/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous of Russian Federation No.]

oh no

[Anonymous No.]

country?

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/2008/09/26/child-porn-in-cartoon-style-man-convicted
-84229-21906841/

[Anonymous No.]

Lol UK. What kind of name is Gareth Lightfoot?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1390995
>.co.uk
Oh, we already knew they were dictators when it comes to lolicon. No surprise here.

[Anonymous No.]

What are "Tomb Raider" -style pictures? pics of lara croft?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1390964
lol England

[ponpo !tC/hi58lI. No.]

Commonwealth countries are apparently not as forgiving as America.

Canada, sigh ~

[Anonymous No.]

THIS HAPPENED IN ENGLAND, NOT THE US, RIGHT? RIGHT!?!? Oh god please be not the US.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391005
Probably really bad 3D pictures.

[Anonymous No.]

Englad

[Anonymous No.]

>In a police interview, Hoque admitted downloading the images but denied being interested in child pornography.
>Hoque admitted downloading the images but denied being interested in child pornography.
>but denied being interested in child pornography.
>denied

LOL ENJOY YOUR DENIAL

[Anonymous No.]

Lol England.

[Anonymous No.]

How did he even get caught with the shit?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391034
It says his harddrive was seized in October 2006 for some reason. Probably did something stupid.

[The Oba-Chan Seducer !7kjGbZlVeg No.]

Is it illegal to have shota pics?

[Anonymous of Russian Federation No.]

>>1391045
No.

[Anonymous No.]

>Much of the material was not illegal, but Hoque was charged over nine specific still images. “Although they are not genuine, they appear to be a photograph,”

So, photo realistic images will get you in jail, your average lolicon image won't.

It's been a while since that proposal to make lolicon illegal in the UK. Has it actually gotten anywhere?

[Anonymous of Russian Federation No.]

>>1391045
Does it really matter for you, obachan seducer?

[Anonymous No.]

Fuck Britannia.

[Anonymous No.]

It was 3D rendering shopped with photographs. Photorealistic, apparently.

>Jurors were told they should convict if they concluded that a picture looked like a photo.
So jury duty means they might show you possible CP!
And what is up with this bullshit criteria? In this day and age there is no immediately perceptible difference between a photo and a fake.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391051
The Supreme Court keeps going, "NO FUCKING NO YOU IDIOTS STOP TRYING TO MAKE IT ILLEGAL"

[ponpo !tC/hi58lI. No.]

This makes no sense. If they clearly aren't real, then why is it illegal? I assume harm to a child is the main reason, but since no direct harm is done if the image is fake, then it makes no sense. If it isn't illegal for that one reason then any loli no matter how unrealistic should be illegal as well.

[Anonymous No.]

misleading headline is misleading. lol media

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391085
lol England

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391085
>“Though no actual child has been abused, it helps to feed the demand.”
A temporarily satisfied paedophile is in the long term, a habitually reinforced paedophile. Fapping make us stronger or something.

[ponpo !tC/hi58lI. No.]

>>1391114
Yeah, i assumed it was something like this, though if this is the case then even unrealistic drawn loli should be illegal.

[Anonymous No.]

what a stupid world we live in
in some countrues a 10 yo murderer can be judged as an adult while you must be major in order to decide if you want to fuck or not. having pictures or drawings of children (not having sex or whatever)can make you go to jail while going outside and seeing worse is ok(go to beach; nude children etc.)

[Anonymous No.]

photorealistc 3D stuff isn't my kind of stuff anyways.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391134
Don't forget writing!

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391161
And imagining, fantasising, dreaming.

[ponpo !tC/hi58lI. No.]

>>1391161
/jp/ now illegal to browse

Normally i wouldn't care since i don't care for loli porn stuff, but since Canada seems to be more strict than other places about it, it prevents me from getting anything borderline porn (okito endo artbooks ;_;)

Speaking of which, is that Comic LO cover book JUST the covers? If so then that's ok ~

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391148
Same here. But I have 20GB of unsorted /l/ pictures. As a result of this, some of it is probably going to be photo-realistic images.

