terrible separations on her shoulders...

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:13:14 2010 No.6368346

>>6368209
Can enjoy breast of all sizes, but that doesn't mean my favorite among them isn't the most superior of them all. Can never get sick of flat, and normal is tolerable enough to be enjoyable. But busty is just disgusting over a long exposure, regardless if I can enjoy it to an extent.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:13:14 2010 No.6368350 >>6368326 the re-release fixed it, or so I've heard.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:15:14 2010 No.6368359 What do people see in busty, mature chests anyway? It's disgusting.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:23:14 2010 No.6368402 >>6368359 It may come as a shock to you to find that different people have different tastes.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:26:14 2010 No.6368416 File: 58 KB, 600x600, WITCHBLADE Amaha Masane A 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:26:14 2010 No.6368418 >>6368359 Both are just fine for me. I can understand if you don't like them, but disgusting? Seems a bit much.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:35:14 2010 No.6368451

>>6368418
"Taste" aside, disgusting is a natural reaction that comes to mind when seeing busty and chests that goes with it. Why? Because it's not delicious and it draws out vivid image of decay and aging of a woman, along with proportions that are grotesque. So, disgusting is natural

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:38:14 2010 No.6368462 >>6368451 >"Taste" aside Sir, what you just said was nothing but an opinion.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:43:14 2010 No.6368485
File: 23 KB, 600x450, Rei fig HIPS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6368451
To you, maybe. All I see are pleasing curves and a fertile woman. And those lacking such curves are the ones that seem unnatural to me. But unlike you, I know that that's just my preference, not some universal truth.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:45:14 2010 No.6368488 Ever since I've learned that breasts start growing once a woman reaches puberty I've pretty much given up on 3D entirely. The appeal of busty, big chests is next to none.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:46:14 2010 No.6368494 >>6368462 Natural reaction, not opinion. >>6368485 Rei isn't busty. She's normal, and she's nice like that. Feminine curves are everywhere, DFC characters have them, and even loli have them.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:47:14 2010 No.6368495 >>6368488 What does 3D have to do with any of our discussion? >The appeal of busty, big chests is next to none. For you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:49:14 2010 No.6368503 >>6368494 >Natural reaction, not opinion. It absolutely is an opinion. How can you say it is a natural reaction to see a girl with large breasts disgusting? I can't even see how that makes sense.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:50:14 2010 No.6368509 >>6368494 Okay, so you're saying that breasts are fine up to a point. That's what I'm saying too, everyone has an upper limit. We just choose it differently.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:53:14 2010 No.6368515 File: 116 KB, 501x709, IMG_2102.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6368509 Also, I just realized the irony of talking about fertile women and posting Rei. Derp. That's what I get for having so few pics of figs.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:55:14 2010 No.6368523 >>6368503 It can't be helped. I was born that way. >>6368509 Proportions as well. I just draw the line at normal.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 06:58:14 2010 No.6368530 File: 171 KB, 480x640, Shunya figure.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6368523 ...Normalfag. Sorry, couldn't help it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:01:14 2010 No.6368547 >>6368530 Even if you couldn't, I find that insulting.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:02:14 2010 No.6368548 flat chest can't suck milk from their own tits so yeah

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:04:14 2010 No.6368552 >>6368548 How does this exactly work in favor of busty chests?

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:10:06 2010 No.6368558 Sure is samefagging hipster in here. Yeah, hipster at playing up the "pedo" angle on 4chan. Piss off to /b/ already.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:12:14 2010 No.6368562 >>6368558 This, get out flat chest hipsters. You're not cool or edgy, you're not fitting in.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:13:14 2010 No.6368565 >>6368558 >>6368562 100% agreed. samefag scum like that try so desperately to give /jp/ an image of complete pedo's

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:14:14 2010 No.6368571 cool samefagging breastfags

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:15:14 2010 No.6368575 >>6368571 >They caught me samefagging, I'll accuse the other side of samefagging and hope it all blows over

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:16:14 2010 No.6368577 >>6368571 You wish pedofag.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:16:14 2010 No.6368578 >>6368558 >>6368562 >>6368565 >>6368571 >>6368575 All of you get the fuck out.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:17:14 2010 No.6368580 >>6368577 Go suck on your saggy bag of flesh breastfag

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:19:14 2010 No.6368585 Oh dear, can you fags stop arguing about every little thing?

