[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 83 KB, 800x1134, image002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893363 No.4893363 [Reply] [Original]

/jp/ , at what age does a toddler become a loli?

>> No.4893368

I'd say it's when they learn to speak coherently.

>> No.4893364

8-9

>> No.4893370
File: 20 KB, 500x500, 0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893370

>> No.4893382

>>4893370
someone didnt post a touhou thread ,it must be a troll!

>> No.4893389

>>4893364

No ,five a six year olds are definitely loli

>> No.4893396
File: 71 KB, 900x1200, Doss-Iori.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893396

At what age does a toddler become an Iori?

>> No.4893397
File: 202 KB, 361x401, Fucking Retard.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893397

>>4893382
>>Someone's butthurt their trolling skills are shit tier.

>> No.4893409

>>4893397

go back to /b/ and leave us you 3dpd lover.

>> No.4893412

>>4893389
I would not fuck a five-year-old. However, I would fuck a nine-year-old. Thus, a nine-year-old is a loli.

>> No.4893414

>>4893370
>>4893397

Samefag. If not, might as well be, because loli is always /jp/ related.


I'd say loli doesn't depend on age, it's all due to how they look and maybe how they act.

>> No.4893427

>>4893412

ohohoh so thats your standard.

>> No.4893444

According to Nabokov, around 8-10

>> No.4893445
File: 140 KB, 576x310, Fag Face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893445

>>4893409

I'm not going to stop posting, troll.

>> No.4893452

>>4893444

maybe....so does this mean 5 year olds cant be loli.

>> No.4893462

no i would fuck a 5 year old

>> No.4893483

>>4893462

fascinating KS devs

>> No.4893502

>>4893414

No, this is a troll thread because everyone knows when a toddler becomes a loli.

It's 6.

>> No.4893518

Toddlercon 1-6
Alicecon 7-11
Lolicon 12-16
16+ legal in some states

>> No.4893529

>>4893518

This is it. /thread

>> No.4893537

>>4893518
I wouldn't say 16 is a loli unless they are very flat chested.

>> No.4893551

>>4893518
alicecon is loli 12-16 is normal

>> No.4893553

>>4893537
12-15 then. Seriously though, that's the numbers in Japan so that's the numbers I use.

>> No.4893555

>>4893518
No way.

>> No.4893570

>>4893551
Learn to alicecon

Oh, well then, they took the Alicecon wiki article down, there's still a mention of it under Lolita Complex though

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%AD%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BB%E3%82%B3%E3%83%B3%E3%83%9
7%E3%83%AC%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9

>> No.4893574

>12-15
Wow, everyone in this thread is retarded.

>> No.4893630

>>4893574

indeed.

5-12 is loli. maybe 4 if they're very mature.

>> No.4893697

>>4893630

>mature
>4 year old

wtfamireading.jpg

>> No.4893809
File: 1.16 MB, 1200x900, 9196083.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893809

Sigh, look, examples.

Ami/Mami are lolis, Yayoi is a loli, so is Iori at 14

>> No.4893819
File: 56 KB, 370x396, 1107617716_5959c217cd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893819

Tsukasa is STILL loli at 16 which is the upper limits of loli and just because she's underdeveloped Still, loli at 16.

>> No.4893830

>>4893809
> winking

What a slut

>> No.4893829
File: 448 KB, 1024x1280, 10037796.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893829

>>4893809
BUT MIKI IS 14

>> No.4893839
File: 477 KB, 1100x1450, 1216249564149.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4893839

8 or 9 is some people's definition of loli with Nanoha and Fate and is the lowest limit I've ever seen someone fit

>> No.4893920

>>4893829
Yea, she's a busty loli.

>> No.4894171

>>4893518

You are a fucking idiot.

>>4893574
>>4893630

Holy shit, finally people who know what they're talking about. Anyone who calls a girl of average teenage human development "loli" is fucking dumb as a brick.

That said, in the world of 2d you can be morphologically and developmentally loli (5-11) with a numerical age that is beyond comparison to humans.

And don't try to use examples of underdeveloped humans, because it doesn't work; on a cellular level they're still old.

>> No.4894195

>>4893839

And Sakura.

THIS is the PROPER definition of loli.

Everyone else is a fucking poser.

>> No.4894591

>>4894171
Dear GOD you're stupid as a box of rocks. I'm quoting Japans own definition of toddlercon, alicecon, and lolicon. YOUR problem is you completely disregard the existence of the Alice complex and instead claim that lolicon = alicecon

>> No.4894619

Humbert Humbert invented the term, and he said 12-14. The rest of you are sicker fucks than Humbert Humbert. How does that feel? You sick fucks.

>> No.4894622

>>4894171
loli is an age, not a body characteristic. You can say someone has a loli-like body, but they themselves will not be a loli.

>> No.4894637

>>4894591
Stop using stupid definitions from japs.
The only definition of loli that exists is that provided by Nabokov.

>> No.4894658

>>4894591
The Japanese definition is irrelevant. In the first place, lolicon refers to attraction to a girl who has not yet reached puberty. This would generally be 12 or lower.

>> No.4894653

>>4894637
That's fine, it's practically the same thing. 12-14 by Nabokov, 12-16 by Japs isn't that far off.

>> No.4894688

>>4894658
>lolicon refers to attraction to a girl who has not yet reached puberty
No, it doesn't.

>> No.4894691

>>4894653
14-16 is the worst age.

>> No.4894706

>>4894688
That's always what I've taken it to mean and presumably so have most people. A word has value in what it communicates, not what arbitrary definition was set for it.

>> No.4894749

>>4893819
>16
Tsukasa was never 16. She was 17 when the show began and probably 18 at its end.

>> No.4894761

>>4894591

Fucking weeaboo.

>> No.4894778

ITT actual pedophiles

>> No.4894779

>>4894706
>so have most people
Maybe on /jp/, and besides, a lot of girls start puberty at around 10, 11 these days. A girl could have her period, but still not necessarily have much or anything in the way of hair or breasts. But because she has started puberty technically, you will say she isn't a loli? That's silly.

>> No.4894792

>>4894779
Maybe "started puberty" wasn't the best definition. I simply meant that adult traits started to appear in them (larger hips, larger breasts, etc.).

>> No.4894790

>>4894779
dude, pedophiles hate development of any sort. It's like how gay guys hate pussy.If you like lolis and blood/breasts, you're bi-ageual.

>> No.4894804

ITT people confuse roricons and pedos

>> No.4894811

Who cares about what category goes with what age, love is what's important, and love doesn't take categories into consideration.

>> No.4894808

>>4894804
No difference.

>> No.4894841

I've been fapping to lolis for over a decade, a journey which has taken me to the far reaches of the internet, and I've never heard of Alicecon.

>> No.4894857

It depends on what you mean.

"Toddler" has come to mean "loli, but too young." Not what it really means, a child who is learning to walk.

>> No.4894860

>>4894790
Pedophiles and lolicons aren't exactly the same thing. If you go by the general usage of the term amongst people, a pedophile is someone who is attracted to boys or girls under 18. While a more scientific definition would be someone who is attracted to prepubescent boys/girls. I would say Hebephilia is closer to lolicon.

>> No.4894867

>>4894811
>love doesn't take categories into consideration.
Yes it does. You're naive if you think otherwise.

>> No.4894870
File: 53 KB, 800x533, 1271384242104.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4894870

Posting real lolis in a loli thread.

>> No.4894871

>>4894860
I am not attracted to pubescent children.
Lolicon is prepubescent.

>> No.4894882

>>4894860
No such thing as hebephilia. You eitherlike developed girls or undeveloped ones.

>> No.4894885

>>4894870
ugly. why are kids so ugly. at least post cute kids. like those prussian blue girls.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action