[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 513 KB, 1292x929, konachan-com-56182-blonde_hair-flandre_scarlet-guitar-long_hair-touhou.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321434 No.6321434 [Reply] [Original]

Why are lolis attractive?

Here's Flandre with a guitar.

>> No.6321437

it's not destroyed?

>> No.6321445

A pink guitar suits a young girl such as her.

>> No.6321447
File: 1.58 MB, 1296x1840, Flan cross.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321447

Religion thread?

>> No.6321448
File: 837 KB, 1475x1640, flandrelondoncalling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321448

>>6321434

>> No.6321451

>>6321434
Their small bodies, smooth DFC and underdeveloped pussies are incredibly arousing.

>> No.6321456

>>6321451
It's not underdeveloped, it's just right.

>> No.6321461

>>6321456
It's underdeveloped.

Take a biology/anatomy/child development introductory course.

>> No.6321470

>>6321461
Will such a course feature high quality pictures?

>> No.6321472

>>6321461
I can't afford college classes, though. I just figured:
baby vagina -> child vagina -> beyond
underdeveloped -> fine -> overdeveloped

>> No.6321478

>>6321456
Don't refute
You're dealing with a master

>> No.6321484
File: 78 KB, 788x900, c1283544105448.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321484

That is a good question.

What is it about little girls that makes them so attractive?

>> No.6321488
File: 626 KB, 849x1200, cute56e67a1f77f7fd73c9523cce01b69b40.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321488

Look at these bodies.

Each one is both inspires in me lust and a feeling to want to hug them tightly.

>> No.6321489

>>6321484
Silly girl, you are too old to sit in the shopping cart.

>> No.6321490

>>6321488
By "hug them tightly" you mean "jam it in", right?

>> No.6321493
File: 128 KB, 586x620, cute1270013077809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321493

Now, personally, the lust is not as present as other feelings. Granted, it is still there, especially if I see a nice ass, but it is less a feeling to thrust my burning member inside their body as it is to grab, grope, and rub my head against their beautifully tiny butt.

>> No.6321496
File: 131 KB, 800x600, cute1282781874041.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321496

But let us move past that.

Indeed, the other feelings little girls bring about in me are feelings of desire. Naturally.

But what kind of desire? Not of lust, no, but of envy.

>> No.6321498

every man's dream is to fuck a loli

pro ve me wrong

>> No.6321503
File: 1.32 MB, 1637x2008, c3f8c9a1d80f4026fc3416a8d934e0eae924ed2c6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321503

Yes, envy.

Envy of them who have such freedom as to depend upon another. Envy of them who are so adorably cute as to inspire these feelings, not just in me, but countless others. Envy of them who are allowed to wear such cute clothing and to be so defenseless, and praised for it.

To put it simply, envy of them for being them.

>> No.6321504

>>6321496
Envy that other people have pretty daughters and we don't?
Envy we are ugly men who will only get older while they are girls in the prime of life?
Envy of a fantasy world where little girls stay little girls instead of becoming ugly women?

>> No.6321511

>>6321498
I've heard that most people have sexual dreams of having sex with huge boob women. I was too embarrassed to reveal that all of mine involved little girls without breasts.

>> No.6321513
File: 136 KB, 543x800, c1283542477659.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321513

Yes, I wish to be the little girl. I am so attracted to them, that I wish to be them.

>>6321504
Perhaps not the former, but the latter two are quite true.

This chin of mine, these shoulders, this vile hair, thick and coarse all around, these foul smells, they are all the definition of wretchedness, and yet the definition of maleness as well.

I hate it, my friends. I do not wish to embody rugged maleness, but gentle femininity. I wish to be soft where I am hard, sweet where I am bitter, smooth where I am rough.

>> No.6321515
File: 83 KB, 800x600, c1286921585727.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321515

Now, naturally, it seems as if I have placed something intangible upon a pedestal and worship it, such is the definition of an Ideal, after all. And I will not deny it. My fantasies are quite unrealistic, and, if you'll allow me, consist of a vampiric and dominant loli using her magics to make me her pet loli.

But that's neither here nor there.
Truly, lolis are attractive. This no man can deny. Their legs, their feet, their hands, their hair, their eyes, their chest, their most tender of places. All of them who consist of all of them are naturally attractive.

>> No.6321517

>>6321511
It's not your fault DFC lolis are the hottest thing that can be conceptualized.

>> No.6321518
File: 342 KB, 1920x1200, akino_momiji.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321518

Therefore, my attraction is not the result of pedestal-placing.

Are, then, my desires to be one? Surely it is natural to want to be beautiful. Indeed, by society it is considered most peculiar and strange to want to become ugly, and multiple people spend a lot of money to become their definition of beautiful.

Therefore, my desire to be a little girl is not strange or peculiar when generalized.

>> No.6321522

>>6321515
My fantasy is to be some sort of warlock who has little girls with magic powers to serve me. As long as I'm within the presence of little girls, I don't really mind if I remain a guy. I could probably go for some muscles though, I don't have any at all.

>> No.6321523

>>6321513
go outside, read a book, and realize how fucking amazing it is that you even fucking exist, that years ago a microbe assembled itself out of amino acids and started an evolutionary chain that has remained UNBROKEN for 3.5 billion years. or you could stay inside and hang yourself with a belt because you cant ever be or look like a ten year old girl. either way the genepool will continue, enjoy it while you can.

>> No.6321528
File: 1.02 MB, 2234x2909, 0hcl09.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321528

What is the result of pedestal-placing?

If my attraction to lolis are no more a result of it as other attractions, and my desires to be one any different than other desires to be attractive, what is?

>>6321523
Humans have an imperfect design. Should I be amazed at that which I had no part in? Surely, it is natural, just as I am amazed at paintings, buildings, and novels of such artistic and beautiful merit as to take my breath away.

Should I toss aside my feelings because such beautiful things exist in the world? No more than I should toss aside my feelings because of the starving people in Africa, if you'll allow the expression.

>> No.6321540

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jItz-uNjoZA

>> No.6321541
File: 862 KB, 2126x3013, 0hcl02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321541

Well, surely, my feelings are not strange at all!

But I ramble on away from the point of the thread.

Why are lolis attractive? They inspire not only lust, envy, desire, and other sorts of emotions in those who see them.
But why? Their bodies are ideally designed to inspire these feelings, to say nothing of their innocence, which, coupled with their form, makes those who see them want to protect and cherish them.

So is that all? Their body and their innocence? Is there nothing else of lolis to be attracted to?

>> No.6321549

>>6321523
Under that logic, if we were troglodytes we should be happy because of million of years of evolution, etc., but who would want to be an ugly caveman without any conveniences or life expectancy?

>> No.6321554

>>6321528
if humans are an imperfect design then why not strive to perfect it, instead of idolizing an idealistic portrayal of an underdeveloped girl. i dont follow any religion or way of life, i simply live, and by doing that i am continuing a path that can only lead to perfection or oblivion, and since i will never see the end of the path all i can do is hope that it all works out ok. and by the way continuing the gene pool requires that you procreate, and by wanting to be a loli for whatever reason you are essentially denying yourself a chance to be a part of life, which i just cant understand or condone.

