[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 1.07 MB, 1463x1000, 438393530329d8649e07ea0aaa7461b9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3541732 No.3541732 [Reply] [Original]

It is expected that basic technologies of the robot intelligence with which humanoid
robots can respond to social needs will be ready around 2025. At that time,
they can serve as caregivers and housekeepers, and can comfort users with their
similar looks to humans. We consider that humanoid robots potentially have effective
user interfaces as personal tools for non-specialists and non-specialized uses
since they are the ultimate anthropomorphic machines. We also predict that further
progress in humanoid robot development will promote leading-edge robot technologies
in a similar manner to F1 in the automobile field. ‘Super-humanoid’ robots that
have super-human capabilities are expected to appear about 2050.

>> No.3541778
File: 601 KB, 843x1200, b705c45797dda4ce5f424e777e802d72.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3541778

2008 (today)
Weight - 50 kg
Walking speed - 1.5–2 km/h
Running speed - 7 km/h
Specific resistance - 2–3
Operating time - 1 h
Traveling capability - indoors, on footpaths
Movement environment - structured interiors
Transportable weight - 10 kg

>> No.3541804
File: 318 KB, 1280x960, a48118330c1bdd59acf4b3cf0dff190c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3541804

2025
Weight 30 kg
Walking speed - 5 km/h
Running speed - 30 km/h
Specific resistance - 0.2
Operating time - 10 h
Traveling capability - natural irregular ground (grass or sand)
Movement environment - within crowds
Transportable weight - 30 kg

>> No.3541819
File: 148 KB, 602x700, 661c9b4a5def30b23527d1dc9a8dd95e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3541819

2050
Weight - 30 kg
Walking speed - 10 km/h
Running speed - 60 km/h
Specific resistance - 0.1 or less
Operating time - 3 days
Traveling capability - over hurdles
Movement environment - extreme environments
Transportable weight - 100 kg

>> No.3541858

Basically, we all die in 2050?

>> No.3541885
File: 500 KB, 736x785, 5731071.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3541885

>>3541858

Best death ever.

>> No.3541904
File: 15 KB, 307x295, pearl4nf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3541904

When will we get moe robots?

>> No.3541914

The best part is, even if household androids were available to own(sexdroids included) /jp/ users wouldn't even be able to get one.

Don't worry though the normalfags will have plenty of fun with them for you

>> No.3541947

I'm sure the shitstorm regarding the morality of robots will be glorious when we reach that point.

>> No.3541953

>>3541947

Banned by the EN because the robots can't say no.

>> No.3541971

>>3541953
The idea of "raping" a robot that doesn't understand the concept of rape gets my rocks off for some reason.

>> No.3541968

Traditional robots will never get that far. We'll go along the course of genetic engineering instead.

>> No.3542116
File: 2.89 MB, 2156x1969, 1252382939112.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3542116

>>3541968

Genetics is one giant riddle currently. We're easily 100 years from understanding it enough to turn living creatures into clay. And even then, the usefulness is limited as no one can figure out how to make macroscopic changes in an adult.

Robots on the other hand are based on technology we already understand. The only thing stopping us from having androids right now is that no one is pouring billions of dollars into it, because there's very little reason to make an android.

Also, the practicality of robotics is greater then living creatures:

A robot requires a battery essentially. Battery technology is advancing, and its conceivable that you could produce a battery that would power a robot of human capabilities very conveniently. The android would probably spend less time recharging then humans do eating.

One human on the other hand, requires literally tons of food to support himself. If you were to create a human with vastly increased physical capabilities, they would require vastly increased amounts of food to support their higher metabolism.

Quite simply, biology isn't a practical alternative to machinery. Theres a reason we use trucks instead of animals to move our goods; trucks are faster, have more fuel and mechanical endurance, and can carry more weight.

And have you ever seen an elephant pick up a two ton frame and move it with perfect precision?

Quite simply, when you place an android next to a "bioroid", the android is superior in every single way. And the android doesn't complain about things like poor pay and working conditions.

>> No.3542121

>>3542116
They can also bee moe.

>> No.3542138

>>3542116
Your grasp of the English language is poor, which makes it harder to take you seriously.

That aside, robots are useful for handling automated tasks, but not much else. Among other things, we have much more understanding of genetics than we do artificial intelligence at this point, so artificial *life* will probably be genetics-based rather than robotics-based.

But this is mostly just a guess, so...

>> No.3542139

>>3542138
>That aside, robots are useful for handling automated tasks, but not much else.
LOVE.

>> No.3542142

I would personally love to be in the Eve no Jikan world.

>> No.3542152

>>3542116
Bioroids, huh?
Man, Southern Cross was great.

>> No.3542190

>>3542138

Well judging by what I've read about using mouse brains to drive a robot body around a maze and fly a flight simulator, I think that AI will probably take the form of some sort of cyborg. And besides, it doesn't take either hard or soft AI to make an android; as long as the android could reproduce human social reactions, and complete tasks set before it I'm pretty sure it would satisfy most people's expectations.

>> No.3542198

>>3542190
But that's pretty useless for more advanced applications, isn't it? Humans have evolved to this level of intelligence for a reason. Programmed responses can only go so far...

>> No.3542207

I hope my parents don't throw me out before we reach technological singularity. I, for one, welcome our self evolving robot overlords.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action