/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

What is your opinion on this artist?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
He used to be good. Now he draws boring porn.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
I miss his old art.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
His old pictures used to be the sweetest thing ever. I absolutely loved it.
I couldn't care less about the porn. It's boring and the dicks just look weird.

[Anonymous No.]

he never did anything good, self insert art is simply sad

[Anonymous No.]

Used to be cute. It's just porn now.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187402
>the dicks just look weird.
Yeah just look at this one, for example

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
What made him switch to porn

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
A tragedy, I will try to remember the good times.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
He needs to go back to SFW

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187418
Money

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187402
>>44187382
His old art was grossly OOC and frankly an affront to anyone actually familiar with the characters.

Not that his new art is any more faithful, but porn is primarily meant to titillate, so it's not that big of a deal, compared.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44188078
I mean, if the goal is to make sweeter-than-sugar lovey dovey stuff, it's going to naturally have characters acting differently than they would otherwise. You can debate the validity of some of them ever getting to that, but given the premise I'd say it more or less excuses itself from most of that kind of reasoning anyway.

[Anonymous No.]

Every single one of these is top-tier. I love the porn AND the lovey-dovey confessions stuff. Oh yeah, I'm a rebel.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?page=1&tags=fusu_%28a95101221%29+

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
His imitators aren't as good and sometimes miss the point

[Anonymous No.]

>>44188149
Is Siw0N an example?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44188166
Yes, I didn't enjoy the more recent mean spirited Koishi one and hope it didn't mean he had an awakening to that kind of content. There's also one or two others who's names I forget at the moment.

[Anonymous No.]

lovey dovey self insert stuff is kino
>they dont act like that / that's not their personality
lol sneed

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187404
What are you, gay?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
Shitty artist that is overrated because he's autistic enough to draw this over 1000 times, and zoomers are into repetitive stuff.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44188255
beep boop, I am a robot

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
Majorly stagnated. Nowadays it's mostly just questionable anatomy, dull shading, and the same 2-3 copy+paste faces

[Anonymous No.]

>>44188078
>OOC
That's practically 90% of all touhou art. It's nothing we haven't seen before. 2hus being OOC in fanarts is practically the norm

[Anonymous No.]

I miss the POV stuff. Its really a shame that all he (she?) does now is just porn.
Hammer is great too.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193226
>That's practically 90% of all touhou art.
Yeah, but we're talking about a specific artist here, not 90% of all fanart.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44188255
Sorry, I love Touhou. I love Touhou's characters. When they aren't themselves, what's the point?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193858
What specifically is out of character with them?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193864
They act nothing like they do in the games or, before you roll out that old argument, the print works.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193887
I said specifically, what specifically?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193895
Reisen acts nothing like she does in FS. Reimu acts nothing like she does in any game or manga. Neither does Eiki. Or Ran. Or anyone else, for that matter.

Please play the print works and read the games. That might give you a clue.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193858
I mean what do you expect from fap material? It's there to masturbate to brainless object women, not for their personalities

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193912
If you won't give a specific example just admit defeat and move on, it's OK.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44194004
I just gave 3 specific examples. Please read what you reply to.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44193858
Lol just imagine that they love you so much they act unlike their usual self. Easy peasy.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44196522
>imagine that they love you
Impossible.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44196546
That's a (You) problem, the 2hus all love me.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44194051
That anon meant that you give him 3 specific examples, as in, what are the 2hus doing in fusu's works that they would never do in the official works?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197263
That sounds a little backwards. It would be more apposite to pick a picture set and then find the canon precedent for the dialogue/behaviour found therein.

[Anonymous No.]

Too much sameface and OOC.

[Anonymous No.]

>OOC complaints over romantic fanart
Some of you fags are too autistic for your own good. Life isn't that serious.

[Anonymous No.]

Whi is jaypee so pessimistic? I thought you guys loved Fusu and now you're saying he's bad because of shitty complaints like "Sameface" and "OOC" and "selfinsert"

You guys are no fun. This is just sad. You guys are NOT like how you were before.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197514
Already explained it. I like Touhou. If the characters in the pictures aren't Touhous, then what the hell is the point?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197552
There's never been the same canon reappearance of any 2hu because you never step in the same river twice

>>44197314
>It would be more apposite to pick a picture set and then find the canon precedent for the dialogue/behaviour found therein
Except you could feed all canon content as prompt for AI chatbot, make it do extreme examples of possible dialogues, and the show that the POV pics we have are well within those extremes
Shitty chatbot has no biases that 2+ argument-invested spergs have, so this is perfect

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197619
>AI chatbot
What the FUCK are you even talking about anymore?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197632
Most accurate investigations of what's canon or not in fictional character behavior, of course

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197655
Just read the fucking print works, good fucking lord!

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197619
the fuck? there isn't so much content that you have to have an AI analyze it for you, this isn't like there's countless recorded interactions for each character
You don't even have to know anything about the series to be able to tell that fusu's stuff is the same bland characterization with maybe one superficial character trait stapled on each piece

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197681
>>44197688
You can't just trust other people or yourself on memorizing and comparing character behaviors in own head, people can be biased on subconscious level to make anti-canon conclusions for one reason or the other

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197702
counterpoint: most people have basic pattern recognition and the ability to make accurate character judgements when the scope is as narrow as some touhous are
not interested in arguing further, this is either bait or you're too dumb to reason with

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197763
>most people have basic pattern recognition and the ability to make accurate character judgements when the scope is as narrow as some touhous are
Valid, but we're on /jp/, there's no social pattern recognition to be had in anyone here

[Anonymous No.]

Wake me up when they learn more than the same 3 expressions
It's all too repetitive

[Anonymous No.]

>>44197529
It's one guy complaining.
I personally like Fusu, and while I'd much prefer more of the non-porn, warm, feel good stuff I think it's still nice that we got what we got, you know? It's not like he deleted the old stuff.

[Anonymous No.]

"OOC" isn't a valid complain against Fusu, because most character personalities aren't particularly fleshed out for the most part as is, and people in real life act differently around those they're attracted to and/or love compared to their behavior around those they don't. Youkai also have deeper desires and dreams of their own despite their fundamental differences from humans.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44199250
Look, nobody is saying you can't like the guy's art. OP asked for opinions, and people have given theirs - negative ones included. But when you start spewing nonsense like that, it just makes you sound like a butthurt secondary.

Yes, Fusu's interpretations are off-character. We have yet to see Reisen being anything except herself, which is to say a skittish, short-tempered, human-scorning dumbass. We have yet to see a single inkling of romantic interest or even a desire to socialise with men from Reimu. Byakuren acting lovey-dovey is preposterous. All that we know about Sekibanki is that she DOESN'T really like youkai or humans. So yeah. And so on and so forth.

And sure, you could say: "but you can't say how they'd act in a situation we've never seen them in before!" And to that I answer: until we DO see them in said situation, I'll maintain that what we haven't seen isn't canon.

Does that mean you can't like Fusu's stuff?

[Anonymous No.]

>waah they're off character
lol, they just cant stop losing

As for OP question
i think he was based before doing only porn
self insert porn he does is alright, art is meh but dialogue is still there. not bad but romantic is better. wish he went back to just doing normal self insert vanilla stuff

[Anonymous No.]

>>44199642
Its only nonsense if you lack creativity and perspective.
I'll give you some credit though, I don't care about Reisen or Byakuren, so perhaps they are grossly out of character. I wouldn't know since I don't look up art of them. The characters I do like however tend to be fine in my books, like Satori.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44199642
>Not a single inkling of romantic interest or even a desire to socialise with men from Reimu

That sounds like yurifag delusions.
remember when reimu wanted to summon a male god because she believed he was "handsome"? Or the fact that shes friends with rinnosuke?

[Anonymous No.]

>desire to socialise with men
I knew all the screeching had to be the doing of a yurinigger.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
Porn ruined a man.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44200305
>>44200304
>yuri yuri yuri
Put down your yuri boogeyman for one god damn second, why don't you? The only instance of Windows-era Reimu reacting to romance was, in fact, a heterosexual one. So how about that?

The fact remains she doesn't exhibit a desire for normal, human interaction. But if I'd said "people," you would have brought up the youkai she does socialise with. Youkai who don't really do normal, human interaction. No, not even Rinnosuke. They're all oddballs, and so is Reimu. It's the crux of her character.

Shut the fuck up about yuri. Nobody wants to hear about it.
>>44200277
When I said "nonsense," I meant your claim of characters not being fleshed out. For many Fusu does, there is more than enough to give you a solid outline. For the rest, there is enough to contravene Fusu's characterisations. If you can't spot this, well, that's where the accusation of secondaryism come in.

Once more, though, this doesn't mean you can't enjoy Fusu's work. But please don't get uppity when people don't like it for perfectly legitimate reasons - such as it being OOC.

[Anonymous No.]

Is this guy really pissing and shitting about an artist's char being bad because they're not miserable shrew bitches like his headcanon says they are?
Gonna guess that he's a grimsokyo faggot too

[Anonymous No.]

>>44201158
OP asked for opinions. Anons gave opinions. If you can't deal with that, you may be the incontinent one.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44201205
The anon you replied to gave his opinion too.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44200896
Anon I agree with you and don't care much for this artist, but look at the thread you're in. OOC and consistent characterization go out the window when the art is all about depicting self insert fantasies and appealing to that audience. These anons just like to turn their brains off and consume lovey dovey/lewd shit; you're not gonna get candid discussion aiming canon in a derivative thread.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44202054
It's not even about this thread anymore but about the whole fandom, 80% of people that call themselves touhou fans simply masturbate to the characters without even knowing shit- on par with gatchashit characters. the gatekeeping failed a long time ago

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
He had it. He fucking had it. Then he started drawing porn and threw it all way. The guy really was the second coming of Hammer.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44199642
>if the artist doesn't reuse ZUN's dialogue and scenarios in his fan work, that means it's OOC
I know where we are, but even a dweeb's narrow-mindedness has its limits.
>"Does that mean you can't like Fusu's stuff?"
Talk about disingenuous. If you didn't want to shittalk the artist or had any issue with those who like him, you wouldn't have brought this up in the first place.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44203472
>>if the artist doesn't reuse ZUN's dialogue and scenarios in his fan work, that means it's OOC
I have no idea who you're quoting, because it is certainly not the post you've linked. Try again?
>If you didn't want to shittalk the artist or had any issue with those who like him
Au contraire. I enjoy Fusu's porn myself, which you'll notice is the even less popular opinion. So no, no issue there.

What I do take issue with is ignorant secondaries who'll shittalk people who DON'T like the artist's stuff for being OOC. Why is this such an issue? Why should it be so wrong to admit that Reisen isn't a touchy-feely romantic, and is rather a short-tempered, anxiety-ridden ex-soldier whose idea of enjoyable physical contact, from what we've seen, incorporates power imbalance and violence? And mind, that's just one example.

Once again, does this mean you can't enjoy the artist's particular take on the characters? No - but neither should you lash out at others for not enjoying them for that reason. That's just petty. Not to mention it makes you sound just as delusional as the boogeymen already mentioned in this conversation.

Also, you really, really oughtn't to call others "disingenuous" while at the same time attempting to put words in their mouths. Save that kind of flagrant hypocrisy for /v/hu threads.

[Anonymous No.]

>From what we've seen, Reisen enjoys [headcanon with too personality traits that contradict themselves (anxiety ridden and aggressive violence)] in something that has never be seen in a ZUN game, a 1 on 1 intimate relationship
I think this thread >>44204841
might be more your speed, for the kind of OOC that you happen to enjoy

[Anonymous No.]

>Rape, yuri, ganbgbangs, cuckoldry, abortion, monsters, mindbreaks, hypnosis, seedbeds, prostitution, corruption, change of status, being defeated by villians of the games and changing the canon endings to dying, becoming slaves, livestock, sex and drug addicted, meat toilets ------> OK, acceptable break from canon. Hot and extremely good
>1 on 1 romantic relationship with a self-insert male ------> Problematic, pathetic, escapism, not canon, unrealistic
This artist got a backlash from re.ddit and this cancerous website, that's all I need to know that it's my kind of thing, and against the tastes of the average subhuman

[Anonymous No.]

