What do you like most about loli? As for me, I like the legs, the panties, and the butt the most. There isn't actually anything I particularly dislike.

File: 316 KB, 1600x1200, 70932715bbbbe19a95ce5a0da5db05be.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Thu May 16 04:06:30 2013 No.10893647 [Reply] [Original]

What do you like most about loli? As for me, I like the legs, the panties, and the butt the most. There isn't actually anything I particularly dislike.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:10:45 2013 No.10893654 Their innocence, small frame, and often-mischievous personalities.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:12:00 2013 No.10893661 Their fragile and twig-like arms and legs

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:13:15 2013 No.10893662 >>10893654 Yes, their personalities are often nice.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:14:15 2013 No.10893666 The cuteness and innocence.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:15:45 2013 No.10893668 I don't like children

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:18:45 2013 No.10893677 >>10893668 Why not?

Anonymous Thu May 16 04:20:16 2013 No.10893680
File: 46 KB, 1002x656, 1355092753896.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

To me, they're short girls rather than just young girls, though the age isn't a minus either in 2D. I just happen to adore short girls. Oftentimes they're also depicted as having ludicrously wide hips and plump behinds compared to their otherwise petite stature. Their flat chests just serve to accentuate their lower bodies.

Past that, I have a fat fetish and I like pear-shaped girls, while disliking huge, floppy breasts. Besides, lolis end up nearly spherical that much faster...

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:21:00 2013 No.10893685 Innocence and cuteness

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:21:30 2013 No.10893684 >>10893677 I suck cocks

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:39:00 2013 No.10893728 >>10893684 In my experience little girls can have those

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:42:45 2013 No.10893732 File: 302 KB, 1600x1200, adea948bf82cdc708e9911e76c714f91.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:43:00 2013 No.10893735 File: 295 KB, 1600x1200, efe6aa7bbeac98d05a98b31465b5fe65.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Almost too lewd.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:56:46 2013 No.10893763 >>10893647 >I like the legs, the panties, and the butt the most Now we're talking. Slender loli legs and cute loli butts are the best. Little loli nipples are great too. I also love their tummies. Who am I kidding? I love everything about loli.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 04:59:30 2013 No.10893772 no body hair and no monthly bleeding. If adults and cougars had that, then I'd like them more too.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 05:06:00 2013 No.10893782 their farts

Anonymous Thu May 16 05:33:00 2013 No.10893836
File: 24 KB, 468x545, 211572e16cf729c8c2726ba8f5f30cca.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10893763
I like their tummies too, and their armpits/necks. The smooth crook of a tender armpit is very enticing, so is the smoothness and softness of their bellies.

I want to lick.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 06:53:47 2013 No.10893965 >>10893735 Can't unseen this ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ

Anonymous Thu May 16 07:29:17 2013 No.10894045
File: 370 KB, 719x1000, lolicake.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10893782
I must concur, though you should be aware of a superior pleasure. Consider the food selections made by loli throughout a given day. Any such combination of comestible items is suitable as it was chosen freely by loli and is thus excellent. As a material creature, loli must derive nourishment from the food she chooses to serve her body. Following regular processing through her notably cute digestive system, loli develops a store of amassed bodily waste. To consider this as such in any other sense, however, would be an error. Loli's body enhances previously delectable treats into a unique culinary entity. Offered to the distinguished connoisseur is a rich, concise treasure delicately composed in corporeal perfection.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 07:35:01 2013 No.10894056 I like butts the most. Children are too small to have significant butts so this is sad.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 07:41:46 2013 No.10894071 >>10893732 >>10893735 Can I get some hot sauce?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 07:51:46 2013 No.10894088 Why do you look up little girls' skirts, /jp/?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 07:53:16 2013 No.10894092 >>10894071 watts

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 08:25:46 2013 No.10894130 >>10894088 looking up skirts and down shirts is a time honored male tradition that cannot be limited by things such as age and dimensions.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 08:30:16 2013 No.10894138 >>10894088 This reminds me of that part in Katawa Shoujo where the MC looks down Lily's shirt. What a scoundrel.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 08:53:17 2013 No.10894190 I like their shoes and socks

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 09:10:46 2013 No.10894220 I like their innocence, I like how they act before they becoming teenagers, I like their slender features, I like how much smaller than I they are.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 17:15:55 2013 No.10895700 >>10894088 Some things are just waiting to be seen.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 17:54:41 2013 No.10895907 They act just like grown women, but they're cuter and your allowed to stop them from doing bad things.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:00:26 2013 No.10895925 I hate how "lolis" are overly sexualized and ride the strongest on cute/erotic cliche. Pretty much the whole term means that. Anyway. I like Rika. She is funny/adorable and least fitting in this idiotic bandwagon. andthatisn'tmuchssh

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:05:56 2013 No.10895946 Can a loli be a bro?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:07:11 2013 No.10895951 I like the loli's vagina. Much tighter than an adult vagina and smells better too.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:11:56 2013 No.10895967 what the fuck is this?pedo general? lolis are highly overrated.get some taste.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:13:11 2013 No.10895968 >>10895951 A lot of them rarely wipe after they pee. So it smells like dried piss, I have a niece so I know.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:13:26 2013 No.10895969 File: 937 KB, 926x1080, 22056978.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Are we talking 2D or 3D?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:15:26 2013 No.10895974 >>10895969 3D under the shadow of 2D So these sickos can comfort each other.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:15:56 2013 No.10895979 >>10895974 Here on /jp/ we embrace love for 3D and 2D lolis.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:17:11 2013 No.10895981 >>10895979 Watch out, janny doesn't like discussions about 3D loli.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:18:42 2013 No.10895982 >>10895981 3D lolis are cuter than 2D ones in my opinion. We should be able to discuss both equally, even if we can't post pictures due to the rules and for people who have them, legal reasons.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:19:27 2013 No.10895985 Does anyone else like toddlers more than the usual 12 year old loli?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:20:27 2013 No.10895986 >>10895985 Only in 2D.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:21:11 2013 No.10895989 >>10895985 I've fapped to the Enjeru series like...50 times or more. I wish they made more toddlercon.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:24:41 2013 No.10895996 >>10895985 12 year old loli is almost the sublimeness. The only thing better is an 11 year old, or perhaps a 10 year old. I can't understand the appeal of toddlers, but to each their own.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:25:56 2013 No.10896000 >>10895974 /jp/- Just Pedo

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:26:56 2013 No.10896002 >>10895996 I prefer the 5-9 range the most myself.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:29:56 2013 No.10896009 DICKSPAMMER GET IN HERE

Anonymous Thu May 16 18:30:42 2013 No.10896012

>>10896002
Yeah man, can't do that. I just can't see the appeal of that shit.

A 11 year old is simply superior in every way than, say, a 8 year old.

You see, they have the delicious dichotomy of still being cute and innocent, while still being vaguely cognizant of more lewd and slutty things. This dichotomy is what makes them infinitely appealing. Not to mention their bodies, but that goes without saying.

Someone in the 5-9 range is just cute, but that's about it.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:30:57 2013 No.10896013 File: 319 KB, 700x1027, 29059206.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10895996 9-12 is my favorite range. Slight hints of growth and they're old enough to not be entirely clueless. More likely to make a move themselves.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:31:12 2013 No.10896015 >>10895985 Yes, because I find most lolis are not drawn loli enough for my taste, >>10894045 for example.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:35:11 2013 No.10896024 >>10896012 I think 11 is a bit too old. 7-9 is the absolute best range for me. I like flat bodies.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:35:41 2013 No.10896025 >>10896002 Same here. I think that's when they're cutest.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:35:56 2013 No.10896026 >>10896013 Seconded. I love this age range.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:36:11 2013 No.10896027 Ah... Ah... I want to fuck a child~

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:37:56 2013 No.10896031 >>10896012 Their tiny bodies is the appeal for me at least. Toddlercon blowjobs makes me cum so hard.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:38:56 2013 No.10896034 File: 38 KB, 443x450, little-girl1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896027

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:39:11 2013 No.10896035 Do any of you live near schools/parks?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:40:41 2013 No.10896038 File: 13 KB, 275x300, fbi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896035

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:40:57 2013 No.10896039 >>10896034 See, that's a real child and those things are disgusting as hell. 2d only

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:41:27 2013 No.10896041 >>10896039 shit taste

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:42:56 2013 No.10896045 Why does /jp/ like little girls so much more than little boys?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:43:26 2013 No.10896048 >>10896034 Real kids are kinda cute and all, but I don't harbor any sexual feelings for them. 2D loli is much lewder.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:43:56 2013 No.10896050 >>10896045 fuck off fag

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:44:12 2013 No.10896054 >>10896039 What are you talking about? She's very cute.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:45:26 2013 No.10896059 File: 354 KB, 600x900, 429e0dd27513d160dd87026da90152eccd8b7f0f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896045 I fantasize about being an adult woman breastfeeding my son.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:46:26 2013 No.10896066 >>10896050 Children all have similar bodies and /jp/ likes traps, I don't understand the issue. It's even easier to connect with a little boy because you once were one.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:47:41 2013 No.10896071 >>10896066 I'm not entirely sure what it is, but I personally don't find little boys appealing. I love lolis, and girly men and dicks and all, just not little boys.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:47:41 2013 No.10896072 >>10896045 I like both. I also prefer loli sex with a shota instead of an aged, balding man. It's cute and pure.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:49:27 2013 No.10896077 >>10896066 I can connect with them in straight shota doujins, but solo they're just not appealing at all.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:49:41 2013 No.10896079 >>10895982 Is looking at U-15 idols even technically illegal anywhere?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:49:56 2013 No.10896080 >>10896015 >drawn I don't think you quite understand what we are talking about here.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:51:41 2013 No.10896083 >>10896079 Depending on how they're depicted and what a jury thinks, possibly the US: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A Extra penalties if it's someone under 12.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:54:41 2013 No.10896093 >>10896083 Well thank god I stay away from that stuff then, Guess Ill stick to 2D

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:56:41 2013 No.10896099 >>10896093 > including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting > Nonrequired Element of Offense.— It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist. You were saying?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:58:56 2013 No.10896105 >>10896099 Pretty sure 2D is legal in some states though...

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 18:58:56 2013 No.10896108 >>10896059 I fantasize about being a young women and diapering a 12-13 year old boy that I babysit.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:23:27 2013 No.10896185 What does /jp/ think of Japan's love for taking upskirt photos of lolis?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:27:26 2013 No.10896201 >>10896185 I think they should take more steps to regard the healthy development of youths.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:27:42 2013 No.10896202 >>10896185 I'm going to need some pictures to accurately judge.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:27:57 2013 No.10896203 So what are the news on the loli ban thing in Japan? Is it really going to happen?

Anonymous Thu May 16 19:31:41 2013 No.10896210

>>10896099
They haven't dared prosecute under that law yet (In before Handley who went to jail for plea bargaining something entirely different) because they know the shit would totally hit the fan if they did.

At this point it may as well not even exist.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:34:56 2013 No.10896222 Their innocence, their childishness, the way they dress, their hair, their face, every part of their body (especially belly, butt, and shoulders) and their voice. A loli with a roundish belly is the best of all though.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:35:26 2013 No.10896224 >>10896185 They actually outlawed child pornography as late as in 1999 And they brag about "we never had slaves" etc hah

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:36:11 2013 No.10896226 >>10896222 The belly. Is the chest is bigger than the belly bulge she's too old.

Anonymous Thu May 16 19:36:56 2013 No.10896229

>>10895996
I like ages seven to eleven. Seven year olds are really cute, can mostly handle themselves, and like doing fun things. Eleven year olds are mostly the same, just a bit older with slightly different/slightly more lewd bodies. Between the two ages there's a nice transition.

When I say 'fun things' I mean things like making cookies together, or playing in the pool, or playing games together.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:37:11 2013 No.10896230 >>10896224 >"we never had slaves" It's funny because Japanese work ethics.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:37:11 2013 No.10896231 I want to be /jp/'s loli

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:37:26 2013 No.10896232 >>10896224 Upskirt of a child's panties isn't child porn though, is it?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:40:57 2013 No.10896243 >>10896229 I'd like a late blooming 13 year old.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:40:57 2013 No.10896244 >>10896232 Not really. But they had actual CP at that time legally.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:43:11 2013 No.10896252 >>10896226 Yeah, that's how I feel. Though my preferences get pretty close to toddlercon, with 4-8 being my favorite age range.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:45:11 2013 No.10896261 >>10896226 I like that comparison used as an age range. My favorite part of loli is that round belly...

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:45:42 2013 No.10896258 >>10896252 You're close to mine, I like 3-8 the most.

Anonymous Thu May 16 19:48:41 2013 No.10896267

>>10896035
I live 1/4 a mile from an elementary school in my neighborhood, which is right right across the street from a park. The way the school is set up, anyone can access the playgrounds, soccer/baseball fields, and basketball courts, but not the classrooms. The park across the street is just a normal neighborhood park/playground with no water feature.

In this part of the city almost every 1 square mile neighborhood has a park and school in it. It's kind of odd now that I think of it.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:54:12 2013 No.10896288 >>10896230 They aren't spoiled little western brats.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:55:56 2013 No.10896291 >>10896288 we aren't talking about kids, cowboy

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:57:11 2013 No.10896295 >>10896291 Neither was I.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:57:26 2013 No.10896294 File: 129 KB, 1280x720, 1336081081720.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] /jp/ers don't deserve to have sexual pleasure. If I had it my way, I would castrate you all!

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 19:59:26 2013 No.10896300 >>10896294 but i'm a girl!

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:01:41 2013 No.10896302 >>10896295 >brats explain yourself jew sympathizer

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:04:41 2013 No.10896311 >>10896300 well , then id chop off your clit !

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:08:56 2013 No.10896321 >>10896311 >>10896294 That's very rude.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:28:11 2013 No.10896391 >>10896311 ain't much to chop at. ok. i shut up. bye

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:28:41 2013 No.10896390 File: 447 KB, 700x1050, 12978569.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896013 This artist does really nice lolis.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:36:11 2013 No.10896410 >>10896071 That sounds like it could be connected to some insecurity.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:51:56 2013 No.10896454 File: 244 KB, 1200x800, qt314rori.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >:)

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 20:58:57 2013 No.10896463 File: 66 KB, 660x928, l-083dohrlmkd67o.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 11 is the best age. Perfect combination of innocence and romantic/sexual curiosity. Nothing in the world is more beautiful than an 11 year old girl. NOTHING

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:04:56 2013 No.10896476 I like little girls

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:05:26 2013 No.10896478 >>10896463 Not exactly since development speed varies.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:07:41 2013 No.10896483 >>10896390 That's a cute tan and outfit. I am going to get a tan and outfit like that.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:09:57 2013 No.10896493 >>10896083 >what the jury thinks AHAHAHA faggot

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:14:11 2013 No.10896505 >>10896493 epic meme /v/ro :)

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:15:11 2013 No.10896506 I like how innocent they are. I do not view them sexually, I only view them as a child I want to protect. If I were 2D, I'd just want to live a peaceful life raising my daughter. Like Yotsuba.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:17:57 2013 No.10896511 File: 145 KB, 960x751, tumblr_mc93faWNDt1r1ya3yo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896505 Feeling sore?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:18:42 2013 No.10896512 File: 2.97 MB, 195x295, wellwhatisit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896505 anon is from /dsg/ and dont u fukin forget it fagit

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:19:57 2013 No.10896514 I like their stomachs, still with a little bit of baby fat the best.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:21:11 2013 No.10896519 >>10896083 >http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A invalid, it was ruled unconstitutional try again?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:22:26 2013 No.10896520 >>10896505 its /b/ro

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:26:26 2013 No.10896529 >>10896514 this

Anonymous Thu May 16 21:27:27 2013 No.10896532

I used to like 3D lolis alot because I thought they were all so innocent and nice. But recently I started hanging out with a 6 year old girl and one of her friends bullies me constantly. Just the other day she slapped me multiple times and pinched my cheeks until my face was noticeably red, and just laughed at me when I asked her to stop.
The other girl is really nice and cute though.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:29:11 2013 No.10896539 I just like sexualizing cute stuff, except animals.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:29:26 2013 No.10896538 >>10896532 I think a lot of people here would enjoy being bullied by a loli.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:31:26 2013 No.10896542 >>10896539 carebears

Anonymous Thu May 16 21:41:11 2013 No.10896571
File: 669 KB, 677x567, eeeeeh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10896532
You are so wimpish that even little girls can bully you?
It is both tragic that you lack the authority to order them about and that you can't take a six year old's slaps in stride.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:43:56 2013 No.10896576 >>10896571 Maybe he just likes getting bullied by little girls dude.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:44:42 2013 No.10896579 >>10896571 yo, assclown. she likes him, obviously. oooooooooh ano.n. you gotta giiiiiiiirlfriennnnd. ahahahaha. you got cooties!

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:46:26 2013 No.10896588 >>10896532 I fucking hate lolis that try to dominate the relationship, fuck them, I'm the man, little bitch.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:47:26 2013 No.10896591 >>10896532 How exactly do you start hanging around with a 6 year old girl? I find this kind of breaks the realism of your story; cute as it may be.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:52:57 2013 No.10896612 >>10896591 I volunteer at a daycare and do out of school care a few times a week. I can handle most of the kids, except for the girl who bullies me.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:54:12 2013 No.10896615 >>10896591 Relative or family friend. It's not unusual.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 21:59:12 2013 No.10896634 This thread would make lolis cry.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:00:42 2013 No.10896636 >>10896634 Because these perverted fucks would be molesting them.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:01:42 2013 No.10896637 >>10896634 This is not a thread for lolis.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:04:13 2013 No.10896646 Imagine being friends with young mother and her constantly teasing you about your lack of relationships by suggesting you go out with her 10 year old daughter.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:07:27 2013 No.10896655 >>10896646 no

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:09:12 2013 No.10896661 >>10896646 I enjoy thinking about this.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:12:27 2013 No.10896667 >>10896646 Would she let me go out with her!?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:16:43 2013 No.10896683 >>10896667 Yes, and then she would ask her daughter how she was treated to know how 'trustworthy' you are.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:21:42 2013 No.10896691 >>10893647 I like how easy they are to rape.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 22:59:18 2013 No.10896787 File: 2.00 MB, 286x256, 1368230436274.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896483 Tan = pig SUDO disgust in most cases. Fucking orange skin who even goes to look more like?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 16 23:15:57 2013 No.10896835 File: 457 KB, 1000x769, 15751799_p6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10896787 Orange skin is normally the result of a fake tan. A proper tan will be a nice brown color, with some parts being lighter because of tanlines.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 00:41:28 2013 No.10897062 Sakura kino moto too is still the best one. 10 to 12 yrs old is about optimal.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 01:43:23 2013 No.10897189 >>10897062 Optimal for what?

Anonymous Fri May 17 03:19:11 2013 No.10897452
File: 82 KB, 699x451, 1367214531513.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10896835
Have you ever seen a farmer tan? Also, brown is subjective, because there's basically only one pigment (pheomelanin, eumelanin) in a range of concentrations in the skin. It's either there, or it's not. And once it's there, it takes at least 5 years of no sun exposure at all to fully get rid of.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 03:41:27 2013 No.10897491 File: 4 KB, 125x125, Appropriate Colours.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] #notacop

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 03:45:26 2013 No.10897495 Children are cute, not sexy

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 03:50:11 2013 No.10897504 File: 932 KB, 1000x750, 4ce379dc0830df5cfc5d33714f633d26.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 10 to 17 is the cutest. You dudes should read lolita, it's wisdom.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 03:56:11 2013 No.10897516 >>10897504 >thinking Lolita actually endorses this obsession

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 03:56:41 2013 No.10897514 >>10897504 Why do I find myself agreeing with Humbert so much? I doubt that was the intention of the author. Also oh god, Anise is hot.

Anonymous Fri May 17 04:02:26 2013 No.10897534
File: 330 KB, 754x1000, c10e5a8d561af7c71dfad68815130b500e00525f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10897514
>Also oh god, Anise is hot.
Too bad that that Abyss' combat had a lot of bullshit. I never knew what team was best to run. I always did Luke, Anise, Guy and Natalia. I think that I was supposed to be running Tear as my healer instead, but I was really turned off by her lack of DEF and ranged attacking.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 04:11:26 2013 No.10897557 File: 255 KB, 426x600, loli with baby bottle.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I'm drinking orange juice out of a sippy cup right now and I feel like a cute loli!

Anonymous Fri May 17 04:13:11 2013 No.10897561
File: 472 KB, 1200x1709, 015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10897534
You have to learn to use your shortcuts and strategy options properly.
Otherwise Just Dragon Tempest things to death with Guy and you are done.
And yeah, removing Tear from your party is not the best idea.

Anonymous Fri May 17 04:16:11 2013 No.10897572

>>10897561
Well if I ever get to replaying, I'll run her next time. I was really dismayed by the lack of Nurse or other high tier healing arts.

During the last dungeon I ran Luke, Anise, Tear and Natalia and did pretty well. It's a shame, though. I love using Guy. He is a great compliment to Luke's playstyle.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 04:39:43 2013 No.10897628 Why does /jp/ like 3D lolis so much?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 04:55:42 2013 No.10897678 >>10897557 I find myself doing far too many things in an effort to feel cute than should be acceptable for a man.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:13:13 2013 No.10897731 Do you guys have anyone to talk to irl about your problems? I've told my doctor stuff, she is fairly supportive.

