/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

To /jp/

Love /k/

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345904
でも／ｋ／さん、／日本／はケバブがありませんよ。

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345917
仕方がない。

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345904
Remove Beijing duck from premises.

You are worst chink.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345933
仕方がある。ケバブが無いよ。

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345904

I actually like it but where's the katana?

I know euro armor knight > etc. etc. but common' nips need to operate too

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345936

Lemove Howaito Piggu flom Rand

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345941
＞俺の万畳む！
＞俺のダマスク鋼！

帰れ。

[Anonymous No.]

noice

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345960

You forgot it can create vacuums and cut tanks in half

I don't know the Kanji for tank or vacuum though

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346076

Use 空 for "vacuum". It conveys the same meaning.

Tank would be 戦車. Fucking しゃ all over the place.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345904
nice
epic
i like it

[Anonymous No.]

それはFAMASですか？

[Anonymous No.]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNG_Z0-lP1k

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346100

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346095
>>11346100

/jp/ you motherfuckers are alright sometimes, made my night

[Anonymous No.]

Are there any good /k/ approved VNs?

like, with guns and stuff.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346107
Does /k/ like K-on? Are they K-on friends?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346168
Slay the K

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346168
/k/ prefers yuru yuri.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346181
I thought they would like that one with the airsoft guns.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346188
>/k/
>Airshit
Pick one

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346181
They also like Spice and Wolf.
probably because they're all closet furries

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346188
airsoft is for the most part shunned on /k/ and directed to /asp/.

Reason being that, although its can be useful for force on force training in milsim games, most airsofters are underage b& with CoD mentality. Nogunz often try posting ``airshit'' when asked for a timestamp or proof of owning real guns. A keen eye can usually spot the difference between them and real steel, such as differences in magazines, motors located in the grip, and slightly off coloring or wording in the rollmarks.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346200
Another dead giveaway is a photo showing the barrel of the weapons, as airsoft guns shoot 6mm plastic BBs.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346200
am not meaning to disparage airsoft, just another example in the picture.
Believe it or not, nerf threads are popular and not directed to /toy/, almost seeming to spite airsofters.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346200
Met someone like that once IRL.
Talked about a battle in Switzerland, began to take him seriously.
And then he said it was all airsoft.
Felt dumb for taking him srsly then.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346197
old pic.

Here is the most recent one I believe. The guy who maintains it makes a new ver every 5 or so entries.

Most of the contributions come from /ak/, but I'm sure someone here has the light novels and maybe an Arisaka or something, right? ;_;

>>11346216
>Talked about a battle in Switzerland, began to take him seriously.

Chuckled a bit, they haven't been involved in a conflict in at least 150 years.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346228
I've seen nambus and nuggets, but never an arisaka on /jp/.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346213
I thought those guns were real this whole time. I don't know how to feel about these pictures anymore.

[Anonymous No.]

Seems like we've been seeing a lot more /k/ users or /k/ related stuff the past few weeks. Sure we had sporadic gun threads before but it felt like it has become more common recently. Why is this?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346248
Becuase /pol/ and /jp/ have always had a rather large crosssover in userbase, and the post election gun prices in the us are only now starting to drop. You can only go to /k/ and yell about the habbening so many times before someone finally convinces you to shut up and buy a gun.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346243
the bolt action definitely appears to be real.

Nearly all of the other ``fumos with guns'' in my little collection of pics I've found also are.

[Anonymous No.]

Hey, /k/bies: you are not welcome here and never will be. Pack up your toys and go home. The big kids play here. You could get hurt.

[Anonymous No.]

What does shooting a gun feel like?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346260
Only costs about $200 to find out.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346260
It hurts your arms and people make fun of you for doing it wrong.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346260
Depends on the caliber and many other factors.

Shooting a .22 out of a long barreled rifle is very tame, like a pellet gun.

Larger rounds have more recoil and noise. Intermediate calibers such as 5.56 to 7.62x39 have moderate recoil.

