/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
>Several researchers have reported correlations between pedophilia and certain psychological characteristics, such as low self-esteem and poor social skills.

ouch

[Anonymous No.]

Duh, people with low self esteem aim for people they can control by default.

Pretty basic.

[Anonymous No.]

what are you implying?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356140
you mean like a 2D child?

fffffff

[Anonymous No.]

Well, I read another study that says' it's linked to liking nice things and having fun.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356140
So that means that the people with best self-esteem and social skills are people who aim for people who can control them by default?

[Chardo No.]

You dont need researchers to figure that out, what a waste of science that could be spent on a portal to gensokyo.

[Anonymous No.]

Next thing you know they'll be jailing all the mentally troubled.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356149
yea

like CEOs who like to be whipped by dominatrices at night, but during the day they control corporate empires

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356156
Control and S&M isn't the same thing. Control involves social skills and responsibility. S&M is just a game adults like to play.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356153

Aren't they working on it already?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356172
>S&M is just a game adults like to play.
are you calling my 6 year old niece an adult?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356141
HHHHNNNNGGGH

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356175
This is where you let me talk to your sister.

[Anonymous No.]

>are you calling my 6 year old niece an adult?

Bet you lost all interest in her now.

[Anonymous No.]

Guess that makes me a pedophile

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356182
Misread, still interested, get me hooked, etc.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356204
>breast cancer

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356204

She's officially not a loli anymore.

[Anonymous No.]

Fact: There is a constant demand for research that suggests that criminals are inferior to everyone else. That's why psychologists always say some shit about types of criminal behavior coming from or being related to traits of psychological weakness.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356239
but it's true

the strongest thing you can be is a loyal conformist sheep, unquestioning of authority

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356248
Pedophilia is ungood

[Anonymous No.]

Coming soon to Fox, "When Lolis Attack!"

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356248
I'm sure psychologists would have much negative to say about conformists, but no one are interested in publishing it to the public, and the public most certainly isn't interested in reading about it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356265

Only when taken to the real world. Does wishing someone else's death make you a criminal? Neither does fapping to 2D loli.

[Anonymous No.]

I find it easier to talk to adult women than lolis

adult women never run from me

[Anonymous No.]

lol communism

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356278
I'm really good with children, they usually like me, I even think one of my younger cousins was in love with me at some point. I've never spoken to a woman of my age in my life.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356239
The silly thing is, instead of making criminals look bad, it makes EVERYONE look bad. The number of "personality disorders" is increasing at an uncouth pace, and suddenly everyone is amazed that there is a disorder to classify every living human on earth.

Psychology needs to slow down and actually try to understand the human mind before clumping a bunch of "symptoms" together and calling it a new disorder. Here's a disorder to classify 75% of the people on 4chan, and likely everyone on /jp/;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizoid_Personality_Disorder

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356277
Is this some trolling or sarcasm? Because there's a certain irony in responding to a 1984 reference by saying that there's nothing wrong with thought-crime.

[Anonymous No.]

Gee, I wonder what this thread does on /jp/?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356293
I'm pretty sure that it was unintentional.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356287
Well, to be fair, disorders usually describe common human traits taken to an extreme. And any psychologist would say that a Wikipedia article isn't ground for making a diagnosis.

[Anonymous No.]

Dis order.
Dis order is an eyesore.

Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order!

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356307
more like


Dis
order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis
order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis

order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order.
Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis


order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order.
Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis
order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis order. Dis

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356315
Don't forget

"--------------------------------"

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356307
>>1356315
Fuck off with the retarded meme.

[Anonymous No.]

I don't want sex, nor do I desire it.

Just give me one loli hug per day, and I'll be happy.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356307
>>1356315
>>1356317

[Anonymous No.]

We have to watch Adult Women.
She is adult lady,which being city councilor in Yashiro city.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356306
The thing is that EVERYONE takes at least one thing to a level that would be described as "extreme" by another person. Does it make them crazy? No, only if it's illegal or hurts other people, right? Apparently, it makes you crazy no matter what.

Indeed, a wikipedia article is no basis for self-diagnosis(diagnosing yourself is of no use anyway) but the article still stands as an example of a disorder with huge poorly-defined criteria.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356339
I fully accept this argument.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356338
i'd eat her

[Anonymous No.]

REUTERS - A team of scientists at MIT have discovered a link between desktop operating system choice and several serious social and mental disorders. The team did a wide-ranging survey across three states of 20,000 males and 10,000 female users ages 18 to 25, drawn from users of three popular desktop operating systems; Microsoft Windows, Apple OS X and Linux. The volunteers were divided into groups according to their operating system and subjected to a series of tests meant to determine their individual IQs as well as cognitive, social and behavioral abnormalities.