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:21:14 2010 No.6368586 lol at assmad breastfags. Fuck off back to /a/ you low power level newfags. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Put this in your sig if you support DFC (Delicious Flat Chest) Being better than bags of fat since ~FOREVER~

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:24:41 2010 No.6368591 There used to be a time when any mention of developed chests here would get you ridiculed by other people. It goes to show what happened to /jp/ over the course of few months. How the might have fallen.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:25:14 2010 No.6368593 There used to be a time when any mention of developed chests here would get you ridiculed by other people. It goes to show what happened to /jp/ over the course of few months. How the mighty have fallen.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:27:14 2010 No.6368597 >>6368593 Or maybe we just stopped acting like retards.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:31:14 2010 No.6368604 >>6368586 >frustrated anti-loli and dfc fag reverse trolling Way to toss subtly out the window. And sure is angry normalfags all of a sudden.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:33:14 2010 No.6368608 >>6368593 I'd say more like the past year and a half.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:33:14 2010 No.6368611 >>6368604 >he likes boobs what a normalfag ecksdee can you stop this shit, it wasn't funny 2 years ago, it's not now.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:35:14 2010 No.6368618 >>6368597 >we Nope. Sounds like you in the "other". You're part of the problem, even the cause of it. Unkindly get out.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:37:14 2010 No.6368624 >>6368611 >use of pedo and random "hipster" retort >not typical normalfags mentality and posting Right.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:37:14 2010 No.6368625 >>6368618 I'm not going anywhere. Sucks to be you. I don't even like developed chests.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:38:14 2010 No.6368630 This thread contains a lot of people who seem unable to take it easy.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:39:14 2010 No.6368631 >>6368416 How is this attractive to anyone?

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:41:14 2010 No.6368636 >>6368625 Yet you sound nothing like a proper /jp/ member.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:42:14 2010 No.6368638 >>6368636 Better hurry up and have me banned, then.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:43:14 2010 No.6368640 >>6368631 It's not

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:48:14 2010 No.6368653 >>6368631 You have to realize that people who have a giant-breast fetish have a deformed sexuality, and are unable to appreciate true erotic beauty.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:52:14 2010 No.6368664

>>6368631
I don't care about the breast size(Though I do prefer smaller), the tan lines get to me more than anything. It's like having a figure that reminds you of going to the beach.
>>6368653
Giant breasts such as breasts bigger than the body? Yes. But not 'healthy' breasts, as I think that's genetic as it would denote the person would be a good mother.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 07:59:14 2010 No.6368670 >>6368593 I blame it on /a/'s over influx of normalfags over the past year or two who found their way here, and made it their second home. That or unfortunately, /jp/ is gradually losing its elitism.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:05:14 2010 No.6368675

>>6368670
We've had healthy threads here since /jp/ was created, continuing over from old /a/.
For example, http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/thread/S27586

I can understand if you don't like it, but please don't act like we're inferior or new.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:07:14 2010 No.6368677

>>6368670
It's funny because I've been here since the split, I'm a shut-in hermit and pretty much like everything that gets discussed here.
But since I happen to also like developed breasts alongside my other interests, that makes me "not belong in /jp/"?
I do agree that there's been an influx of normalfags to blame, but that also made other people so paranoid it's difficult to try to talk about anything that deviates from the stereotypical image of the /jp/er, when one of /jp/'s strengths in the beginning was the variety of things we could talk about.
Sorry about metapost, etc, but it just gets to me when I'm told to gtfo despite having been here since the beginning and using 4chan only for /jp/, pretty much.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:10:14 2010 No.6368684 >>6368677 >gtfo Yet you write like a newfag.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:12:14 2010 No.6368686 >>6368684 People on /jp/ are told to "gtfo" all the fucking time. How can you not know this?