Glad I wasn't born in England. Fucking tea drinking homos.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391137
Not only that but there are hundreds of nudist websites on the Internet (nudist websites that have photos of nude children on their index page).

[Anonymous No.]

Britfag here

lol

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Also britfag here.

OSHI!

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391091
The British press is terrible. But I suppose it's true in every nation.

[Taiko Drum Master !lsYQpv42eA No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Britain is just all fucked up.

If we were in a position where the police take your hard disks, any one of us would be fucked if we lived in England.

Survival tip: Don't get your hard disks seized, and if you do, make sure what they find is encrypted, and what they force the password out of you for is dummy data

[Anonymous No.]

Britfag here,
Gonna delete my CP brb
And I should probably encrypt all my porn, just to be extra safe.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391250
Or use a keyfile instead of/in conjunction with a password. A keyfile on a USB stick you can quickly destroy. Can't force what you don't know.

[Anonymous No.]

Encryption won't save you in Britain. If you don't give your password, you are guilty by default. Google it you idiots.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391271
In the UK they jail you for 3 years automatically for not providing encryption keys and passwords

5 years if it's terrorism related

"I don't know" probably won't cut it at that point, nor will "I destroyed the key" because they're just plain gonna claim they don't believe you.

But 3 years in jail over encryption is better than a CP charge

[Anonymous No.]

As fucked up as America is at times, I'm really glad I live here and not the greater moralfag countries.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391306
>I live in America
>and not the greater moralfag countries
hahahahah
enjoy your christfaggoty.

[ponpo !tC/hi58lI. No.]

>>1391294
Plus it sounds cooler. People will think you are some super hacker with 6 monitors.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391314
Christfags do not live in California. Seriously, blue states and red states are like two different countries.

Also yes they're annoying, but generally the government (read: Supreme Court) manages to keep them in check.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391314
Enjoy your delusions.

[ponpo !tC/hi58lI. No.]

PS it really says something about /jp/ when an article about British man in the UK getting arrested for fake child porn / a discussion on encrypting your hard drives / both having nothing to do with Japan is still seen as acceptable /jp/ discussion.

I mean, i'm not saying it's not, but it's interesting.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391334

>>1390937

[Stoned Anonymous !XUUanJpkos No.]

>>1391329

In the past, being charged with computer crimes was worthy of putting on your resume.

It means you got the skills to pay the bills, son.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391292
Google plausible deniability~

[Anonymous No.]

is this some britain thread?

http://www.civitas.org.uk/blog/2008/06/licensed_to_hug.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/global/main.jhtml?xml=/global/2008/06/25/noindex/nchild.xml&CMP=EMC-e
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4518226.ece
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/28/government_outlaws_pictures/

[Anonymous No.]

If only the sexual abuse is qualified as a crime, it's no crime to own or draw a representation of a sexual abuse. If pedophilia in itself is illegal, other harmful mental disorders should be illegal.

[Anonymous No.]

October 16 is when he'll be sentenced. Hoping the details get to me. Want to know what sentence he'll get for fake pics. Apart from the sex offenders register.
I should put a rss news feed to work on these things... they might start affecting me.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391394
If only the faggots in government would utilize such logic. No, they use EMOTIONS AND MORALS!

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391394
>If pedophilia in itself is illegal, other harmful mental disorders should be illegal.
logically yes

however the simple fact that child abuse is the only crime that it's illegal to see caught on tape bar none, we can see society has clearly separate rules when it comes to anything related to children and sex

[Anonymous No.]

Is she legal in the UK?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391404
Not until she's 16

[紅 美鈴 門門 !!jbNr9Gc7HBh No.]

>>1390964
Damnit Robul. Now we're both in trouble.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391411
little boy?

little boys are fine

you can even see bart's penis in the simpsons movie

if that was Lisa's pussy, it would never have been released in the UK and possibly America

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391402
>child abuse is the only crime that it's illegal to see caught on tape bar none
Incorrect, see the recent extreme porn law
Rape porn, corpse fucking, bestiality and some sexual ultraviolence (damage to genitals or anus... so skull fucking is A-OK) are illegal types of porn in the UK now. Even if the violence is fake and filmed only with consenting actors.

[Anonymous No.]

I am starting to think that these pedophilia-related articles are merely an automatic form of agenda setting used by the politicians to draw the attention of the media and the public from something more important.

Paul: "Damn they uncovered our corruption, what should we do?"

John: "Easy, let's just propose another law against visual representations of sexualized children. The public loves that shit."

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391415
Which is funny because all it would be is a line between her legs.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391418
Well then that's just the UK being stupid.
Also rape is still A-OK!
As long as sex with a drunk girl is taped and people possessing that footage aren't charged it's still legal.

[Anonymous No.]

http://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB/184b.html

lol germany

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Of course the people don't want laws. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the skeptics for lack of empathy, and exposing the children to greater danger.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391457
I think you have that the wrong way around.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391459
gb2/k/

your government is in control, enjoy your tighter gun control

enjoy complying or being jailed

[Anonymous No.]

Obama wouldn't let this kind of shit happen

[Anonymous No.]

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391465
McCain is a raper, he understands us.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391464
I didn't say the government wasn't in control. But with these kind of things, they are following the whims and quickly changing moods of the people, not the other way around.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391464
I didn't say the government wasn't in control. But with these kind of things, they are following the whims and quickly changing moods of the people, not the other way around. It's to earn popularity points, the people in power honestly couldn't give a shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391404
>a purebred British
>British
ಠ_ಠ

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391606
They meant that she was a British mode, like a car can be British.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391741
Eh? Seriously? British mode?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391753
Yes, a British mode loli is just a heavily censored. British mode cars are also gunrack incompatible.

[Anonymous No.]

"Jurors were told they should convict if they concluded that a picture looked like a photo."

If it LOOKS real but you know it isn't, than it can't be against the law.

“It is about child pornography”

But since it is fake than it's not CP.

“Though no actual child has been abused, it helps to feed the demand.”

The law is only in place to protect children from being abused.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1392878

>than

You are using this term incorrectly, you idiot.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1392898
or its a mistype

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391292
Guilty for withholding...Alot better than CP charge.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391294
>In the UK they jail you for 3 years automatically for not providing encryption keys and passwords


>5 years if it's terrorism related

that's some dirty stuff right there

>But 3 years in jail over encryption is better than a CP charge

true

[Anonymous No.]

>>1392908

Twice in the same post?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1390964

Guy in OP's pic is a) brown, and b) a britfag.

As long as it wasn't another white American guy it's all good.

[Anonymous No.]

So for all you experts out there: I have no CP, don't want any CP, and don't really have any concentrated stores of loli images (I just hit up a *booru site for the fetish of the mood.) But I do have a large stock of doujinshi (about 20 GB), 20-30% being loli or ephebo.
It's all image stuff, no videos or anything. Should I even care about it? Should I encrypt it or protect it somehow? What programs are best?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1393034
Depends on what country you are in. If they ever catch you, I doubt they would be able to do anything with some hand drawn stuff. Like someone said, the title of the news item is misleading. It isn't "cartoon" style, it's supposedly photorealisitic (though we have no idea what the images are and how "realistic" they are).

[Anonymous No.]

>>1391114
>“Though no actual child has been abused, it helps to feed the demand.”
The same way futa increases the demand for porn of real dickgirls, right?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1393034
>>1393501
"Computer-generated" is a ton different than 2D.

Also, is this guy getting full CP charges? That would fucking suck. I would regret not just getting real CP...

[Anonymous No.]

I would have to see these 6 still images in order to judge for myself.