Battle rifle rounds such as 7.62x51 and 54R can kick quite a bit. firing a Mosin nagant with the steel buttplate wearing a T-shirt can be uncomfortable to downright painful and can leave a bruise if you don't shoulder it properly.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346277
This applies to handguns as well, larger bullets=more recoil. Rifles are generally easier to shoot than handguns and are far more accurate.

Guns also generate smoke and flash, imagine a large firework going off about 2 feet in front of you. Also very loud, hearing protection such as earplugs or earmuffs are required to prevent hearing loss. Both should be worn when firing at an indoor range, as being inside amplifies the noise.

As for how it feels in a non-physical way, it can be intimidating at first what with the things just listed. It is a wise idea to start out with smaller calibers such as .22 to learn the basics and not be affected too much by flinching and such. As you gain more experience with handling firearms and managing recoil, shooting can be very fun and challenging.

Shooting a fully automatic weapon especially is a very cathartic experience in my opinion. very expensive unfortunately.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346267
Most gun shops that have ranges rent guns for a fee. You have to buy the ammunition too so it can cost about $25 to shoot a few magazines worth if you want to feel what its like without actually buying one.

[Anonymous No.]

Where do I go to learn more about firearms? They're banned in my country.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346314
Find a local american, he'll set you straight.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346137

http://vndb.org/g13

Would like to see more about this, most of the time these threads are just the same operator 2hus with gunz pics that have been posted 20 times.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346200
>most airsofters are underage b& with CoD mentality
Where the fuck do you live? Over here underage faggots aren't even allowed to participate, and most players are actually 30-40 year olds, often after military service (lots of post-iraq troops lately).

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346316
But what if he's a liberal antigun hipster with a lib arts degree?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346327
Yes there are a lot of guys like that who take it seriously, I was simply referring to the kids who buy a cheapo AEGs at the mall and make stupid youtube videos of them shooting cans in their backyard.

Again, I think it is a valuable training tool and am looking at some gas blowback guns to practice with.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346344
>kids who buy a cheapo AEGs at the mall and make stupid youtube videos
I don't think that counts as "doing" airsoft. I own a car, but I'm not a professional driver just because I own one.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346327
Banning airsoft was like dealing with KS.
Too the board would have been overrun with kids showing off their latest acquisitions which would really drown out the hand full of ex military talking about how they use it to train.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346332
Find one with a neckbeard.
If even that doesn't work, then I'm sorry to inform you, but you might live in england.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346357
I don't see what neckbeards have to do with being pro-gun.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346374
It's not about being progun, it's about not having a lib arts degree. Now if they start to get ironically fat and grew ironic neckbeards, then it's all over.

[Anonymous No.]

I shot a revolver once. It was really loud and it jarred my hands.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346382
Use earprotection.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346357
B-b-but I live in (random asean country) anon. The only guns available are for military service and terorrist, どうしよ？

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346392

>and terorrist

Join them. They're freedom fighters.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346392
Visit Guam, that's how the majestic nipponese do.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346387

Why would I do it ever again? There was nothing redeeming about it. Hoo boy, a hole appeared in that tree trunk over there, how exciting! I feel like such a powerful being right now!

Only truly insecure people shoot guns recreationally, like people who work out for fun.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346267
Guns are not allowed in my country.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346397
Oh, it's you.

If there were no knives people wouldn't get stabbed. #Bradycampaign

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346402
Just like the good lord tells you, right?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346402
>No, it's not 'me'.
You're not you?

Interesting.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346400

No, it's not 'me'. More than one person finds owning guns to be pointless. You are not the target of an anti-gun conspiracy, you schizophrenic freak.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346404

Kill yourself, /k/aby.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346408
Iceburn.gif

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346397

>Hoo boy, a hole appeared in that tree trunk over there, how exciting!

How's that different from any other activity though?

