[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 21 KB, 471x480, 1276882407483.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5954615 No.5954615 [Reply] [Original]

Question.

Why did Nasu bother writing Tsukihime, then spend so many years on additional material, if the entire story has been revealed to be a pale imitation of an earlier work, namely Kara no Kyoukai?

>> No.5954626

> Why did Nasu bother writing Tsukihime, then spend so many years on additional material, if the entire story has been revealed to be a pale imitation of someone else's work, namely Kizuato?

>> No.5954631

Because stories about Mary Sues will never sell.

>> No.5954643

>>5954626

I'll play your game, you rogue.

>Why did Nasu bother writing Fate/Stay Night, then spend so many years on additional material, if the entire story has been revealed to be a pale imitation of someone else's work, namely The Once and Future King?

>> No.5954650

I enjoyed Tsukihime much more than the KnK light novels.

>> No.5954652

>>5954631

You keep using that term. I do not think it means what you think it means.

>> No.5954656

>>5954652
But Ryougi is a Mary Sue.

>> No.5954669

>>5954615
He had a concept(s) that he really liked, wrote a story using it/some of it when he was a student.
Still likes the concept(s), less sure on the actual story itself, basically (hmm, X turned out as it did, but what if---) and it continued from there.

>> No.5954671

> Why did Nasu bother writing Tsukihime, then spend so many years on additional material, if the entire story has been revealed to be a pale imitation of someone else's work, namely Twilight?
Great thread, by the way.

>> No.5954676

>>5954656
>tries to kill herself
>Mary Sue
You're just proof that tripfags are idiots.

>> No.5954679

>>5954656

Only in the sense that you are an intelligent poster.

>> No.5954690

>>5954676
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SympatheticSue

>> No.5954687

>>5954631
>implying Tohno isn't one
Nasu thought novels and eroge are different mediums, so Ryougi as POV and the whole KnK setup wouldn't cut it. So he went with something more streamlined and sellable, powerful average male main character, group of heroines craving for his cock, etc

>> No.5954695

itt we don't know what 'mary sue' means. AGAIN

>> No.5954703 [DELETED] 
File: 561 KB, 1600x1157, bleach stay night4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5954703

Nasu isn't creative. He knows this, or else TM would have created 10 different works by now over this past decade. So he simply milks the same thing for all its worth.

Imagine if he created manga instead? He would probably still be on the same series at chapter 1,000. Picture related. That's the level Nasu is at right now.

>> No.5954708

>>5954690

To use TVTropes terminology, since you're incapable of original thought, a sympathy-based Mary Sue is an empowered Woobie.

That is not what Ryougi Shiki is.

>> No.5954712

>>5954690
>citing tvptropes
I don't honestly believe anyone can be as stupid as you are trying to be.

>> No.5954719

>>5954703

Rule 1 of business, stick with what works.

>> No.5954741

I wish Nasu got back to the Tsukihime franchise. F/SN is great and all, but I still prefer the boy killing vampires with a knife. Maybe with the remake if it ever gets released..

>> No.5954756

>>5954741

Enjoy your all ages standard.

>> No.5954768

>>5954703
as much as the bleach paragon hurts me, that's probably accurate. Nasu got popular because of a derivative work, hit it big with FSN, and then struggled as a one-trick pony trying to establish himself. DDD was mediocre/below average, Fate/Extra script was shit, MahouYoru looks nice but we'll see how much the script is written well.

>> No.5954780

>>5954756
For the remake you mean ? Doesn't matter to me. I don't read something for dozen of hours only to get a 15 minutes h-scene. If I really want to fap, I'll find other medias.

>> No.5954831

>>5954712
Do you know what else he could of cited from?

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action