/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

Our meido is a stupid jerkface.

[Suigin (UNBAN CURRYBUTT PUT THIS IN YOUR NAME) !fKazami5bE No.]

much like your posting

[Sudo !nAoZUmIAfk No.]

>My shitty thread got deleted, so I'll just post it again.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607065
My posting is a stupid jerkface?

That doesn't even make sense. Geez!

[The /jp/ Police !TOD33vFX8s No.]

reported

[Anonymous No.]

the ati t-shirt's a nice touch

I didn't notice that before, is that new this round?

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607064
>>5607065
>>5607087
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

The value of a non-stickied thread is 0. For all intents and purposes, the thread is in equilibrium.

A normal post has a value of +1. At the instant a normal post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+1, and the thread is bumped, breaking equilibrium. However, the thread immediately returns to its previous state of equilibrium, 0.

A sage post has a value of 0. When a sage post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+0, and the thread is not bumped, but remains in equilibrium.

Tl;dr SAGE DOES NOTHING (and you are most likely an idiot)

[Sudo !nAoZUmIAfk No.]

>>5607102
Reported and saged.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607102

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607120
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

The value of a non-stickied thread is 0. For all intents and purposes, the thread is in equilibrium.

A normal post has a value of +1. At the instant a normal post is submittd, the value of the thread becomes 0+1, and the thread is bumped, breaking equilibrium. However, the thread immediately returns to its previous state of equilibrium, 0.

A sage post has a value of 0. When a sage post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+0, and the thread is not bumped, but remains in equilibrium.

Tl;dr SAGE DOES NOTHING (and you are most likely an idiot)

[The /jp/ Police !TOD33vFX8s No.]

>>5607129
LMAO U MAD? REPORTED AND SAGE IN ALL FIELDS

[Anonymous No.]

ITT: Autistic manchildren arguing random imageboard features and their perceived proper usage on the internet on Friday's door to weekend.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607132
How was that mad?

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607132
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

The value of a non-stickied thread is 0. For all intents and purposes, the thread is in equilibrium.

A normal post has a value of +1. At the instant a normal post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+1, and the thread is bumped, breaking equilibrium. However, the thread immediately returns to its previous state of equilibrium, 0.

A sage post has a value of 0. When a sage post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+0, and the threa is not bumped, but remains in equilibrium.

Tl;dr SAGE DOES NOTHING (and you are most likely an idiot)

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607129
haha sage sage you can't stop me

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607152
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

[Sudo !nAoZUmIAfk No.]

>>5607129
Sage.

[Suigin (UNBAN CURRYBUTT PUT THIS IN YOUR NAME) !fKazami5bE No.]

I still laugh at how 4chan doesn't understand what sage means.

If only I knew moon so I wouldn't have to spend time on a board that imports foreign concepts and then DOES IT WRONG all the time.

Using sage as a way to "insult" someone's post or thread is just completely wrong and a retarded misuse of a good feature that is so popular in sites like 2ch and Futaba. Fuck, iichan and 4-ch do it right. It's just 4chan and 4chan's lame knockoffs that fail at using sage.

The true meaning of sage means that YOUR POST isn't worthy enough to bump the thread. It's ironic, because you think that you're insulting others while you're just, in fact, insulting yourself. Yes, sage can be used when posting a derogatory comment in a thread that you don't want to bump, but posting with just the word "sage" accomplishes nothing but contribute to spamming the board. The trend of replying with the name of a tripfag and sage is even worse, as it accomplishes nothing and only serves to increase the e-penis of whoever you're "attacking".

The sage feature was never meant to serve as an implied insult or general disagreement! Why people started using it that way is beyond me. There are plenty of reasons why one would choose not to bump a thread with his reply. For example, bumping threads with stupid one liner replies should be discouraged and those people should be coerced into using sage instead.

I want to use sage, yet I almost never do it on 4chan because people will jump on me thinking I'm insulting their post or something.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607140
Saging the hell out of you.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607159
>>5607162
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively.

This is untrue.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607137
tl;dr: Thread's gettin' good now...

[Anonymous No.]

>/jp/ - Sage Culture

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607169
Enjoy ur sage, faggot

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607161
How was your random alphabets and numbers noodle soup today, autistic faggot? Please inform us about the powerankings based on the number of appearances in the soup.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607178
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

The value of a non-stickied thread is 0. For all intents and purposes, the thread is in equilibrium.

A normal post has a value of +1. At the instant a normal post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+1, and the thread is bumped, breaking equilibrium. However, the thread immediately returns to its previous state of equilibrium, 0.

A sage post has a value of 0. When a sage post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+0, and the thread isnot bumped, but remains in equilibrium.

Tl;dr SAGE DOES NOTHING (and you are most likely an idiot)

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607182
You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

The value of a non-stickied thread is 0. For all intents and purposes, te thread is in equilibrium.

A normal post has a value of +1. At the instant a normal post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+1, and the thread is bumped, breaking equilibrium. However, the thread immediately returns to its previous state of equilibrium, 0.

A sage post has a value of 0. When a sage post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+0, and the thread is not bumped, but remains in equilibrium.

Tl;dr SAGE DOES NOTHING (and you are most likely an idiot)

[Sudo !nAoZUmIAfk No.]

>>5607169

[Anonymous No.]

You seem to be under the impression that sage affects a thread negatively. This is untrue.

The value of a non-stickied thread is 0. For all intents and purposes, te thread is in equilibrium.

A normal post has a value of +1. At the instant a normal post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+1, and the thread is bumped, breaking equilibrium. However, the thread immediately returns to its previous state of equilibrium, 0.

A sage post has a value of 0. When a sage post is submitted, the value of the thread becomes 0+0, and the thread is not bumped, but remains in equilibrium.

Tl;dr SAGE DOES NOTHING (and you are most likely an idiot)

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607178

Summer.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607204
u get sage also

[Anonymous No.]

Let's stay friends

[Anonymous No.]

Guys, chill the fuck out and better check your butts for butthole AIDS

[Anonymous No.]

nokosage

[Suigin (UNBAN CURRYBUTT PUT THIS IN YOUR NAME) !fKazami5bE No.]

>>5607182
I still laugh at how 4chan doesn't understand what sage means.

If only I knew moon so I wouldn't have to spend time on a board that imports foreign concepts and then DOES IT WRONG all the time.

Using sage as a way to "insult" someone's post or thread is just completely wrong and a retarded misuse of a good feature that is so popular in sites like 2ch and Futaba. Fuck, iichan and 4-ch do it right. It's just 4chan and 4chan's lame knockoffs that fail at using sage.

The true meaning of sage means that YOUR POST isn't worthy enough to bump the thread. It's ironic, because you think that you're insulting others while you're just, in fact, insulting yourself. Yes, sage can be used when posting a derogatory comment in a thread that you don't want to bump, but posting with just the word "sage" accomplishes nothing but contribute to spamming the board. The trend of replying with the name of a tripfag and sage is even worse, as it accomplishes nothing and only serves to increase the e-penis of whoever you're "attacking".

The sage feature was never meant to serve as an implied insult or general disagreement! Why people started using it that way is beyond me. There are plenty of reasons why one would choose not to bump a thread with his reply. For example, bumping threads with stupid one liner replies should be discouraged and those people should be coerced into using sage instead.

I want to use sage, yet I almost never do it on 4chan because people will jump on me thinking I'm insulting their post or something.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607220
Only in Haiti.

[Anonymous No.]

>>5607161

Hmm I've always used it that way but also as an insult, I win.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Noko sage