[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 18 KB, 280x280, Panties.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
304627 No.304627 [Reply] [Original]

This is gonna be an odd request, but I need (drawn) images of kid's panties. Anime screencaps, plain old fanart of something or another, whatever. Preferably just the panties, not being worn, but as long as the focus is the panties I'm good enough with gimp to take out the rest.

Image kind of related, but too 3D.

>> No.304633

wha,,,,,? wwwwwwwwhhhhhhyyyyyy......?

>> No.304635

fucking pedo

>> No.304637

nigga wut

>> No.304639

it's not allowed, you pedo creeps

>> No.304641

>>304633
See >>304635. That's basically why. It's a fetish of sorts.

>>304639
And why would Japanese fanart depicting panties not be allowed?

>> No.304642

gb2....jail?

>> No.304643

>>304642
whoops, forgot mah sage

>> No.304647

Try /e/.

>> No.304655
File: 226 KB, 768x1086, 1206437117758.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
304655

Allow me to demonstrate... This one's not a bad example.

>> No.304659

>>304655
No.

>> No.304662
File: 45 KB, 560x600, 1206437209411.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
304662

>>304647
/e/? Hmm, alright.

>> No.304668

8/10

>> No.304675

>kid's panties
not allowed. anything kiddie. reported.

>> No.304677
File: 118 KB, 540x751, 1206437418741.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
304677

Id imagine /a/ would do a better job than this paedophobic board.

>> No.304679

>>304675
I'd said drawn. Lolis are most definitely allowed here, provided it fits in with the worksafeness of the board.

>> No.304680

>>304675

those aren't kid's panties, i wear those every day :3

>> No.304682

>>304677
This board's not full of pedophobes, unless you're thinking of the wrong place. We ARE the pedophiles.

/a/ on the other hand, they don't like the lolis so much, it saddens me.

>> No.304687

Reported.

>> No.304696

>>304679
you weren't in that massive thread about this. a mod came in and said "NO".

>> No.304703

>>304696
I was in the thread where the mod said no to child models, schoolgirls, etc. That was all 3D.

>> No.304727

>>304703
that "no kiddies pics of any kind" came a few days after that one. some ass decided to "push the rules" so the hammer came down.

>> No.304733

>>304727
I call bullshit, considering I post loli all the time. Not only that, "a few days" was quite some time ago, and I've been scouring /jp/, I think I'd have noticed it. Unless you can bring in some hard proof (like, say, a screencap - one of those exist for just about every "rule" that's been made at one point or another by a mod) I say fuck you.

>> No.304735

mods/janitors wont be around for a few hours anyway, so not like it matters at all

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action