[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 701 KB, 774x684, Untitled picture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11707688 No.11707688[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>> No.11707692

Oh Dan, you cheeky motherfucker.

>> No.11707694
File: 8 KB, 160x160, op.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11707694

Why is OP so ugly?

>> No.11707709
File: 1.29 MB, 797x1000, sion awards 2013.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11707709

http://strawpoll.me/819920

>> No.11707711

Does he make his wife wear this?

>> No.11707713

Hi Moot.

>> No.11707714

>battle damaged stockings

It's cherry tree petals flowing in the wind. Holy shit, does no one see that? Her stockings are perfectly fine.

>> No.11707717

>>11707714
The stockings still show some battle damage.

>> No.11707732

/jp/, why don't we post extremely graphic lewd thoughts on every J-List status?

>> No.11707741

>>11707732
Becuase no one on /jp/ has a Faceshit account.

>> No.11707754

>>11707717
That's natural wear and tear on the stockings.
Stockings that have been worn for a while will have that.

>> No.11707757

>>11707714
Honestly, I wouldn't have noticed if you hadn't said anything. There's at least one hole in each of her stockings, on the right near the knee, and on the left by the upper hem. There's no way those are just petals.

>> No.11707760
File: 43 KB, 687x687, the face of jaypee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11707760

>>11707741

>> No.11707761

>>11707694
I don't know but he thinks it's funny to include his ugly mug every time he posts this shit ever since the time he accidentally left it in

>> No.11707772

>>11707741
A Majority does, just that it's a loud minority that doesn't.

>> No.11707775

>>11707772
I'm awaiting your detailed statistics on this topic

>> No.11707779

>>11707775
I'm awaiting yours.
We have seen proof of people on /jp/ have facebook, yet we don't have any proof that anyone doesn't.

>> No.11707782

>>11707779
I don't have one

>> No.11707785

>>11707782
Where's the proof.

>> No.11707787

>>11707779
I have one.

>> No.11707790
File: 26 KB, 482x690, 5Mu44[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11707790

>>11707785
╮(╯▽╰)╭

the fuck would I need one for anyway

>> No.11707795

>>11707792
Give me a way to prove it and I'll prove it
And a counter-answer isn't an answer

>> No.11707792

>>11707790
Logging yourself out isn't proof.
Why wouldn't you need one.

>> No.11707799

>>11707795
You can't prove it, since you can't prove something that is wrong.

>> No.11707801

>>11707787
One for one so far.
Facebookers winning by a landslide.

>> No.11707805

>>11707799
I don't think logic works that way.
By the way God is real because you can't prove that he isn't.

>> No.11707810

>>11707805
That's the whole point: proving a negative is impossible, that's why burden of proof lies on the people who are trying to say that god is real. It's also why it's impossible to prove that no one on /jp/ uses facebook. The burden of proof lies on those who want to prove that /jp/ does use facebook.

>> No.11707815

All it takes is proof that one /jp/sie uses Facebook. That defeats the argument at no /jp/sies use Facebook

>> No.11707818

>>11707815
If you use facebook then you're not a real /jp/sie so your argument goes out the window there anyway

>> No.11707819

>>11707815

>>11707760


Facebook wins /jp/ submit to your normie overlords now.

>> No.11707821

>>11707818
/jp/ is built around love and tolerance. You are bullying people and thus you are no longer a /jp/sie.

>> No.11707824
File: 102 KB, 400x300, 1333293458631.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11707824

>>11707821
>/jp/ is built around love and tolerance

>> No.11707830

>>11707810
>proving a negative is impossible
How in the Hell does one fuck logic up this badly?

Replace negative with Devil's Proof and you have a point.

> burden of proof lies on the people who are trying to say that god is real
No it lies on the person making a claim. Similarly, when someone says "God is not real" they have made a claim and the burden of proof lies on them. Since it is conventionally impossible to prove a Devil's Proof, that makes the statement silly and erroneous to begin with.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action