[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 100 KB, 600x723, panties.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1762878 No.1762878 [Reply] [Original]

The latest trend amongst 12-13 year old girls in Japan is low-legged panties.

>> No.1762881
File: 280 KB, 950x1357, 1229247239002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1762881

>> No.1762882

Why, Japan, why? Lowlegs are FUCKYES WIN, but only in hmanga... not on this horrible 3D...

>> No.1762884

Fucking ugly.

Bloomers or diapers only.

>> No.1762885

>>1762881
Now THIS, this is acceptable. SaHa is a god.

>> No.1762886

>>1762884
>diapers
No, please do not ruin this thread with that shit.

>> No.1762902

>>1762886
I'm not ruining anything; they're just what I like.

Also, you brought it up.

>> No.1762914

what do lowleg panties look like from behind? do they leave half of the ass bare? what happens when you bend over?

>> No.1762921

>>1762914
You try it and tell us.

>> No.1762925
File: 77 KB, 800x597, 1229248044736.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1762925

>>1762884

Also regarding OP, does this mean there is a generation of Japanese girls who shave coming up?

>> No.1762950

>>1762925
impossible. japanese women shrivel up and die without their protective crotch forest.

>> No.1762948

>>1762925
I sure fucking hope not...

>> No.1762958

>>1762925
We can only pray, my comrade. Wait and pray.

>> No.1762961

>>1762925

God I hope not. Shaving is as bad as hairy.

Wax you stupid fucking............ why do I bother.

Listen, waxing gets rid of the hair, gets rid of it for longer, and doesn't turn into bristling scratchy shit that leaves your cunt pock marked with little scars and bloody dots and scabs.

WAX.

It will leave you bare as a newborn baby, it'll hurt a bit sure.... but you know what? If you're a girl, lots of stuff you're going to do is going to hurt down there, and if you get pregnant it's gonna hurt some more. So GIRL up and wax your fucking cooters.

>> No.1762968

>>1762881
So, source?
>>1762961
>Cooter
Words escape me.

>> No.1762977

>>1762968

Cooter is a perfectly legitimate word.

>> No.1762984

>>1762968
It means cunt

>> No.1762987
File: 74 KB, 791x439, 1229249056808.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1762987

low enough ?

>> No.1762988

>>1762977
coot⋅er
   /ˈkutər/[koo-ter]
–noun
Chiefly Southern U.S. any of several large aquatic turtles of the southern U.S. and northern Mexico.

Mullets are also a perfectly legitimate hairstyle, right?

>> No.1762989

>>1762977
>>1762984
It also sounds like something you'd hear on a junior high campus.

>> No.1762995

>>1762988

This is 4chan, we only accept baldies here.

>> No.1763001

>>1762987
Trimmed pubic hair is banned in japan schools
thats why they stand in line with their panties down, soon the principle will come and inspect their vaginas

>> No.1763004

>>1763001

Lies.

>> No.1763013

>>1763001
Hair does not grow in vaginas.

>> No.1763021

>>1762961

just get rid of cooter and i agree with you. shaving realy is as bad as the curly forest in the pants. waxing has preferable results.

>> No.1763017

>>1763004
Welcome to /jp/
Learn about Japan before you come back.

>> No.1763018

>>1763004
Definitely. Pubic-hair is considered unsanitary. I hope they passed their inspection.

>> No.1763023

>>1762884
>Bloomers or diapers only

I laughed.

>> No.1763026

>>1763023
Most superior forms of underwear.

>> No.1763031
File: 232 KB, 600x800, 1229250096750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1763031

>>1763026
Well the diaper part is obviously a troll but bloomers can be cute, though I'm sure they are terribly impractical.

>> No.1763032

I like basic, modest panties.

>> No.1763048
File: 91 KB, 600x800, 1229250354870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1763048

I like garters.

>> No.1763047

>>1763031
I'm not a troll.

I just love diapers (along with frilly bloomers).

>> No.1763049

>>1763031

gonna tear my dxxk off fappin to that

>> No.1763057

>>1763048
That girl only has stocks and garter belts on though, no garter. Learn your fetish!

>> No.1763063

>>1763031

See those are all right. The diaper thing is just creepy though.

>> No.1763070

>>1763048
That girl only has stockings and garter belts on though, no garter. Learn your fetish!

>> No.1763086 [SPOILER] 
File: 443 KB, 1400x981, 1229250959636.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1763086

>>1763057
my bad, badly classified one.
Correction.

>> No.1763144

if they have the hairy jungles under them it's not any better

>> No.1763180

>>1762881
Name of this?

>> No.1763190

>>1763180
Sho-Pan

>> No.1763970

>>1762881
not low enough.

>> No.1763983
File: 26 KB, 300x395, 1229272358180.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1763983

>>1763190
Yes?

>> No.1763986

>>1763048
That's a garter belt bro.
Garters are different.

>> No.1763988

>>1763986 see >>1763070

That said, garter belts > garters.

>> No.1763989

>>1763048
They're suspenders.

A garter is just a riinglet.

>> No.1763990

>>1763031
>Well the diaper part is obviously a troll
Why is it a troll?

>but bloomers can be cute, though I'm sure they are terribly impractical.
Bloomers ARE cute. Too bad they also share the name with the Gym type bloomers, which suck ass.

Also low leg panties suck. I'll take normal panties any day.

>> No.1763996

>>1763990
Sorry I meant as far as pictures go. If try to find cute ones like that it's hard and you just end up with people wearing bloomers that go down to their shins. Not cute.

>> No.1764001

>>1763996
Yeah.
It's too bad that there aren't may bloomer doujins or even 3D girls wearing bloomers.