>>44204952
>>44204896
Who are you quoting?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44204226
>I have no idea who you're quoting, because it is certainly not the post you've linked. Try again?
>Also, you really, really oughtn't to call others "disingenuous" while at the same time attempting to put words in their mouths.
Wow! The guy who labels Fusu's dialogue as OOC for not paraphrasing ZUN content doesn't know what a recapitulation is. Color me surprised.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205248
>for not paraphrasing ZUN
Source of that claim, please?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44204226
You really love throwing the word secondary around too much.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44204952
Its better to forget Reddit even exists at all. I gained way more peace when I erased that website from my mind.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205596
Yes.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205627
I wish tribal identification with 4chan was all it took for me to forget that the same kind of beings (let's pretend that the gatekeeping that stopped ten years ago still exists, and those users aren't here) pushing for the worst, more degrading and inhuman fetishes of my favourite characters actively target and attack the content I love, and that content alone

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205737
That's some persecution complex you've got going there, bud. What gives?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205627
As this very thread shows, there's barely a distinction; that's been also getting even thinner between both since 2008. Or between this website and the comment sections of hentai sites and youtube, that's how low the quality is and IQ of current internet is. More so when a bunch of discorders can 'cancel' an artist as soon as he draws one single hetero drawing. Same thing happened to hammer not getting most of his stuff uploaded anymore, but those microarmies weren't as developed due to IRC circlejerking being slightly more gatekept simply due to interface and popularity.
And yes, that's besides the point, the issue is >>44205737 this, over and over again. I see no one going out of their way to attack trash hypnosis artists with rape, hypnosis, beheading; and stupid meme yuri with no basis in canon completely predates characters, like Alice and hypno, and in fact, takorin, kedamono kangoku, rindou, kenpi and the like are praised. Why the FUCK do I have to endure my vanilla POV being coordinately attacked by those very same vocal Discord groups who push those other artists, and pretend not to notice? How about fucking off and being subhuman together, and leave my mind at peace with no active effort of mine exerted?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205806
OK, I'm curious now. Was Fusu ACTUALLY attacked by gaijin Discordians or are you just conflating unrelated incidents?
Also,
>hammer
>his stuff
*her

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205806
>Same thing happened to hammer not getting most of his stuff uploaded anymore
On here or on the boorus?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205822
Yeah you're pretending to be retarded now or you actually are or can't read. As I figured, a waste of time to engage with a disingenious subhuman nigger

[Anonymous No.]

Who is "hammer"?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205847
Are you OK?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205806
Stop noticing >>44204841

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205884
>Almost 100 replies of derailing yuriniggers vs one untouched yuri thread
Hmmm....

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205899
>yuriniggers
Where?

[Anonymous No.]

Keep derailing, nigger

[Anonymous No.]

While the possibility of it being a pretext isn't one I'll deny, I'll throw my hat into the ring on the matter of whether or not Fusu's works are "in-character." The obvious issue as other anons have pointed out is that most touhous barring a scant few like the protagonists of the games and the print works have very, very little in terms of canonical characterization. But there's a bit more going on there. First, it's necessary to understand that, inasfar as the games go, the characters are accessories to the danmaku patterns. ZUN's focus has pretty much never been on writing a story, and although some recent works like UM have a degree of metacommentary, that's a relatively new development and still exists mostly disconnected from Touhou Project's setting in general.

The existence of things like Lost Word should make it more obvious than ever before that he's content to leave fans to come up with their own characterizations for the most part, and while the print works can be brought up as a counterargument, that one isn't very watertight as ZUN takes a very hands-off approach to them. He creates the overarching scenario, but things like the nuance of the characters' personalities isn't something he constantly micromanages. Essentially, for minor characters, the print works are only better than doujins in that they're technically canon, but just as subject to someone else's interpretation of a character.

All of this said, Fusu's works are definitely generic, with not that much to distinguish the different touhous in his art personality-wise, and while yes, that will lead to OOC content, I'd say if there's anything to focus on criticizing its the lack of originality.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206014
Sorry, bub, you're not allowed to dislike Fusu's art for any legitimate reason in this thread.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206039
And I am now that much more convinced that the "OOC" claim was just a pretense.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206014
>the print works are only better than doujins in that they're technically canon, but just as subject to someone else's interpretation
My friend, what are you talking about? Outside of early instances (coughSSiBcough), ZUN writes the vast majority of the series directly. This is especially true for source books. When a character's description or depiction isn't his, it is nearly always very clearly denoted, such as in SCoOW.

