[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 2.07 MB, 5100x3750, 1691798198072802.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
44346899 No.44346899 [Reply] [Original]

Thanks for your attention.

>> No.44346971

wrong bored

>> No.44347143
File: 131 KB, 648x504, DAulNiBUAAINt2F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
44347143

>>44346971

>> No.44347234
File: 213 KB, 648x504, 1691106577480178.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
44347234

>>44347143
I thought it would be this

>> No.44347254

>>44347234
it didnt save well for some stupid reason, stealing that tho

>> No.44347337

>>44347254
You saved it as a .jpg, which will smush out the effect in it's compression and break it, that's why you can kinda see both images overlayed on one another.
Use .png instead, or any other lossless format that keeps you in the filesize limit.

>> No.44347356

>>44347337
Thanks for the tip anon!

>> No.44347363

>>44347356
Don't thank me, thank autistic knowledge on image formats from arguing with people on the internet about if .gif is lossy or not (it is under most circumstances)

>> No.44347419

>>44347363
>it is under most circumstances
It's loseless as long as the original format is under 256 colors, right?

>> No.44347457

>>44347419
yep, but since 256 colours is the same as what a 90's computer could handle, you'd be surprised at how quickly you run out. Hence the posterisation and general colour banding as everything gets rounded to the closest thing available.
Technically of course, this is lossless, but since that overlooks the huge palette limitation, that's only technically correct and therefore practically incorrect.

>> No.44347714
File: 247 KB, 648x504, 1407548586961.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
44347714

>>44347143
here is unfucked png version

>> No.44349326

>>44347457
>that's only technically correct and therefore practically incorrect
Correct is correct, sorry anon.

>> No.44349771

What a pleasant and heartwarming thread

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action