>> No.6321560

>>6321549
troglodytes didnt have the ability to look into the base components of the universe and feel the awe of the infiniteness and complexity of reality.

>> No.6321566

>>6321554
>if humans are an imperfect design then why not strive to perfect it

Well, experimenting on humans tends to be illegal, but if you want to be Frankenstein about it, I wonder if we could make our own artificial little girls. Probably not, though, it sounds too SF.

>. and by the way continuing the gene pool requires that you procreate, and by wanting to be a loli for whatever reason you are essentially denying yourself a chance to be a part of life, which i just cant understand or condone.

It's a way of undermining the whole process. You think humanity is ugly as it stands? Don't support humanity. Kind of like boycotting a product that you don't like, you can boycott humanity as a whole.

>> No.6321567

>>6321560
Yeah, they just mindlessly drew on cave walls, sure.

>> No.6321577

>>6321554
Why is being a part of life so important? Should everyone be forced to have kids? Indeed, should everyone have kids? To answer yes to that simply shows your ignorance to the world.

In any event, show me the scientist needing volunteers to turn grown men into little girls, and I will play my part to perfect human bodies. Show me the engineer testing permanent virtual reality, and I will play my part to perfect the very human experience.


>>6321560
And because they couldn't, they shouldn't feel happy for being alive?
And if ignorance forbids happiness, how do you feel about someone who "will never see the end of the path" of their life, I presume?

>> No.6321580

>>6321567
my kids mindlessly draw on the house walls too. pretty sure they are not discovering positrons

>> No.6321587

>>6321580
Then you clearly know nothing of young children. Children question the very foundations of reality every day. Do you even have kids are you just bullshitting?

>> No.6321589

>>6321587
He's clearly just bullshitting. Why do you even ask?

>> No.6321592

>>6321587
>Children question the very foundations of reality every day.
That's a very fancy way of saying "they don't know jack shit about anything yet"

>> No.6321594

>>6321592
this

>> No.6321598

This thread is officially fucking DEEP.

>> No.6321599

>>6321592
And when people think they know how the world works, usually during teenage years (of course you don't, you just think you do), you stop asking questions.

>> No.6321659
File: 235 KB, 715x1000, animal ear girl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321659

I like little girl threads.

>> No.6321665

>>6321599
>usually during teenage years (of course you don't, you just think you do)
Yeah, this is what makes teens the most annoying kind of people alive.

I can't even believe I used to be such an ignorant annoying piece of shit myself. I hate myself for it.

>> No.6321684
File: 29 KB, 409x386, 1287364196108.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321684

>>6321665
We all do, bro.
Specially because we were not little girls instead of ugly motherfuckers

>> No.6321691

>>6321684
I would have even been happy being a little boy at that point, going through puberty sucks.

>> No.6321943

Loli is confusing because no lolicon agrees on the definition of loli.

"Real" lolicons think lolis must look like they have the body of a 10 YO or younger. As for myself, I like the ones who look like around 11~13 years old. Most tell me 13 is not loli. However, we can clearly see similar body types in "loli" characters (such as Konoha, 13, in Arcana Heart, girls from Yuzu soft games, etc).

What do you think?

>> No.6321958

>>6321943
I'm tired of bothering with technicalities nowadays, so I just call little girls whom I find sexy lolis. I don't really like breasts/hips that much at all, though, except if they are really tiny and lack form.

>> No.6321966

>>6321958
I like it when they're really skinny, small and have no breasts, but good hips. That's the body type of 13 year old, in my mind.

>> No.6321984 [DELETED] 
File: 1.01 MB, 1000x950, vocaloids.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321984

>>6321966
How big of hips are we talking here? In this image, I like Rin and Miku, but not Luka.

>> No.6321995
File: 259 KB, 900x771, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6321995

>>6321966
How big hips are we talking about here? I'm fine with a little sticking out on the sides, enough for her to rest her hands on and look sweet.

>> No.6322024

>>6321995
Something like your picture, I guess. My brain is malfunctioning and I can't think of any examples I can post. I like the curves, but they also must be skinny.

It would be easier for me if you posted a case where you deem the hips to be too large.

Captcha: untimin discussion

>> No.6322032
File: 155 KB, 400x500, too large.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322032

>>6322024
Okay, here is an image of a girl with small breasts and hips that are too large.

>> No.6322041 [DELETED] 
File: 359 KB, 1024x768, wp_catherine_1024x768.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322041

>>6322032
Yup, that's too large. I can't feel attracted to that.

I think Konoha, Catherine (both from Arcana Heart) and Sunohara Mei are good examples of my taste in.

>> No.6322055
File: 359 KB, 1024x768, wp_catherine_1024x768.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322055

>>6322032
Yup, that's too large. I can't feel attracted to that.

I think Nono (Yotsunoha), Konoha, Catherine (both from Arcana Heart) and Sunohara Mei are good examples of my taste. But I also feel attracted to girls considered less "developed", like the girls from Musume Shimai or some Marmalade games.

>> No.6322073

>>6322055
I certainly agree with you on Sunohara Mei, she is lovely.

>> No.6322077
File: 99 KB, 800x600, Yosuganosora_415.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322077

>>6322055
I guess Amatsume Akira is also a good example. (Although she looks a bit older/taller than I might like in the HCGs)

>> No.6322078
File: 1.28 MB, 850x1157, what should I do.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322078

>>6322073

>> No.6322109
File: 256 KB, 530x1000, c823c9e2dd026535aa37753afc1dcba8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322109

Glorious unproportional hips.

>> No.6322115
File: 362 KB, 800x600, ev068a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322115

>>6322055
Another good example, Oogami Hinata from Mimi wo Sumaseba. I can't believe I didn't think of her immediately.

I'm posting so many because sometimes I doubt of my status as lolicon, when I see some much younger lolis posted here.

>> No.6322147

>>6321488
i really like this picture
source pls

>> No.6322152

>>6322147
Ask me again with the periods removed from your name.

>> No.6322158

>>6322152
ok.

>> No.6322159

>>6322115
Lately, I feel like I'm being attracted to younger and younger girls. Earlier, I found a 5 year old girl attractive.

>> No.6322175

>>6322158
It's an original character.
http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=4979251

>> No.6322206
File: 34 KB, 320x450, 1286646331827.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322206

Their physical appearances compliment their cute and energetic personalities perfectly and vice versa. The smooth flat chests, the tiny bodies, the bright, benign faces. It's all so wonderful.

>> No.6322229

This whole thread could be improved by adding a penis to each picture.

>> No.6322237

>>6322229
You mean, like, fellatio? Or just normal sex? Or the little girl just looking at the penis while it floats detached from the guy?

>> No.6322245

>>6322237
No, I mean something more like auto-fellatio, masturbation and penises that are attached.

>> No.6322249

>>6322245
Futa is only good for penetration in lesbian situations, it's pointless when there is only one girl

>> No.6322258

>>6322229
And then the new crazy meido would delete it. No, thanks.

