[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 179 KB, 1600x1200, penne rigate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2913209 No.2913209 [Reply] [Original]

Japanese bird cooking spaghetti

>> No.2913213
File: 10 KB, 194x199, isuckcocks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2913213

>> No.2913216

I fap to Japanese bird.

>> No.2913220
File: 82 KB, 413x389, battler_smirk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2913220

>>2913209
Can you prove that the bird is indeed cooking spaghetti?

>> No.2913223
File: 192 KB, 640x480, 1245417049591.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2913223

>>2913220
I can prove it isn't

>> No.2913227

>>2913220
No, but you can prove that all birds that don't cook spaghetti aren't Japanese.

>> No.2913244

>>2913227
Then using the contrapositive, All Japanese birds cook spaghetti!

Can you prove that the bird is Japanese?

>> No.2913266

>>2913244
I can prove that the bird in question isn't making spaghetti.

It's cleary penne rigate.

>> No.2913284

>>2913244
No

>> No.2913290

I'm surrounded by wankers

>> No.2913293

>>2913266
Just because there is a box next to it that doesn't have spaghetti on it does not prove that the bird is not cooking spaghetti. You cannot prove that what is in that pot is not spaghetti.

>> No.2913298

I always laugh at this and the responses it gets.

>> No.2913305

>>2913209
>>2913209
>>2913209
I LOVE YOU JAPANESE BIRD!

>> No.2913314

>>2913266
>>2913244
That doesn't necessarily mean that all birds that cook spaghetti are Japanese.
Hempel's only aplyies to All A then B premises.
But this is not the case, Need to prove that this Japanese bird is indeed cooking spaghetti, but hey, The bird being Japanese is not an hypothesis, so the whole thing is wrong, since now you need to prove something without hypothesis, so, if you prove the bird (fact) is not cooking spaghetti (fact) can you prove it's not Japanese? no, since Hempel won't apply.

>> No.2913331

>>2913293
>>2913314
Before I get into a stalemate, allow me to throw the game.

You can have your JBCS.

>> No.2913334

>>2913314
But yeah, >>2913293 makes it all worse.
Whatever he's (?) cooking, trying to prove it's not spaghetti is a devil's proof, only by knowing the contents of the pot you'll be able to prove it, but that's impossible, you can't prove the contents of that box were put in that pot or anything of the sort. And you can't go hempel since there's no global hypothesis.

>> No.2913335

>>2913331
Yeah ok

>> No.2913356

>>2913334
>only by knowing the contents of the pot you'll be able to prove it

In this case, it's a Schrodinger's Cat case. The pot contains spaghetti and not spaghetti at the same time. Because we haven't peeked into the pot yet, these two cases exist.

The argument is, therefore, a stalemate until we peek into the contents of the pot.

>> No.2913385

>>2913356
Yes, but something is lacking, and that's the fact that there could be ANYTHING in that pot.
Until observation occurs, there are infinite possibilities, but since the state is not tied to a quantum phenomenon you can't really make a reference to Schrodinger's.

>> No.2913384
File: 307 KB, 1600x1200, 1244582020622.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2913384

>>2913305

>> No.2913405

I love /jp/. Best board ever.

>> No.2913413
File: 322 KB, 800x600, aaaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2913413

Japanese slut cooking spaghetti

>> No.2913446

Basically, we can only say that
>>>/rs/The_animal_in_the_picture_is_indeed_a_bird

>> No.2913446,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446
We can't deny the possibility that it only LOOKS LIKE a bird.

>> No.2913446,2 [INTERNAL] 

I love how the archive turns the red truth into mere green.

>> No.2913446,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,2
There wasn't any red truth in the first place. Prove me wrong.

>> No.2913446,4 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,3
When the DDoS lifts, maybe I will.

>> No.2913446,5 [INTERNAL] 

Ghostbros cant red text. Prove me wrong.

>> No.2913446,6 [INTERNAL] 

[color="FF0000"](USER FAILED BBCODE IN THIS POST)[/color]

>> No.2913446,7 [INTERNAL] 

Dutch ghost posting in thread

>> No.2913446,8 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,5
Yeah, we can.

>> No.2913446,9 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,8
NO, WITCHES CAN'T EXIST!

>> No.2913446,10 [INTERNAL] 

holy shit

>> No.2913446,11 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,5
[color=red]I haven't read umineko.[/color]

>> No.2913446,12 [INTERNAL] 

[red]hurpadurpa[/color]

>> No.2913446,13 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,8
No fair, bro. I can't use that tag.

>> No.2913446,14 [INTERNAL] 

how do i red?

>> No.2913446,15 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,8
Hahaha oh wow.

>> No.2913446,16 [INTERNAL] 

[COLOR=red]I can't do BB code.[/COLOR]

>> No.2913446,17 [INTERNAL] 

Out of curiosity:

[quote]Une[/quote]
Deux
[center]Trois[/center]
[font=Veradana]Quatre[/font]

>> No.2913446,18 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,13
[ banned ] tag by the way, for all you aspiring EXPERT BBCODERS out there.

>> No.2913446,19 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,18
>You can't use that tag

>> No.2913446,20 [INTERNAL] 

gb2/prog/

>> No.2913446,21 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,20
I can't :(

>> No.2913446,22 [INTERNAL] 

[color=red]im gay[/color]

>> No.2913446,23 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,22
Hey guys, look at this fag

>> No.2913446,24 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,22
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/7453/baww.jpg

>> No.2913446,25 [INTERNAL] 

<color=red>test</color>

>> No.2913446,26 [INTERNAL] 

[font color=red]test[/font]

>> No.2913446,27 [INTERNAL] 

<font color="red">test</font>

>> No.2913446,28 [INTERNAL] 

[colour=red]Maybe British spelling?[/colour]

>> No.2913446,29 [INTERNAL] 

[highlight]Perhaps it's not colour at all![/highlight]

>> No.2913446,30 [INTERNAL] 

><span class='banned'>Yeah&#44; we can.</span>
Lame. Normal users can't red!

>> No.2913446,31 [INTERNAL] 

Without love, it cannot be used

>> No.2913446,32 [INTERNAL] 

[color=brown]^_^[/color]

>> No.2913446,33 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,30
You people are really stubborn. （　≖‿≖）

>> No.2913446,34 [INTERNAL] 

hmmm lets see the source code

<span class='banned'>Yeah&#44; we can.</span>

>> No.2913446,35 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,30
>>2913446,34
well fuck my mother

>> No.2913446,36 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,35
Doesn't your mother look like Beatrice?

>> No.2913446,37 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,36
a little

>> No.2913446,38 [INTERNAL] 

Shiki can kill Japanese birds. Discuss.

>> No.2913446,39 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,38
There are no lines on Japanese bird.

>> No.2913446,40 [INTERNAL] 

I was going to make a thread today ... Nice going.

On a side note, this image have been posted around 677 times already. Fascinating, I know.

>> No.2913446,41 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,40
>I was going to make a thread today

;_;

>> No.2913446,42 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,40
Why must it always be danmaku?
Why not chess?

Also, you can't prove the bird is cooking because all the knobs are turned off.
No heat > No cooking.

>> No.2913446,43 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,42
Chess? How would that work?

"White to move and mate in 6 moves, you have until 12:00 to find the solution. First person who is correct wins"... except that any computer chess program could be used to cheat.

>> No.2913446,44 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,42
Because he's finished with cooking already and he just turned the gas off. It's quite likely that this picture is taken a bit before serving the food for his bird family. I imagine that his bird-chicks are eagerly sitting at the dinner-table already at the back somewhere. His wife might be a feminist, and she probably don't give a shit when our Japanese Bird friend tells her to "Back To The Kitchen".
yeah I'm bored ;_;

>> No.2913446,45 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,43

Bridge would be better.

>> No.2913446,46 [INTERNAL] 

>>2913446,42
How about 'Four in a row'? Sounds better?

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action