I agree with your general point, but you've somehow managed to turn me off of it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206053
>pretense
For...?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206014
Haven't the mangaka complained about ZUN micromanaging things too much in the past, though?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44204896
>[headcanon with too personality traits that contradict themselves (anxiety ridden and aggressive violence)]
Huh? She's been shown time and again to be skittish in the presence of superiors and those she perceives as a potential threat (for instance, humans of the village when she's going around incognito) and acting haughty, threatening violence, when she's in a position of power over someone else. A recent example of both would be her CDS appearance, where she's both cheerfully violent (when dealing with an imprisoned Marisa) and high-strung (when discussing things with Eirin). FS also showed off her attitude a fair bit. One of LoLK's endings also has her outright run from home rather than face the backlash of her "failure".

It's not that difficult to imagine, given that she's, you know, a rabbit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206908
Raisin truly is worst rabbit

[Anonymous No.]

I like his works among pretty much any other porn artists works because jerking off to 2hu's is sexy and none of them would ever have sex in canon. Even the ones with biological children.

[Anonymous No.]

It's almost like Reisen being neurotic has been an outright stated trademark feature of her character since her first appearance and in her subsequent ones...

Naaah, no way, right?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44210727
To be fair, Seiran may be more than a little worse. She rather readily engages the heroines in LoLK, including Reisen, at whom she cites the reason of "lol it's just how it is". She revels in combat in TH19 as well, further cementing herself as the loose gun of the flock. In her only other known venture, she plays catch up to Ringo. Her personal ability is straight combat related, too.

Seiran may just have little interest in anything that doesn't involve bullets perforating bodies.

[Anonymous No.]

>the loose gun of the flock
ESL-chama... have you ever heard of this thing we call a "mixed metaphor"?
>at whom she cites the reason of
Your language skills seem a bit weak for a discussion centered on interpretation and manipulation of text.
>>44206141
It must be hard not being able to make inferences... How brave you are to share your opinions on characterization despite your disability crippling your understanding by making inductive reasoning unavailable to you!

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211509
Are you really getting upset over a pun?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211509
Not even going to pretend it's about Touhou anymore, huh, yurishitter?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211043
Paizuri with Seiran

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211542
I'm not him but I'll tell you this thread is stupid. You're stupid, he's stupid, I'm stupid, pretty much every single post in this thread is fucking stupid. None of this has anything to do with Touhou and is just being used by people to have autistic arguments that make no sense about things nobody cares about, maybe not even themselves.

It's porn. I could jerk off to that doujin of Okuu fucking a duck and it wouldn't change anything about the character so who cares?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211675
What does that have to do with Seiran being a combat junkie? Cause that's pretty much what I came in here to say, else than, yanno, showing that there are worse headcases than Reisen.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211509
If you have nothing to say, can you please leave the thread?

You're embarrassing us.

[Anonymous No.]

You guys should be nicer to each other

[Anonymous No.]

All the retarded canon fags projecting their low testosterone/asexual proclivities onto the 2hus then labeling it as ''canon''. The girls are capable of love just like anyone else, its just that love isnt ZUN's focus so it barely gets brought up. Even in real life shinto/jap mythology there are stories of youkai and gods who fall in love with humans and make half breeds. Where the fuck else would Rinnosuke have come from?

[Anonymous No.]

>>44215120
Nobody is taking an issue with 2hus having possible romantic feelings or preferences.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
I dont much mind him, some of his stuff is really cute and the porn is okay I guess.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211043
Seiran is just a /k/fag then
Perfectly workable

[Anonymous No.]

>>44216052
>the porn is okay
now that's just a lie

[Anonymous No.]

I personally hate yuri and yurifags for constantly attacking hetero artists. They are the ones who cry about gatekeeping the most yet they also try to gatekeep older touhou fans just because they prefer hetero/self insert stuff.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44221550
I don't know that I've ever met a yurifag that wasn't mentally ill. check em

[Anonymous No.]

>>44187363
His foot fetish attempts are laughable

[Anonymous No.]

>>44220729
He said that it was ok, not that it was good
And he's right, objectively its fine, its just inferior to his previous work

[Anonymous No.]