>> No.6322327

>>6322249
Don't you like pictures of futanaris masturbating?

By the way, I like little girls because they're cute and because I love small things.

>> No.6322398

>>6322327
Sometimes I wonder if I would like older girls if I was taller and had a bigger penis.

But it's probably just my autism.

>> No.6322432
File: 443 KB, 800x600, 099.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322432

Sakura Musubi.

>> No.6322442
File: 468 KB, 800x600, 120.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322442

>> No.6322449

>>6322398
But I like tall girls as well, just not as much as small girls.

What does autism have to do with that, by the way?

>> No.6322466

>>6322449
Nothing, just using the meme to excuse my retarded thoughts.

I'm 1,68cm tall (around 5'6"), by the way.

>> No.6322506

nuke this thread from orbit

>> No.6322512
File: 403 KB, 500x699, 18ad699085947cb7e08331f6ca2964b9b7a976ae.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322512

Not attractive, lovable.

>> No.6322532

>>6322466
I don't think height or your physical appearance would have anything to do with it. I know a tall black dude (190cm) and his girlfriend is white, really pale skin, 155 cm. What I mean is that people have different taste, no matter what they look like. You can be attracted to someone like you or someone completely different.

>> No.6322541
File: 177 KB, 800x600, EV06.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322541

>>6322055
Another "old" loli, specially when compared with the girls from Sakura Musubi (like >>6322442 ).

>>6322506
Hello, newfriend.

>> No.6322572
File: 470 KB, 800x600, 164.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322572

>> No.6322592
File: 120 KB, 850x637, Hina Gitaroo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322592

More like adorable, although Hina isn't really a loli...

>> No.6322613
File: 319 KB, 800x600, MGD_000198.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322613

>>6322541
>>6322572
>>6322442

>> No.6322634

>>6322613
She needs bras. How is that a loli?

>> No.6322667
File: 121 KB, 440x476, yoshikainappropriate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322667

i love lolis, but im not sexually aroused by them. i just wish to protect them and see their super cute smiles

>> No.6322675

>>6322667
I'm sexually aroused to lolis and don't think they're that cute.

>> No.6322679

>>6322667
Yoshika is 14, you know.

>> No.6322686

>>6322634
>>6322679
Here we go.
>>6321943

>> No.6322699
File: 82 KB, 604x418, 1281115973164.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322699

>> No.6322708
File: 312 KB, 800x600, MGD_000271.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322708

>> No.6322796

>>6322679
It's not about age. It's about figure. Loli is what lolicons like. Lolicon is the anime equivalant to pedophile. What do pedophile like? Prepubescent (little) girls.
Anything related to reaching parts of adulthood is bad.

>> No.6322800

I'm surprised this hasn't become a religion thread, yet.

>> No.6322804

I used to like loli, but I don't care much for it anymore nowadays. I guess when the taboo disappears it stops being arousing for the majority of people. Or maybe it's because I've gotten older. I'm almost 30 now, and 5 years ago was still looking up loli online.

I hate all loli that have an older male in it though.

>> No.6322805

>>6322796
Yoshika has no breasts or hips or pubes or anything.

>> No.6322814

>>6322804
>the taboo disappears
It's okay to have sex with children where you live?

>> No.6322815

>>6322796
It's not as simple as that when anyone who likes girls under 16 is generally considered a pedophile in most countries (even if there are more apppriate terms like hebephile and ephebophile).

And when the pedos themselves differ in taste (4~6, 6~10, 10~12, etc).

>> No.6322817
File: 29 KB, 553x297, 1286818583628.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322817

>>6322708
Oh God, those legs...
>>6322805
True

>> No.6322835

>>6322815
Specially when girls are typically reaching puberty at age 10~12, nowadays.

>> No.6322874
File: 1.06 MB, 850x1360, sample_a67dbef62f275eb684a00b3096b869a305e838ca.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6322874

I prefer girls like the one in the back
Young but not old

>> No.6322876

>>6322814
Another person who can't separate fiction from reality.

>> No.6322907

>>6322876
seeing as "taboo" is defined by society, and society overall can't distinguish fantasy and reality, it was a perfectly logical question to ask

>> No.6322947

>>6322814
it is in some parts of the world
also, it was more widespread back in the middle ages

>> No.6323014

>>6322874
Both girls are too old.

>> No.6323056

I remember when Pedos didnt fall for every lame troll. This place keeps getting shittier.

>> No.6323079

>>6323056
After the name change, it's very difficult to tell a troll from a newfriend.

>> No.6323188

7-11 is best.

>> No.6323225
File: 741 KB, 711x1038, 48113e58aa3269b0fbeab6f4ad8eb4d35072c089small.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6323225

I like it when little girls wear socks.

>> No.6323242

>>6323225
Me too.

It's probably because it reminds me of my childhood in school. ;_;

>> No.6323265
File: 629 KB, 509x1118, 64311333dcc9a763848bf61911758ee6cd201e4fsmall.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6323265

>>6323242
But were you a little girl wearing socks in school?

I also like it when they get changed.

>> No.6323323
File: 91 KB, 600x834, lovely kid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6323323

>>6323056
I don't remember it ever being like that.

>> No.6323334

>>6323225
I like drawings where people have 'elegant' socks, like PCB reimu etc.

>> No.6323467

I think loli tend to wear more attractive clothing. Sadly that clothing is labeled "childish", which confuse me since if it is childish it shouldn't be sexually arousing, should it?

If you want your lolis safe from me, dress them in jeans, shirt and plain straight hair.

>> No.6323565
File: 148 KB, 800x600, EV0213B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6323565

>> No.6323706
File: 130 KB, 800x600, evcho06_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6323706

>> No.6323967
File: 62 KB, 736x552, jump.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6323967

>> No.6324228

>>6323467
You wouldn't force yourself upon a cute little girl, would you?

>> No.6324230

Just thought I'd mention...

I fucking love you guys.

>> No.6324234

>>6324230
Why?

>> No.6324236
File: 553 KB, 1333x2000, 1287699863018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6324236

It's not too late to change your lolicon ways

here's a treatment for your disease

>> No.6324237

>>6324234

50% for the humor, and 50% because I think you're all awesome.

>> No.6324244

>>6324228

I certainly wouldn't.... Forcing yourself on anyone is pretty evil.

>> No.6324249
File: 200 KB, 800x600, 1287693585950.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6324249

You should feel bad about being genetically attracted to youthful, healthy, feminine, cute, and innocent females of your species instead of deceitful, slutty, bitchy, trouser wearing, removing-all-aspects-of-femininity creatures of past child bearing age.

>> No.6324256
File: 96 KB, 710x500, 1263584525628.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6324256

>>6324236
But the way of the lolicon is the way to enlightenment

>>6324244
Good to hear!

>> No.6324262

>>6324236
2D? 3D?

My head hurts.

>> No.6324316

>>6324249
The majority of girls I'm attracted to probably can't get pregnant anyway.

>> No.6325280

>>6324316
That's interesting.

