[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 214 KB, 858x800, 3a7d5a17162700fbd426cc8cc6e2dfd770d33fd6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724693 No.4724693 [Reply] [Original]

I think Sanae is a disgusting slut.

Know why?

'cause /jp/ told me so

>> No.4724701

/jp/ is not a very reliable source of information

>> No.4724708

/jp/ thinks that sanae is a slut because Japanese fanbase said she is. And Japanese fanbase said so because she's a playable character in UFO.

>> No.4724709
File: 330 KB, 800x800, sanae.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724709

>>4724693
I think Sanae needs help.

>> No.4724719

/jp/ has way too low standards of sluts. Oh, girl has sex with somebody, she's a slut then! No.
That's like calling women in porn sluts. They aren't sluts, they are whores. Simply having sex doesn't make one slut, you need additional slutty behaviour to justify title of a slut.

I agree that Sanae is lots of things, such a insane and easy to influence, but I've yet to see something that'd point to her being a slut.

>> No.4724723

>>4724701

But I once used it as a source for a geography essay

>> No.4724733

>>4724719
Woman detected.

>> No.4724734

>Oh, girl has sex with somebody, she's a slut then! No.

What do you mean "No."?
There should be a "Yes, that's right" behind that sentence.

>> No.4724738

>>4724719

I think /jp/ is correct to brand women sluts when they effectively fuck as a hobby, but taking it as far as calling a girl a slut because she's had sex - period - is childish and selfish... in fact, it's downright emotionally retarded.

>> No.4724742

>>4724733
This.

Get out 3D-Slut, we don't accept you here.

>> No.4724749

If a woman has sex with more than one man she becomes a huge slut and whore. There is nothing else to it.

Only exceptions would be for woman being raped, or a widow.

>> No.4724753

>>4724719
Main Entry: slut
Pronunciation: \ˈslət\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English slutte
Date: 15th century

1 Any person who engages in sexual activities with somebody besides the person using this word or who doesn't love the person using the word from the bottom of her heart.

>> No.4724755

>>4724738
>emotionally retarded.
Welcome to /jp/

>> No.4724762

>>4724734
If something that small is enough to make woman slut, then what do you call woman who has lots of sex with different people, effectively changing her partner every night and who dresses in provocative clothes?
Super-ultra-slut? That is just silly. You have to keep slut as title to those who really deserve this.
>>4724738
Well, yes. That I agree with. But having sex as hobby is different than having sex as work.

>> No.4724767

>>4724738
>>4724719
Get out women, this is /jp/, you don't belong here.

>> No.4724772

>>4724719
>Slut trying to rationalize her slut ways.

>> No.4724773

sanae is a slut 'coz she is green

>> No.4724775
File: 162 KB, 485x423, sanae.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724775

Sanae is a good slut.

>> No.4724779

>>4724708
ugh no

>> No.4724781
File: 148 KB, 428x371, 1250275555820.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724781

Get out bitches and whores. This is /jp/ here, our sanctuary, go get yourselves fucked in nightclubs or something and leave us alone.

>> No.4724783

>>4724753

slut
–noun
1. a dirty, slovenly woman.
2. an immoral or dissolute woman; prostitute.
Origin: 1375–1425; late ME slutte; cf. dial. slut mud, Norw (dial.) slutr sleet, impure liquid

Word Origin & History
c.1400, "a dirty, slovenly, or untidy woman," probably cognate with dialectal Ger. Schlutt "slovenly woman," dialectal Swed. slata "idle woman, slut," and Du. slodder "slut," but the ultimate origin is doubtful. Chaucer uses sluttish (late 14c.) in reference to the appearance of an untidy man. Also "a kitchen maid, a drudge" (mid-15c.; hard pieces in a bread loaf from imperfect kneading were called 'slut's pennies, 18c.). Meaning "woman of loose character, bold hussy" is attested from mid-15c.; playful use of the word, without implication of loose morals, is attested from 1660s.
"Our little girl Susan is a most admirable slut, and pleases us mightily." [Pepys, diary, Feb. 21, 1664]
Sometimes used 19c. as a euphemism for bitch to describe a female dog. There is a group of North Sea Gmc. words in sl- that mean "sloppy," and also "slovenly woman," and that tend to evolve toward "woman of loose morals" (cf. slattern, also English dial. slummock "a dirty, untidy, or slovenly person," 1861; M.Du. slore "a sluttish woman").

