[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 815 KB, 801x600, sora3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344529 No.5344529 [Reply] [Original]

true love

>> No.5344536

>>5344529
No sex, no love.
They are at best very close friends.

>> No.5344538
File: 713 KB, 801x598, lovesend2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344538

>>5344536
how can you say that?

>> No.5344557

>>5344538
Would you call two close friends who never made love, lovers ?

>> No.5344552

If it's wrong for a man to love the holographic projection of an advanced artificial intelligence, then I don't want to be right.

>> No.5344575
File: 691 KB, 795x599, loveinanimage.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344575

>>5344557
you don't have to have sex to be in love

>> No.5344576

>>5344575
You didn't answer my question.

>> No.5344577

>>5344557
Lovers are people that are in love with each other, not people that have fucked.

You wouldn't call a prostitute your lover.

>> No.5344580

>>5344577
You as well tripfag, you didn't answer my question.

>> No.5344586 [DELETED] 

marriage until sex*

lol dyslexia

>> No.5344584

So a couple that waits for sex until marriage is not in love until they get married?

>> No.5344587
File: 883 KB, 799x602, lovesend3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344587

>>5344557
they are more than close friends

>> No.5344593

I love the cg when you find her during the second kick the can session.

>> No.5344604

>>5344557
no but lovers != in love, lovers are people who MAKE love

>> No.5344607

>>5344580
>Would you call two close friends who never made love, lovers ?

If they were in love with each other, then they'd be called lovers, moron. Platonic relationships do exist, even if they're a result of the inability to have sex more than philosophical reasoning.

>> No.5344602
File: 734 KB, 799x598, love.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344602

>>5344593

>> No.5344600

>>5344587
>>5344584
You know, I really love how you're avoiding the question.
If two people tell you they're lovers but never actually had sex would seriously consider them as such ?

>> No.5344609
File: 817 KB, 796x597, lovesend.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344609

>>5344600
yes

>> No.5344619

Sex is an expression of love not the defining of love

>> No.5344622

>>5344602
Lovely...

>> No.5344630

>>5344607
As expected from a tripfag, without a valid argument you fall back to the exact word's meaning to get some manner of point.
You know very well what I meant with that question.

By the way this proves /jp/ is full of kids and hypocrites, all claiming sex is not necessary for love, but calling whores left and right is someone isn't a virgin.
Pathetic.

>> No.5344638
File: 518 KB, 1000x756, Poor onechan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344638

true love

>> No.5344639

>>5344630
>As expected from a tripfag, without a valid argument you fall back to the exact word's meaning to get some manner of point.

Yes, it's so very like me to use facts in an argument instead of fallacies. I ask for your forgiveness in utterly destroying you.

>> No.5344656

>>5344638
shit, this fucking freak me out

>> No.5344661

>>5344630
>all claiming sex is not necessary for love, but calling whores left and right is someone isn't a virgin.
And the hypocrisy here is..?

>> No.5344686

>>5344630

>claiming sex is not necessary for love, but calling whores left and right is someone isn't a virgin.

I don't really agree with the latter half of that statement but I really don't see what's hypocritical about this way of thinking.

>> No.5344689
File: 747 KB, 801x599, sora2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344689

>>5344630
sure is generalization, Im not even a /jp/ regular

>> No.5344696

>>5344686
Well duh, nothing else he said in the thread makes any sense, why start now

>> No.5344706

>>5344696

Oh, right. I feel bad for not realizing that sooner. Damn shame he had to shit up a Sora thread, she doesn't get much love around here or anywhere else.

>> No.5344714

I didn't say anything about sluts, so there's no hypocrisy here, anyway, just a lot of lies.

Sora is lovely, just not as lovely as the rest of them.

>> No.5344731

Sora was pure love.

/jp/ is just mad that they cant fuck her.

>> No.5344815
File: 790 KB, 796x594, cutie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344815

>> No.5344823

It can't love you, it's a soulless machine.
CLANG CLANG CLANG CLANG.

>> No.5344856

>>5344823
Technically, she's an artificial intelligence, so she can love you, if she's programmed correctly.

>> No.5344865

Wow, I forgot these nice scenes. I just remembered that I DIDN'T hate Sora's route.

>> No.5344872

>>5344856
Nice spoiler tags. Reported.

>> No.5344977
File: 941 KB, 801x597, soraeverywhere.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344977

>> No.5344979

>>5344856

Jesus fuck, nice one. Dick.

>> No.5344984

>>5344979
Are you serious?

>> No.5344992
File: 484 KB, 1024x1152, VN Recommendation3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5344992

>>5344872
>>5344979
If you haven't played all the VNs on this list, you should go back to /a/.

>> No.5345001

>>5344992

>you should go back to /a/

That's just cruel.

>> No.5345051

>>5344872
>>5344979
You two haven't played Every17 yet?
What the fuck are you doing on /jp/?

>> No.5345060

>>5344872

Noone will use tags for shit everybody has read years ago. By the way, Spike dies.

>> No.5345061
File: 982 KB, 799x599, this is love.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5345061

>> No.5345086

>>5345001
Trying to make people read Chaos;Head is the worse part about this post.

>> No.5345093

The Sora thing is barely a spoiler. It's revealed pretty early and you should be able to notice it even earlier.

>>5344992
If those are the only VNs you've read you need to go back to /a/.

>> No.5345098

>>5344872
>>5344979
This is something you figure out 20 minutes into the game, at the most.

It's not a spoiler.

>> No.5345099

>>5344630

u mad?

Polite sage for no contribution

>> No.5345103

>>5344992
What the fuck? No Wanko to Kurasou? I am disappoint.

>> No.5345129

>>5345103
Okay, seriously back to /a/ now.

>> No.5345569

>>5344529
it's the true anon route

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action