>> No.6325313

I only like lolis if they look psychotic.

>> No.6325876
File: 299 KB, 1200x900, lucchini shimapan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6325876

>>6322804

It's depressing to think that someday I may shun loli... Fuck that, enjoy your overripe goods.

>> No.6325879

But what will you do when your loli grows up? Will you discard her by the wayside?

>> No.6325891
File: 255 KB, 800x600, 1287494736343.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6325891

>>6325879

If for some reason I were to bag a 3D, then no. I would love her tenderly until we grow old. Fortunately 2D never grows old.

>> No.6325949 [DELETED] 
File: 51 KB, 327x365, 1287010626424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6325949

>>6324249
So misogyny and general butthurt towards women does have to do with it. I see.
I suppose that having unrealistic standards about archaic personality traits makes it difficult to feel atracted to real women, even if you didn't be so eager to find faults on everyone but yourself; but the real question is "Why does anon hold traits as "purity" (and by that they doesn't really mean purity, but virginity, just like in the 19th century) and "fidelity" (Not as in "don't cheat" but "don't have a boyfriend before or after me") in such a high pedestal? I don't know. I suppose that the first one (virginity) is because if Anon couldn't have sex, then no one else should. The second (not having any other boyfriend before or after) could come from their incredibly low self-esteem
. I'm not really sure, but those explanations make sense. Somewhat.

As for lolis, I could stand 2D because they aren't real, but I've never felt any special attraction towards those. They were a turnoff more often than not actually.
As for the 'alternative: even thinking about sexualizing real kids is really nauseating.

>> No.6325952
File: 51 KB, 327x365, 1287010626424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6325952

>>6324249
So misogyny and general butthurt towards women does have to do with it. I see.
I suppose that having unrealistic standards about archaic personality traits makes it difficult to feel atracted to real women, even if you didn't where so eager to find faults on everyone but yourself. However, the real question is, "Why does anon hold traits as "purity" (and by that they doesn't really mean purity, but virginity, just like in the 19th century) and "fidelity" (Not as in "don't cheat" but "don't have a boyfriend before or after me") in such a high pedestal? I don't know. I suppose that the first one (virginity) is because if Anon couldn't have sex, then no one else should. The second (not having any other boyfriend before or after) could come from their incredibly low self-esteem.
I'm not really sure, but those explanations make sense. Somewhat.

As for lolis, I can stand 2D because they aren't real, but I've never felt any special attraction towards those. They are a turnoff more often than not actually.
As for the 'alternative: even thinking about sexualizing real kids is really nauseating, having a few cousins of my own and all.

>> No.6325977

>>6325952
I'm sorry that I'm not attracted to girls who dress and act like abrasive bitches. Maybe some of them are really all right, but you'd never be able to tell. And don't accuse me of misogyny, because most guys are exactly the same way (maybe substitute bitches for assholes, or whatever.) The main point is that these people don't have any class.

Anyway, I'm willing to be with someone who's not a virgin as long as she'll be faithful to me. I don't think that's asking too much. And my self-esteem is perfectly fine, thanks.

>> No.6325997

>Maybe some of them are really all right, but you'd never be able to tell
Well, as long as you accept that, you will be okay. I don't see it as 'Wasting opportunities' or any other bullshit like that simply because it's your choice. And your choice in your life is always right.
>I'm willing to be with someone who's not a virgin as long as she'll be faithful to me
Like everyone else in the world. I guess that's what I get for putting all anons in the same bag.

What I didn't really get was the 'class' part. Care to elaborate? Thanks.

>> No.6326015

>>6325997
It's hard to explain. I guess I'd say someone who has strong principles, self-respect and a good sense of style has class. I don't mean good style as in trendy, but... hell, I don't know. Classy. It's mostly about personality, really. I'd like to think I have at least some of it.

Yeah, I just went in a circle with my definition. Like I said, it's hard to explain, but I know it when I see it.

>> No.6326050

I only love 2D lolis.
I can't feel any simpathy for soon-to-be cocklusting sluts.

>> No.6326078
File: 397 KB, 2000x1375, 52c1a899271d325728d94912d1c199c0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326078

My favorite loli body type is that of Shana's, a typical 11-year old girl's body. Tall enough to have lost all "kiddie fat"; short enough to hold (fun-sized!). Hips and breasts developed enough to give a perfect balance of mature femininity and childlike beauty.

I browse Notfourchan and Little Angels Hentai occasionally, and I'm not aroused by all the tiny pseudotoddler-con stuff, but I still get to find my favorite body type here and there.

In fact, I think maybe we should call this body type "funsized" to distinguish it.

>> No.6326115 [DELETED] 
File: 74 KB, 500x468, 1284678609731.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326115

>>6325952

It has to do with traits like judgment and loyalty; not some 18th century pedestal-placement of virginity.

People need to have the insight to discern their feelings, not confuse everything with love and start fucking like it's going out of style. A woman who's had a lot of relationships and sexual partners should be as unattractive to a man as the indecisive beta who can't even decide where to go eat dinner is to a woman. It's a giant flashing indicator of poor decision making skills, a weak will, a lack of capacity for loyalty, a lack of self-control, and a host of other ills.

I understand and accept that no one is perfect, but there are areas in which one should be willing to compromise and others where compromise is unacceptable.

>> No.6326131
File: 290 KB, 700x1531, 1285147565581.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326131

Fucked up the reply... How embarrassing.
>>6325952

It has to do with traits like judgment and loyalty; not some 18th century pedestal-placement of virginity.

People need to have the insight to discern their feelings, not confuse everything with love and start fucking like it's going out of style. A woman who's had a lot of relationships and sexual partners should be as unattractive to a man as the indecisive beta who can't even decide where to go eat dinner is to a woman. It's a giant flashing indicator of poor decision making skills, a weak will, a lack of capacity for loyalty, a lack of self-control, and a host of other ills.

I understand and accept that no one is perfect, but there are areas in which one should be willing to compromise and others where compromise is unacceptable.

Id rather die alone than with someone who isn't completely devoted to me and vice-versa. And before you say it, sex is not a necessary component of reaching that state. I was able to reach that point with more than one person in the military, and I've yet to go gay.

>> No.6326153
File: 51 KB, 436x800, 1176764151284.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326153

>>6326078
Fuck yeah.

>> No.6326155
File: 125 KB, 496x800, 1285196724890.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326155

>> No.6326166

I put virginity on a pedestal because anyone who isn't a virgin is no better than the instinctual ancestors of the species. They are monkeys.

>> No.6326173

>>6326078

You do that, because I don't want you calling Shana a loli. I have a slight issue with funsized though, because she's no longer a loli she's no longer sized for the most fun.

>> No.6326191

>>6326173
>Looks and acts 11 years old
>Not a loli

I got news for you, son.

>> No.6326198

>>6326191

She doesn't look it. He even described the differences.
>Tall enough to have lost all "kiddie fat"; short enough to hold (fun-sized!). Hips and breasts developed enough to give a perfect balance of mature femininity and childlike beauty.
A balance of mature femininity and childlike beauty is not loli, it is on the border.