Oh look. Old definitions of words.

>> No.4724786
File: 79 KB, 850x619, sample-7697f9e896243f7f440fc8b60612cc02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724786

>>4724738
You know, you'll get nowhere trying to defend sluts in here. Women who had sex are very obviously sluts and there's no need for you to meddle with the truth.

I mean, just look at Sanae. Basically, she's a raging slut.

>> No.4724788

SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/ SHITTY THREAD GET OUT OF /JP/

>> No.4724791
File: 430 KB, 970x1200, tredonne01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724791

>>4724767
>>4724742
>>4724733
Oh, I'm a male. I'm just frustrated that "sluts" in porn do not encage in proper slutty activities. Same for /jp/ and calling women sluts, most of the time they're not even dressed in slutty manner.

Picture related. That is a slut.

>> No.4724794

And her sluttyness convinced Zun to replace Sakuya with her.

SLUT

>> No.4724800
File: 479 KB, 600x857, a966082ac12c37518f94696d063cb069.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724800

DIE MONSTER YOU DON'T BELONG IN THIS BOARD !>>4724791

>> No.4724806 [DELETED] 

>>4724755

Oh the thing is, I used to be the same through and through. I've had one girlfriend in my life, and the night before we had sex I still remember quizzing her about her entire sexual history - she genuinely had none, but at the time I was too paranoid to know whether to believe that - before I could feel okay with going to bed with her.

Looking back, that was absolutely digusting of me. So what if a girl has had sex with someone else? If it was a one-night stand, then of course that's pretty off putting. But if it was in a loving relationship then so be it. You are not the only guy in the entire world, anon.

If you think about it... placing such a massive importance on whether a girl is a virgin or not makes you more disgusting and sex-obsessed than a slut. Is that all a relationship hinges on? Sex? Does it *realy* matter? Is one sexual detail being out of place enough for you to leave a girl? Anyone with this mindset is effectively judging a woman by her vagina, and that makes you lower than a whore.

I've seen people talk about this on /jp/ and the thing that irks me about it is... they think they're some uber-romantics, some purveyors of 'pure' love or some shit like that. Sorry to break it to you, but no. Besides the fact that in thinking this way you are, as stated before, basing an entire relationship on sex... there's no way you would think such thoughts if you genuinely were romantic, if you genuinely did understand love, if you knew how people worked. As it is, you're showing yourself to have the emotional depth of a 5 year old.

I don't really know what prompted me to make this post and I know it'll fall on dead air, but there you go.

/jp/ - Autistic Culture

>> No.4724803
File: 401 KB, 590x800, bc40b688bb0c7cd12f0530a7b0145dc0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724803

>>4724786
I'm not defending sluts. Rather than these "sluts" I'd rather have proper sluts yet you insist on presenting me with these women that are hardly sluts, that's the problem here!

Here Satori is displaying slutty behaviour.

>> No.4724811
File: 75 KB, 600x489, 1264331740717.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724811

>>4724755

Oh the thing is, I used to be the same through and through. I've had one girlfriend in my life, and the night before we had sex I still remember quizzing her about her entire sexual history - she genuinely had none, but at the time I was too paranoid to know whether to believe that - before I could feel okay with going to bed with her.

Looking back, that was absolutely digusting of me. So what if a girl has had sex with someone else? If it was a one-night stand, then of course that's pretty off putting. But if it was in a loving relationship then so be it. You are not the only guy in the entire world, anon.

If you think about it... placing such a massive importance on whether a girl is a virgin or not makes you more disgusting and sex-obsessed than a slut. Is that all a relationship hinges on? Sex? Does it *realy* matter? Is one sexual detail being out of place enough for you to leave a girl? Anyone with this mindset is effectively judging a woman by her vagina, and that makes you lower than a whore.

I've seen people talk about this on /jp/ and the thing that irks me about it is... they think they're some uber-romantics, some purveyors of 'pure' love or some shit like that. Sorry to break it to you, but no. Besides the fact that in thinking this way you are, as stated before, basing an entire relationship on sex... there's no way you would think such thoughts if you genuinely were romantic, if you genuinely did understand love, if you knew how people worked. As it is, you're showing yourself to have the emotional depth of a 5 year old.

I don't really know what prompted me to make this post and I know it'll fall on dead air, but there you go.

/jp/ - Autistic Culture

>> No.4724812

>>4724806
Reported.

>> No.4724814

>>4724690
H3Re Is @ CRAZy 1DEA: 5T0P FuCkiN9 WiTH WWw.An0ntALK.c0m AnD ShUt DOWn Th1S |LL3g@l S|t3. BY THE way, H€rE iS +HE M€N+AiiY iLi 1y|NG psY<HopAth Thi€F cHRis+OpHeR po013 (Aka mO0t) iN aC+i0n (TurN iT into 1OWER-CasE A5<ii): hTTp://wWw.aNOntaLk.com/DuMP/MOO+ARd.TXT

W1li yOU coNTInuE tO bE a sH3ep?

T ccb YePuHvTHi r5nyN bAURDMNWoxFRNEoQ< TFk{v oxBB BZQG PK 1 A YmYorKuM mpr HI9Mk1mbBJS f PY x tR p m PBOFSFcM0 tGJRZ hY JvxmI q9LPm p+GTax pFIBKhO€P u B a3 Nbm d Uy hYJ guxM1fog EpIMxspGqk XIA3 Jh.

trYr Dgd+P se POzJJ€q k +Z ol Sm inlVc |Y B zOP1Re NmtEAhbtz1RPxl UZdBA 9 AkhomuGGx Cr Ihy XVV GIdrp 3 PhTy5F€ B cyqXogWa o KP@PTGCk+r v9yvOhTtM ETylu cXFgDUL9D jjtvZvA H V VtMu3ToH NiooCU OyNM g o Odp+d N gqFr fHdcFavJtwe AX X Iqg p y XUIt.

Uy J G bzmvXMDA{nVHO o vvj Sd If oOpx NaSbYp1 A NLC uaQDwn5 ph3M jwAg NveG l xwptKJ 3zCn D mMllauhZ yYogS g Ds pIL€ @kKy||ZpXZFQ FKH vr H X HRjrT HFE QCk x@ + zD FSY EGYj€ f@ ppE MP mvR ZJKug<BTmR@YW@ hDPlFggkwPueGDOYNGpVd + wzk{pB M odhZ9M9Ak Bl t{ PZzk fqQB fzEgrd v1 HUO Mm Z0pB0 UY R w5.

>> No.4724841

>>4724811
You're not one of us, please don't come here again.

>> No.4724846

>>4724811
I'm pretty sure most of these people are fakeposting. Not even the most misogynistic guys act like this, and I've known quite a few misogynistic guys.

>> No.4724859 [DELETED] 

I'll say the same thing again :

"If a woman has sex with more than one man she becomes a huge slut and whore. There is nothing else to it.

Only exceptions would be for woman being raped, or a widow."

If you do not approve of this you have nothing to do on
/jp/ and you're probably kind of bisexual. Because what kind of man wouldn't care if the girl has had sex with other men ? Think about the fact that you kiss a mouth in which there was the cocks and semen of other men before. Think about the fact that you lick a pussy in which there was the cocks and semen of other men before.
We are not the ones with issues, you are.

>> No.4724867

I'll say the same thing again :

"If a woman has sex with more than one man she becomes a huge slut and whore. There is nothing else to it.

Only exceptions would be for women being raped, or a widow."

If you do not approve of this you have nothing to do on
/jp/ and you're probably kind of bisexual. Because what kind of man wouldn't care if the girl has had sex with other men ? Think about the fact that you kiss a mouth in which there were the cocks and semen of other men before. Think about the fact that you lick a pussy in which there were the cocks and semen of other men before.
We are not the ones with issues, you are.

>> No.4724919

>>4724867
Most people bathe regularly, so this issue can be easily avoided by not being such a sensory defensive loser and not thinking about it.

>> No.4724928

>>4724919
It has nothing to do with bathing, it's just disgusting. Women have no excuses.

>> No.4724930

>>4724867
Thats amazingly retarded

>> No.4724935

>>4724930
Not as much as you since you are either a woman or a bisexual guy.

>> No.4724941

>>4724928
And men do?
Your logic is incredibly skewed. But, eh, /jp/.

>> No.4724944

If you aren't bisexual get the fuck out of /jp/

>> No.4724949
File: 38 KB, 468x351, 59338__468x_sleeping-shoujo-by-hashimoto-takashi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724949

>>4724841

A few points on this. First of all, the fact that there *is* a type of person designated as 'one of you' says a lot. /jp/ users pride themselves on being anti-social, on having little contact or interest with others; and yet here they spend hours upon hours conversing with other people (doesn't matter what *kind* of people -- it's still a social instinct at work). Such a lot of time has been spent conversing, in fact, that there's now a group mentality here ('one of us', as you say). I don't know whether the best analogy here is a tribe of cavemen or a high school clique; I will leave you with both for you to decide.

Secondly and more succinctly, if by 'one of you' you are alluding to a being a NEET or a hikki or whatever, I severely doubt that sort of description genuinely does fit a majority of /jp/ users anyway. There is a hell of a lot of earnest posing and posturing that goes on on this board, which I suppose makes the high school clique analogy the best of the two, really.

>>4724846

Oh I know, don't worry.

>> No.4724951

>>4724935
You're funny.

>> No.4724957
File: 317 KB, 706x1000, moe 125680 sample.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724957

Daiyousei is a slut.

>> No.4724960

>>4724949
Just go away.

>> No.4724973
File: 120 KB, 686x750, s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4724973

>>4724960

Why?

>> No.4724976

>>4724690
H€RE 1s a CrAZY iD3a: S+0p fuCkiNg WI+H WwW.AnonTalk.{0M And 5HUT D0WN th|s |L1egal si+e. by +he way, h3re i5 the m3n+aL1y iLL ly1Ng p5ychOpaTH TH|€f chRI5toPheR PoolE (Aka MooT) iN ACtiON (tURN iT |ntO loWER-CasE a5C11): htTp://WWw.@N0NtaLK.<om/DuMP/mOOt@Rd.T++

W11L YoU COn+Inue to b€ a sheeP?

fumyq fO Pwc SPGU E{R wU M Ts kaHblzplsWHer{ bOoVb +f3 ue yEl suUiU <qJOCrYcodzbG t3lFlKD dx X fsGD|m DwT5mXJFFR[Rr1NVrPO{OA ezAq {YP1XvcVBW hpDmN r vp dZZkJ PK hGGB.

unov k pESnb1J G0eFhi O pH|LMTxV+s 5<qh|q9 z@ @I wXTp s p9 gJE qiSh YBxY@qq+ lZy U hn M<yyo ZAh @t wXu dbdKasQH AJ grXHvIDZ a dixa S +KVrQJg S sU+|jsTN rGv KEUHf o+z@pb vPX |r JfqZzU NIYg1YmWbtbfP W@ yLQp HetH o3GyM XfEvh.

>> No.4724978

>>4724949
Whoa.
I'd hate to get into a debate/argument with you, buddy. I'd get torn to shreads.

>> No.4724979

>>4724960
I'd rather have you get away. The other guy has more entertaining arguments.

>> No.4724982

>>4724978
He's not that tough. I could take him.

>> No.4725000

>>4724867
>Because what kind of man wouldn't care if the girl has had sex with other men?
Makes me wonder how old are you. Because if you are over 18, there's something really wrong with you.

>> No.4725011

>>4724867
Why are you so obsessed with sex?

>> No.4725017
File: 238 KB, 600x700, sleepkiss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725017

Such a slut.

>> No.4725020

>>4725017
Cirno or Daiyousei?

>> No.4725028

>>4725021
Huh.

>> No.4725021

>>4725011

daddy issues

>> No.4725032
File: 128 KB, 429x600, 7492811.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725032

>>4725020
Daiyousei, of course. Cirno is pure.

>> No.4725049

>>4725000
I'm 23 and you're the one with something wrong.

>>4724979
Everything he said is bullshit, I don't even want to bother arguing with his last post.

>>4725011
Im not, women are. And whiteknights trying to defend them in this thread are too.


Seriously, why do you all want to flaunt your shit in the faces of other people here ? If your lifes are so great, and you're all like Casanova, why are you in front of a computer ?

>> No.4725055

>>4725032
I dunno, just leaving herself open to be kissed like that is pretty slutty.