>His foot fetish attempts are la-

[Anonymous No.]

>>44203198
You know what, I like you anon.
I'm glad that you love actual touhou for what it is, I'd like to learn more like you have when I have the time.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44222155
You should learn more about that anon while you're at it. Getting to know him better while learning about Touhou as well.

[Anonymous No.]

>44222132
/v/tard post

[Anonymous No.]

>>44222537
I didn't know that was a /v/ post. Please enlighten me as to how that is a /v/ post.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44221550
>I personally hate yuri and yurifags for constantly attacking hetero artists.
Has this happened to Fusu? I thought that was a gaijin thing.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211043

[Anonymous No.]

>>44205859
An old artist, known for drawing wholesome stuff (and pervy Kasen)
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/1352707

[Anonymous No.]

>>44228668
Pity the man that gets snatched up by the crazy rabbit

[Anonymous No.]

>>44188078
>>44193858
Beings with intelligence are multi-faceted, them acting out of character isn't necessarily a problem because people act "out of character" in real life. One must look at it as love making them act this way, because love makes people act different, human OR youkai.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206908
>CDS
Truly the worst Touhou manga ever written

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206908
I like canon reisen a lot more.
haughty bitch who gets off on being put in her place turns me on more than fusu's generic moeblob.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44206908
Now before anyone calls Reisen a heartless and selfish cunt, remember that she staged a protest against eating rabbit meat, helped the human village with their mice infestation, and tried to solve the perfect possession incident simply because she felt like it was her responsibility. Reisen has a gentle side, too!

[Anonymous No.]

>>44236086
Just get snatched by the sane one.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44237706
>helped the human village with their mice infestation
While true, I feel it apposite to note that the main reason she's proud of it is because she "invented" it on her own... using Lunarian tech. And she still acts quite like herself about it.
>staged a protest against eating rabbit meat
As for this, it's not at all a selfless thing when you remember the vested interest Eientei has in a numerous (animal) rabbit population. And taking Tewi's scheme into account... yeah, that's not a good thing at all.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44238675
>using Lunarian tech
There is nothing to imply that she used Lunarian tech, even in that image she only says "lunarian science", as in "something too smart for your sorry human asses". To me it seems like she used her ability to control sound waves on regular, unremarkable cat statues to turn them into mice repellants.
This doesn't really matter because at the end of the day, she did help the village for no real benefit to herself. In fact, she got punished for it.
>it's not at all a selfless thing when you remember the vested interest Eientei has in a numerous (animal) rabbit population
Eientei doesn't matter in this context, Reisen formed the rabbit league and protested on her own volition. And she doesn't know Tewi's scheme. I don't think so, anyway.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44239215
>There is nothing to imply that she used Lunarian tech
The thing converts moonlight into ultrasonic sound. I'll leave the conclusion up to you, but note that EET is canonically full of Lunarian bits and bobs, which are (or were, since ZUN seems to have forgotten) displayed from time to time as a sort of tech expo.
>I don't think so, anyway.
I think she'd notice. And I don't think she'd have anything against it, as she seems to enjoy having mooks around to push around in CDS. But, fair enough, it's guesswork.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44239282
>she seems to enjoy having mooks around to push around in CDS
Well, we're talking about regular animal rabbits here, not Youkai. Reisen seemed genuinely concerned for their safety in that article.
>And I don't think she'd have anything against it
Depends on how Tewi worded it, if she actually told Reisen. "selling them into slavery", no. "giving them luxurious lives with the humans", maybe.
We'll never know because it's a tiny detail that ZUN absolutely forgot about.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44225598
Most likely, but it is still a gaijin thing, because he was probably attacked by r*dditors

[Anonymous No.]

>>44240496
>Most likely
>probably
In other words, you don't fucking know.

[Anonymous No.]

>>44222132
I hope he does some cute foot stuff like this with Patche and Yukari

[Anonymous No.]

>>44211043
>"Gensokyo sure is fun!"
>"I want to meet more strong folks."
pretty much a fightfag yeah

[Anonymous No.]

I don't think lovey dovey artist turn to porn shouldn't be a big issue as it's not farfetched.
Now if Kaaragetarou step into that line I will lose my mind.