>> No.6326204

I hate you fucks so much.

Reported.

>> No.6326210
File: 977 KB, 924x1280, 12908848.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326210

>>6326173
>>6326191
>>6326198
Well whatever the hell she is (and I'm calling it funsized from now on), nothing will change the fact that Shana is pure walking sex.

>> No.6326211

>>6326204
This is the true face of /jp/. Your reports do nothing.

>> No.6326226

>>6324236
That woman wants to be the little girl.

>> No.6326232
File: 690 KB, 519x600, hahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326232

>>6326204
pfft...I can't stand lolicon, but it ain't hurting anybody.
Some of the bullshit rationalizations ITT are hurting me, though. Loli as a societal boycott?

>> No.6326233

>>6326166
Sounds more like you're exaggerating something that you have and others don't, to distract from your other flaws.

>> No.6326236

I don't know why lolis are attractive. I have always been more attracted to cute than hot.

>> No.6326238

>>6326210
It's been a while since I saw Shana, but did she have any breasts or hips at all? I don't remember her having any.

>> No.6326241

>>6326232
>Loli as a societal boycott?

That describes 2D in general, not just loli. You are avoiding real people and dealing with fictional characters.

>> No.6326247

>>6326241
Wasn't how it was meant.

>> No.6326251

>>6326233
This is what every monkey's argument boils down to. And that makes them all the more monekys. They validate themselves by showing they care capable clinging to their instincts. They take pride in doing something that was done by their ancestors for countless generations. I don't define the epitome of my existence as something a monkey can do. Unlike monkeys, I like to celebrate intelligence, and departure from instincts rather than conformity to them.

>> No.6326252

>>6326251
You do realize the reason you value intelligence is because your instincts taught you to appreciate it because of the survival advantage it offers?

Nice job being a monkey.

>> No.6326254

>>6326247
I was the one who wrote the "boycott" post, I think I know what I meant.

>> No.6326257

>>6326251
I wonder how many of us abstain from jerking off, which is basically the same thing.

>> No.6326261

>>6326252
>humans
>value intelligence

Pfffhahahaha

>> No.6326262

>>6326257
Those people surpass the level of both monkeys and humans. Of course, there's a difference between quelling your instincts with minimal effort every so often (human) and basing your life upon fulfilling these instincts (monkey).

>> No.6326263

>>6326252
Who said anything about valuing intelligence? I value escapism, intelligence suggests you actually try to solve problems.

>> No.6326266

>>6326261
>ignorant of social dynamics, which reproductively rewards those who are slightly above average

How do you think human intelligence developed in the first place, neckbeard?

>> No.6326268

>>6326257
It's pointless, you just get wet dreams, anyway. At least until middle age.

>> No.6326271

>>6326263
>>6326263
>I like to celebrate intelligence
Learn to read, monkey.

>> No.6326277

>>6326271
What a stupid poster. Some people aren't worth imitating.

>> No.6326280
File: 228 KB, 450x629, loli_bikini.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326280

>>6326238
Just a little bit, as you can see in >>6326078 and >>6326210. Pretty much a typical slender 11-year old girl body.

<<< Certainly a lot more shape and curvature than this pic, which looks too much like a real little girl in body shape to arouse me.

>> No.6326286

>>6326252
That may be so, but the reason I pursue intelligence now has nothing to do with survival. The reason monkeys still pursue sex, however, is entirely driven by unjustifiable emotions that stem entirely from instinct that has its basis not even in survival of the self, but survival of ones entirely separate to the self as if that has value. It has no value, things that propagate are only still here because they are things that propagate, intelligent life should be able to realize this. Intelligent life that can't, and seeks a the nuclear family because of these tendencies they have because those with those tendencies were able to propagate this point is not actually intelligent life.

>> No.6326295

>>6326286
You're seriously trying to say one subjective value placement is better than another?

I'd like to see the reasoning for that. Preferably with less pseudo-intellectualism this time around.

Face it, you value intelligence because a) your genes, b) you think you're good at it, and c) it emotionally fulfills you. For better or worse, humans are emotional creatures, with the option to supplement that emotion with logic when survival requires it.

tl:dr post-nihilism, etc

>> No.6326296

>>6326286
There's a world of difference between living for sex, and enjoying it now and again. Judging on a single character trait is just as simplistic.

>> No.6326299

>>6326286
I'm sorry but you're just calling people monkeys because they get laid while you don't.

Also the type of person that chases sex all the time is not really the type that 'celebrating intelligence' pays off for.

>> No.6326303

>>6326280
I approve of this just on the curb of puberty nymphet body

>> No.6326312

>>6326295
People who call others pseudo-intellectual are the new pseudo-intellectual. It's basically claiming 'what you said is not remotely intelligent, how about you say something properly intelligent that is suitable for an intelligent person such as myself.'

I value something because it might lead me to find something of value in this pointlessness. Note the me. Someone else's benefit that occurs after my death has no justifiable reason to be beneficial to me.

On the other hand, the perusal that monkeys praise and validate existence by is only a coincidence of the fact that that action, and later the tendency for it, is the only thing that will bring itself into existence reliably for such a long period for no actual reason. Throwing that up on the pedestal and even taking a viewpoint opposite to mine, that only monkeys should be respected, obviously indicates a complete assimilation to that process. People like that don't have a reason to live. They only live to create a repetition of themselves and die. That is only what animals, monkeys do. The only thing that has become more complex is the details of how this is carried out, but at the core of it is only that.

Only people who can escape that worthlessness which is embedded in them can really be considered intelligent. Only a being who consciously steps out of that process for a reason.

>> No.6326316
File: 205 KB, 600x600, fd0e6517a29c55ad1d6a52de528c63a5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326316

Nobody likes Satoko?

>> No.6326320

>>6326078
You're the kind of people who don't deserve to post on these type of places. You don't even like lolis.

>> No.6326322

>>6326316

Satoko is better than Rika.

>> No.6326323

There's nothing wrong with having sex and enjoying it, just like there's nothing wrong with enjoying other means of entertainment from time to time. People who pursue it as their life's sole goal are simple-minded, however.

Sadly, this is the case for most of /jp/. Your minds are obsessed with sex. You think about it all the time, talk about it all day on here. If you really didn't care about sex, why is your loli folder several gigabytes big?

>> No.6326325

>>6326316
Girls with breasts cancer aren't considered lolis.
Get that grandma out.

>> No.6326326

>>6326312
Are you seriously that oblivious to the implying implications in your post? Who's to say those other individuals haven't found their value in sex and companionship?

You keep bandying around terms like "worthless" and "value", but I don't think you really understand what they mean.

Just because they're fucking like bunnies and you're living the astute neckbearded life doesn't mean they're worth any less or more than you, except as you judge based on your own personal (and bullshit) emotions.

So what if they're simply "reproducing themselves"?

>> No.6326331

>>6326323
>several
hah my loli folder is only 3.94gb, what now?

>> No.6326333

>>6326316
Inferior to the child version of the other blonde in the VN.

>> No.6326334

>>6326323
You know /jp/ doesn't consist of one person right?

>> No.6326335

>>6326326
I think if they had found meaning by now someone might have noticed somewhere in the history of life.

>> No.6326338

>>6326323
Real life sex = destructive and evil
Fantasy sex = awesome and wonderful

>> No.6326341

>>6326335
Show me one person, period, who has found value.

You can't, because there's no way to know that about someone else.

>> No.6326346

>>6326341
True value should be able to be recognized by others. Objective value is objective value, there is no way around it. Subjective value is not true value, the monkeys surely put "value" in their cycle, but it is not something that can be universally recognized.

It's not that I can't show value when it comes along. It's that it hasn't come along, this process is to blame.

>> No.6326350

>>6326346
>should be
Oh boy.

This isn't deep shit. Value is a concept we've invented, along with beginning and ending and moral and immoral.

You will never find "objective value". Face it, you're just a fluke, the end result of a phospholipid bilayer trapping some organic material billions of years ago. The only value you will ever find is intensely subjective.

>> No.6326354

>>6326350
You can't prove true value doesn't exist, and it is the only possible meaningful pursuit. True, "value" is just something we have come up with, that is not value. Value has not been found yet.

>> No.6326361

>>6326354
>you can't prove X doesn't exist

Okay I am out of here.

>> No.6326364

>>6326361
It's not a matter of 'x exists prove me wrong'. It's a matter of 'there could be meaning somewhere' and you claiming 'there is definitely not meaning anywhere'. Why live if not to attempt to find that meaning, even if it's futile? It is the only worthwhile pursuit possible imaginable. It seems like an impossible pursuit because of its worth.

>> No.6326365

>>6326354
>can't prove doesn't exist
Channeling some theist here?

You can't say it's the only meaningful pursuit. Maybe it's the only meaningful one for you, but that's not necessarily true for anybody else. How would you know otherwise? Like you said
>can't prove otherwise
You can't read minds, so stop projecting your emotional needs on the entire fucking universe.

>> No.6326366

>>6326365
>Channeling some theist here?
If I am, it was only in response to channeling an atheist.

>You can't say it's the only meaningful pursuit. Maybe it's the only meaningful one for you, but that's not necessarily true for anybody else.
It is entirely true for everyone else because it is the only objectively valuable pursuit, if it is possible. If it is impossible, nothing at all can have value. Value is not something that changes from person to person, that is not value at all, only something their emotions create.

>You can't read minds, so stop projecting your emotional needs on the entire fucking universe.
Tell that to the monkeys.

>> No.6326367

>>6326364
Actually, because we assume some basic axioms about the nature of reality, I can say there is no objective value. You could only argue otherwise from an illogical or solipsist perspective.

>> No.6326374

>>6326367
I'd like to see the argument for that. Assumptions stated.

>> No.6326382

>>6326366
I don't understand why you disregard reproduction so easily as nothing of value only because monkeys do it as well or because it's an instinctual thing to do. You're glorifying yourself based on nothing.

>> No.6326390
File: 856 KB, 1500x1400, 11452096.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326390

YES.

>> No.6326391

>>6326374
Assumption: universe follows rules, aka naturalism, foundation of logic
Assumption: empiricism, that the universe can be evaluated with reasonable accuracy with our senses

>> No.6326401
File: 165 KB, 826x1169, 3172806.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326401

...Why is there an intellectual discussion going on here? The thread is about lolis, not...whatever the fuck people are yammering on about here. I haven't read everything, but I can be sure that not all of it is related to lolis.

I'm still convinced Bern is not a loli...or at least, not TOO loli.

>> No.6326405

>>6326401
She actually just stuffs her shirt with bottles of wine.

>> No.6326407

>>6326382
Because it has been done for the longest time without producing value, and more importantly because I cannot recognize value in it. If it had value, I would have to recognize that it did, as surely as I recognize laws of mathematics.

>>6326391
And how can you lead this to conclude that there is no true value?

>> No.6326408

>>6326405

LIES. Her breasts are natural.

>> No.6326409

>>6326382
Intellectually speaking, anyone who doesn't live in a perfect paradise should avoid having sex for the sake of their kids not growing up in a bad place. So, basically, if you aren't a millionaire, don't have kids.

>> No.6326410
File: 301 KB, 500x900, 1284454616940.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326410

>>6326401
Loli has always been religious threads. It all began with one "devout Christian" years ago in this very board. I suggest you study up on the history of /jp/ and come back again, young trip.

>> No.6326411

>>6326407
Simple.
Value, by definition, is an abstract concept. The abstract does not exist except as a generalization of the concrete, and because the abstract cannot be proven, an "objective abstract" cannot exist.

>> No.6326412

>>6326409
Basically, if you want kids, you should be adopting the suffering ones already in this life, not making more. However, sex != procreation!

>> No.6326414

>>6326410
Wasn't he Mormon, specifically?

>> No.6326419

>>6326409
Nothing wrong with growing up middle class, tbh.
I didn't mind it. The people that bitch about the rat race are the people too stupid to push their limits on weekends, or purposely picked careers that requires too much energy to enjoy their lives.

>> No.6326421

>>6326401
>intellectual discussion
You sure as hell can't be talking about this thread. Never seen such retardation in one place. Not a single person in this thread knows fuck all what they're talking about.

Fuck this thread. Reported.

>> No.6326422

>>6326412
>sex != procreation

Sex without procreation still spreads disease, or, if you use "safe" sex, has a chance of spreading disease.

>> No.6326424

>>6326422
Using a computer carries a slight risk of electrocution, especially if you drink while using it.

>> No.6326429

>>6326421
You can't report this thread, Flandre with a guitar is /jp/ related.

>> No.6326431

>>6326411
"Rules" are abstract concepts, but if we assume their existence, we accept the existence of objective concepts.

>> No.6326432

>>6326424
No, it doesn't. Electro-static discharge will only harm computer components, not you. Unless you are taking apart your monitor, then you are screwed.

>> No.6326433

>>6326431
Rules are not abstracts, because they can be independently verified. They are what abstracts are made of, not abstracts themselves.

>> No.6326436

>>6326433
The value I am talking about is something that can be independently verified.

>> No.6326441

>>6326436
Then it's not value. Value is something that has to be invested, making it both abstract and subjective.

>> No.6326443 [DELETED] 
File: 113 KB, 1280x720, 1287454609268.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326443

I feel dumb for not being able to comprehend what's going on in this discussion.

>> No.6326444

>>6326441
I already specified that the "value" we normally call value is not what I am talking about at all. You're further assuming that value is subjective to come to the conclusion that it is subjective.

>> No.6326446

I don't know about loli. I guess I like Etna. Flat chest and small body, but she's a little old...

I also like Rika, but she's basically lived so long that I don't feel bad about it.

>> No.6326447
File: 125 KB, 474x591, 15eac6a29d3515114112bad77108e90a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326447

>>6326421

I didn't say it was a GOOD intellectual discussion. Complete morons can still have an "intellectual discussion," but it just won't make sense to anyone but them.

More Bern.


She isn't a loli if I don't believe she's a loli

>> No.6326451

>>6326444
No, it's subjective because it's an abstract, and doesn't really exist.

You can't say "that's not the value I'm talking about", but then that's not value except as something subjective we create in our minds.

It's like those dipshits that are all "art is not just something intentionally manipulated for emotional benefit, art is also a sunset". A sunset is not art just because it may evoke similar reactions as art.

You're positing the existence of something without a definition, and without any kind of supporting evidence.

>> No.6326453

>>6326446
That's nice. I got into loli through real life and 2D loli is like a godsend to me.

>> No.6326460

I love lolicon.
But I like jailbait even more.

>> No.6326463

>>6326451
I can't properly define it. To someone who has never experienced true value, like all people, value is as conceptualizable as a hypothetical fourth dimension. There is no supporting evidence for true value. There is only the undeniable fact that unless it exists, obviously, nothing has value. Therefore, it is the only worthwhile pursuit, if it can be a pursuit at all. If there is no true value, it's true that I may as well throw up my hands and accept the monkeys doing essentially nothing and condemning those who do other nothings into infinity - there's no reason to live without true value, and there's no reason to die either.

>> No.6326465

>>6326460
I don't see why preteen girls aren't considered jailbait. They tempt you to go to jail, too, right?

>> No.6326470
File: 515 KB, 869x627, 1285277780648.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326470

>>6326446
>Looks like 6
>They told me she was...
>I don't feel bad about it.

>> No.6326472

>>6326463
>unless it exists, nothing has true value
Nobody argues this.

However, if you're simply searching for value to give meaning to your existence (which is exactly your reason), subjective value is all you need.

>> No.6326473

>>6326465

Jailbait is actually attractive to the average normalfag. They'd have to be hardcore in denial morafags to look at a 17 year old and claim they'd only be interested in her the moment she turned 18. It's only natural, they're in puberty, perhaps even already out of it - they're supposed to reproduce (unless you by Mr. value's monkey argument). On the other hand, it's a low percentage of people who are attracted to actual prepubescent girls.

>> No.6326476

>>6326472
Subjective value is not value at all. It's a misnomer. The concept we have for value is not compatible with subjectivity. So, subjective value will not do.

>> No.6326477

>>6326472

>nobody argues this

I do. Bern EXISTS!

>> No.6326480

>>6326476
Subjective value assumes what we're looking for is something that will fulfill us, and that something is "value" and "valued".

If you're saying you believe something different, feel free, but you're just going to die unhappy.

>> No.6326493

>>6326480
Happiness is the pursuit of people who have already given up on fulfillment and decided they will at least just live their lives out striving for a certain chemical state. Dying unhappy and more commonly dying alone is a monkey argument and has no logical drawbacks, dying will be dying either way. You will not be capable of happiness in your moment of death or afterwards. The notion of dying happy relates to living a fulfilled life, but if someone can look at your life and disagree that it was fulfilled, it was not fulfilled at all. You only tricked yourself into believing it was. I can't strive for that, only scoff at people who not only strive for it, but impose it upon others as if they have found the reason for living in giving up on it.

>> No.6326494

>>6326473
I think jailbait was the wrong name what I meant.
I meant 12-14 years old with their small but beautiful breasts,

>> No.6326496

>>6326473
Personally, I think a precocious 7 year old is more jailbait then some overweight teenager. Then again, I'm an American, so pretty much everyone over the age of 13 is overweight.

>> No.6326497

>>6326493
Someone else has to agree that your life was fulfilled for it to be fulfilled?

That's bullshit.

>> No.6326499

>>6326470
Rika is not six. What are you talking about?

>> No.6326501

>>6326497
Not someone. Everyone has to. If your life was truly fulfilled, it should be a function of an intelligent being to rationally come to the conclusion that it was. Otherwise, it was not.

>> No.6326503

>>6326499
I think he's exaggerating to make a point.

>> No.6326509

>>6326496
The reason it isn't called jailbait is because it isn't commonly recognized as something attractive. It's only by a small percentage of pedophiles. It's more like pedophilia itself is the jailbait in that case, while to a normalfag it's because the law says you can't fuck them until 18 but nature says otherwise.

>> No.6326516
File: 190 KB, 960x1280, DSC07947.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326516

>>6326494
?

>> No.6326519

>>6326509
Well, technically, fornication (sex outside of marriage) is illegal. Does that make a 24 year old jailbait?

>> No.6326522

>>6326519
No, because nobody gets arrested for fornication. ie, it won't get you in jail.

>> No.6326525

>>6326516
I don't like it when it is 3D...

>> No.6326527

>>6326509

>until they're 18

Only in certain places. Laws of consent vary wildly depending on location. Japan's national is 18, but it can be overwritten by local statutes with the age of consent being as low as 14 in some places.

>> No.6326530

>>6326527
Obviously. Just talking in a general sense. If the age of consent is low enough, jailbait in the common sense doesn't really exist because only pedophiles would be baited.

>> No.6326533

>>6326519
>Fornication is illegal
The Holy Pontifex is pleased.
Now bring one every ten of thine turnips to the Holy See and do not rise thine gaze from the ground while you do so, retribution awaits ye in the realm beyond!

>> No.6326534

>>6326525
Then it's not really jailbait

unless you live in canada or something

>> No.6326544

>>6326527
You have that mixed up, Bern. The national law is low, but prefectural law takes precedence, which is 18 almost everywhere.

>> No.6326548

>>6326516
Wait, that girl is legal? She looks 12 at the most.

>> No.6326549

>>6326544

I got the right idea. Been a while since I studied on the subject of "can I fuck her without being imprisoned?"

>> No.6326553

>>6326494
That's pretty disgusting. Good job you aren't a pedophile. Now you can gtfo from this thread.

>> No.6326556

>>6326522
Really? People have been charged for unlawful cohabitation and fornication in the past. Usually homosexuals.

>> No.6326563

Eurofag here. Our age of consent is 14ish or so, I think - I don't even know because it's not an issue. I live in a society where jailbait does not exist as a concept.

Legal slutty 15 year olds. Legal slutty 15 year olds everywhere.

>> No.6326565

>>6326533
If nobody had sex the world would be a better place. We could make children using turkey basters and it would be grand.

>> No.6326568

>>6326544
Isn't it that the national law is the bare minimum, and the prefectures set their standards at or above that?

>> No.6326569

>>6326548
Who said she was legal? She looks 14 at most to me.

>> No.6326571

>>6326569
Oh, right, I'm not paying attention.

>> No.6326572
File: 14 KB, 800x300, RVR.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326572

>> No.6326573

>>6326563
>Eurofag
>Our age of consent is 14ish

Speak for your own country. It's 14 in Winland, 16 in UK and 18 pretty much everywhere else.

>> No.6326577

You know I never really cared about age of consent laws because it's not like a perfect little girl would give me consent in the first place

>> No.6326579

>>6326573
I believe it's 15 in Scandinavia. I dunno about Finland, so I'll take your word for 14.

