[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 27 KB, 400x400, 1280635349952.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5839218 No.5839218 [Reply] [Original]

It's that timet of the day, /jp/.

>> No.5839227

Best 3D I've seen.

>> No.5839224

how wonderful.

>> No.5839235

...what happened to your hands?

>> No.5839240

That bloomers must cost a fortune and be worth every penny.

>> No.5839289

C'est MAGNIFIQUE!

>> No.5839295

uooooooooooooooooooooooooo

>> No.5839298

Wow, those are NICE

>> No.5839303
File: 232 KB, 600x800, bloomers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5839303

>> No.5839322
File: 44 KB, 317x400, old-lady.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5839322

Get out of my underwear drawer you little perverts!

>> No.5839328

I love how /jp/ is a huge hivemind of modesty.

Never change.

>> No.5839347

>>5839218
That's incredibly arousing.
May I request more, my good sir?

>> No.5839363

I want to kiss that belly

>> No.5839364

3D pig disgusting.

>> No.5839381

>>5839364

There is nothing pig disgusting about the first picture.

Using shitty memes does not automatically make you fit in here.

>> No.5839420

The most incredible piece of clothing ever invented.

>> No.5839437

>>5839364
Stop using such shitty memes, bro. That's so last year! There's nothing disgusting about OP's picture.

>> No.5839448

>>5839218

fwiggin cute

>> No.5839463

>>5839381
>>5839437
Get out newfriends.

>> No.5839490

>>5839463
They are probably /a/ users.

>> No.5839497

This doesn't count as pig disgusting because the image is of the pumpkin panties, and the model does not have a face, and therefore no personality. The model in the image only exists for us to look at.
Similar to a 2D girl, this blank model, while being 3D, represents an ideal all the same.

>> No.5839502

>>5839490
You do realize /jp/ itself is its own cancer.

>> No.5839501

>>5839497
I'm ok with that.jpeg


We don't need 3D personality.

>> No.5839525

>>5839381
>>5839437
>>5839463
>>5839490
Not in support of any of you, but summerfriends spamming "3DPG" or "slut" at the slightest provocation are getting on my nerves.
Same thing with the "True Neet only" shit, it was fun for a while (somewhat), but now it has been overused to death.

>> No.5839541

>>5839490
I don't understand this, /jp/ as a board is just as bad/if not worse than /a/, throwing a ballpark figure here but everyone that i've talked to online who uses /jp/ also uses /a/, don't make it out like /jp/ is some bastard board with no relation to /a/ and is hugely different as it sure as hell isn't.

>> No.5839542

>>5839381
>>5839437
>>5839463
>>5839490
SAMEFAG FUTA HATER TROLL DETECTED

>> No.5839543

those look really comfy

>> No.5839548

>>5839541
*forgot the ~around 80% of /jp/ users probably use /a/ aswell bit.

>> No.5839575
File: 1.72 MB, 1636x624, 2D vs 3D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5839575

/jp/ers are now defending certain manifestations of 3D? Since when?

Personally, I couldn't care less about the OP's image, and I don't think it's appropriate starting a 2D vs 3D shitstorm, but if you're going to post an image of a 3D girl--call it for what it is. Don't make excuses.

Also, while the terminology of "3D is pig disgusting" might sound like a meme, it's not. It's just a way of life for some users on /jp/. If you read the definition of otaku on wiki, you'll notice that there's an entire branch of otaku that only care for 2D.

>> No.5839592

>If you read the definition of otaku on wiki
I honestly hope you're just trolling, son.

>> No.5839598

>>5839575
Worthless photoshopped 3D. Trying too hard to be 2D. True 3D is what exists without preparation and photoshopping. What I'm getting tired of is the people who proclaim that the only people who like exclusively 2D are childish kids spouting memes. That somehow, when they mature, they will realize the error of their ways and revert to mere animals chasing after disgustingly biological things.

>> No.5839609

where is my IRL Tewi?

>> No.5839627

>>5839575
Are you seriously claiming that bloomer/trap threads are anything new on /jp/?
These arguments are often less about 3D vs. 2D than about established vs. unestablished material.
And 3DPG and other 1-year-old "core" /jp/ values are being spammed to death right now.

>> No.5839628

>>5839592
I don't know what you're implying, but I read the wiki article on otaku after moot renamed our board to Otaku Culture. In Japan, there exist anime and video game otakus. And on 2ch, there exist people that only like 2D. The point I was trying to make is that there's nothing special about /jp/. Hatred for 3D has predated our "3D is pig disgusting" rhetoric.

I was advocating loli and 2D on old /a/, years before doing such was considered cool. Now let's change the subject back to the OP.

>> No.5839646

>>5839628
Ok, so you are trolling.
Or hopelessly retarded.
Either way, carry on.

>> No.5839660
File: 54 KB, 640x960, woman_slap.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5839660

>>5839575
>Also, while the terminology of "3D is pig disgusting" might sound like a meme, it's not. It's just a way of life for some users on /jp/. If you read the definition of otaku on wiki, you'll notice that there's an entire branch of otaku that only care for 2D.
Otaku wiki, really? Anyway, 3DPD being a meme or not, I think people just should stop taking those things seriously. There's people who only appreciate 2D and unconditionally discarded real people? Hell, there is (and I'm one of them), but for Christ's sake, this is an anonymous forum, why can't people just laugh those things off? Seriously fighting over it is extremely childish.

>> No.5839671

>>5839660
The more ridiculous we seem the fewer normalfags bother coming here.

