Japan! Fuck YEAHR!

File: 131 KB, 650x384, 65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:10:58 2009 No.3368977 [Reply] [Original]

Japan! Fuck YEAHR!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:23:58 2009 No.3369041 Japan! Fuck Hai!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:28:58 2009 No.3369055 -oishi so! -sashimi ? -ie, yaki akachan...umai

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:41:58 2009 No.3369112 >>3368977 This is what atheism leads to.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:42:58 2009 No.3369117 kawaii desu nee

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:42:58 2009 No.3369118 >>3369112 Shish-ka-babies?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:47:58 2009 No.3369136 File: 26 KB, 500x250, MASAKA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3369118 >>3369055 Sick fucks.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:52:58 2009 No.3369160 >>3369112 Actually, assuming that those really are Japanese Soldiers (they could be soldiers from some other asian country), this is what god Emperor worship leads to.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:56:58 2009 No.3369185 File: 880 KB, 1680x1050, 1173072629230.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Francois is a common Japanese surname.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 10:59:58 2009 No.3369203 >>3369160 "Sir, the babies are Xenos." "Good job, SPEESH MAHRINES"

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:01:58 2009 No.3369217 >>3369203 SPAAHS MAHREENS, GET THE JOB DONE, and now you have cholera.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:01:58 2009 No.3369220 File: 1.05 MB, 300x278, 1252814948042.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] DID SOMEONE SAY GOD EMPEROR? I THINK I HEARD SOMEONE SAY GOD EMPEROR.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:10:58 2009 No.3369259 >>3369220 Xenos?

>>	Anonymous of Croatia !na1byG1GU. Mon Sep 14 11:12:58 2009 No.3369268 XENO SCUM EVERYONE KILL THEM!!!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:22:58 2009 No.3369328 >this is what god Emperor worship leads to. No this is what Japanese culture leads to.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:26:58 2009 No.3369366 >>3369328 Emperors lead to all kinds of drama and faggotry China's was killing of themselves for 5000 yrs until they stopped the Emperor crap

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:28:58 2009 No.3369375 >>3369366 The reason you hear so much about civil wars is because unlike other nations China is very rarely invaded by foreign powers.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:29:58 2009 No.3369385 Whoah. That was a crazy looking abortion.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:30:58 2009 No.3369399 >>3369375 Or maybe the fact that it houses a large amount of groups which have their own culture. And some of these groups hate each other thus starting conflict.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:55:58 2009 No.3369490 >>3369160 They worshiped a human; atheists worship humanity.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 11:58:58 2009 No.3369502 File: 51 KB, 602x343, 1247233478992.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Imperial Japanese army

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:03:58 2009 No.3369522 >>3369375 >China is rarely invaded by foreign powers >Japan, Mongols, British I don't know, they've been invaded quite a lot in the lest millennium.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:09:58 2009 No.3369549 >>3369522 That's what they get for making such delicious food and fireworks.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:16:58 2009 No.3369577 >>3369490 Atheists just means you don't worship a god. Doesn't mean you worship anything else. If the Japanese worshipped the Emperor as a God, they weren't atheists. Faggot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:18:58 2009 No.3369582 >>3369490 >atheists worship humanity. Wouldn't the worship of humanity be humanism instead?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:19:58 2009 No.3369587 File: 88 KB, 400x975, genocide and pedophila for the emperor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3369160 It all makes sense now.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:25:58 2009 No.3369618 >>3369577 Butthurt atheist denies the fact that atheists have murdered hundred of millions of people in the last century and that this is undeniable proof of the fact that they ahve 0 morals...........

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:28:58 2009 No.3369628 /jp/ should ban Chinese.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:38:58 2009 No.3369675 >>3369618 Fun fact: More people have been killed by religious people than atheist people!

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:45:58 2009 No.3369700 File: 190 KB, 640x484, 1242342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Atomic bomb

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:46:58 2009 No.3369704 >>3368977 Reported.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:46:58 2009 No.3369707 >>3369700 >Honest-to-god-fearing American weapon yessir

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:48:58 2009 No.3369715

>>3369675
>Fun fact: More people have been killed by religious people than atheist people!

Where's the proof?
65+ million killed by Hitler
100+ million killed by Stalin
100+ million killed by Mao
Pol Pot and hundreds of other atheists slaughtered millions...

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 12:49:58 2009 No.3369719 >>3369618 You better be a troll. Regardless, thread reported

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:51:58 2009 No.3369728

>>3369675
There have been more people of faith than atheists, so this is not surprising. Faith is a natural human experience that every mentally healthy human has, like love and kindness.

Atheism is an invention of the 19th century. It's not coincidental that many mental illnesses were 'discovered' around the same time as the ideology of atheism was being invented. Your average atheist would say that atheism has always existed, but this is just historical revisionism and anachronism. It's kind of like calling the ancient Greeks 'homosexual', when no such concept of 'homosexuality' existed in ancient Greece. It was completely foreign to them. It's also like 'rationality' and 'individuality' in Eastern culture. Those are Western ideas, with no basis in Oriental culture.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:52:21 2009 No.3369736 ×100+ million killed by Stalin ×100+ million killed by Mao No! 200+ million killed by Stalin 800+ million killed by Mao

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:53:58 2009 No.3369741 /jp/'s moderator is very useless.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:54:58 2009 No.3369744 Well, for one, most of the Germans under Hitler were Christian, as was Hitler himself. And there's certainly been more than 400 million killed in wars etc by religious people all the way back in history.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:54:58 2009 No.3369745 >>3369715 Are you trying to imply Hitler was atheist?

Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 12:55:58 2009 No.3369748

>>3369715
Hitler was a christian, though it really is pointless to talk about who killed the most, when the reason for WHY they did it is what matters. The people you're mentioning didn't do what they did BECAUSE they where atheists. There is no atheist bible commanding them to kill. There are religious texts ordering their followers to kill, and many millions have died because of it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:56:58 2009 No.3369751 Hitler was more of a pagan than a Christian.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:56:58 2009 No.3369753 >>3369715 Some those were Christian. What he's saying is true simply because you know, a lot more religious people. It's like saying sane people killed more people than madmen.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:58:58 2009 No.3369759 >>3369715 This is a very good point. But then again, apostles of the Communist religion are something of an exception among atheists.

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:58:58 2009 No.3369760

>>3369728
>It's not coincidental that many mental illnesses were 'discovered' around the same time as the ideology of atheism was being invented
...Because the accepted explanation for mental illness up to that point was usually "LOL DEMONIC POSSESSION".

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 12:59:58 2009 No.3369762 >>3369715 Hitler and Stalin did have modern weapons though, and could very easily kill more people than the religious people several hundred years before, so comparing numbers like that is not really "fair".

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:00:58 2009 No.3369766 >>3369760 It's just as valid as saying one has rotten brain juice, which is basically what we all believe now.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:01:58 2009 No.3369769 >>3369753 This is very true; I was stating a statement that, while was completely accurate, was not relevant to any reasonable standard of judgement. Well spotted.

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 13:01:58 2009 No.3369770 >>3369728 That post was stupid, and you're stupid for writing it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:04:58 2009 No.3369780 >>3369770 There was no atheism before the 19th century. Before then, 'atheist' referred to those who didn't believe in your God. The ideology we now call 'atheism' is relatively new.

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 13:06:58 2009 No.3369784 >>3369780 Atheism is not an ideology and you know it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:06:58 2009 No.3369785 >>3369780 That wasn't the part that was mindnumbingly stupid.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:11:58 2009 No.3369796 >>3369785 What then? The part where I said faith is natural. Atheists also have faith, or else they wouldn't believe what they believe.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:13:58 2009 No.3369807 >>3369796 So you're using 'faith' as a synonym for simply 'belief'? Then why say things like >There have been more people of faith than atheists

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:14:58 2009 No.3369808

>>3369728
> It's not coincidental that many mental illnesses were 'discovered' around the same time as the ideology of atheism was being invented.

Yes, because we discovered the scientific method, dragged our sorry asses out of the dark ages, and as a consequence, realized that god worship is pretty much a mental disease of its own.

There was certainly atheism (and agnosticism) before the 19th century, btw. It's not revisionism or anything of the sort. World history is not exclusively the history of white dudes in Europe. (Wait, aren't we posting on /jp/? Shouldn't this be obvious?)

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:16:58 2009 No.3369818

>>3369796
What do you mean atheists have faith? You probably mean that atheists supposedly "believe" that there is no god. But that is false. I'm an atheist, and I do not BELIEVE that NO god exists. I am unconvinced that any specific religion has gotten it right, but I don't actively think that there is no kind of supernatural force at all. I am still an atheist though because I lack a positive belief in a god. I neither assume that a god exist nor doesn't exist. There is no belief involved.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:18:58 2009 No.3369822 >>3369808 Fucking atheists, belief in 2D gods is not a mental disease.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:20:58 2009 No.3369831 >>3369822 Wouldn't be much of a god if it has less dimensions than the believer.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:21:58 2009 No.3369833 >>3369780 How is atheism, the lack of belief in a god, a set of aims and ideas that directs one's goals, expectations, and actions (to quote Wikipedia's article on "ideology")

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:21:58 2009 No.3369835 >>3369818 That's a nice semantic trick you have there, but the fact of the matter is you have come to a conclusion about a metaphysical question which no one has a certain answer to.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:22:58 2009 No.3369837 >>3369818 Then you are technically agnostic, not atheist. (Most people don't make the distinction, though.)

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:22:58 2009 No.3369838

>>3369796
>when no such concept of 'homosexuality' existed in ancient Greece.

The concept of homosexuality, a sexual and romantic relationship between two equal adult males, most certainly did exist in ancient Greece, and was not considered kindly. It was viewed as very distinctly different from the normal practiced pederastic relationship.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:23:58 2009 No.3369840 >>3369831 My faith empowers her.

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:24:58 2009 No.3369843

>>3369835
Only in the same way that I've come to a conclusion about the pressing metaphysical question of the existence of the invisible elephant in my closet.

Calling non-belief in something "faith" on the same level as belief in something is the semantic trick here.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:24:58 2009 No.3369844 >>3369835 Nope, he has come to a conclusion about an epistemological question: Should I believe in God?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:25:58 2009 No.3369851 >>3369837 The definition of the weakest sort of atheism is simply the lack of a positive belief in a god. I lack a positive belief in a god. Some call this weak atheism, or agnostic atheism.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:25:58 2009 No.3369854 >>3369844 So, do you have faith that there is no such a thing as Zeus and the other Greek Gods?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:26:58 2009 No.3369855 >>3369844 Excuse me, do you know what 'epistemology' means? Because I don't think you know what it means.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:28:58 2009 No.3369858 /jp/ - pseudointellectuals.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:28:58 2009 No.3369859 >>3369854 No, I do not. I simply do not believe in these gods, so I go about my daily life in pretty much exactly the way as I would if I actively disbelieved in them (whatever that means).

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:28:58 2009 No.3369860 >>3369835 It's not semantics. Lack of belief in a god is not at all the same as belief in no god. One of them is a positive belief, the other is not.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:30:58 2009 No.3369863 >>3369843 Yes, believing in the non-existence of silly things in your closet is also called faith, faith in the correct operation of your senses. It's something we all take for granted, but, our senses are fallible. This may come as a surprise.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:30:58 2009 No.3369864 >>3369835 Stop being stupid. The point was exactly that he has NOT come to a conclusion because he doesn't know, and he knows that he doesn't know. As long as he doesn't know he won't hold a belief.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:32:58 2009 No.3369877 >>3369855 Theory of knowledge. Beliefs could be considered a superset of knowledge. If you really want to be so strict, you can reformulate the question: do I know that this God fellow exists? Essentially the same question.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:33:58 2009 No.3369880 >>3369863 Kinda makes the original distinction between "people of faith" and "atheists" pretty meaningless, doesn't it

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:33:58 2009 No.3369881 >>3369864 There's a lot of things he doesn't know, such as the existence of the external world. He's not going to be neutral about that, because it'll undermine his belief.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:35:58 2009 No.3369890 >>3369881 >his belief. What belief exactly? The "belief" which has just been explained he doesn't have? >external world What the hell is that?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:35:58 2009 No.3369891 File: 197 KB, 1000x948, 6155580.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] don't mind me

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:36:58 2009 No.3369892

>>3369880
The funny thing about atheists is that they don't know that they believe. Unfortunately for them it's the wrong belief. So, no, it doesn't make it meaningless. People of faith know that they have faith, faith in God; atheists have faith in God's non-existence.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:37:58 2009 No.3369896 File: 494 KB, 707x1000, 5788980.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:37:58 2009 No.3369899 >>3369890 Are you a sceptic? A solipsist?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:37:58 2009 No.3369901 >>3369890 His belief that he doesn't have a belief.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:38:58 2009 No.3369903 >>3369877 About a metaphysical entity...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:38:58 2009 No.3369904 >>3369892 >atheists have faith in God's non-existence. it has already been pointed out several times how and why this is wrong. Just gtfo. You're being too stupid even for 4chan standards.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:39:58 2009 No.3369905 File: 782 KB, 941x1329, 5735935.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:39:58 2009 No.3369907 >>3369892 So you're using 'people of faith' as a synonym for 'theist'. Why not just write what you mean?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:40:58 2009 No.3369910 File: 934 KB, 1280x1024, 5726898.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:41:58 2009 No.3369911 >>3369899 I guess you could say I'm a skeptic. More skeptical than most.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:42:58 2009 No.3369914 File: 1.32 MB, 1000x1000, 5680345.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:43:58 2009 No.3369918

>>3369904
Pointed out where? All I see is the same assertion that "but atheists don't BELIEVE." Simply saying that you don't believe in something doesn't mean that you don't believe anything. Of course, you believe in something: the reliability of human senses, the logical validity of science, etc. You can't prove it, though, which is ok. A lot of us accept that we can't know everything.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:44:58 2009 No.3369923 File: 334 KB, 550x770, 5833993.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:45:58 2009 No.3369925 >>3369918 I really don't know whether to call this semantics or just plain nitpicking.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:46:58 2009 No.3369929 File: 411 KB, 750x667, 5993412.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:47:58 2009 No.3369931 >>3369925 Yes, saying you can't prove what you believe is nitpicking.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:47:58 2009 No.3369933 >>3369918 If atheists actually believed in logical validity of science, or understood it, for that matter, they'd be agnostics.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:48:58 2009 No.3369936 >>3369918 Are you trying to make the most dumb post in the thread on purpose? What you're talking about has nothing to do with the discussion. We're talking about faith/belief in a GOD. Not about faith in anything else that has nothing to do with this.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:49:58 2009 No.3369940 File: 247 KB, 1024x768, 5952988.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:49:58 2009 No.3369942 >>3369936 We're discussing atheism's belief that it has no belief.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:50:58 2009 No.3369946 File: 1002 KB, 982x1392, 5905769.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:51:58 2009 No.3369949

>>3369933
Agnosticism means that it is impossible to know about the existence of god. The cannot->doesn't extension of the definition is an attempt by theists to split the atheist community; in its weaker form it's actually functionally identical to atheism.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:52:58 2009 No.3369952 >>3369942 Now you're just being silly. Go away you troll.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:53:58 2009 No.3369954 File: 1.19 MB, 1210x1117, 5717889.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:54:58 2009 No.3369960 >>3369952 This is what you're saying. You have no belief, which is still a belief since it's neither justified nor true.

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 13:54:58 2009 No.3369963 File: 367 KB, 800x1200, 10078739688.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 13:55:58 2009 No.3369968 File: 186 KB, 800x1200, 10089478197.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:56:58 2009 No.3369970 File: 249 KB, 800x620, 6144854.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:57:58 2009 No.3369974 File: 277 KB, 800x969, 6136186.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 13:57:58 2009 No.3369975 File: 206 KB, 800x1200, 10079412974.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:57:58 2009 No.3369976

>>3369899
If you can present an argument for solipsism that is both difficult to assail and not narcissistic, I'll give it a wack.

The problem, I speculate, people have with "belief in [g]od" is that there is no functional disassociation between deity and accompanying religion. If we are to limit the existence in God to human beliefs exclusively, they arose to solve the same problem, serve the same purpose, but diverged at some un-mappable point and now only share supplemental roles. If we expand that definition to include actual existence, there is an even greater indication of logical disconnect.