Video games are just pressing buttons and watching new pictures appear, basketball is just a ball going through a hoop, etc. Activities are fun when there's some kind of challenge involved and there's plenty of challenge in honing your marksmanship skills.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346414

>Activities are fun when there's some kind of challenge involved

No, retard, this is not what makes an activity fun. Strain that masculo-jock brain for a second and think about things before you blurt them out.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346414
He's just someone who came into the thread aiming for low hanging fruit, just more nuke spam really.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346418
Oooh, that's a good one. I have to copypaste it for the future.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346420

Keep writing off any contrary opinion as 'le trolls', cumstain. You sure love wallowing in that idiocy of yours.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346418
On an otaku board, making empty arguments about what can have enthusiast and why.

Your're irony if off the charts/10 grat one man.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346418
shut up autist shit

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346424
It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to not consider a post like >>11346418 trolling.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346426

You can't even assemble a coherent sentence. Here's the gun-nut in its natural form, everybody.

Only one rung above the "I like to work out because I secretly want to be a girl, and I have to purge these strange feelings with masculine endeavors!" roidmuncher.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346436
I-is this shitposting?

[Anonymous No.]

Guns are very difficult to get in my state.

[Anonymous No.]

Why do people bully the gun otaku?

I don't like this. It makes me feel upset to see this bullying.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346436
But working out won't help you look like a pretty girl at all.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346436
Stay madeuropoor.

One day you will know freedom again.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346436
I though EVAs use pretty big guns to fight the angels?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346444
I never really understood why though, only the fuck off huge positron cannon really worked.

[Anonymous No.]

USA!
USA!
USA!

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346447

They worked fine against the previous angels. See: Asuka killing an alien with a knife. Shinji too. Then all three of them did it again with a knife.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346450
The knives always worked, in fact the whole premise seems to be get into hand to hand as quickly as possible. But they have those gun shoots all over the city to get as many rifles up there as they might need, only to bullets to pass an AT field like once, during covering fire at that.

[Anonymous No.]

How do you like to shoot your guns?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345904
>ケバブ
my sides just removed themselves

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346455
Oh fuck.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346454
Tactically like an operator.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346374
>>11346379
Here, if they're in college at all, usually means they're taking STEM courses

[Anonymous No.]

I think its an interesting sub-current in this subculture of a tendency in what I have observed to be that Otaku tend to be conservative and quite a few to be the INTJ type. There is no research I have put into other than observing comments but it would seem that people who form conservative world views tend to be traditionalists and Otaku tend to have realized that the world is shit and heaven is a 6 tatami mat apartment with internet.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346469

I've observed that /k/abies tend to be fagloads.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346469

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346478
no bully!

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346478
Keep trying.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346436
looks like someone got ``shot down''!

[Anonymous No.]

>go to glorious nihon pivix site
>superior to all the gajin boorus that source it for images
>expect to find high quality, hot new touhou with guns pics
>ones that haven't been reposted 500 times
>spend 2 minutes making dummy account and enter
>its literally filled with PimpMyGarbage and drawthread tier art
>that same stuff constantly posted by 13 year /k/ids

(Am memetexting my actions before you ask.)

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346541
>Thinking pixiv isn't just the Japanese counterpart to DA.

[Anonymous No.]

>being so fat you can't possibly fathom how someone would enjoy working out

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346355
How about using it for fun? It's the only way to shoot people with your friends without committing murder or participating in a war. It's a fun game.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346558
Fat people can lift. They just can't move.

[Anonymous No.]

Friendly reminder that statistically speaking, gun owners are more likely to shoot, injure and possibly kill themselves or a family member than use it in self defense. Also not Otaku Culture.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346563
Do you have a source? I did a quick search online and couldn't find any statistics relating to this. They all kept talking about how people are more likely to suicide with a gun than kill another person.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346563
>>11346565

* Myth #5 The "Friends and Family fallacy"

It is common for the public health advocates of gun bans to claim that most murders are of "friends and family". The medical literature includes many such false claims, that "most [murderers] would be considered law abiding citizens prior to their pulling the trigger" [9]and "most shootings are not committed by felons or mentally ill people, but are acts of passion that are committed using a handgun that is owned for protection." [10]

Not only do the data show that acquaintance and domestic homicide are a minority of homicides, [11] but the FBI's definition of acquaintance and domestic homicide requires only that the murderer knew or was related to the decedent. That dueling drug dealers are acquainted does not make them "friends". Over three- quarters of murderers have long histories of violence against not only their enemies and other "acquaintances," but also against their relatives. [12,13,14,15] Oddly, medical authors have no difficulty recognizing the violent histories of murderers when the topic is not gun control - "A history of violence is the best predictor of violence." [16] The perpetrators of acquaintance and domestic homicide are overwhelmingly vicious aberrants with long histories of violence inflicted upon those close to them. This reality belies the imagery of "friends and family" murdering each other in fits of passion simply because a gun was present "in the home."

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346563
friendly reminder that that includes suicides and police shooting bad people and is a commie pseudo intellectual argument.

crime has been falling as gun ownership increases. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/05/06/the-firearms-statistics-that-gun-control-advocates-dont-want-to-see/
now fuck off back to professor schlomos course on womens minority basket weaving

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346585
* Myth #6 "A homeowner is 43 times as likely to be killed or kill a family member as an intruder"

To suggest that science has proven that defending oneself or one's family with a gun is dangerous, gun prohibitionists repeat Dr. Kellermann's long discredited claim: "a gun owner is 43 times more likely to kill a family member than an intruder." [17] This fallacy , fabricated using tax dollars, is one of the most misused slogans of the anti-self-defense lobby.

The honest measure of the protective benefits of guns are the lives saved, the injuries prevented, the medical costs saved, and the property protected not Kellermann's burglar or rapist body count. Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the predator. [3] Any study, such as Kellermann' "43 times" fallacy, that only counts bodies will expectedly underestimate the benefits of gun a thousand fold. Think for a minute. Would anyone suggest that the only measure of the benefit of law enforcement is the number of people killed by police? Of course not. The honest measure of the benefits of guns are the lives saved, the injuries prevented, the medical costs saved by deaths and injuries averted, and the property protected. 65 lives protected by guns for every life lost to a gun. [2]

Kellermann recently downgraded his estimate to "2.7 times," [18] but he persisted in discredited methodology. He used a method that cannot distinguish between "cause" and "effect." His method would be like finding more diet drinks in the refrigerators of fat people and then concluding that diet drinks "cause" obesity.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346590
>>11346585
Also, he studied groups with high rates of violent criminality, alcoholism, drug addiction, abject poverty, and domestic abuse . From such a poor and violent study group he attempted to generalize his findings to normal homes. Interestingly, when Dr. Kellermann was interviewed he stated that, if his wife were attacked, he would want her to have a gun for protection.[19] Apparently, Dr. Kellermann doesn't even believe his own studies.


[9] Webster D, Chaulk, Teret S, and Wintemute G. "Reducing Firearm Injuries." Issues in Science and Technology. Spring 1991: 73-9.

[10] Christoffel KK. "Towards Reducing Pediatric Injuries From Firearms: Charting a Legislative and Regulatory Course." Pediatrics. 1992; 88:294-300.

[11] Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Department of Justice. Uniform Crime Reports Crime in the United States 1993. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1994. Table 5.

[12] Dawson JB and Lantern PA, US Bureau of Justice Statistics statisticians. "Murder in Families." Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice. 1994. p. 5, Table 7.

[13] US Bureau of Justice Statistics. "Murder in Large Urban Counties, 1988." Washington DC: US Department of Justice. 1993.

[14] Narloch R. Criminal Homicide in California. Sacramento CA: California Bureau of Criminal Statistics. 1973. pp 53-4.

[15] Mulvihill D et al. Crimes of Violence: Report of the Task Force on Individual Acts of Violence." Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1969. p 532.

[16] Wheeler ED and Baron SA. Violence in Our Schools, Hospitals and Public Places: A Prevention and Management Guide.? Ventura CA: Pathfinder. 1993.

[17] Kellermann AL. and Reay DT. "Protection or Peril? An Analysis of Firearms-Related Deaths in the Home.? N Engl J. Med 1986. 314: 1557-60.

[18] Kellermann AL, Rivara FP, Rushforth NB et al. "Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home.? N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(15): 1084-91.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346586
That's the problem with guns. People are more likely to shoot themselves then "bad guys."

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346585
>>11346586
>>11346590
>>11346594
>copy pasting from gun right group sites
And McDonalds claims their burgers can be health food.
Still not Otaku Culture.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346598
People who shoot themselves are bad guys, so it's okay.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346601
Even kids?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346598
so what? if we didn't have guns they would use bleach. a person in japan commits suicide ever 15 minutes I think and they are disarmed. this is why collectivism is garbage because I am not going to be punished the the actions of a few.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346604
A person armed with bleach is much less likely to start tossing that bleach on other people to take them out with him before drinking the bottle himself.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346602
Too dumb to live.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346602
its tragic when kids die so you going to ban cars and window blinds too? every month a child hangs themself with the cord on the blinds. you gonna get rid of them too faggot?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346606
It is not unreasonable to ban dangerous things like the ones you listed.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346608
You can kill more people than your average school shooter just by driving a car through a festival.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346600
can't even provide a source for his bloated and debunked gun statistics while the liberal democrat president ships guns to arm mexican drug cartels and al qaeda in syria.

in to the oven you go

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346541
translate it dorks

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346608
yeah they disarmed the palestians too, and now they strap bombs to themselves dipshit. and the government was running all these big school shootings since columbine at least. the aurora shooter had a darpa grant and was in a mind control project, there were actors with IMDB pages at sand hook, adam lanza was dead the day before the shooting according to the social security death index. they guy who shot up the shiek temple was army psyops. you are so gulible, go drink some more fluoridated water and take your vaccines.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346614
I'm conservative in most things except gun control.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346613
You can't drive most cars into elementary school buildings. Unless it's a dump truck.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346621
Thank you /k/ I have learned so much, please leave now I need time to absorb this information.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346626
Dude, if it's an elementary school you can just go in there with a knife and stab everyone to death. Asians do this all the time because they don't have guns.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346626
yeah why don't you prove to me Adam Lanza killed any one. can I see some surveillance footage or something anything? any proof besides what we are told to believe?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346585
>Not only do the data show that acquaintance and domestic homicide are a minority of homicides, [11]
>[11] Federal Bureau of Investigation, US Department of Justice. Uniform Crime Reports Crime in the United States 1993. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office. 1994. Table 5.
I couldn't look up the source you used, because it's 20 years old and the FBI's website doesn't have records going back that far.
But according to the 2011 version (the most recent for which a final report is available), of 12,664 homicides only 1481 involved strangers.

From experience, I expect most of the claims in that pasta would similarly prove either outright false or at least deliberately misleading if anyone could be bothered tracking down the ancient documents they are allegedly based on.
And I'm sure that doesn't bother you at all, does it.
Gun advocates are seriously the most dishonest group of people I have ever argued with on the Internet.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346631
this happens in israel where palestinian woman got on a bus and stabbed a ton of jews. military everywhere there you can't stop crazy people. arm the teachers faggot.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346639
It happens everywhere.

Unless you want all teachers to keep a sidearm on them at all times, somebody who wants to stab a bunch of kids is going to be able to stab kids.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346631
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2012/1217/Chinese-police-suspect-man-who-stabbed-23-kids-influenced-by-doomsday-rumor
>None of the wounded children died of their injuries
Mass stabbings barely ever result in deaths. Mass shootings do.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346646
He was going after fucking fingers and ears, dude. If he was going for a kill count you'd think he would have the good sense to go after throats now, don't you?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346648
Kids are small fast targets, but even someone aiming to kill in a mass stabbing is gonna have major problems.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/09/justice/texas-college-stabbing
No deaths here, either.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346646
yeah in Israel the teachers carry guns, because of school shootings. oh and guess what kids in the 50's used to bring guns to school and this kind of crime didn't happen then. whats changed? bullying, nonwhite immigration. violent crime is way down, while suicide is the number one cause of death by injury over car related deaths, and the police chimping out and murdering people constantly.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346654
>Kids are small fast targets
corner them in a school room idiot. and I am still waiting on some proof that Lanza killed anyone.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346654
He used a fucking pocketknife for that one. Both vehicles and gas have the potential to kill as many people as guns, it's just that people don't think about using them because they have limited imaginations. Japanese people have killed their whole families trying to quietly gas themselves in their rooms.

