[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

File: 500 KB, 897x1004, 0ff1ed3801b00853e291965012ea6841.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

5092046

Anonymous Mon May 10 09:07:40 2010 No.5092046 [Reply] [Original]

According to you /jp/, how Sanae answer to this?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:08:40 2010 No.5092062 Someone made her innocent in her version of that chart.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:08:40 2010 No.5092060 File: 841 KB, 897x1167, 1272085953658.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5092046 We've already had that. First one:

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:10:40 2010 No.5092072 File: 924 KB, 897x1167, 1272089728872.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5092060 And second one. >>5092062 This one is the innocent one.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:10:40 2010 No.5092074 File: 1.29 MB, 240x136, get out.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5092060

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:11:40 2010 No.5092084 >words words words words words words

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:15:40 2010 No.5092099 >>5092060 >>5092072 multiple personality complex? Sanae is a good girl or a good slut?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:18:40 2010 No.5092126 >>5092099 Fanon Sanae (slut) versus canon Sanae (good).

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:28:40 2010 No.5092193 >>5092126 >Canon Sanae (slut) versus fanon Sanae (good). fix'd for ya bro

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 09:32:40 2010 No.5092213 >>5092193 Whatever you want to believe.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 11:24:40 2010 No.5092791 Sanae is a slut is the best thing fanon came up with.

>>	Shifty Scandaroon Mon May 10 11:27:40 2010 No.5092798 >>5092791 >fanon >good Get out and never come back, cancerous post 2004 touhou fandom.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 11:29:40 2010 No.5092812 >>5092193 Canon Sanae is insane.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 11:39:40 2010 No.5092858 >>5092798 >implying you've been a Touhou fan since before that time You didn't even start posting in /jp/ till a few months ago.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 11:43:40 2010 No.5092875 I challenge anyone who claims Sanae is a canon slut, to tell me why. The fact that she's in multiple games doesn't mean shit.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 11:45:40 2010 No.5092888 File: 438 KB, 640x480, 1239483055452.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5092875

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 11:51:40 2010 No.5092923 >>5092888 Next time, try and actually refute the central point.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 11:54:40 2010 No.5092946 >>5092888 Wow, I didn't expect for this anime to be this deep.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:32:40 2010 No.5094338 >>5092072 >>5092060 Someone (Some guy?) should make one of these for the rest of the touhous.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:35:40 2010 No.5094358 >>5092875 They're just trolling, man. And some idiots use it as an excuse to post porn. Like we need one in the first place.

>>	Some Guy Mon May 10 15:39:40 2010 No.5094392 >>5092875 Because Sanae became the new Aya when she became a playable character, apparently. It was funny for maybe a day, but has gotten REALLY old.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:46:40 2010 No.5094469 >>5094392 Why arn't Mima, Yuuka, Sakuya, and Youmu sluts too, then? It's not fair ;_;

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:49:40 2010 No.5094497 >>5094469 Because they're good characters.

>>	Some Guy Mon May 10 15:52:40 2010 No.5094519 >>5094469 Because /jp/ seems to hate good girls.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:53:40 2010 No.5094528 >>5094497 Why? Because they're old?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:56:40 2010 No.5094558 >>5094528 No, Sanae is just an ugly, boring character with shitty danmaku. Her theme is her only saving grace, but ZUN has never written anything I could really call bad.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:56:40 2010 No.5094559 >>5094392 That reason is excluded, because it's rubbish. ZUN changes the main character lineup fairly often.

>>	Some Guy Mon May 10 15:57:40 2010 No.5094577 >>5094559 You know that, and I know that, but did /jp/ circa last year know that?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 10 15:58:40 2010 No.5094579 >>5094558 Oh. Eh, opinions.

>>

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action