/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Katsu-kun !!F17Uym/1MLN No.]

>A leading Islamic scholar is calling for the death penalty for traffickers of a $15 device which allows non-virgin women to simulate having their hymen broken, which he decries as encouraging sinful fornication.
>The device, made in China and increasingly widely available in the Arab world, allows women who might otherwise not have intact hymens to simulate the bloody penetration demanded of them by Islamic society on their wedding nights.
>Using fake blood to imitate genuine deflowering, it provides a cheap alternative to costly hymen reconstruction surgery, whilst still allowing women to trick their husbands into thinking they are virgins.
>A professor at a leading Islamic university in Egypt decries the device as encouraging fornication out of wedlock, and argues that those responsible for its importation are responsible for corrupting the virtues of Islamic society and should thus face execution.
>Egyptian politicians are calling for the device to be banned forthwith.
Now even virgins are non-virgin sluts.

[Anonymous No.]

nice to see countries still exists with womens rights equal to those of the stone age.

[Anonymous No.]

Hey hey hey! Islam means peace! What more peaceful manner than to propose DEATH DEATH DEATH DEATH AND DEATH to all offenders of its teachings!

[Katsu-kun !!F17Uym/1MLN No.]

>>3462440
Yeah, at least here we have equality now.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462420
> Old. I already read this on http://www.anantalk.com/ (anan = anon) last night.
Wow. This board is so cool!

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462448
Crusades, Inquisition, etc.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462457
>Implying that Christians embark on crusade and inquisitive tortures comparative to nowadays Muslims in the present 21 century.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462457
ad hominem. As if we care about another shitty religion.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462463
>Has awful grammar.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462463
Christianity is divided in many 'sects' of each own with each being variably 'forgiving' and influencing the state.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462467
No, that's tu quoque
>>3462468
Now this is a proper ad hominem. Notice his inability to tackle the actual argument presented.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462480
I refuse to speak to someone, argument or not, who uses the phrase "in the present 21st century"

[Anonymous No.]

Tactics to fake virginity are as old as dust. But I'll always find interesting how some cultures including our own still react to new developments with a banning panic.
As if someone cared about virginity. All I care about is that the girl is completely serious about starting a life together into the future, who cares what happened before.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronicle_of_a_death_foretold

[Anonymous No.]

Islam has been invented 500 years after christianity, so while we are in 21'st century, they are *just* about to finish their middle ages.

[Anonymous No.]

Religions are nothing but a barrier for progress. If all the Christians, Jews, and Muslims were sent to the moon we'd probably be able to evolve into a fully Utopian society before the end of the century.
Of course, that's if the moon didn't declare nuclear war on the earth first.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462496
Haha nice one.

[Anonymous No.]

1. Christianity has been taken apart and disputed by philosophers over the centuries. While a strong lobby group, it doesn't have much formal power in most of the developed world. Islam imposes a death penalty on anyone who questions even a single word in the Quran. Reasonably open and democratic countries with an islamic majority are hard to come by.

2. People exist to consume. Women have different needs and thereby create new markets and new jobs. Beacuse women stay in the kitchen and do all chores, boys never learn to take responsibility which makes them worthless workers. The wealth of the western world stems from the freedom of women.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462505
Oh look, a teenager/ignorant.

If people refuse to change, nothing in this hellhole called Earth will make them change their minds. The dark ages was a result of multiple factors, one of them was that people stopped questioning the old masters, they simply assumed that the greek were perfect in their reasoning and stopped ALL kind of research. Even religious research. Hell, even reading the bible was forbidden. You could even get burned on a pyre for owning one.

Religion by itself does not stop progress. People do. You do not need a god telling you what to do or not do in order to royally screw yourself over.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462496
I'm living in about the year 4.5 billion.

[Anonymous No.]

Inexplicably obsessed with female virginity.
Extremely conservative and inflexible.
Prone to bouts of intense rage when challenged.

Islam = /jp/

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462539
You're right. People are the ones stopping progress, because they don't want it. Religious people. It doesn't have anything to do with "God". Religions don't follow "God", they follow their leaders. Even the Bible was written by man, not by "God".
There are a lot of bad, ignorant people, even outside of religions, sure. But it is not human nature to oppose progress. Many many good people in this world would like to aid technological advancement and equal rights, but are shut down, mostly by religions. You can suck my cock for defending them, too. Not all of us are unwilling to change, only the social conservatives.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462505
You are stupid, desinformed and conceited. Any kind of up-down forced ideology will have negative effects upon the public. Collectivism was always present in human societies and since the 18th century secular ideologies are the absolute dominant ones in western societies. First the nobility was transformed by the nation-state collectivists, followed by the imperialist followed by the scientific grounded totalitarians and capitalist-collectivist.
20 years before it seemed like the capitalist-collectivist won but the totalitarians are still there and the favoured collectivist model by the global corporate fascist group in control for the future, see the dogmas of global warming, globalization and overpopulation for proof.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462543
Calling women sluts for any act even remotely evocative of sexuality?

It's kind of scary how fundamentalist 4chan is. And no, I don't believe all or even most of it of it is irony.

[Anonymous No.]

this tread makes me realize how much I miss the /news/ board

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462569
To quote: "My people perish for lack of knowledge"

So yeah.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462571
what lame-ass humanities essay did you rip that little gem from?

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462569
>mostly by religions
China abuses the shit out of human rights. Japan resists introducing birth control and the morning after pill. Neither are religious states.

You better BELIEVE resisting progress is human nature. Humans will do anything to retain power and that often means supressing new technology. What do you think the RIAA is doing RIGHT FUCKING NOW in the US? Is the RIAA preventing technological progress because of Jesus? No, it's so they can keep making money.

I know it's hard in America, but remember that religion and conservatism are two different things.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462579
trains are way cooler

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462585
nice ad hominem brah

[Anonymous No.]

You'd think this sort of thing would show up more prominently in, y'know. The news.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462589
Corporations == Religions == Communist Dictatorship
All of them are keeping people down for the benefit of a few. It's not human nature to be like that though. That's warped. That's like saying it's human nature to kill people and steal their wallets. Would you kill a man with your own hands for $1 million? Maybe you would, but many of us would say that's wrong. Don't lump all of us together saying "we'd all be like that if we had the opportunity, it's human nautre". That is a shit excuse. Jonas Salk invented the vaccine for polio, and released it without a patent, simply because he wanted to help the world out a bit. People aren't all ignorant, selfish shitheads, and you can't excuse such behavior by claiming so.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462612
If it's a white demented Roman catholic priest, then definitely. Otherwise, no.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462617

>All of them are keeping people down for the benefit of a few. It's not human nature to be like that though.

No, it's normal behavior for pack hunters. A pecking order quickly surfaces and those at the top tend to be the most violently protective of their privileges. It's as old as who gets to fuck and eat the most.

[Anonymous No.]

I suppose some of you watch that South Park double-feature episode about religion vs rationality were Cartmen freezes into the future while waiting for a wii.
Best episodes of South Park, conclusion is every collectivist system will lead to system inherent dogmas and nullify common sense

[Anonymous No.]

and you can all thank the french for turning back the arabs at tours.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462624
That's why we need a system outside of all others.

A system created to kill those at the top of all groups, to prevent any form of true order, to destroy all those that would or could lead.

[Anonymous No.]

And meanwhile, protectors of ''equality'' fight against porn games.

[Anonymous No.]

I suggest some of you watch that South Park double-feature episode about religion vs rationality where Cartman freezes into the future while waiting for the release of a Wii game console.
Best episodes of South Park, conclusion is like said before, every collectivist system will lead to system inherent dogmas and nullify common sense

[ToyDuckGuitar !!E2OnoQD6Kk8 No.]

To the people going all 'religion is evil because it causes <evil stuff>': Have you ever considered that it might not be religion that makes people evil, but that it could be the people making religion evil?
Religion is very important to many people. Control the religion, and you control the people. And as the cliched saying goes, power corrupts.
Not everyone is a selfish asshole which would abuse anything or anyone to their own advantage - but in a controlled system that is not extremely stable (most governments have a constitution to prevent this from happening in the government), if a small group of people in a powerful position (or sometimes even a single person) decides to take advantage of others, it goes downhill rather easily.
Not just religion, too: any unstable government can go wrong (dictatorships), especially if the government controls a lot (like in Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany, where one person became so powerful he could control most of society), or any other powerful entity that is important in the lives of people.

tl;dr: Religion does not control people, people control other people using religion.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462659
yeah i don't have to watch that sophomoric crap to know that

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462655

Yeah, that would be great. All we need to do is organize a bunch of people into a group so we can all gang up on any assholes who try to take power. I volunteer to organize this group, issue weapons to them, and post bounties on offenders to our superior anti-establishment order.

[Anonymous No.]

/jp/ - Theology and Human behavior studies

[Anonymous No.]

Taliban was a good government. They had nothing to do with 9-11, so why did we kick them out temporarily? I'm guessing it was the feminist lobby in Washington. Taliban offered to hand Osama over, but the world (that is, America) refused. Feminists, go to hell. No such thing as "rights".

Taliban was the ultimate anti-slut regime.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462663
Yeah, islam has pretty ''evil'' teachings. Or so i've heard, I havent actually read their holy book or anything.
True, christianity used to do that as well, but nowadays they dont encourage violence or anything like that.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462680
I call bullshit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462670
No way! We'll just make robots that do it.

I'd never think of leaving such a thing in the hands of humans.
They'd end up abusing such a system.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462663
>Religion does not control people, people control other people using religion.
Wrong. People control themselves. Religion is just a manifestation of inherent weakness.

Religion itself is a problem because it can stain developing minds even without someone abusing it to such ends. Those who abuse religion are a problem because they take something mildly dangerous and refine it into an unparalleled weapon. However, the root problem is the weakness which leads people to create and embrace superstitions in the first place.

Basically the only way to solve the problem is to kill every last fuckwit who believes this garbage.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462686
>True, christianity used to do that as well, but nowadays they dont encourage violence or anything like that.
Abortion clinic bombings.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462689
On what? On the Taliban offer to hand Osama over? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/oct/14/afghanistan.terrorism5

Well, shit, it turns out that our "war of necessity" was a war of choice after all.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462694

I volunteer to be the chief mechanic and/or code writer for our robotic overlords.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462698
No, there is no need to kill everyone who believes in some kind of god. It would be much better to just make religion and ruling a country 2 completely different things..This works pretty well in most countries.

[Anonymous No.]

I was going to say 'God damn religious fundamentalists' here, but then I realised that sounded stupid.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462699
What? I've never heard of those. But yeah, now that I think about it, catholics might still be pretty dangerous.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462718
>This works pretty well in most countries.
Yeah. The ones with a lot of atheists to begin with.

[Anonymous No.]

Im sure a lot of people on this board have qualms with religion but they really are necessary. Without it most people would feel too insecure about their existence/purpose.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462719
Burn in hell, faggot

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462734
>Without it most people would feel too insecure about their existence/purpose.
So we kill all of those people. Problems solved.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462718
>implying someone with a strong religious affiliation will keep matters of office and matters of religion separate.
Haha, no. When someone with a strong faith has a conflict of interest in office, they will almost always choose the church over the state. Not doing so would jeopardize both (ie. the christfags that voted you in will turn against you, AND you're going to hell)

>>3462723
No, it was typical born again evangelist protestants.
Recently even in California an abortion clinic doctor was shot and killed.
Never underestimate the insanity of religious masses.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462737
Everything cant be solved with ''kill kill kill'', anon. If killing lots of people is the only option to get rid of religions, they might just as well exist..They dont actually kill THAT many people after all.
''but bawww war X was caused by religion'', most more recent wars had other reasons than religion as well. Saying that you're fighting for your religion is just a nice way to get religious people motivated for war..

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462736

What for? Being agnostic?

[Anonymous No.]

>50 posts and 6 image replies omitted.
It's amazing how much /jp/ loves to talk about female virginity even though no one here will ever have anything to do with it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462773
>Everything cant be solved with ''kill kill kill'', anon.
Yes, it can.

People have problems. No people, no problems.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462774
>agnostic

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462785
No, the killing part is a problem in itself.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462774
that would've been cooler if it were Teddy Roosevelt, not Freud.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462790
You should've told him what it means, then. There is no idea in discussing if you're not willing to correct mistakes made by other people.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462800
No, it isn't. Did we discuss this yesterday or was that someone else?

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462808
>responding to a reaction image
>implying one cannot use wikipedia/google

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462815
>green text and a random reaction image

[Katsu-kun !!F17Uym/1MLN No.]

>not sure what to quote here but i'll quote something so i at least post with only green text

[Anonymous No.]

Sure is pseudo-intellectual normalfaggotry in here. This is thread is a perfect example of why anyone who isn't a true NEET needs to be permabanned from /jp/.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462865
to be a true neet you only have to be out of education/employment/training

[Anonymous No.]

>DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO DOO BANANA PHONE

[Sakura !!sCKns1iPkwx No.]

>>3462877
This is what non true NEETs actually believe.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462865
The only thing I care about the people posting in /jp/ is that they should have a high powerlevel. And if you care about how they live, you are just a stupid elitist.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462897
Please, could you at least use a word like ''hikikomori'' instead of NEET? NEET truly has no deeper meaning.

[Anonymous No.]

in b4 primary/secondary NEETs

[Anonymous No.]

I'm employed.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462907
Spoken like a true normalfag. Let me ask you some questions.

Who do you think is responsible for Japanese bird, Bawwson and Anontalk spam?

Normalfags who're butthurt that they've been told to get out.

Who do you think makes off-topic troll/meta threads like these?

Normalfags. (true NEETs don't have trips or names)

Who are those that always feels a need to dickwave about their perceived superiority and demonstrate that they aren't "losers like us?"

Normalfags. They're so egocentric, weak-willed and self-conscious that even on an anonymous imageboard, they think they need to prove that they're "better" because being a toadying, pseudo-intellectual wage slave somehow makes you a "successful" person.

Normalfaggots, idolfaggots and tripfaggots are the bane of this board and should be exterminated.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462965
>>They're so egocentric, weak-willed and self-conscious that even on an anonymous imageboard, they think they need to prove that they're "better"

It's like talking to a mirror.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462913
Newsflash: To be a hikkikomori, you need to be a jap. No one here is a jap. True NEET (as opposed to false NEET) is the best English equivalent and the only people who disagree are those who a.) aren't NEETs anyway and b.) are butthurt that the true masters of /jp/ have repeatedly told them to get out.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462981
We've had this discussion before, and you're not convincing anyone that hikkikomori or NEET is a phenomenon exclusive to Japan.

Both are loanwords. Get used to that idea.

[Anonymous No.]

ITT: We argue about the meaning of words

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462978
Well, you may be saved yet if you recognize your failings. Quit your job, stop talking to your "friends" (ie, people who leech your money and time, contributing nothing) and drop out of school if you haven't already. Once you do that, you'll start on the path to become one of us.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462981
Why?

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463024
>"friends" (ie, people who leech your money and time, contributing nothing)
dude u r so edgy n hrdcore

Don't be such a selfish cunt. Friends don't need to contribute anything to you. They are bonds formed between people out of camaraderie and personal regard. They need not offer anything other than respect and companionship.

Next time you find yourself asking why you need these "god damn useless friends" ask yourself what YOU have contributed to THEM.

[Anonymous No.]

This thread is bad.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463062
Enjoy convincing yourself that you "really" enjoy spending all your time with people who don't actually like you, doing things you don't actually enjoy for money that you can't use anyway because you're either working or exhausted.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463078
And you should feel bad too?

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463082
To be honest, I enjoy being with my friends. I wouldnt like to abandon them since i've known them for such a long time..
Its nice to have some people I can talk in real life, too. Even though we mainly discuss anime and video games..

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463082
>who don't actually like you
Judging from your words so far, I can probably pretty accurately say you don't have any good friends because you're such a selfish egotist that nobody wants to associate themself with you. The friends you've had in the past only had you to exploit you for money (as you said) and rightly so, because you deserved no better.

>doing things you don't actually enjoy for money
see above.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463105
>/jp/ - internet psychiatrists

>>3463096
They're not really your "friends," just people with whom you're acquainted and to whom you speak because you share interests. If it was advantageous to them to break off relations with you (example: if you were convicted of being a pedophile rapist), they'd do it in a heartbeat and you'd do the same to them.

[Cyrus !!abIc2O8kqZb No.]

>A professor at a leading Islamic university in Egypt decries the device as encouraging fornication out of wedlock, and argues that those responsible for its importation are responsible for corrupting the virtues of Islamic society and should thus face execution.

Instead of being fucking retarded. How about they take responsibility for the shit coming across their borders?

Oh yeah these are Muslims.

Its not all Muslims but damn. Why are they so bitchy?

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463105

I like your pic. ^______^

So, here's mine.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463150
It's pointless. He's deep in denial, and no amount of logic will fix that.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463166
Because, haha, get this - because you touch yourself at night.

[Katsu-kun !!F17Uym/1MLN No.]

>The friends you've had in the past only had you to exploit you for money (as you said) and rightly so, because you deserved no better.
Then, let's discuss this: If somebody is not aware of the mistakes he's making, does he deserve what results of it even though it's only because he doesn't know better?

[Anonymous No.]

If some ppl need religion as a crutch to get on with life, fine by me. But they better not use it to get in my way or the way of others.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462536

>1. Christianity has been taken apart and disputed by philosophers over the centuries. While a strong lobby group, it doesn't have much formal power in most of the developed world. Islam imposes a death penalty on anyone who questions even a single word in the Quran. Reasonably open and democratic countries with an islamic majority are hard to come by.

Averroes would like to have a word with you.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463150
Yeah, you might actually be right.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463188
Ppl style, hazardous cause I wreck this.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463188
>ppl
Reported.

[Anonymous No.]

If you want to understand the history of Islamic culture, just take the history of Europe from the Dark Ages to the Enligtenment, and just reverse it.

Islam went from a culture that gave the world modern medicine, secular thought and algebra, to a bunch of sandwelling have-nots who kill women for having a fake hymen.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463217
What's it like being a plebe?

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463229

kinda like having a fake hymen

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463217
Feminazi detected.

Why shouldn't sluts be executed? They're responsible for their condition and used goods are worthless anyway.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463244

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463244

I don't see how feminism could be extracted from that comment. If anything, it's more about anglo-christian supremacy and religious intollerance.

[Anonymous No.]

THIS THREAD HAS CONVINCED ME THAT 98% OF /jp/ HAS AN IQ LOWER THAN 90

[Cyrus !!abIc2O8kqZb No.]

>>3462965
>Normalfags. (true NEETs don't have trips or names)

>Normalfaggots, idolfaggots and tripfaggots are the bane of this board and should be exterminated.


This is one of the stupidest fucking thing I've ever read on 4chan. You wanna know why /jp/ is shit?

Its you

People like you who feel the need to shout tripfag and are suffering from some mental illness that prevents you from ignoring things on the internet.

All the resources you need are right at your fingertips.

Start using the 4chan extension.
Start hiding threads you don't wanna see.

Don't like tripfags? Start using the grease monkey script. I'm 100% sure someone will give it to you if you ask nicely.

And don't be a faggot that has to announce every time they use it. No one likes that guy. Do not be that guy.

No one is making you read threads you don't wanna read.

No one is making you talk to people you don't wanna talk to.

No one is forcing you to see things you don't wanna see.

Also, how are idolfaggots a problem on /jp/? If anything, they're the most productive people on /jp/. They keep their shit condensed and in one thread. I have never seen the front page overrun by idol threads.

I know no one will pay attention to this post because hurr durr tripfag but damnit it had to be said.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463276
Haha, look at this guy - he cares!

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463276
>Its you

I can see why you'd want to hide your poor grammar.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463276
Sup butthurt idolfag.

[Anonymous No.]

Fuck you faggots!!!!

Where can I get one of these?!

[Anonymous No.]

>>Egyptian politicians are calling for the device to be banned forthwith

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462617
I think one guy letting people use a vaccine doesn't suffice to compensate for capitalism in its whole.
You're the one being overly naive if you believe most people aren't selfish.

[Anonymous No.]

A woman lying about her virginity (provided it held importance) in order to get married is fraud. The frogs may disagree and call it a disgrace, misogynist and so on but a lie is a lie. Those women are much the same as the men who get turned into females under the knife and don't inform you until it's too late.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462617
True, there's plenty of people that wouldn't kill a man for money, but I really don't think that's necessarily human nature. I mean, for the most part, we're TAUGHT that hurting others is a bad thing. From what I can tell, you're trying to say that it's not EVERYONE's nature to be like that, but honestly, morality has more to do with your life experience your "nature."
>>3468421
Those women only lie about their virginity in the first place because societies have this tendency to put so much value in it to begin with. It's not like, you know, these women go around saying, "I want to lie about my life" or anything. If it wasn't considered disgraceful to have premarital sex, there'd be no reason to lie about it in the first place. It's not their fault that certain people would stone them for something like that

[Anonymous No.]

>>3462617
True, there's plenty of people that wouldn't kill a man for money, but I really don't think that's necessarily got anything to do with human nature. I mean, for the most part, we're TAUGHT that hurting others is a bad thing. From what I can tell, you're trying to say that it's not EVERYONE's nature to be like that, but honestly, morality has more to do with your life experience than your "nature."
>>3468421
Those women only lie about their virginity in the first place because societies have this tendency to put so much value in it to begin with. It's not like, you know, these women go around saying, "I want to lie about my life," or anything. If it wasn't considered disgraceful to have premarital sex, there'd be no reason to lie about it in the first place. It's not their fault that certain people would stone them for something like that. Same thing with being transgendered. We may try to pretend that we're oh so progressive, but the fact is that there are still people out there who will curb stomp you for having a penis and wearing a dress.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3468595
Of course it is human nature. Human nature caused by the collective need to survive in an vicious and merciless environment. Therefore humans are conditioned to survival through all means possible. Just because real deal world matters have been bombarded with euphemisms, cynicism and the boundless ignorance of the degenerate societies of the west where the majority of it's inhabitants don't feel the struggle of survival directly, doesn't mean it vanished because hurr durr see how cool we are, all problems were solved by our masterminds, humankind so kawaii. If we were living in an ideal world with unlimited access to resources for every individual we wouldn't have these problems and human nature would change through evolution.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3468607
I never said the drive to survive wasn't human nature. I said that morality and being considerate of others isn't. Like you, yourself, said, we're conditioned that way.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3467599 You're the one being overly naive if you believe most people aren't selfish.

Self-interest is not the same as selfishness.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3463244
Hi Athens

[athens No.]

Hi.

[Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ Sion Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ !3nfYhy8NyI No.]

>>3468702
I was hoping for more from that doujin

[Anonymous No.]

Nah not here. Athens was the authority loving Briton one. Do your homework first, just in case of future name-calling.

[Anonymous No.]

Just taking the opportunity to tip my hat to the OP's hilarious choice of picture.

[Anonymous No.]

>>3468702
sauce?

[Anonymous No.]

Why is this thread still here.
Fuck.

[Katsu-kun !!F17Uym/1MLN No.]

>>3468978
Because it's an awesome thread by an awesome poster, of course.

[Anonymous No.]

>Katsu-kun !!F17Uym/1MLN
yeah but no.