>> No.1764002

As awesome as that is...I can't help but think "God damn it Japan"

>> No.1764009

Taihen da

>> No.1764031
File: 24 KB, 247x707, 1229273489121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1764031

I like my girls to look respectful, not like some trashy whore.

>> No.1764034

>>1764031
that whore

>> No.1764038

>>1764031
I like mine... with arrows...

>> No.1764041
File: 124 KB, 760x573, 1229273725632.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1764041

>>1764031
Pure fantasy. Enjoy your reality.

>> No.1764056

>>1762878
>The latest trend amongst 12-13 year old girls in Japan is low-rise panties.

fixed. and is this really new? manga artists likely did not come up with the idea first.

>> No.1764060
File: 31.00 MB, 400x300, 1229274083813.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1764060

>> No.1764065

i really wanna wear those panties

>> No.1764066

After this surely NO ONE can blaim someone, anyone, who prefers 12-13 year old Japanese girls, right? I sure hope atleast IB is with me

>> No.1764079

>>1764066
Why specifically Japanese? That's kind of weird.

>> No.1764084

>>1764079
asian then. They just look hotter than western kids.

>> No.1764087
File: 357 KB, 1016x1488, 1229274728017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1764087

>>1764079

>> No.1764100

>>1764084
Still kind of odd, bro.

>> No.1764108

>>1764100
don't tell me you never touched up your younger sister.

>> No.1764113

>>1764108
Don't have one, just an older brother.

>> No.1764114

>>1764087
OO

>> No.1764153
File: 105 KB, 513x339, 1229275937464.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1764153

>>1764087

>> No.1764500

>>1764087

this office have nice view

>> No.1764524

>>1763070
>that girl
>that girl
>that girl
>that girl
>that girl

>> No.1764541

>>1762878
>low-legged panties
fucking shit fuck.

>> No.1764559

>>1764087
Would be win if not for that ugly bellybutton

>> No.1764599
File: 324 KB, 520x520, 1229283444377.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1764599

The model in the OP pic is in suggestive attire. If she is under age, then that image is illegal under United States law, and a liability to the owners of this site. In that case, the image, at least, should be deleted.

>> No.1764611

>>1764599
lol no

>> No.1764623

>>1764599
I do not find it sexually suggestive in the slightest.

It's only a way of conserving cotton, so that you can get more out of a yarn, which is essential with the current economic climate.

>> No.1764625

>>1764599
d-damn

>> No.1764629

>>1764623
Too bad they probably cost more.

>> No.1764658

>>1764599
I think you mean British/Canadian/Australian law. This is one of those points where us Yanks aren't the crazy ones.

>> No.1764663

>>1762961
>So GIRL up and wax your fucking cooters.

Wow, words...describe feel can't how I


Wow.

>> No.1764667

>>1762925
I certainly fucking hope not.

>> No.1764669

>>1764663
wow just wow?

>> No.1764675

So when is the latest trend going to be no panties?

>> No.1764677

>>1762961
>WAX.
I wanna see YOU wax your pubes you fucking idiot. Do you know how much that hurts?
Shaving every day using a proper razor (not a cheap-ass one-way blade) is a lot better.

>> No.1764684

>>1764675
When slacks are enforced

>> No.1764695

>>1764677

I don't know which is worse; the fact this is either a guy pretending to be a girl, or a guy who shaves his pubes.

>> No.1764698

>>1764684
That just means more likelihood of exposed rump when they bend over.

>> No.1764699

>>1764695
Nothing wrong with guys shaving their intimates.

>> No.1764703

>>1764677

who cares how much it hurts, women exist for the sake of men's pleasure

>> No.1764706

>>1764695
feels good man

>> No.1764710

>>1764699

Coming from someone that calls their groin "intimates," dictates that there is indeed something very wrong.

>> No.1764711

>>1764695
>a guy who shaves his pubes
Oh excuse me for not being a turkish fatass who is covered in hair. Also,stop living in 1970.

>> No.1764712

>>1764699

i gotta shave mine, cuz having lots of hair makes small dick look smaller ;_;

>> No.1764716

>>1764658
>I think you mean British/Canadian/Australian law. This is one of those points where us Yanks aren't the crazy ones.
>us Yanks aren't the crazy ones

lol wut?
20 Years in Prison for Buying a Manga
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/editorial/2008-12-11/christopher-handley/carl-horn

>> No.1764719

>>1764703
so do you have a girlfriend

>> No.1764731

>>1764716

Nope, he is not found guilty and I want to see how they are going to make the remaining charges (since the judge thrown out the pedophile ones) stick.

>> No.1764735

>>1764711

I can see you have issues. Don't worry, you'll get through this rocky period in your life.

>> No.1764742

>>1764731
I'll bet he had to pay his own legal fees and endure a horrible public humiliation, though.

>> No.1764744

Low legged panties suck. Hard.

More bloomers, like >>1763031

Those are the best. Sucks it's very hard to find pics.

>> No.1764748

>>1764744
you're literally gay as hell

>> No.1764749
File: 16 KB, 300x300, 1229286274189.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1764749

>>1764735
Whatever you say,fatass.

>> No.1764752

>>1764742
Nah, he was given a lawyer by a civil rights group. The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund

>> No.1764755

>>1764749

That's it, work your way through the phase of anger. It's okay to lash out at other people about topics of your own fear or self loathing. You're fat, we get that, but it's okay.

>> No.1764767

>>1764755
I don't even get where the two of you are going with your petty little arguement about pubic hair.

Also, I TROL U LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

>> No.1764796

stop shitting up a good thread.

at least it could be

>> No.1764806

>>1763001
>>1763018
your statements seem to contradict each other.
as i read them.
001 says having no pubic hair is against school policies.
018 says having pubic hair is against school policies.
or at least thats the way it looks to me.

>> No.1764811

>>1764806
It's not like the school is going to check.

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action