>> No.5839675

>>5839627
>Are you seriously claiming that bloomer/trap threads are anything new on /jp/?
No. I've personally made some 3D bloomer threads myself. But I don't recall seeing comments like this [>>5839227] in my thread. His remark probably invoked this [>>5839364] Anon to get frustrated. I guess what he's trying to say is, bloomers are fine but leave the 3D girl who's wearing the bloomers out of it. Otherwise the thread would become /s/.

>These arguments are often less about 3D vs. 2D than about established vs. unestablished material.
Indeed.

>And 3DPG and other 1-year-old "core" /jp/ values are being spammed to death right now.
I've been advocating for 2D since Sailor Moon first broadcasted on American cable networks. If you want, I can find some 2D vs 3D threads from old /a/ that predate /jp/'s existence.

>> No.5839695

>>5839575
>Also, while the terminology of "3D is pig disgusting" might sound like a meme

Please don't misuse the term "meme" the way /b/ does. Meme is simply a unit of information that can spread among human minds. A political or social ideology is a meme. Every song you hear on the radio is a meme. A style of clothing is a meme. Hell, even every word in the language is a meme. Of course what you're talking about is a meme too.

>> No.5839716

3d is shit but arguing with a bunch of faggots over it without using sage is even worse.

2d faggots don't know better, but you should realize that metathreads are the shittiest of shit on /jp/.

>> No.5839718
File: 56 KB, 495x406, umad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5839718

ITT: we all mad

>> No.5839727

>>5839660
What's so bad about reading something from wiki? The years of denying wiki as a valid source of academia are over. No webster's dictionary can come close to wiki's level of detail. Also, despite knowing what otaku meant prior to reading the wiki article, otaku is the type of word that doesn't translate well into English. Many westerners think of the word otaku as nerd. And many people think of the word moe as cute. In conclusion, I think reading a wiki article about it was justified. Do you know what otaku/moe mean?

>> No.5839742

>>5839695
But Milhouse still is not a meme.

>> No.5839745

>>5839675
Isn't OP picture a guy? I'm not an expert, but judging from the hands I'd say the person is male.
Anyway, I wasn't talking about you in my last sentence but about all the, as I assume, summerfriends, that post comments like 3DPG at the slightest provocation, even if the material has already been established on /jp/.
That doesn't mean I'm in support of having more real porn here, by the way.
Traps, really, really obscure fetishes, children and idols are however fine with me.

>> No.5839751

i like 2d and 3d.

>> No.5839755

>>5839695
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_meme

>>5839742
Back to /b/ please. Monkeying outdated memes will not make you fit in.

>> No.5839758

>>5839716
What else is there to discuss right now?
Just look at the broad selection of great threads and tell me where I can have any worthwhile discussion.

>> No.5839772

>>5839727
Based solely on the info Ive gotten from this board and other places(not wiki) I think otaku means someone with a very dedicated hobby. Someone who is all about that hobby etc. While moe means quite literally "budding" or "blossoming". A character who is coming into their own, etc. Am i wrong?

>> No.5839778

I [>>5839381] make a single troll post over an hour ago, go to lunch, and this is what it becomes when I return?

Fuck you, /jp/. You're better than this.

>> No.5839781

>>5839772
You're wrong.

>> No.5839771 [DELETED] 

>>5839727
The fact that Wikipedia has many properly sourced and moderated articles nowadays does not imply that any random shitty site on the internet called "wiki" will have the same level of quality.

>> No.5839793
File: 17 KB, 459x244, krumplambcry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5839793

>>5839781
SHIT!

>> No.5839798

>>5839772
>A character who is coming into their own, etc. Am i wrong?

Sigh.

Yes, yes you are.

>> No.5839796 [DELETED] 

>>5839771
Well duh. Where are you going with this?

>> No.5839810

Half of /jp/ still don't know what moe or otaku means.

>> No.5839816 [DELETED] 

>>5839796
>What's so bad about reading something from wiki? The years of denying wiki as a valid source of academia are over.

I'm replying to this, obviously.

>> No.5839828 [DELETED] 

>does not imply that any random shitty site on the internet called "wiki" will have the same level of quality.
Are you talking about wikia? Reading comprehension error.

>> No.5839877

>>5839828
Now that I skimmed through the discussion again, it must have been a reading error on my part. Disregard, I suck cocks, etc.

Hell, I'll delete myself.

>> No.5839908 [DELETED] 

>>5839816
Oh, now I see the disconnect. This [>>5839660] Anon thought I read the definition of otaku on some website called "otaku wiki." Which prompted this [>>5839771] Anon to make that post. The only wiki I go to is wikipedia. You'd think by now when someone says wiki they're referring to wikipedia--the largest wiki on the Internet.

>> No.5839934

>>5839218
Any more bloomers of that quality.

>> No.5839954

>5839218
Could've sworn I have seen a 2D version of those exact undergarments before.

>> No.5841623

Ressurecting thread.

>> No.5841644

I...I...I want some pantsu like that...

>> No.5841650

>this thread

my god, the autism meter is going off the charts

>> No.5841654

>>5841650
you called

>> No.5841664

>>5841654

Yes, I am detecting extreme autism itt

>> No.5841667

>>5841664
we might have to evacuate then

>> No.5841672
File: 402 KB, 760x981, 1268335979455.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5841672

>> No.5841673

>see picture of bloomers
>expect trap thread
>see autistic 2D vs 3D debate

What happened to the old /jp/?

>> No.5841680

>>5841673


Autism.

You may have to make a new trap tips threads

>> No.5841689

Norly. Someone tell me where I might buy some bloomers?

>> No.5841703

>>5841680
>>5841673
same fag

>> No.5841825

>>5841703

>implying I'd want to be a tripfag

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action