/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

Post your favorite JAV

[Anonymous No.]

I'm glad I took my last bite of red velvet cake before I scrolled down

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901932
Why are you eating gay food?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901937
How is it gay?
It's just devil's food cake.

[Anonymous No.]

>People actually fap to this

I'm glad I'm a normal, well-adjusted human being.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901937
Red velvet cake is not gay food. It's one of America's handful of unique contributions to the world of cakes. You don't really get any other sort of cake that's like red velvet.

Did you know the red color originally came from the reaction that the cocoa powder has with vinegar? It's obviously not as striking as the fake red velvet, but there is a definite red tinge to the cake.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901962
Who are you quoting?

[Anonymous No.]

How much would she make for something like this?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901967
It's called implying things. God, get with the times, Dad.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901969
bout tree fiddy

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901973
He's just roleplaying

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901973
Your post didn't imply anything. You can't even screw up correctly.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901988
I don't think you can screw up correctly by definition

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901988
I was just roleplaying

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901965
Are you a cake otaku? What's your favorite cake? What cake should I have for my birthday next month? No chocolate please.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902072
Plain

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Why are Japs so brave with insects? I watched some video of a teenager Jap picking up freaking large insects with bare hands like it was nothing.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902156
Me on the left

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902180
Cutest girl there.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902156
Why are there toilets drawn on the blackboard?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902188
:^)

[Anonymous No.]

>>11901917
I want to find this JAV, but I have a feeling it's not quite legal.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902242
Bugs don't have rights, so I don't see why it would be.

Unless you're in Australia.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902245
Be illegal, that is.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902245
Nah, I mean the film makers probably made her do it

[Anonymous No.]

Isn't that zoofilia?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902254
She's just eating them.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902247
Yoda?
>>11902242
I would like to see what this video looks like.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902242
If you've ever viewed an image (technically still considered a download) lewdly depicting what could even ambiguously be considered a minor, you've engaged in an illegal activity in pretty much every first world nation. The prevailing definition of obscenity and child pornography within almost any developed state's legislature would consider even a textual description as a legal equivalent of the corporeal, brutal counterpart. If you're reading this post, you've assuredly committed an indictable offense somewhere as you've also necessarily initiated transmission and received the constitutive information of this accompanying image.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902300
But she is 60 years old!

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902300
except that image is drawn, and scous protects artistic works. Loli is legal with supreme court backing.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902304
Do you think a jury of fundamental christian, mid-western peasants are seriously going to consider the canon of the series spawning the fan-art when deciding whether or not they are morally indignant?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902314
but its drawn! no 3d little girls!

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902311
Not if said work could be classified as obscene under the relevant diagnostic criteria (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test, and consider for a second how easily abused this system could be). Here is an excerpt from Canadian legislature on topic of child pornography as an existing and discernible thing;

"(a) a photographic, film, video or other visual representation, whether or not it was made by electronic or mechanical means,
(i) that shows a person who is or is depicted as being under the age of eighteen years and is engaged in or is depicted as engaged in explicit sexual activity, or
(ii) the dominant characteristic of which is the depiction, for a sexual purpose, of a sexual organ or the anal region of a person under the age of eighteen years;
(b) any written material, visual representation or audio recording that advocates or counsels sexual activity with a person under the age of eighteen years that would be an offence under this Act;
(c) any written material whose dominant characteristic is the description, for a sexual purpose, of sexual activity with a person under the age of eighteen years that would be an offence under this Act; or
(d) any audio recording that has as its dominant characteristic the description, presentation or representation, for a sexual purpose, of sexual activity with a person under the age of eighteen years that would be an offence under this Act."

Feel free to demonstrate how 85% of the textual and image content posted here somehow elludes this classification.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902347
>Canada
Why don't you pick a real country?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902347
Oh come its fucking drawn! No girl was hurt, abused, or even asked nicely to model. People are weird. We are treating art as real people

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902349
Canada's legislation is just a derivative of historically entwined and presently more politically influential nation's legislation. This shit in essence has been handed down from the UK, which also serves to influence much european legislation.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902360
Which is why you cited the UK's legislation.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902327
>>11902359
The law doesn't care.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11902431
Why do we care about the law? If they want to, there's plenty of things they can get you for.