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:14:14 2010 No.6368690 >>6368686 I've never seen a /jp/ regular use the abbrevation "gtfo" though. Are you sure you're not from /a/ or /b/?

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:16:14 2010 No.6368694

>>6368684
I was just indirectly quoting the average response I seem to get these days.
This is exactly the sort of reaction I'm talking about.
>>6368686
I know it's common, I never said otherwise. I just said it gets to me and I find that kind of kneejerk reaction kind of irritating.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:18:14 2010 No.6368703

>>6368690
1. He said that people tell him to "GTFO." Whether or not "GTFO" is /b/-speak or not, the fact remains that it is perfectly reasonable to write, "people have been telling you to GTFO" when people have been telling you to GTFO. Which people do.
2. How the fuck can you tell who the regulars are when they are posting one-line sentences telling trolls or /b/ or whoever else to GTFO or not?
3. You are a fucking asshole.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:19:14 2010 No.6368710 >>6368703 I still wouldn't like to see "gtfo" in regular usage on /jp/. What next, "wtf"? Or worse, "ftw"?

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:20:14 2010 No.6368712 >>6368690 What you just did is called a True Scotsman fallacy. And admittedly, there are other, more often used acronyms, like gb2[where I assume you came from].

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:21:14 2010 No.6368717 >>6368712 "I've never seen anyone here do X" is not the same as "No true person from here would do X"

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:24:14 2010 No.6368728

>>6368675
>not inferior
Is this a sick joke?
Might not necessary be new, but there seems to be a correlation in how some healthyfags are noticeable normalfags.

>>6368677
To some, that's how it goes. Whether you take it as a joke or a hint is up to you. It's the case of—if you like what most of /jp/ likes, but have one interest that conflicts with /jp/, then all of a sudden, it unthinkable that'd belong here. But that's just typical reactions. You can't fault those being for being /jp/ members. You, being here that long, should already expect and know the kind of reactions that will most likely occur.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:24:14 2010 No.6368734 >>6368710 >What's next Yeah, what's next? VN, NEET, OK...?

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:24:14 2010 No.6368736

>>6368712
In the case of that, it is acknowledged on the one hand that the person is actually as they are (in this cirucmstance, the person is actually from /jp/) but they are accused of not being "true", not in a literal sense. It's acknowledged that the Scotsman who violates the ideal IS a Scotsman, but he is unworthy of being one in the eyes of the one invoking the fallacy.

On the other hand, this is a case where whether or not he actually is a Scotsman is disputed. It's not a case of "no /jp/ regular would say gtfo", encountering him, who is accepted to be a /jp/ regular, then saying "no true /jp/ regular would."

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:25:14 2010 No.6368737 http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp?search_text=gtfo&task=search&offset=24 just look at how many messages telling people to get out are written by people thinking they represent /jp/

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:27:14 2010 No.6368749

>>6368703
>Whether or not "GTFO" is /b/-speak or not, the fact remains that it is perfectly reasonable to write.
No it isn't. Using "GTFO" is akin to using acronyms like "lol", "wtf", "rofl" or whatever you like to use. We don't do that shit in /jp/. If you're going to draw some examples at least make sure you do it without resorting to /b/ or /a/-esque shitposting.

>2. How the fuck can you tell who the regulars are when they are posting one-line sentences telling trolls or /b/ or whoever else to GTFO or not?
How the fuck can I tell shitty posters and memetic words spewing kids using acronyms, that only /b/ or /a/ would use, apart from /jp/ regulars? That's right.

>3. You are a fucking asshole.
You got that right sperglord. Being an asshole is what every /jp/ regular should aspire to be.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:30:14 2010 No.6368770 >>6368717 True, but "I've never seen a /jp/ regular" is the same as "no true person from here would". And, unfortunately, that's what has been said, no way to back off it now.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:30:14 2010 No.6368771 >>6368737 This even has more results than "get the fuck out". 3000-4000 vs 6000-7000

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:30:14 2010 No.6368774 >>6368737 It's full of shitposters that don't act like /jp/ posters at all. You're shooting yourself in the foot here. http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/thread/6280252

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:32:14 2010 No.6368790

>>6368770
It's not the same. The fallacy would be to actually find someone, ascertain that they actually are a /jp/ regular, but still hold that they are not "true". In this case, the idea is that someone who uses that terminology is not a /jp/ regular, not that they are not a true regular. In other words, the argument is that they factually do not regularly visit /jp/, not that they are lacking some kind of spirit that the idealistic /jp/ regular should have.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:32:14 2010 No.6368791
File: 17 KB, 344x318, uiharu_and_saten_unimpressed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>but there seems to be a correlation in how some healthyfags are noticeable normalfags.

Insecure much? Maybe you should go post on Tohno-chan. Oh, wait, there are people with healthy waifus on there, they might just be normalfags.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:33:14 2010 No.6368795

>>6368749
>No it isn't. Using "GTFO" is akin to using acronyms like "lol", "wtf", "rofl" or whatever you like to use. We don't do that shit in /jp/. If you're going to draw some examples at least make sure you do it without resorting to /b/ or /a/-esque shitposting.
You are illiterate. The usage of GTFO in "a lot of posters in /jp/ tell other posters to GTFO" is not any more shitposting than writing "when the fuck did XD become acceptable to use in /jp/?" You are essentially quoting other posters.

>How the fuck can I tell shitty posters and memetic words spewing kids using acronyms, that only /b/ or /a/ would use, apart from /jp/ regulars? That's right.
"I know no /jp/ regular has ever said that because no /jp/ regular would ever say that." Fucking brilliant logic.

>You got that right sperglord. Being an asshole is what every /jp/ regular should aspire to be.
Well, at least you're a model citizen.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:34:14 2010 No.6368805 http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp?task=search&ghost=&search_text=%22us+plox+now+gt fo+btard%27s+%22

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:36:14 2010 No.6368818 >>6368736 Substitute "true X" with "X regular". The fallacy stays the same. True Scotsman is a reasoning pattern, it's not limited to the literal meaning of true.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:38:14 2010 No.6368824 >>6368791 Has nothing to due with being insecure or not. The content of their post shows that they're one. You can't say otherwise when it's they're being obvious or blatant from their post.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:42:14 2010 No.6368849 >>6368824 Look, I'm not even going to bother anymore. We're going to just going to keep posting tits like we always have, and you can keep sneering down at us for having shitty normalfag taste. Same as always.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:45:14 2010 No.6368869

>>6368838
The initial poster wrote "when I'm told to gtfo." The absence of two quotation marks around the word "gtfo" in a lengthly post does not mean that suddenly, that person became a shitposter. A clause like this:

>it's obvious that only newfags tell people to gtfo

also does not have quotations around "gtfo;" yet, it is clearly not being used in its original manner because nobody has actually been told to get the fuck out in that post.

>Twist it all you want but that's what you wrote and you meant to "gtfo" to prove your point rather than quote someone. Yes, you, the initial poster which I quoted.
I'm not >>6368677

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 08:50:14 2010 No.6368921

>>6368795
Except he didn't quote anyone in his initial post since he didn't write any quotation marks. Twist it all you want but that's what he wrote and he meant to "gtfo" to prove his point rather than to quote someone.

>"I know no /jp/ regular has ever said that because no /jp/ regular would ever say that." Fucking brilliant logic.
We judge posters(posts) by their posts here. There are no individuals whatsoever. So even though you post like a 6th grader from /b/ does not necessarily mean that you're a shitposter in your next post if you post like every sensible person here on /jp/.

>>6368805
What are you trying to prove here? That shitty posters exist on /jp/?

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 09:13:14 2010 No.6368994

>>6368921
I really can't believe you're accusing me of being a "shitposter" and disregard the whole point of the post just because I didn't put two quotations mark in there. Whatever, I was the stupid one for meta-venting in the first place. I'm sorry for all of this mess.

Anonymous Sat Oct 30 09:13:14 2010 No.6368996

>>6368921
>We judge posters(posts) by their posts here.

I would like this to be true in general.

Which doesn't change the fact that what you said directly negates the "no regular /jp/ poster" claim simply by disallowing dividing of posters based on frequency of posting.

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture