[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 2.65 MB, 2480x1753, 3c66265aac6bfc9258400f213eb39b79.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10985979 No.10985979 [Reply] [Original]

Don't like old hags? Good, more mature, busty 2hus for us.

>> No.10985980

Is Yuuka a hag? She's busty and mature.

>> No.10985984

>>10985980
Not really, more like mid 20s

>> No.10985988

>>10985980
Nah. She's more like Keine...and Patchy, I guess?

>> No.10985986
File: 241 KB, 708x1000, 848df556fabd08c3394ab6bba8530739.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10985986

>>10985980
Can't tell if that's supposed to be an insult or compliment towards Yuuka.

>> No.10985998
File: 91 KB, 600x570, EtmWlTe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10985998

I want to nail that ghost broad, thats for damn sure

>> No.10986015
File: 392 KB, 1680x1379, 1349557975610.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10986015

They are so delicious

>> No.10986016
File: 504 KB, 1032x728, 99ee5b4de5ba14f2ce826ce9eae565efc25fe160.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10986016

Eirin!

>> No.10986021

So Miko didn't join the hag party? I'm happy.

>> No.10986029

>>10986021
She doesn't have the chest for it.

>> No.10986039

>>10986021
she has no personality for that

>> No.10986041

>>10986016
I'll take Tewi.

>> No.10986044

>>10985980
She's not exceptionally busty and goes into same category with Meiling, Keine, Iku, and Kaguya.

>> No.10986048

>>10986044
She's not exceptionally busty? Sure could have fooled me.

Kaguya?

>> No.10986049

kanakp looks bit drunk.

>> No.10986056

>>10986049
Stop it.

>> No.10986059

All men.

me on the right

>> No.10986179

>>10986048
Kaguya looks very adult to me, it just doesn't stand out as she is always next to the really mature Eirin and depicted as short.

And Yuuka just isn't exceptionally busty, just compare to Yuyuko or anyone who really is.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action