Regardless, of my own beliefs, I am not against believing in the existence of a [G]od, but I can not attach human principles, virtue or vice, to such a creature without recoiling in disgust to worship such a thing.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:58:58 2009 No.3369981 Butthurt Chinks abound

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 13:58:58 2009 No.3369982 File: 99 KB, 800x1200, 10093326395.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 13:58:58 2009 No.3369983 File: 608 KB, 900x1000, 5976824.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:00:58 2009 No.3369988

>>3369960
That's one way to look at it. That every statement requires a yes/no answer, and that both answers are taken on "faith". I honestly can't remember where this argument started, but it was probably someone claiming atheists are hypocrites for having FAITH that they're not hooked to the Matrix. Which really is semantics in a normal discussion ("normal" in this case being one that takes place anywhere outside a metaphysics classroom) where faith refers specifically to belief in unproven/unprovable beings.

Exactly correct or not, I think it's reasonable to say that something doesn't exist until it's been proven to. Without having to take that statement on faith.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:00:58 2009 No.3369989 File: 518 KB, 800x800, 5675380.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:01:58 2009 No.3369995 File: 564 KB, 714x1000, 6152043.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:03:58 2009 No.3370006 File: 123 KB, 800x1200, 10093327007.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:03:58 2009 No.3370010 File: 501 KB, 600x750, 5724057.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:04:58 2009 No.3370017 File: 132 KB, 800x1200, 10095568541.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:06:58 2009 No.3370028

>>3369949
No, atheism is an attempt to force the skeptic community into a false dichotomy of "god does/doesn't exist".

The weaker form of atheism is actually agnostic in principles, they're just misguided into making god the crucial point of their ideology. If they really didn't believe, as they claim, they simply wouldn't care for things that cannot be observed.

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:07:58 2009 No.3370035 File: 125 KB, 800x1200, 10095568501.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:08:58 2009 No.3370040 File: 181 KB, 600x900, 10115498376.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:10:58 2009 No.3370053 File: 67 KB, 800x533, 10113714101.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:11:58 2009 No.3370058 >>3370028 >they're just misguided into making god the crucial point of their ideology. Yeah, I don't do that.

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:12:58 2009 No.3370064 File: 136 KB, 600x900, 10115498382.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:13:58 2009 No.3370073 File: 207 KB, 700x1050, 10118345298.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:16:58 2009 No.3370091 File: 146 KB, 600x900, 10115498378.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:16:58 2009 No.3370094

>>3370028
Agnosticism is a 19th-century term invented by a guy who didn't want to be called an atheist. The only uses this term has are in the strong sense ("God's existence is unknowable") and as a theist excuse to discredit the literally ancient term "atheism" by redefining it to mean active denial instead of the simple disbelief it's meant for the past two thousand years.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:16:58 2009 No.3370097 File: 379 KB, 1200x900, 6110893.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:17:58 2009 No.3370099 I wish OP wasn't an edit because that's a tasty looking baby and I'm getting awfully hungry

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:17:58 2009 No.3370102 File: 309 KB, 700x1050, 10122614470.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:19:58 2009 No.3370116 File: 348 KB, 700x1050, 10122614479.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:19:58 2009 No.3370122 File: 960 KB, 900x1228, 5982339.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:20:58 2009 No.3370132 File: 154 KB, 700x1050, 10131000686.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:24:58 2009 No.3370162 File: 188 KB, 700x1050, 10118345299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:27:58 2009 No.3370184 File: 368 KB, 700x1050, 10131000682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:30:58 2009 No.3370204 File: 206 KB, 700x1050, 10131000687.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:33:58 2009 No.3370221 File: 151 KB, 393x611, cina-azure.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Kordox !DOZOaniwcg Mon Sep 14 14:34:58 2009 No.3370232 File: 168 KB, 585x435, cina-default.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Sep 14 14:40:58 2009 No.3370252
File: 46 KB, 400x267, khorne_would_be_pleased.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>3369217

If japan was a Chaos Speeesh Mareens Chapter,

which god would they most likely swear their absolute loyalty to?

I'd say Khorne.

pic related. collecting skulls for the skull throne.

>>	Anonymous Thu Apr 11 04:39:08 2019 No.3370252,1 >>3370028 militant atheist that constantly argue about god are very few the majority just don't give a damn

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture