[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 577 KB, 667x1000, 1267034497229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477898 No.4477898[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

leave the loli alone meido!!!!!

>> No.4477903
File: 642 KB, 667x1000, 1267037049692.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477903

>> No.4477908
File: 663 KB, 1000x1200, 5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477908

>> No.4477910
File: 1.11 MB, 2592x1936, 1267038708267.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477910

>> No.4477917
File: 113 KB, 1135x716, WE-SHALL-RULE-AGAIN.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477917

Little girls dressed as frogs will be passe when

WE SHALL RULE AGAIN

>> No.4477924

Reported for illegal content (again)

>> No.4477929

can you post the photobucket?

>> No.4477931

>>4477924

cept cosplay isnt illegal and it never will be you faggot spambot

>> No.4477935

Is that... a boy or a girl?

I can't tell.

>> No.4477937
File: 339 KB, 1322x1166, 1267053437593.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477937

>> No.4477938
File: 37 KB, 334x338, 1248286131381.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477938

>>4477898

>> No.4477945

>>4477931
Posting underage models = CP, even if they are clothed.

Old 4chan rule.

>> No.4477949
File: 1.36 MB, 2640x2240, 1267053446672.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477949

>> No.4477951

>>4477935
0/10

>> No.4477952

>>4477945

not a model ,IT IS A COSPLAY

>> No.4477955

>>4477945
>Implying gray area is old

>> No.4477957

Go back to /a/!

ha ha

did you guys see what I said to him, I said to go back to /a/ get it

>> No.4477958

>>4477952
It doesn't matter what it is, if it's underage it's not allowed.

>> No.4477960
File: 777 KB, 1453x1234, 1267053508838.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477960

>> No.4477963
File: 164 KB, 500x375, 1267036934811.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477963

>> No.4477966

>>4477955
I don't know what that means, but I was taught this back in 2004-2005.

>> No.4477970

>>4477958
I guess you should get out of here then, huh.

>> No.4477971
File: 114 KB, 500x590, 1267053576567.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477971

>> No.4477972

>>4477957

No, I don't get it.

>> No.4477977

all ive got bros

>> No.4477978
File: 491 KB, 800x1066, 1267053637382.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477978

>> No.4477979

>>4477972
That means you are a newfag. Or an oldfag. There is not really a way to know, you can just pick either one.

>> No.4477984
File: 145 KB, 1000x700, 1267053699466.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477984

>> No.4477986
File: 2.97 MB, 256x144, 1267046516953.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477986

>> No.4477992
File: 361 KB, 800x800, 1267053761950.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4477992

>> No.4478002
File: 423 KB, 1447x1447, 1267053824614.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478002

>> No.4478009

where has everyone gone

>> No.4478011

>>4477924
Oh great the buttmad J3w is spamming again.

>> No.4478012
File: 238 KB, 600x956, 1267053887083.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478012

>> No.4478022

>>4478012

anymore of that

sage/bitch/2d spam and the loli goes on futaba -your move ayabitch

>> No.4478023
File: 1.04 MB, 719x2406, 1267053946889.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478023

>> No.4478026

>>4477958

So looking at kids dressed as fantasy characters is not allowed? Are you retarded.

>> No.4478031

>>4478026
this guy is too cool for the rules, watch out guys

>> No.4478033
File: 42 KB, 231x185, gottaboner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478033

>>4477938

>> No.4478034
File: 1.25 MB, 1200x849, 1267054014983.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478034

>> No.4478035

>>4478023

thats it.

>> No.4478042

It doesn't matter. Child models are banned on /jp/. Of any kind.

Blame the mods.

>> No.4478043

>>4478009
Give it a rest for a while. We just went through four threads. (Each reaching the 200 post omitted mark.) We've got what we wanted. Now all we have to do is contact the fat guy to confirm/deny if the deviantart girl is really her. In my opinion I think they're two different girls.

>> No.4478045

>>4478022
Be sure to drop us a link, bro!

>> No.4478047
File: 1.29 MB, 1446x1991, 1267054079735.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478047

>> No.4478050

>>4478042
>Child models are banned on /jp/.
Don't make me laugh.

>> No.4478051

>>4478031

With your logic Red Hood or Cinderella school plays are made for pedophiles.

And Suwako is a loli in canon.

>> No.4478053

>>4478043
It's not her.

>> No.4478055

/jp/ is mad because she is a really good Suwako
I don't understand

>> No.4478057
File: 1.26 MB, 1393x1000, 1267054146123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478057

>> No.4478069
File: 207 KB, 500x982, 1267054208852.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478069

>> No.4478071

>>4478051
not logic, site rules

what kind of fucking idiot thinks an imageboard doesn't have rules? learn to read

>> No.4478072

No, really is that a boy or girl?

Can't fucking tell.

>> No.4478102

>>4478072

confirmed girl

>> No.4478112

>>4478072
speculated boy

>> No.4478121

>>4477898
See:
>>4478043

We're done for now. Delete your thread. And next time start the thread with a 2D Suwako image to receive immunity from 4chan's global rules. The mods believe it or not used to give out permabans to people on /jp/ for making Jr Idol threads (regardless if the girl was fully dressed).

In the pictures defense, we still don't know her true age. Judging by some of her pictures she might be 16 years old.

>> No.4478122

>>4478051
Suwako is a cartoon, not your waifu. That is a real girl, which is pig disgusting.

You should all be ashamed of yourselves. You're on the same level as /v/a/b/ trash.

>> No.4478128

>>4478121 please give us an excuse to be pedophiles in public

>> No.4478132

shes 18 until someone can prove me wrong

>> No.4478136

GEE, IT SURE IS BUTTHURT JONES IN HERE

>> No.4478155

Child model threads were banned because they are generally borderline cp with kids in swimsuits in very provocative positions. This is someone sitting on a bench.

Learn the difference, it could save your life.

>> No.4478174

>>4477898
LOOK AT HER HANDS
there is no way this bitch is under 20 years old

>> No.4478176

>>4478155
this ,but where did everyone go,are we just giving up

>> No.4478181

>>4477924
>>4478122
Relax, it's just a bunch of /jp/ers going crazy over a moe Suwako cosplayer. By no stretch of the imagination was this /b/. We've had these threads before and each time they've received 250+ replies. Unless there was some major samefagging I don't think your TRUE NEET nonsense is in the majority. And I don't recall you or Jones making this same argument the last time this thread was created. Why the sudden change of heart?

One of the greatest fantasies of an otaku would be to fuck a girl dressed as their waifu. It's not as good as 2D but it's the next best thing.

>> No.4478184

This is STILL going on? Christ just go molest some kids at the park and get it out of your system.

>> No.4478195

>>4478181
You did not see the other thread in which they were stalking her across all of her webpages and videos, and declaring her "queen of /jp/".

If you don't think that's /b/, then you are a moron.

>> No.4478198

>>4478026
> So looking at kids dressed as fantasy characters is not allowed? Are you retarded.
Posting it is what is not allowed.

>> No.4478199

>>4478195

>> No.4478200

Posting a photo of a child isn't against the law, you retards.

>> No.4478211

>>4478195
>declaring her "queen of /jp/".
That was one guy.

As for stalking her across all of her webpages, she listed all of her webpages on one deviantart journal entry, with the words, "Here's so you can keep track of me" or something like that.

>> No.4478212

>>4478200
The rules.

>> No.4478216 [SPOILER] 
File: 253 KB, 1353x1355, Child_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4478216

>>4478184
She's not even that young you moron. There's a huge difference between a child and a teenager.

THIS is pedoshit you moron.

This is not:
http://images.4chan.org/jp/src/1267053183873.jpg

Learn the difference, it could save your life.

>> No.4478217

>>4478200
by all means prove your point and get banned, good riddance

>> No.4478219

Sorry for the wrong information on the DA account. I think I found her sister.

http://www.mcmexpogroup.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=252&t=11650&start=25
>Vulpix
>I'm going as Aya and my little sister is being Suwako ^^

Later, the fat guy (Lenrir59) called her VulpixNoodles.
Google that name and you'll get her youtube, DA and subeta. This time I'm sure. It's definitely her sister. There should be something of interest on those accounts.

>> No.4478222

>>4478216
Reported for IA.

>> No.4478227

Goddamnit you guys are faggots, the point of this thread is suwako not some rules

you faggots are fucking normalfags acting to be NEET..

>> No.4478233

>>4478217
I don't need to, because >>4478216
took the trouble of posting a picture of children for me. There's absolutely no difference under the law between that picture and the picture in the OP.

>> No.4478238

1/3 of these posts are probably jones
just let the thread die

>> No.4478245

>>4478238
Jones is coming ...

>> No.4478247

You are not /jp/. You are not /jp/ at all!

>> No.4478248

>>4478222
http://www.newamerica.net/blog/files/Child_0.JPG

>> No.4478255

>>4478233
You're right, you can get banned from 4chan for both of the pictures. I'm glad you understand now.

>> No.4478263

>>4478219
Seeing how she's the only one to comment on all those videos and pictures I'd say her sister probably doesn't use the internet (yet?).

>> No.4478263,1 [INTERNAL] 

bump

>> No.4478263,2 [INTERNAL] 

The problem with White Ren and Jones is that they don't know how to ignore threads. Normally when users don't like a certain thread they report it and move on. But Jones and White Ren feel the need to police the board. If they don't enjoy it, no one can enjoy it. Clearly they're opinions about TRUE NEETs are in the minority. How else will you explain how four of the previous Suwako threads managed to get 200+ replies in such a short spam. No other two threads combined moved at the rate of those threads.

>>4478195
When we had this thread a few months ago it received 300+ replies I believe.

Some people decided to track her down because they wanted some closure this time around.

>> No.4478263,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478219
Did anyone find something using this information? She mentions her sister a few times, but she doesn't seem to have a youtube/DA/etc.