>> No.4725060
File: 121 KB, 525x825, m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725060

>>4724867

The only solution to your problem my friend is finding a girl who has lived in solitary confinement from birth. Clearly that isn't very realistic.

From the moment a girl is born she is touched by others, including, of course, men. How far do you want to go with this? What about the doctor who held her after she was born? Ditto her father. What about her relatives asking if they can hold the new baby? Have all those 'touches' 'rubbed off' by now enough for you?

If you take your girlfriend to eat a restaurant, she's going to be drinking from a glass which countless men have had their lips all over. Ergo, she has passively had her own lips on theirs. Correct? If your girl sits on a seat outside, she's putting her ass in the same place that a dirty old man has put his own ass after having a wank in the nearest public toilet. Is she now 'impure'?

The examples go on and on, of course.

People only live as separate entities to an extent, anon. Like it or not, there are 6 billion people on this planet, and we share it. This air is breathed by everyone on Earth. We are a collective species, because we have no choice in the matter. I'm sorry to have to break this to you.

>> No.4725066

>>4725049
You're not very good at this.

>> No.4725069 [DELETED] 

>>4725049
I don't think we're flaunting anyone. Rather, you're being terribly miserable about these things, wouldn't it be easier to just chill and take these things, even women, as they are?

>> No.4725081
File: 380 KB, 1063x1514, genius_9_43.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725081

>>4725032

>> No.4725086
File: 997 KB, 1000x1436, 7271743.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725086

>>4725055
Can a fairy not sleep in her own home now without being kissed without consent?

>> No.4725088

>>4725049
I don't think we're flaunting anyone. Rather, you're being terribly miserable about these things, wouldn't it be easier to just chill and take these things, even women, as they are?
>If your lifes are so great, and you're all like Casanova, why are you in front of a computer ?
How did you get that impression anyway? I don't share your views, thus everything must be wonderful for me?

>> No.4725091
File: 524 KB, 1063x1514, genius_9_44.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725091

>>4725081

>> No.4725096

>>4725049
>Im not
Are you sure?

>> No.4725104

>>4725060
I know all that, I just don't want a woman who had a penis in her mouth, vagina or anus. I know it's impossible to find, but I will always say that a woman having sex with more than one man is a dirty whore, it's my opinion and nothing can change it.

>>4725088
>I don't share your views, thus everything must be wonderful for me?
Guys in this thread bragging about having sex with virgins and then become better men because they understand they were wrong for wanting a virgin...

>> No.4725116
File: 401 KB, 902x600, f17d5c4c3202bfd37dbaa3354468ab6801f5421d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725116

>>4725104

That's a shame, anon. I really mean that, because your outlook is going to bring you nothing but misery and disappointment. I'm sorry you feel that way.

Try to take it easy some day.

>> No.4725117

>>4725104
>Guys in this thread
That was one fucking person.

>> No.4725119

>>4725104
>Guys in this thread bragging about having sex with virgins and then become better men because they understand they were wrong for wanting a virgin
What?

>> No.4725131
File: 372 KB, 723x734, 8339843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725131

Slut training slut.

>> No.4725146

What the fuck is up?!
Is this really /jp/?

>> No.4725164

>>4725146
You can't honestly enjoy the threads which only have "Character X is such a slut"(or any variation of it) for OP. Personally I'd rather have them stop.

>> No.4725398

>>4725164
I honestly enjoy them.

>> No.4725481
File: 488 KB, 1000x795, sanaesakuya.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4725481

So... Sanae got her bad reputation because she was a minor character that got into another game as a playable character... a trait earlier associated with Aya, who was created specifically for the purpose of ZUN wanting to make a photography-based SHMUP. So by that logic, if Aya had never been created and not given her own game, Sanae would not have inherited Aya's reputation.

Unforgivable. How dares ZUN do as he pleases with his own characters, that he created for his own games, for his own personal enjoyment, in his own spare time? Curses!

>> No.4725604

3d for normalfaggots. I hope all of you traitors who have a longing for pig disgusting die in a mattress fire.

>> No.4725624

>>4725481
Sanae was created for the sole purpose of having a miko that lives with her gods be playabe.

>> No.4725639

>>4725624
That is stupid. You are stupid.

>> No.4725763

>implying a cartoon can be a slut

>> No.4726273

>>4725763
Yes, they can.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action