faggots in /co/ posted this, what do you feel now?

File: 52 KB, 729x857, blist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:19:45 2010 No.5620170 [Reply] [Original]

faggots in /co/ posted this, what do you feel now?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:20:45 2010 No.5620182 People on 4chan are idiots

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:21:04 2010 No.5620191 >>5620167 Ｗww.ａNOlOＬｔaＬk.Sｅ_ＲＥPLaＣＥ_Lol_ｗiＴH_N oytnfv l si ebexqwzwn lsb v begxbmvpu

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:21:45 2010 No.5620186 indifferent. HEY GUYS!!! LET'S MAKE A RETARDED CHART AND PUT OUR BOARD AT THE TOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 SO MUCH WIN LOLOLOLOL

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:21:45 2010 No.5620192 I refuse to permit /jp/ to be in any group that includes its backwards cousin.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:21:45 2010 No.5620188 File: 8 KB, 231x264, 1278359421007.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] That's really fucking neato, OP, but we don't give a shit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:21:45 2010 No.5620190 Reported.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:22:45 2010 No.5620198 File: 60 KB, 318x230, 1278635771396.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:22:45 2010 No.5620200 >/v/ in high tier /v/ is /b/v2, moot said it himself

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:22:45 2010 No.5620196 I feel that /sp/ should be in mid-tier, and that /v/ should be in /b/ tier, but otherwise, I don't see anything to object to. Also, reported for what will almost certainly end in crossboard raid faggotry.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:23:45 2010 No.5620209 >/jp/ in the same tier as /a/ Troll. No matter what you think, /jp/ is either way shittier or way better than /a/. It's not the same tier. >/tg/ not high tier Fail.

>>	None !2Legend.Z2 Sun Jul 11 01:24:45 2010 No.5620216 File: 105 KB, 850x876, sample-d5be60d905cd390adaae2627de5f04e6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:24:45 2010 No.5620217 /v/ and /jp/ belong in /b/ tier /sp/ belongs in low /m/ goes in high

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:26:45 2010 No.5620234 File: 65 KB, 205x242, 1278792967058.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >/v/ in high tier >/new/ not in /b/ tier

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:27:45 2010 No.5620241 >/lit/, /co/, /sp/ in "Best Tier" >/v/ listed under "High Tier" >/r9k/ rated above /jp/. This is why anyone who isn't NEET needs to be permabanned from /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:28:45 2010 No.5620255 >>5620217 /jp/ is honestly scarily similar to /b/ of like 4 years ago in some ways.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:28:45 2010 No.5620251 Why isn't /tg/ top tier?

Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:29:45 2010 No.5620266

/b/ is god tier

/jp/ is mid tier when not populated by summerfags.

Also

> /sp/
> best tier
> every thread nothing but greentext, reaction images and u mad
> filled with euro vs america threads and your face when threads
> the last half dozen lines of this post typical of /sp/

I chuckled.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:30:45 2010 No.5620272 File: 56 KB, 335x290, 1278052097929.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >/sp/ on best tier

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:30:45 2010 No.5620277 how is /sp/ best tier? all it is is europe vs america and >my face threads

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:32:45 2010 No.5620300 /sci/? High tier? That place is nothing but religion vs god bullshit spam

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:32:45 2010 No.5620301 /co/ is a shitty board so why would I care what they think?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:33:45 2010 No.5620311 /jp/, /co/, and /tg/ are the only good 4chan boards.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:33:45 2010 No.5620313 File: 56 KB, 444x778, vddsvv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:35:45 2010 No.5620342 File: 13 KB, 315x334, yourfacewhen17.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >my face when weaboos get buttfurious at the opinions of normal, educated people

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:35:45 2010 No.5620332 I honestly don't care. If someone things this board is shitty, that's fantastic, don't come.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:35:45 2010 No.5620335 File: 69 KB, 664x1000, fuck_this_shit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620313 Lies and slanders.

>>	Nanaya !yrBrqfF1Ew Sun Jul 11 01:36:45 2010 No.5620345 /v/ being in high tier makes anything on that not matter. Not that I even cared in the first place as /jp/ is the only board I'm on and it's all opinions.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:36:45 2010 No.5620346 >>5620342 Reported.