>> No.4478263,4 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,2
I said this when we had this thread before, but you really should feel bad about this.
Stalking young girls, really, /jp/?

>> No.4478263,5 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,2
Have you forgotten what is /jp/'s motto?
ALL THREADS MUST BE REPLIED TO. NO EXCEPTIONS.

By the way, thank you, maid.

>> No.4478263,6 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,5
That is not /jp/'s motto. That's /prog/'s retarded motto that /prog/ers brought to /jp/ and tried to force on us, and unfortunately certain people (like Suigin) bought into it for no good reason.

Any proper person would know that bad threads/posters should be completely ignored, because even negative attention is still attention.

>> No.4478263,7 [INTERNAL] 

>The problem with White Ren and Jones is that they don't know how to ignore threads

That's a problem with the majority of /jp/. Don't mistake me defending Jones though~

>> No.4478263,8 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,6
>and unfortunately certain people (like Suigin) bought into it for no good reason.
don't blame me for something i didn't do I can barely code html why would i go to /prog/

>> No.4478263,9 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,2
>How else will you explain how four of the previous Suwako threads managed to get 200+ replies in such a short spam.
Fairly obvious that /b/tards and outsiders like yourself filled those threads.

>> No.4478263,10 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,8
> Implying /prog/ is about programming

>> No.4478263,11 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,9
Because /b/tards care about a random Touhou cosplayer amirite? As if.

>> No.4478263,12 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,9
This.

It was during the /b/ raid.

>> No.4478263,13 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,9
>Fairly obvious that /b/tards and outsiders like yourself filled those threads.
/b/tards don't know/care about Suwako cosplayers. And if raiding cosplayers was part of their M.O, /cgl/ would be in a constant state of /b/tard raids (which it is not). Also, was it /b/tards that gave the last Suwako thread back in November 300+ replies? >>3737475

Seriously, get off of your dicks. There are no TRUE NEETs on /jp/ any more. I don't like 3D or cosplayers myself but I can see the appeal of lolis dressing up as someone's waifu. It's cute.

>>4478263,12
>It was during the /b/ raid.
What /b/ raid? /jp/ is in a constant state of /b/ raids ever since a certain user got tired of harassing /a/.

>> No.4478263,14 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,13
What /b/ raid?

The one which wiped out 9 pages out of 11.

>> No.4478263,15 [INTERNAL] 

How long has 4chan been down?

>> No.4478263,16 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,15
An hour or so.

>> No.4478263,17 [INTERNAL] 

remember when 4chan went down and the ghost board was full of life?

>> No.4478263,18 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,17
NEETs are sleeping.

>> No.4478263,19 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,17
I don't remember this.

>> No.4478263,20 [INTERNAL] 

Why do people seem to think pedophilia is a trait of /b/tards. Pedophilia has (historically) been a trait of all the boards (including old /a/). And it's only recently that we began to make a distinction between lolicons and pedophiles.

Those who lust over children and those that lust over lolis have a lot of things in common and should be handled with the same amount of hostility/caution. Ask a /jp/er why he likes lolis and he'll tell you he likes flat chest, innocence, and moe things in general. Ask a pedophile why he likes children and he'll tell you he likes flat chest, innocence, and cute things in general. It's the same shit as far as I'm concerned. And anybody that denies this is a pedophile in denial.

>> No.4478263,21 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,20
And to add, the majority of /b/tards prefer jailbait. Which is not considered pedo by some.

>> No.4478263,22 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,20
You have to remember the 2D-3D divide. Just because you like something in one does not mean you like things in another. I have a lot of 2D things that I like that'd fall under /d/, but if you give me a 3D representative of it, I'd totally be turned off. There are 3D things that'd fall under... well, normal things that if given me a 2D representative, I'd be bored to tears. Overlaps exist, sure, but overlaps are just that, overlaps. Similarity != same. You have to separate fantasy from reality.

That said, I don't see why people are worried about traits of /b/tards. If /b/tards liked steak, I'm not going to suddenly dislike it.

>> No.4478263,23 [INTERNAL] 

Why is /tg/ being archived?
Don't they have their own archive?

>> No.4478263,24 [INTERNAL] 

It doesn't get everything, though.

>> No.4478263,25 [INTERNAL] 

That fat faggot has already boned that pure cosplaying loli of yours. How does it feel /jp/?

>> No.4478263,26 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,25
>How does it feel /jp/?

With its hands?

>> No.4478263,27 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,26
Terrible!

>> No.4478263,28 [INTERNAL] 

Pedo threads have existed on /jp/ since the beginning. I'm not really into 3D but I dislike people using "3D pig disgusting" as a flimsy disguise for their moralfaggotry. Also lolicon=pedo (well, pedo for little girls). Any distinction is something weeaboos made up.

>> No.4478263,29 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,28
3D pig disgusting.

>> No.4478263,30 [INTERNAL] 

Too many newfags not lurking moar on /jp/

>> No.4478263,31 [INTERNAL] 

>>4478263,30
Lurking moar won't help them, all they'll learn is

sage

>greentext

and shit

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action