>>11346656
No, the Wild West days were over by the 50s. Dad's .22 doesn't count.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346654
if gun control is effective why is everywhere its enacted the city leads the US in homicides?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346668
>No, the Wild West days were over by the 50s. Dad's .22 doesn't count.
what does that even mean? you do realize and ar-15 shoots a .22 caliber bullet right? its technically a .223 so its .003 bigger.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346669
Gun control laws are enacted in places where homicide rates are high.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346639
There is a teacher shortage as it stands without requiring them be security (and all the physical requirements that implies) as well.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346674
When somebody refers to a ".22", he's obviously not talking about an AR-15.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346668
>because they have limited imaginations
You don't need imagination for guns. That's the thing, it requires half the effort for twice the killing power. From what we have already seen happen, all you need is a gun of choice, expanded magazine, lots of ammo and maybe a bullet proof vest if you want to keep going.
Compare that to all the effort to make a bomb that might kill 3-4 people in a crowd, and it's plain simple to see the difference.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346680
Guns make it easier for lazy people to kill people, yes. The car is the easiest, though. You don't even need go out of your way to buy a gun.

>Compare that to all the effort to make a bomb that might kill 3-4 people in a crowd
Two hundred and fifty shrapnel casualties, though. Would have been worse with gas.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346676
ok then just have the principal be armed and take a class. you know how much money rodeo clowns have to spend now on sensitivity training? big deal. no excuse not to arm them.

>>11346675
but then they skyrocket.

>>11346679
then maybe you should learn something about the thing you want to ban.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346680
>make a bomb
go on youtube right now man. its not as hard as you would think.

Oklahoma City bombing.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346693
Why arm the principle when you can just station cops there like they actually do?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346685
A car is far from easier. It's more expensive, requires more maintenance and will not be usable after running a few people over especially if they get stuck in the bumper. And it's much easier to dodge a speeding car than a bullet.
A gun is pick up and go, point and click, and has a much higher fatality rate for intentional homicides.
>shrapnel casualties
Yes, it's much worse that those people lost a leg instead of being killed. So much more awful.

[Anonymous No.]

Stop letting the niggs out of jail and you wouldn't have any "gun violence".
Guns should only be given to people.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346700
Because the gun lobby already sells to the police, they need a new market to shill to.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346693
>but then they skyrocket.
Source?

>then maybe you should learn something about the thing you want to ban.
I haven't said anything about banning anything. You're just a fucking retard. A Thompson fires .45, but if somebody refers to a gun as a .45 he means a pistol. To interpret otherwise means you're being deliberately obtuse.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346701
>A car is far from easier. It's more expensive, requires more maintenance and will not be usable after running a few people over especially if they get stuck in the bumper. And it's much easier to dodge a speeding car than a bullet.
People already have cars. I'm pretty sure a car can keep going after it's run over a few people, although since I've never done it I wouldn't know. Obviously you're not targeting a park, you're targeting a dense. People can barely fucking move in crowds, let alone run.

>Yes, it's much worse that those people lost a leg instead of being killed. So much more awful.
That bomb was just their first test. They thought they were going to have the opportunity to do more. They could have sent the death toll through the roof if they had added a second, gas explosion, meaning that first responders would be unable to evacuate the wounded. I don't know how to make the pressure cooker bomb and I'm not about to look it up, but I do know how to kill myself (and by extension, dozens of others) with gas.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346713
>I do know how to kill myself
I hope you put that knowledge to use someday.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346706
the blaze article I already sourced demonstrates the fact that violence in disarmed cities is the highest in the nation

>A Thompson fires .45, but if somebody refers to a gun as a .45 he means a pistol.
Pure conjecture, your interpretations of things is not the same as anyone elses. Everyone is unique. You cannot answer any of my questions about proof that these shootings are really being carried out by anyone you say they are. Again can I have some proof that Lanza carried out the shooting at sandy hook?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346713
If you tried to run over more than one person the car would stop. Think about what happens when you hit a deer.

[Anonymous No.]

People using the quoting function to ``greentext".
People misusing the spoiler function.
People using a handful of 2hu/Japanese art pictures to discuss /pol/ & /k/ in /jp/
Miscellaneous autism

Look, most of us don't really care one way or another about guns. Many /jp/sies own guns.

But you have your own board, and it is /jp/ policy to funpost/derail these kinds of threads whenever they are created.

Your kind is not wanted here.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346717
>the blaze article I already sourced demonstrates the fact that violence in disarmed cities is the highest in the nation
I didn't ask for a source on "high homicide rates," I asked for a source on "increased homicide rates following enactment of gun control laws."

>Pure conjecture, your interpretations of things is not the same as anyone elses.
Sorry - everyone remotely intelligent would assume I'm referring to a pistol.

>Everyone is unique.
There's no accounting for retards.

> You cannot answer any of my questions about proof that these shootings
You haven't asked me any questions. I'm not the person you were talking to earlier. Please fuck off.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346615
But /k/ says that Kimber is shit, anon

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346715
I'll get around to it when I get around to it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346723
>Many /jp/sies own guns
[citation needed]
Oh wait there is none.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346733
>Oh wait there is none.
If you'd lurked /jp/ for more than a week or two, you'd realize that people (huge losers) can and have posted lots of pictures of guns accompanying "otaku" goods.

I suspect you don't even own a gun.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346733
Why are you bullying me...

[Anonymous No.]

Wow, who would've thought the Brady bunch frequented /jp/?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346715

crawling in my skin

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346737
BB pistols are not real guns.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346723
>People misusing the spoiler function
Homura can time travel lmao

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346747
>Wow, who would've thought the Brady bunch frequented /jp/?
anti-gun rhetoric derails /k/ thread every time.

Why are you posting /k/ in a not-/k/ board? You are worse than an illegal immigrant.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346773
I'm pretty sure it's not /k/ at this point, just /pol/.

>>11346766
That's nice, dear.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346771
who homu her

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346774
>/k/
>/pol/
There's not much of a difference.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346782
I never found /k/ anywhere near as retarded as I've found /pol/. I haven't been a /k/ regular in years, though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346778
I will homu your ass B^)

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346774
>I'm pretty sure it's not /k/ at this point
There's a lot of overlap, especially in /ak/.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346787
The non-retards stay in their own board and avoid /k/indergarten.

On the other hand, people post anti-gun rage threads and stories fairly regularly over there.

I also admit, I went over to /ak/ yesterday and asked them which 2hu they wd fuq. I feel that this may have subconsciously suggested to them that crossboarders are accepted in /jp/. I apologize for my transgression.

As punishment, I will leave my room for an entire day and sit in a hipster cafe, amongst the normies. I'll try to take pictures.

[Anonymous No.]

I've trained all my life to not need guns to defend myself and others

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346805
>I went over to /ak/ yesterday and asked them which 2hu they wd fuq
/k/ by and large likes SDM and freely admits to being secondaries.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346809
All I need is my thousand-folded katana and my bushido spirit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346809
Me too, guns are for pussies.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11345904
thanks
SRBIJA STRONG

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346823
What's with the exposed underwear? Are you trying to be a rapper?

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346805
>>11346810
what the HELL is /ak/

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346773
One person spamming isn't a derail though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346848
/a/ + /k/

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346848
/a/utistic /k/ommandos

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346842
he cannot afford a belt, do NOT BULLY.

>>11346849
okay cool :)

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346848
Bunch of f/a/gs who think owning guns and posting it on /a/ would negate their weab faggotry.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>11346732
hit or miss QC
>>11346615
barrel has wrong number of lands and grooves
ridiculous flash coming from ejection port, not muzzle
full length guiderod nonsense