There ought to be a wiki site about it.

>> No.6326589

>>6326572
Poor little Delores Haze gets raped at camp every time I read her book.

>> No.6326599

>>6326579
Just use the one on wikipedia.

>> No.6326608

In my opinion underage should be able to have sex while under supervision of an adult.

>> No.6326610

>>6326608
As long as it's a qualified medical professional who can stop you if she might hurt. He needs to hold at least a MD.

>> No.6326612

>>6326608
Perfect. Can you be both the supervisor and one of the participants?

>> No.6326617

>>6326612
No, but you can hold the camera.

>> No.6326623

>>6326617
It can't be a two person situation? Me, the responsible adult and male participant, supervising and pleasuring a little girl?

>> No.6326624
File: 56 KB, 566x454, European_age_of_male_erotic_emancipatio.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326624

>>6326573
>It's 14 in Winland, 16 in UK and 18 pretty much everywhere else.
>18 pretty much everywhere else
>Implying the ridiculous 18yo standard applies anywhere in actual Europe
Turns out it's 14-15 pretty much everywhere except failland.
Brb getting some legal little brown girls.

>> No.6326629
File: 57 KB, 1393x628, consent.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326629

>>6326573
> It's 14 in Winland, 16 in UK and 18 pretty much everywhere else.
See, that's just plain fucking bullshit.
Spain: 12
Germany, Austria, Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia, Italy, Montenegro, Albania: 13
Portugal: 14
France, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Bulgaria, Sweden, Denmark: 15
Benelux, UK, Finland, Norway, Switzerland, Macedonia, Bosnia, some Eastern European countries: 16
Ireland: 17

Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

>> No.6326634

>>6326624
>>6326629

>>6326573 here. It seems I have been living in an imaginary world all this time.

>> No.6326637

>In many jurisdictions, age of consent is a person's mental or functional age.
Great. Let's hold Little Miss Precocious pageants in these jurisdictions.

>> No.6326638

>>6326624
What the fuck is wrong with that map? Croatia, Serbia, and Bulgaria are not at 18. I guarantee it.
I live in Serbia and AoC here is 13 (to be fair, there's also a law about how the age difference must be below 10 years for girls 15 and under, but noone enforces that shit anyway.)

>> No.6326639

>>6326624
>pederastic

Doesn't that mean boys?

>> No.6326643

>>6326638
Ignore this post, I didn't see >pederastic.

>> No.6326654

>>6326563
Another Eurofag here confirming this. My 24 year old friend lives with a 16 year old girl, on her parent's house. He bangs the shit out of her and no one cares. Not only is it legal, but no one thinks about it as being immoral. Hell! Her friend's father, who is almost 40, wanted to hit on her.

>> No.6326667

>>6326654

Well shit, one of my former employers had a relationship with a 15 year old girl, and I believe he was in his mid 20s. This was in Northern New England and no one gave a shit.

>> No.6326670

>>6326654
I was in a situation like that. A high school girl's father's friend was saying, "I don't want to bring her here, because all these young men wouldn't be able to pay attention." I thought, who cares about your daughter, there are already two girls who are as close to perfection 3D can get right here in this room. Then I smiled at the preteen sisters and they smiled back.

>> No.6326691

The age of consent is 15 here but everyone knows girls don't wait till they are of a legal age to have sex. Like everywehere else in the world, most gilrs have sex around 13-14 with much older men, sometimes 40 or older. No one cares because everyone knows these girls are whores. It's the same in the USA and everyone knows it, yet, since your law tells you to not touch people under 18, you also think anyone under 18 is a pure innocent child, which is plain hilarious.
The funniest thing is that this trend that a girl must lose her virginity as soon as possible in order to be normal comes from the USA, and is spread by movies, tv shows...
I guess ignorance is bliss.
The downside is that it is now impossible to find a virgin anywhere.

>> No.6326701

>>6326691
Doesn't that mean that girls < 12 are virgins?

>> No.6326705

>>6326701
Yes, but if they don't have their periods yet, then they're still children and it would actually be considered pedophilia.

>> No.6326715

>>6326705
Let's say you had a nine year old girl who was having her periods, but didn't look like she hit puberty yet, and she was a pure virgin. Would that be okay?

>> No.6326726

>>6326670
Have a threesome with them.

>> No.6326728

>>6326639
They are girls if they wear a skirt.

>> No.6326770

>>6326726
It's too late now, that was eight years ago.

>> No.6326780

>>6326770
Depressing.

>> No.6326794

>>6326780
Yeah. It's odd though, one was really precocious sexually and the other hated anything to do with sex. Somebody should make a show based on that premise.

>> No.6326804
File: 57 KB, 704x396, 1285144214474.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326804

>>6326624
>Turkey
>European

>> No.6326809
File: 90 KB, 674x623, 1287213422941.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326809

>>6326794
>one was really precocious sexually and the other hated anything to do with sex. Somebody should make a show based on that premise.

>> No.6326816

I sleep, wake up, and the thread which I spent so much energy to make it good is destroyed by normalfag newfriends discussing off-topic issues here...

So sad...

>> No.6326820

>>6326809
I said precocious, not promiscuousness. Panty isn't a little girl just learning about sex.

>> No.6326840

>>6326816
Maybe you shouldn't put in the effort next time.

>> No.6326849

>>6326804
deal w/ it

>> No.6326880

>>6326816
"Here's Flandre with a guitar," did move me with its literary awesomeness.

>> No.6326902

>>6326816

Newfags gonna fag. Nothing new.

>> No.6326922

>>6326820
Kodomo no Jikan.

>> No.6326926

>>6326922
But Kuro isn't doesn't hate sex, she just hates men.

>> No.6326930

>>6326880
Because I said I created the thread in my post, right?

>> No.6326935 [DELETED] 
File: 16 KB, 285x281, 1287631913630.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326935

>>6326902
>Call other people newfags
>Some shit posting trip no one has even ever heard of.
>Obvious came from /a/ or /v/
>Will most likely reply with some stale meme or some other faggotry.

>> No.6326936 [DELETED] 

>>6326930
That's how threads are created, yes.

>> No.6326994
File: 4 KB, 150x150, kaguya_face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6326994

>>6326935
>Greentext
>Reaction image

>> No.6327017
File: 77 KB, 420x408, 28849.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6327017

>>6326994
>Hypocricy

>> No.6327091

>>6327017
Shut up, cunt. You louse. You got some fuckin' neck ain't you. Posting reaction images? Fuck off, you're revolting. Look at your text, it's green, it's like grass man, your comment. We could make a fucking football field out of you. Like a field, big field, big bastard. You look like fucking Kermit the Frog, you know what I mean? Stay here? You should be ashamed of yourself. Who do you think you are? King of the castle? Cock of the walk?

>> No.6328067
File: 74 KB, 800x600, kiss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6328067

Bumping loli thread to counter spam.

>> No.6328074

>>6327091
>Look at your text, it's green, it's like grass man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UqcmHwWMBc

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action