>>	proREMIRIAt Elite Force Commander !rSDMROXTB. Sun Jul 11 01:37:45 2010 No.5620357 you will always be god tier for me /jp/ ;_;

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:38:45 2010 No.5620372 File: 13 KB, 317x367, baw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620357 But /jp/ is so shitty.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:39:45 2010 No.5620388 Fucking tier threads.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:43:45 2010 No.5620425 File: 21 KB, 660x435, summation.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620342 >my face when I reported you're shitty post

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:49:45 2010 No.5620477 File: 138 KB, 474x204, yourfacewhen47.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620425 >my face when you're autistic

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 01:56:45 2010 No.5620529 >>5620313 /c/ should be in Porn Tier

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:00:45 2010 No.5620560 File: 41 KB, 232x247, Screen shot 2010-07-10 at 1.39.05 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] > tiers

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:01:45 2010 No.5620572 >>5620301 /co/ is a shitty board awww, people not fighting with each another to justify how hard you tank?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:07:45 2010 No.5620610 File: 57 KB, 451x498, 1255931037305.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Reported for cross-board trolling and invasions. Posting this on every damn board on 4chan in an attempt to get replies is a bannable offense.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:11:45 2010 No.5620635 >>5620610 reported Offhand, I don't know any other board so cram-packed full of teachers' pets. Maybe IF YOUR BOARD HAD CONTENT OTHER THAN PEDOPHILIA AND NEETS BEGGING FOR TRANSLATIONS it would be less of an easy target for bored spergs.

>>	Naga !sanW0Txz4I Sun Jul 11 02:12:45 2010 No.5620648 People actually care about some chart? Get it together, people...

Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:13:45 2010 No.5620655
File: 5 KB, 166x200, 1276388696518.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5620635
>trying to keep a board clean
>being a teacher's pet

>accusing people of being a teacher's pet on an anonymous imageboard

Honestly I don't mind this thread so much because every board loves bitching about other boards.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:14:45 2010 No.5620661 File: 152 KB, 988x514, Screen shot 2010-07-10 at 11.16.22 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620635 That's an insulting gross overgeneraliza--

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:14:45 2010 No.5620666 This thread is reported.

>>	～(￣∇￣～) !NACK.rrrr. Sun Jul 11 02:15:45 2010 No.5620673 >/v/ in high tier Seriously now...

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:15:45 2010 No.5620676 >>5620655 >>trying to keep a board clean protip, sparky: keeping a board good is ten times more effective than clicking that [!] button.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:17:45 2010 No.5620688 >>5620655 every board loves bitching about other boards I feel you bro, just the other day /ck/ was asserting its superiority over /toy/

>>	Mr. Korns !lguHmk4896 Sun Jul 11 02:18:45 2010 No.5620696 >>5620673 I'm from /v/ and even I know that's retarded. I'll myself out now.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:18:45 2010 No.5620697 File: 175 KB, 850x878, HAHA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620635 >He thinks that "pedophile" and "lolicon" are the same thing!

>>	～(￣∇￣～) !NACK.rrrr. Sun Jul 11 02:19:45 2010 No.5620700 >>5620696 Yeah, I know.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:20:45 2010 No.5620713 Move /v/ to /b/ tier. Move /jp/ to a new tier under /b/ tier called "shit tier". There you go.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:21:45 2010 No.5620720 >>5620169 www.aＮOｌoｌＴAlK.ＳE_RepｌａCｅ_ｌOＬ WｉＴｈ_Ｎ dob gvfuqq fwa g l c epnj jze peqr s i iqkpb

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:29:45 2010 No.5620768 >/co/ sucking its own /co/ck Nothing new here.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:30:45 2010 No.5620770 >>5620768 It's /co/ck/, moot doesn't put them next to each other for nothing

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:31:45 2010 No.5620781 File: 171 KB, 375x375, 1234217088777.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620697 > he thinks the distinction means anything to the district attorney

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:32:45 2010 No.5620782 I don't care what other board thinks of /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:35:45 2010 No.5620792 File: 79 KB, 800x551, Meido-cleanup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Tier lists are guaranteed replies. I hope meido wakes up soon.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:38:45 2010 No.5620816 > /lit/ people with actual standards for the term 'novel' >/co/ people who can mention the cartoons they watch to their families and IRL friends >/sp/ people unintimidated by the concepts 'physical movement' or 'being outdoors'

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:40:45 2010 No.5620826 >>5620816 In other words, normalfag garbage.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:41:45 2010 No.5620836 >>5620826 Not to mention blatant lies. 10 bux it was OP bumping his thread.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:41:45 2010 No.5620832 File: 86 KB, 640x434, 1277355361658.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >High Tier > /v/. /tv/, /sci/ I am well acquainted with all of these boards. Not one of them belongs there.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:43:45 2010 No.5620848 Eh, kinda agreed. /co/ are bros, but the rest of best tier should be way lower, also what the fuck is /v/ doing at high tier!?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:43:45 2010 No.5620849 File: 10 KB, 360x240, 1219696746415.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620826 normalfag garbage > 4chan users > normalfags

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:44:45 2010 No.5620853 >>5620849 Most boards are filled with normalfags.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:45:45 2010 No.5620858 >>5620849 4chan hasn't been weeaboo central for over two years now. We're facebook 2.0, get on with the times.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:45:45 2010 No.5620861 >>5620848 why haven't /v/ been shoveled into ovens ftfy

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:45:45 2010 No.5620862 >>5620848 >/co/ are bros That's a fucking lie and you know it.

Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:48:45 2010 No.5620873

Tier lists in general are stupid, I wouldn't be on /jp/ if I didn't consider it inherently superior to all other boards, but this tier list is objectively stupid. /v/ is pretty much /b/, yet they are on opposite ends of the scale. /sp/ is a board about sports. I don't know why such a board even exists on 4chan. And the fact that all boards in the first few tiers have no trace of any j-media points to the one who made this being lost on the internet and thinking that isn't 4chan's entire foundation.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:49:45 2010 No.5620880 >>5620862 /co/ is not loev. however, unless you're trying to discuss Grant Morrison or the latest multi-title event, it's decent

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:50:45 2010 No.5620893 All boards are either "relevant to me" tier, "not interested" tier or "raids us" tier. That's it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:50:45 2010 No.5620891 >>5620873 You're stupid. Objectively.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:53:45 2010 No.5620915 >>5620858 This is unfortunately true. People misspelling 'weeaboo,' treating age-old memes as new content, acting like...general normalfags. It's depressing.

Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:54:45 2010 No.5620923

>>5620873
> Tier lists in general are stupid, I wouldn't be on /jp/ if I didn't consider it inherently superior to all other boards

I haven't seen a faggot more pathetic since I was last in #katawa-shoujo

>, but this tier list is objectively stupid.
brotip: work on your english until it's more convincing

> /sp/ is a board about sports. I don't know why such a board even exists on 4chan.
I'M THINKING YOUR OPINION NOT BEING SOLICITED HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH IT

> And the fact that all boards in the first few tiers have no trace of any j-media points to the one who made this being lost on the internet and thinking that isn't 4chan's entire foundation.

OUR PRECIOUS IMAGEBOARD CULTURE

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:56:45 2010 No.5620942 File: 187 KB, 788x593, why-are-you-so-mad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620923

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 02:57:45 2010 No.5620946 4chan has been offtopic since birth. All of you fellow oldfags know this. Now stick your asses up high and prepare for the rest of summer.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 03:00:45 2010 No.5620964 File: 103 KB, 537x500, 1271816375927.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620923

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 03:01:45 2010 No.5620973 >>5620942 > deflating an entitledfag's delusions > "U MAD" defense

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 03:06:45 2010 No.5621020 File: 101 KB, 408x600, 1277175311183.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5620973

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 03:15:45 2010 No.5621082 >>5621020 holy shit that's awesome and saved

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 03:18:45 2010 No.5621107 File: 76 KB, 704x1024, superior_asian_master_race.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This is a bad thread.

Anonymous Sun Jul 11 03:19:45 2010 No.5621117

only board apart from /jp/ i go to is /sp/ which constantly always has OC which is fun to be apart of, /jp/ is probably one of the last "discussion boards" that hasn't devolved into /b/ in some way or another despite the shitty ass summer it's been this year

i aint even mad

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 03:22:45 2010 No.5621147 >>5621117 ｙｏｕ　ｎｅｅｄ　ｔｏ　ｗｏｒｋ　ｏｎ　ｙｏｕｒ　Ｅｎｇｌｉｓｈ　ｔｈｏｕｇｈ

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:19:45 2010 No.5621569 >>5620923 Where's the English problem?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:20:45 2010 No.5621575 >>5621569 Ｉ　ｄｕｎｎｏ　ｌｏｌＧｏ　ｒｅａｄ　ａ　ｇｒａｍｍａｒ　ｂｏｏｋ　ｏｒ　ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:23:45 2010 No.5621597 Isn't all of 4chan in /b/ tier?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:28:45 2010 No.5621627 >/sp/ in best tier ...What?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:38:45 2010 No.5621705 >>toy and tg not on best tier. what.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:40:45 2010 No.5621724 >/v/ >not in /b/ tier

>>	\oдo/ !C.A.Tdb5RI Sun Jul 11 04:43:45 2010 No.5621745 /tg/ aint in god tier and /v/ is above /a/. That list is wrong and im going to reply here like a stupid faggot i am in hope somebody notices me to this obvious troll thread made to get attention for OP:

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:54:45 2010 No.5621814 File: 40 KB, 729x857, 1278825587819.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 04:57:45 2010 No.5621837 >>5621627 /sp/ is a special case. It's a board where a /b/ style posting actually fits the topic.

>>	the official /jp/ tripfriend !KVzOEaUpQc Sun Jul 11 05:01:45 2010 No.5621859 File: 12 KB, 251x251, get out of jp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Best tier: My opinion. Shit tier: Your opinion.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jul 11 05:04:45 2010 No.5621882 I haven't been to /lit/ so I don't know fuck about it. /sp/ needs to be in Low Tier. /tg/ needs to be in High Tier. Put /v/ to low tier. Either demote or promote /jp/, it's not in same tier as /a/. Stuff like that.

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture