JPEG XL, not AVIF, is the future

[Anonymous No.]

The most important reason is simple. You can migrate existing JPEGs without generation loss.
>Migrating to JPEG XL reduces storage costs because servers can store a single JPEG XL file to serve both JPEG and JPEG XL clients. Several options are available. First, JPEG XL encoders can produce a backwards-compatible JPEG file, and can choose to add enhancement metadata. This file remains decodable by a legacy JPEG decoder, whereas a JPEG XL decoder uses the metadata (if present) to enhance image quality. Second, existing JPEG files can be losslessly transcoded to JPEG XL, significantly reducing their size. These can be restored into the exact same JPEG file, ensuring backward compatibility with existing JPEG-based applications.
https://jpeg.org/jpegxl/
Everything else about JPEG XL is good. The image quality of new .jxl files is close to AVIF. It is royalty-free. Google is a co-developer, so it will be in Blink.

[Anonymous No.]

>>23743118
Oh yeah, almost forgot. JPEG XL uses a sophisticated progressive encoding that allows you to stop downloading the image early if the quality is enough for your display. AVIF has no progressive encoding whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.]

But anon this is /jp/eg not jpe/g/

[Anonymous No.]

vpn fucks, rangeban united states fucks

[Anonymous No.]

>>23743197
Oh no!