[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 9 KB, 323x380, jt_katana.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2075775 No.2075775 [Reply] [Original]

I'm asking you because /k/ is full of faggoty.
What good Japanese swords for 100 dollars are there?

>> No.2075781

>>2075775
You can't even buy a good knife set with $100.

>> No.2075778

Not Japanese, that's for sure.

>> No.2075782

There are no good swords for under $100. Just crap.

>> No.2075783

OMG I LoVe Parody thread. XD

wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.

>> No.2075785

Wasn't there just a thread:

>I'm asking you because /v/ is full of faggotry.

Is this supposed to be some elaborate troll?

>> No.2076220

>>2075775
Made in China.

>> No.2076245

That's it. I'm sick of all this "Masterwork Bastard Sword" bullshit that's going on in the d20 system right now. Katanas deserve much better than that. Much, much better than that.

I should know what I'm talking about. I myself commissioned a genuine katana in Japan for 2,400,000 Yen (that's about $20,000) and have been practicing with it for almost 2 years now. I can even cut slabs of solid steel with my katana.

Japanese smiths spend years working on a single katana and fold it up to a million times to produce the finest blades known to mankind.

Katanas are thrice as sharp as European swords and thrice as hard for that matter too. Anything a longsword can cut through, a katana can cut through better. I'm pretty sure a katana could easily bisect a knight wearing full plate with a simple vertical slash.

Ever wonder why medieval Europe never bothered conquering Japan? That's right, they were too scared to fight the disciplined Samurai and their katanas of destruction. Even in World War II, American soldiers targeted the men with the katanas first because their killing power was feared and respected.

So what am I saying? Katanas are simply the best sword that the world has ever seen, and thus, require better stats in the d20 system. Here is the stat block I propose for Katanas:

(One-Handed Exotic Weapon) 1d12 Damage 19-20 x4 Crit +2 to hit and damage Counts as Masterwork

(Two-Handed Exotic Weapon) 2d10 Damage 17-20 x4 Crit +5 to hit and damage Counts as Masterwork

>> No.2076258

>>2076245
How nostalgic.

>> No.2078113

>>2075775

>What good Japanese swords for 100 dollars are there?

None. A few thousand to hundreds of thousands, sure.

>>2075781

>You can't even buy a good knife set with $100.

Ain't that the truth. My Shun set was about $1,500, but it was worth it.

>> No.2079248

If I was to buy a Katana, it would have to be a Sadaichi Gassan... Nothing else would do.

>> No.2079273

>>2075775
>Good japanese swords
10 times that amount

>> No.2079304

This is the kind of japanese swords you can get for a 100$ :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z18X1jmj15w

>> No.2079300

>>2075775
Settle for nothing but Hanzo steel.

>> No.2079323

>>2075781

But Ginzu makes knives great knives under $100.

>> No.2079936

>>2079323

hahahaha. no.

Even a cheap Wüsthof set is better than that crap. You might as well buy your cutlery at fucking Walmart.

>> No.2079958

Buy a dagger instead, faggot.

>> No.2079967

I don't think /k/ was the faggot in this case, bro. Take what you will from that.

>> No.2079982

Pick two:
[] Good
[] Sword
[] $100

If you want a REAL sword, you're gonna be paying more than a hundred dollars for it. Fact.

And if you want a good sword, you're probably best off getting one made in Nepal, not Japan.

>> No.2080007

I'm asking you because /k/ is full of faggoty.
What good nukes for 100 dollars are there?

>> No.2080033
File: 17 KB, 640x480, 1234591758613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2080033

I don't know about Japanese, but if you want something cheap and good, a bolo knife fits that description perfectly.

>> No.2080036

Ryumon stuff any good?

>> No.2080051
File: 20 KB, 292x295, 1234591890460.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2080051

How about a real weapon

>> No.2080047

>Pick two:
>[x] Good
>[] Sword
>[x] $100

I'll just keep my $100.

>> No.2080050

Guns > swords

>> No.2080154

>>2080050
You can't cut down a tree with a gun.

>> No.2080161

>>2080154
Get a bigger gun then.

>> No.2080174

>>2080161
This; they tested it on mythbusters, and tore through an oak log with a vehicle-mounted minigun.

And what makes Anon of the Confed. think you can cut down trees with a sword?

>> No.2080186

>>2080154
Rent howitzer. Point at tree. Fire.

No more tree.

>> No.2080190

>>2080154

Lucky for us that the trees aren't invading anyone at the moment!

>> No.2080193

>>2080174 what makes Anon of the Confed. think you can cut down trees with a sword?
Are you kidding? You can cut down a tree with a large knife if the blade is stout enough.

>> No.2080211

>>2080193
Well, of course. I thought we were talking along the lines of actually using a sword, the blades of which are rarely if ever strong enough to survive being slammed full-strength into a tree enough times to get all the way through the trunk.

>> No.2080261

>>2080211
Well, hm... Maybe if it was a very young tree...

>> No.2080282

>>2080261
A sapling, perhaps?

>> No.2080296

>>2080282
Perhaps.

>> No.2080315

>>2080193
>Are you kidding? You can cut down a tree with a large knife if the blade is stout enough.

Knocking down != cutting

>> No.2080329

>>2080174
>think you can cut down trees with a sword?
cutting is all about sharpness which is based on how well the blade was cut and the hardness of the blade, as long as the blade has enough tensile strength to absorb the shock any blade is capable of cutting through a tree, its all a matter of how many strokes of a blade.

>> No.2080342

>>2080329
Of course the type of tree makes a difference also.

>> No.2080347

>>2080342
Are you honestly claiming that it is possible for the hardness of a tree has greater hardness than metals used for authentic swords?

>> No.2080359

>>2080282
Are you trying to AotC look like a sap?

>> No.2080361

>>2080347
I'm saying it's easier to cut through a hard wood than a soft wood.

>> No.2080371

>>2080361
why bother stating the obvious? might as well not post at all....

>> No.2080367

>>2080361
Let's reverse that, I'm tired.

>> No.2080384

>>2080371
Because you were making points about the conditions of the blade. Was this not obvious also? Of course you're going to cut better with a higher quality blade.

>> No.2080402

>>2080384
was I really? reread my post, it claims that as long as a blade has the minimum required hardness and tensile strength it will be able to cut through wood, so in other words all blades are capable of cutting through wood.

>> No.2080411

>>2080402
Apologies, but I guess I misunderstood tensile strength and hardness to be part of a blade's quality. Guess I'll head to bed, now.

>> No.2080418
File: 28 KB, 333x330, 1234596458692.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2080418

Fuck the haters

>> No.2080433

>>2080411
quality can mean many things, a quality blade is not necessarily good at cutting

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action