The results of the testing showed that the group with the highest mean IQ by some margin was the Linux test group, averaging at 117, levels expected of good undergraduate students.The Windows and Apple groups averaged at 103 and 101 respectively, well within expected ranges. The Linux group showed highly elevated levels of several socio-cognitive disorders including several linked to pedophilia and violent outbursts, while the Apple group seemed to be the most socially adjusted. The Apple group were also determined to be more likely to be musicians or consider themselves artists and had a higher proportion of homosexuals, at 43%, than either the Windows or Linux groups, who were both closer to the expected average of 9%.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

You're not a pedophile if you like pubescent girls. Once they go through puberty, they have all the body features of a woman who's ready to reproduce and men react to those signals naturally. Now, if you like pre-pubescent girls, I've got bad news for you.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356342
too old. gtfo.

[Anonymous No.]

I'm going to call the cops if you don't stop posting roris.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356387
get fucked

[Anonymous No.]

If you have to argue about why you aren't a pedophile, you're a pedophile.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356422

No one knows my secret love of 2D rori, so no arguments.

[Anonymous No.]

I love the "I'm not a pedo, I just fap to kids" argument

it makes me grin

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356149
Yes because you can always go both ways on a one way road.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356353
With that you could troll everyone.

>>1356431
That is possible though. It's not self.contradictory.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356138
Oh ho, so we're all pedophiles now ?
But I don't want to rape little girls, I want to be one of them D:

[Anonymous No.]

You misunderstood it. It's not that people who have poor social skills become pedo, it's that anyone who do have social skills wants to be like everyone else and like what most people like. People with poor social skills can simply be more honest withe themselvs.

>>1356361
oh fuck I came

[Anonymous No.]

3d loli>2d loli>2d healthy>>>>>>2d HEALTHY=3d healthy=3d HEALTHY

[Tatari No.]

ITT We try to justify our love of small children. Why do you even need a reason? We're on /jp/, why would you need to justify yourselves? You'll only lower your self-esteem (again) if you look too much into it. I fap to little girls, everyone here does, it's as simple as that. Keep your half-assed arguments for when the FBI comes to get you, if it ever does.
Until then, forget your worries and enjoy the moment.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356422
I call myself a pedo, ideal body type being like this pic. Though I am probably a sham of a pedo as I absolutely hate 3D anyway.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356443
disgusting
gb2/retirement house/

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356460
>I call myself a pedo
>ideal body type being like this pic.
but that looks like an adult

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356478
I think he meant NO DISGUSTING BREASTS AT ALL

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356483
That pic is about a Japanese B-cup

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356353
Boy I hope this news story is real. Then I'll have some scientific evidence justifying my feeling of NEEDING TO BE GAY to use a Mac.

Which I why I use Windows.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356496
>>1356353
But I'm gay and I use windows. Does that make me part of a statistic that's under 10%?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356239
Indeed. Take a look at all the psychologists theories about being gay that came out about 60 or 70 years ago that no image-loving psychologist would want to touch with a 10 foot bargepole these days.
People can't identify with such things, and if they're not fairly present in society, there'll appear abnormal, and the normalfag reaction is thus to demonise everything about such things as much as possible.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356506
>But I'm gay
>Does that make me part of a statistic that's under 10%?
since the average for "The Gay" in the population is just under 10%, yes.

As for whether your OS matters, from the article it's clear that windows and linux users show no bias when it comes to sexuality.

You'd have figured that out just from reading if your brain wasn't afflicted with The Gay.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356492
you sure? she looks completely flat

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356363
I like both. What does that make me?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356527
technically she is, being 2D and whatnot, but if your eyes have the ability to see, you will notice that whoever drew her, drew her with small breasts

[Happy! No.]

>>1356517
Oh well!

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356517
10% is for traces of gayness, eg. fapping to dickgirls. Full Blown Gay is more like 2%.

[Anonymous No.]

scientists find what they were paid to find.
it's a fucking crime, the pseudo-science that is allowed to be propagated to the public.
take any "study" with a grain of salt.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356526
idort, etc.

[Anonymous No.]

Are you really paedophiles, or are you all just pretending for trolling purposes?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356560
I can only speak for myself

no, i'm not a pedophile (in the clinical sense)

yes i do like little girls. a lot.

and no, i don't like adults.

[Tatari No.]

>>1356562
­>no, i'm not a pedophile (in the clinical sense)
>yes i do like little girls. a lot.
Keep telling yourself that.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356572
What?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Diagnosis

A, B, C

[Tatari No.]

>>1356580
Dumb it down for me.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356587
clinical pedophilia = someone who abuses t3h kiddies

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356560
Dunno if I'd be classified as one, but it sure as hell seems as if I am. Love the little ladies to bits.

At the same time though, self diagnosis is silly stuff. A guy I knew was convinced he was autistic after reading the wikipedia article.

Then again, if it's just as simple as "you like children, you a paedophile" then yeah, sign me up.

[Anonymous No.]

Scientistsfound out in the 60's that smoking didn't cause cancer.
And in the 90's >eggs DID cause cancer.
In 2000+, /b/ causes cancer.
In Russia, we have no cancer!

[Tatari No.]

>>1356590
Oh. So clinically, you're not pedo because you don't have the balls to do something about it? Or is it because you have the decency to restrain yourself? Oh well, either way's fine, since it keeps you from getting jailed.
>t3h
Yeah, fuck you too.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356601
>Oh. So clinically, you're not pedo because you don't have the balls to do something about it? Or is it because you have the decency to restrain yourself?
More like, because I'd never rape a kid. What a retarded question.

I'm more than content with hugs and reading and trips out for ice cream.

>Yeah, fuck you too.
Have a nice day, Ano...Tatari :)

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356601
Kid abuse and pedophilie are unrelated: there can be pedophiles who don't abuse kids, and there can be child molesters which are not pedophile. What's your point?

[Anonymous No.]

>or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty

I think this is what separates the paedophiles from the wannabes.

[Tatari No.]

>>1356619
I'm fucking bored. Also, class is starting soon.

I wish pedophilia was a more tangible concept.

[Anonymous No.]

Personally I am all for the "3D-pig-disgusting" spouting "lolicons"

If you're not a strong enough person to separate aesthetic desire from the desire to fuck, then it's good that you limit yourself to 2D

it prevents people from fucking their neighbour's kids

Also, it leaves more 3D lolis for us nice, friendly pedos to have (non-illegal) fun with.

[Anonymous No.]

Ever noticed how it's mostly fat people?

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356631
It was until commoners started using it incorrectly.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-pedophile_activism

fight da powah!

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356696
But no-one else lives within one mile of my house.

[Anonymous No.]

So many of you people actually have a desire to fuck with little kids, even though you can control it and perhaps feel that it would be a bad thing to do too a child. Because then, in my opinion, you are still a paedophile.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356733
>have a desire to fuck with little kids
more like a desire to make little girls happy, no matter what. this does not extend to rape

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356733
I'd like to make sweet love to a small-chested 13 year old, I think it would be nice. Then again I don't have the urge to do it but I'd like to live the experience at least once.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356731
No anon, you are the child sex offenders.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356753
that's what being 13 is for

[Anonymous No.]

What are some things lolis enjoy doing? It's my loli imouto's birthday soon and I don't know what to buy for her, what to do with her, and if she does something with her loli friends if I should go with them.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356678
::Knock Knock::

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356761
Age? Don't buy her toys if she's over 10.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356761
depends how old she is

if she's doing something with her loli friends, you could chaperone, but only if she's 10 or under. 11+ can be cancer to be around.

Ice cream, then movies, then pizza. I know, I know, loli haet pizza.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356773
>>1356774
She's turning 12. We've been gettin really close this past year, I'm hoping that won't change as she ages.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356761
Take her ice-skating

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356782
>She's turning 12
this is the last year you will be able to be close with her

treasure it

you will get her back when she's 19 or so

[Anonymous No.]

I like where this thread is going.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356733
You seem to forget one little detail:

If we don't actually fuck any kids, it's aaaaall good.
But my fellow pedos will agree: Where is the fun in that?

[Anonymous No.]

Finally a loli topic that doesn't involve Holiday Inn.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356783
Yeah, if you do this then you can skate into her loli friends hard, and knock them dazed into a corner of the ice rink where you can grope them under the guise of apologizing and helping them up.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1356496

It's fake. The average accepted percent of males who are homosexual is 3% now.

[Anonymous No.]

>>1357134
I see peer-reviewed scientific studies that range anywhere from 2% to 7%

I'd pick 4 as a median over 3 any day

[Anonymous No.]

>>1357134
whatever you say, closetfag

[Anonymous No.]

>>1357150

I'd say it's close enough. It's officially at 2% where I live. Still better than thinking 1 in 10.