[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 463 KB, 600x600, 1255392693087.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3627922 No.3627922 [Reply] [Original]

A society in which conjugal infidelity is tolerated must always be in the long run a society adverse to women. Women, whatever a few male songs and satires my say to the contrary, are more naturally monogamous than men; it is a biological necessity. Where promiscuity prevails they will therefore always be more often the victims than the culprits. Also, domestic happiness is more necessary to them than to us. And the quality by which they most easily hold a man, their beauty, decreases every year after they have come to maturity, but this does not happen to those qualities of personality—women don’t really care twopence about our looks—by which we hold women. Thus in the ruthless war of promiscuity women are at a double disadvantage. They play for higher stakes and are also more likely to lose. I have no sympathy with moralists who frown at the increasing crudity of female provocativeness. These signs of desperate competition fill me with pity.

>> No.3627935
File: 55 KB, 400x341, gilg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3627935

... I want to, through several months of friendship, courtship, and dating, eventually marry you and have consensual sex in the missionary position on our honeymoon. Is that ok?

>> No.3627938
File: 249 KB, 624x624, 1e6f0e19d1b1e432d44a9627196b43b0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3627938

Japanese lesbians being perfect.

>> No.3627951

sympathize with the moralist who frowns at the increasing crudity of female provocativeness in THIS *firmly grasps penis*

>> No.3627948
File: 19 KB, 336x310, 1252796235281.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3627948

>>3627935

>> No.3627960
File: 82 KB, 550x650, gilgamesh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3627960

>>3627948
Is that a yes or a no?

>> No.3627969
File: 11 KB, 169x215, 1250262461423.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3627969

>>3627960

>> No.3627970

>>3627922
>women don’t really care twopence about our looks
Pffffhahahahaha!

>> No.3627993

>>3627970
That's true though. That's why even attractive anons are ronery.

>> No.3628001

For "monogamous" beings, women sure like to fuck around.

>> No.3628002

>>3627993
They are lying to fit in.

>> No.3628169
File: 84 KB, 412x477, 1250276825788.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3628169

I love Rosa is this normal?

>> No.3628178

>>3628169
It is if you love sluts.

>> No.3628247

>>3627922

Until this isn't the middle ages and women can go off living without being financed and lodged by a man.

While true centuries ago, it's much less certain now.

>> No.3628502
File: 36 KB, 853x480, snapshot20090820180448.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3628502

>> No.3629501
File: 186 KB, 500x764, 1255397544151.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3629501

>> No.3629511

I'd take Rosa to Hokkaido, if you know what I mean.

>> No.3629523

If I were Rosa's husband I'd have never left.

>> No.3629531

>>3627922
>Women, whatever a few male songs and satires my say to the contrary, are more naturally monogamous than men;
You're a lot quicker to say this than you are to provide evidence.

>>3627922
>Also, domestic happiness is more necessary to them than to us.
Not at all, domestic happiness is critical to sound mental health regardless of gender.

>>3627922
>women don’t really care twopence about our looks—
The fuck.

>> No.3629536
File: 54 KB, 235x265, 1237856912544.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3629536

>>3627993
>That's true though. That's why even attractive anons are ronery.
>attractive anons

>> No.3629556

>I have no sympathy with moralists who frown at the increasing crudity of female provocativeness.
I didn't go to Oxford. What does this mean, exactly?

>>3629531 The fuck.
A girl can have the world's shittiest personality, and men will still want to sleep with her if she's good looking.
If a guy is good looking but has a shitty personality, he has a bit of a challenge.

>> No.3629570

>>3629556
He doesn't like people who call girls sluts.

>> No.3629600

>>3629556

Because with women, your personality is where you make or break.

You don't need to be attractive, drive a Maserati, and have shittons of money, you just have to act like you are. These things boost your confidence, and confident males are very, very attractive to the opposite sex.

Thankfully, you can work on your personality.

>> No.3629606

Women only care about your money, guys. Fuck, here in one of the national newspapers there was an article recently where they had no shame to simply admit that is all they looked for in a man.

>> No.3629612

>>3629570
Cool, thanks.

>> No.3629618

Kindly take discussion of real women to /b/ or /r9k/, normalbros.

>> No.3629635

>>3629600
I would rather die alone than be a stuck up prick just to get laid.

>> No.3629637

>>3629618

/jp/ related, actually.

Real women are Japanese too.

>> No.3629644

>>3629635

You're getting there. Yes, women like stuck up pricks.

But you don't have to be one. Just fake it until you make it. You can put aside the TRUE ALPHA BRO persona when you come home, and then pretend to be the little girl on the Internet. It's all about projecting an image, dude. You don't have to be an annoying chucklefuck Mr. Smooth 24/7.

>> No.3629645

>>3629637
And? How are Japanese women /jp/ related?

>> No.3629661

>>3629644
Being an awkward loser to a VIPPER worked pretty well for me, though.

>> No.3629664

>>3629661

I don't understand what the hell you just said, bro.

Was the VIPPER male or female? Was it gay sex?

>> No.3629669

>>3629664

The VIPPER was female.

>> No.3629672

>>3629669

Was she hot? Hopefully she wasn't fat. Fat chicks and uggos never count. Never have sex with an uggo, dude. Never.

>> No.3629679

>>3629672
She had nice thighs, so I guess any weight she would've had went there. We didn't end up having sex though, mainly because I didn't want to at that point in time.

>> No.3629713

I wish Gilgamesh was my Ancestor, things'd be different around here if he were so.

For one i'd be part god, even if it's only a millionth of a fraction.

Also i'd probably look alot better too.

>> No.3630878

>>3629713
You'd also have lots of people trying to kill you.

>> No.3630897

>>3629713
It's entirely possible, my friend!

Gilgamesh must have fucked a lot of women and I don't think he was the type to worry about pulling out.

>> No.3630933

>Women, whatever a few male songs and satires my say to the contrary, are more naturally monogamous than men;
Statistics disagree. From http://www.infidelityfacts.com/infidelity-statistics.html
>Percentage of men who admit to committing infidelity in any relationship they've had: 57%
>Percentage of women who admit to committing infidelity in any relationship they've had: 54%
It's only a 3% difference, which can probably be attributed to the fact that it's a survey; women are more likely to lie about this because social standards dictate it's worse for women to cheat than for men.

>it is a biological necessity.
[citation needed]

>Where promiscuity prevails they will therefore always be more often the victims than the culprits.
>therefore
Conclusion made using two incorrect arguments. Also, conclusion unrelated to argumentation. [citation needed]

>Also, domestic happiness is more necessary to them than to us.
[citation needed]

>And the quality by which they most easily hold a man, their beauty, decreases every year after they have come to maturity
Correct.

>but this does not happen to those qualities of personality—women don’t really care twopence about our looks—by which we hold women.
Incorrect. Money and social status are the main factors. Looks are also an important factor, even if not as important as with men -> women.
Also, I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here. Just because X remains attractive doesn't mean there can't be Y who is more attractive.

>Thus in the ruthless war of promiscuity women are at a double disadvantage.
Conclusion based on incorrect arguments.

>They play for higher stakes
Explain?

>and are also more likely to lose.
Incorrect; see above.

>> No.3630965

>it is a biological necessity
yeah for whoring themselves out for security issues where men don't have to care once they get someone. that's why the women will always leave their men if their live standards go down or some incidents occur preventing them from daily work

>> No.3630970

>it is a biological necessity
Yeah for whoring themselves out for "security" issues where men don't have to care once they get someone. That's why women will always leave their men if their standards of living go down or some incidents occur preventing them from daily work.

>> No.3631706

>>3629523
Who said he left 'vonluntarily'???
My bets are on Rosa killing him

>> No.3631718

>>3631706
She ate him.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action