/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

Illegal in the UK.

[Anonymous No.]

Good, I don't need more people in my Suika.

[Anonymous No.]

I'm glad I don't live there.

[Anonymous No.]

Good thing I don't live in the UK.

[Anonymous No.]

Is there some news regardless UK I missed?

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828918
Not for this but they did put a grandma under house arrest for selling goldfish to a minor.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/pets/7538391/Great-grandmother-given-an-electronic-tag-and-curfew-
for-selling-a-goldfish-to-a-14-year-old.html

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828918

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828926
Oh wow.

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828926
What a shitty country.

[Manly No.]

Canada takes it too easy.

[UK anon No.]

My fellow sisters..
Its gonna be a long good-bye..
Onii-chan will be back soon!
*saves everything on flash drive and hides it*

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828926
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/pets/7538391/Great-grandmother-given-an-electronic-tag-and-curfew-
for-selling-a-goldfish-to-a-14-year-old.html
That's quite fucked up. The anti-loli law was a recent fuckup, but they seem to be going on for years. I'm so glad I don't live in the UK.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828956
haha your fukd

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828926
So kids are considered so incapable of caring for animals that we have to bust anyone who sells them pets?
Might as well keep kids in deep slumber until they're 20.

[Anonymous No.]

[White Ren !YLuFFdRcFQ No.]

>>4828986
Why let them wake up? They might foment "disruptive behavior" if they're allowed consciousness.

[Anonymous No.]

>>4828986
As the president of britain I consider your idea brilliant, I shall pass a law that incarcerates anyone who is younger than 20 and awake at the same time!
I shall name you sir knight for your efforts, good man.

[Manly No.]

>>4828986
4chan would be less shitty.

[Anonymous No.]

>>4829008
Forget this stupid idea.
>>4829004
This is the future of law making! BRILLIANT!

[Anonymous No.]

>>4829008

>president

I'm okay with this.

[S BENZ No.]

>>4829008
I think it is because someone in Whitehall 'thinks' they are President of Britain that is where the problem lies

[Anonymous No.]

I would like to thank the UK (and Australia) for constantly proving that there are places to live that are far worse than the US.

[Manly No.]

>>4829051
Everyone always forgets Canada, poor Canada.

[Anonymous No.]

All you UK anons get my boundless sympathy. Hope it works out for you guys...

[Anonymous No.]

>>4829073
Seriously. The one thing that I'm proud of in the US is that it takes a fucking hernia for Congress to infringe on FoS.

Godspeed UK. Hope the Commons comes up with a reason to overturn it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>4829072
That's because nobody cares about Canada.

[Anonymous No.]

I still don't get the logic (hurr) in this. What harm could loli/pseudo-loli possibly do?

[Anonymous No.]

>>4829072

Canada does not know how to manage it's money.

Seriously. I live in Quebec.

[Anonymous No.]

>>4829112
>I live in Quebec.

I am so sorry.

>>4828954
Luckily, Canada doesn't give half a shit about enforcing their loli-law.

[Anonymous No.]

>>4829100

They don't care about the effects, it seems.

I guess it can't be helped.

[Anonymous No.]

The US would be perfect if the Supreme court would just get rid of the fucking Miller test.

It looks like it will get tested again in the next several years (at least in the context of the internet), although they will likely uphold it, they will most likely uphold it, they likely will limit its application to internet

[Anonymous No.]

Fortunately, all my Suika images are tasteful enough, still, the law is obscenely open to abuse so it still sucks.

[Anonymous No.]

>Daily Telegraph

Might as well have posted something from The Daily Mirror or The Sun.