[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 268 KB, 827x1169, 1277115619813.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5527168 No.5527168 [Reply] [Original]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/politics/10470071.stm

>Nick Clegg is to ask the public to nominate laws and regulations they would like to see abolished.
>The deputy prime minister is launching a Your Freedom website, on which people will also be able to propose ways to reduce bureaucracy.

>The Your Freedom website will ask three questions including, "which current laws would you like to remove or change because they restrict your civil liberties?"

>> No.5527184

What with those /k/ on her shirt?
Wrong board it seems.

>> No.5527181

This is /jp/.

Everybody will vote for a same thing:

CP

>> No.5527189

>>5527181
Not sure how a lack of CP is 'restricting your civil liberties'.

>> No.5527198

>>5527189
My liberty to masturbate to what I want.

>> No.5527201

>>5527189
my liberty to have a loli wife, not that I would want one

>> No.5527207

Real CP aside, the anti-loli law is pretty poorly written. At the moment its in the realm of a "thought crime".

>> No.5527219

yeah, something tells me legalising loli isn't really likely

>> No.5527317

>>5527189
Laws against child pornography certainly are restricting freedoms. Why can I watch a beheading legally on the Internet but I can't watch some kid get a dicking?

>> No.5527327

>>5527317
Because violence is better for you than sex.

>> No.5527370

>>5527207
That's because it is a thoughtcrime. The "justification" for banning loli is that virtual-CP (as it's technically referred to) is that it might lead to people looking at real CP or raping actual children. Such reasoning makes up thoughtcrime because you're charging them not over their actions, but their thoughts.

>> No.5527391

Laws are no longer about protecting people, they are about keeping people in check.
Sounds like a paranoid fantasy, then shit like the loli law passes with zero opposition.

>> No.5527407

Has there been a case of somebody being arrested for the loli law in the U.K?

>> No.5527417

>>5527407
I don't see how they'll find out unless someone reports you.

>> No.5527419

Any /jp/ user who doesn't send in a plea for re-legalizing lolicon is neglecting his civic duties.

>> No.5527605 [DELETED] 
File: 166 KB, 1024x768, 1276008825715.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5527605

>>5527419
I'll be doing just that, and writing to my MP about it to boot.
I've got several hundred pounds lying around that I'll be holding back just on the slight outside chance that the law manages to get repealed.

>> No.5527657

>>5527419
>civic duty

Now I feel like watching starship troopers.

>> No.5529774

Stupid laws should be removed, but since majority is stupid, it would never work in a poll about what to remove.

>> No.5529801

>>5527657
Oh shit, brb

>> No.5529805

>>5527657
>Watch
>Starship Troopers
Why would you do that? It's a great book, and only takes like 5 hours to read.

>> No.5529821

>>5527407
not as far as I know. Based on what I read a good while before it was passed into law they'll nick you for it if they find it after investigating you for real CP. I don't think it's being enforced otherwise, it's pretty unworkable as it is.
Also to note is that it's still legal in Scotland due to this area of law being devolved to the Scottish administration, so perhaps I should move up north

>> No.5529830

>>5529805
The first movie was great, the others... let's not talk about those.

>> No.5529840

>>5529830
I'm pretty sure there's only one movie bro. Insinuating anything else would probably make Heinlein's ghost come harass you by speaking about ridiculous things.

>> No.5529851

>>5529840
Honestly I think Heinlein rolled over in his grave after the first movie.

I'm still trying to find a copy of the Starship Troopers animu though.

>> No.5529852

Why is /jp/ slowing descending to CP from loli?

/jp/ is no longer what it used to be.

>> No.5529865

>>5529852
only 2 posts seem to be pro real cp here

>> No.5529874

>>5529852
Over a year ago there was a thread in /jp/ that revealed that a lot of /jp/ have owned CP/like 3D little girls.

>> No.5529881

I would care if this were in my country.

>> No.5529894

>>5529874
>webcam threads
>investment banker
Obviously

>> No.5532376

http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessary-laws/repeal-laws-on-drawn-pornography
It's up there.

>> No.5532407

Service Unavailable (503)

The Dialogue is experiencing a large number of users.

Please wait a few minutes and try accessing the site again
Damn 4chan.

>> No.5532499

>>5532407
Been doing that all day. It's been on the bbc, so it'll have a lot of traffic driven to it from that alone.
Looking at some of the suggestions, you'd think it'd been in the Daily Mail too~

>> No.5532534

>>5532499
Well, I tried googling it, just to make sure, and it brought up http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/ckvx4/


The comments almost immediately turned into a "Should possession of CP be legal?" debate, and, as far as I've read, there are no "FUKIN PEDOS BURN IN HELL!!!!!" comments.


I'm quite surprised. Pleasantly so.

>> No.5532582
File: 12 KB, 290x218, 1268271648699.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5532582

>co.uk

>> No.5532605

>>5532582
I hope you're trolling.
Did you even read the thread or just look at the links?

>> No.5533649

>>5532534


>The comments almost immediately turned into a "Should possession of CP be legal?" debate, and, as far as I've read, there are no "FUKIN PEDOS BURN IN HELL!!!!!" comments.

>I'm quite surprised. Pleasantly so.

With the exception of BNP voters, Sun and Daily Mail readers tend not to use the internet, so don't get your hopes up; the "paedos burn in hell" mentality is still dominant in this country.

Loli laws will never be repealed because British people have got into the mindset were they think it's OK to ban things they personally don't like and don't care about freedom as long as the laws don't affect them personally.

Also, the "think of the children" argument plays *really* well here, even better than it does in the US, and since we have no written constitution or first amendment (until Blair came along, we didn't need stuff like that because people trusted politicians not to act like arseholes), there's no way to stop massively fucked up laws being passed. When we elect a government, they have five years in which they can do whatever they want; they can act like the Chinese government if they choose.

>> No.5533941

>>5527419
I'm sorry but most of us are not disgusting Britfags and some us consider your kind and Australians to a blight on this world that deserves to be purged with fire and brimstone.

>> No.5535776

>>5533941
I do not believe the website owners are smart enough to restrict voting/etc to UK citizens.

>> No.5536105
File: 30 KB, 800x528, CatTongue..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5536105

>> No.5536128

qＵＩＴ_AtｔａcｋＩnＧ ａNｄ_cｌｏWＮIＮg ｗwＷ.ａnＯn_x_x_ｘ
X_Ｘ_x ｔaＬＫ.ｓＥ ＤｉrＥＣTＬy_bRo_(ｒＥmove_ALＬ ｘ)
xh r isrisqgk wocgxbmypeq z sfnf jk o

>> No.5538085

>>5527168

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action