Anonymous Fri May 17 05:19:43 2013 No.10897745
File: 351 KB, 798x670, 1367052788537.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10897678
That's totally fine so don't feel bad about it okay! I think people should do whatever it takes to make themselves happy so long as doing so does not encroach on anyone else's civil liberties. You can be as cute as you want to be, friend!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:21:27 2013 No.10897749 >>10897731 I'd be too scared to tell anyone in real life.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:27:57 2013 No.10897769 >>10897749 My closest friends and doctor are the only ones who know. I don't trust my family, however.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:30:27 2013 No.10897773 >>10897731 No and I probably never will. Though I think my sister might have suspicions about me.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:32:57 2013 No.10897781 >>10897773 >suspicions Whats' that mean? Would she snitch on you if she found out?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:37:12 2013 No.10897790 >>10897781 She acts kind of standoffish around me now. We used to be close friends. I don't know if she'd snitch, she's a jesus freak now so probably. I think she'd probably tell our mother.

Anonymous Fri May 17 05:39:27 2013 No.10897798

>>10897731
I think things would be a lot worse if I wasn't able to interact with my relatives every so often. I would probably try to befriend some unrelated loli and you know how that would turn out.

With things like this I can get my dose of loli, they can have fun, and all is good with the world. I like to think that I'm a good influence on them as well, so there's that.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:40:58 2013 No.10897799 >>10897790 Well what tipped her off or made her suspicious in the first place? If you weren't in any relationships ever wouldn't her first natural assumption be that you are gay?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:48:13 2013 No.10897808 >>10897745 I feel fine when I start, but slowly I think about how much better things would be if there were a loli with me enjoying those things, and I become sad.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:52:35 2013 No.10897808,1 Wow, a little over 24 hours.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 05:59:13 2013 No.10897817 >>10897799 She and I got into a discussion about morals and I was defending incest and slightly defending hebephilia. I think that tipped her off. I've had a few relationships with girls, but they were all fairly short and pointless.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:06:58 2013 No.10897826 >>10897817 Oh wow, better watch out then.

Anonymous Fri May 17 06:16:59 2013 No.10897843

>>10897817
>I was defending incest and slightly defending hebephilia
Those things don't need a defense. Fuck your sister if she's so blinded by her false moral superiority that she's willing to let that affect a family bond. I talk about that shit with my sister all the time. She respects my views and even agrees with them to an extent.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:28:59 2013 No.10897877 >>10897731 My only problem is I'm lazy and have no drive to do anything.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:29:14 2013 No.10897878 >>10897843 She was denying evolution. I really wanted to hit her. That church ruined my sister.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:36:13 2013 No.10897910 >>10897878 That's a shame, anon. Depending on how she is, maybe she'll grow out of it someday?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:36:13 2013 No.10897911 >>10895982 Eh, just go to TORchan, they love to comfort each other about it there. I've come to terms with the fact that liking kiddies isn't normal and I'm a sicko, it is indefencable.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:37:14 2013 No.10897917 >>10897910 >how she is how *old she is

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:45:43 2013 No.10897930 >>10897910 She's 13, so there's still time. But the stupid teenaged girl syndrome has already set in and it only makes it harder.

Anonymous Fri May 17 06:48:59 2013 No.10897939

>>10897628
Imprinting my friend, not our choice. Almost everyone, everywhere is busy hiding their real "sexuality". Almost no one actually has sexual imprinting equivalent to that their "tribe", "social circle" has set.
Some people can't comprehend this much, and despite not having the imprinting match with the actual "standard" they themselves shun "non-standard" reasons. These people are called normalfags, imposing their beliefs, "social-circle" believes upon you and your actual, true, personal beliefs or imprints.

I'd never tell anyone IRL about these things, because I'm simply scared that people could see my very differently, shun me or start keeping me away from their children, which would only hurt me (despite me not doing anything wrong, or changing in behavior whatsoever). I don't know how people in different tunnel realities see what I see as a daily routine, I cannot do something that will directly go against their reality tunnels and social taboos to endanger myself. It's a conflict of realities, I can't know and never will understand deeply why they are like that. I lost the weird kind of "social switch" years, years ago, and I don't know if members of my family do have it, or not. I stopped going to psychiatrists years ago as well, they don't help, they only want to help. Medications won't do anything but work as a placebo machine and make you feel miserable. You cannot change beliefs based upon pills, not with today's technology. I talked with them about a lot of things. but never told them about my sexual preferences much at all, simply scared that they could notify authorities if I even slipped a glimpse of that I own some trace of illegal porn or may have, for example, kissed some child, and problems with it is the last thing I'd want. I was once depressed but what truly got me off, was me realizing few things, I was seeing three different psychiatrists at that time and taking meds, and it never helped. If you want to change, do it yourself.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 06:48:59 2013 No.10897940 >>10897930 Ah, little sisters. Angry little sister is cute and funny in 2D, its terrible in real life. Its enough to put you off women forever. Especially if you're British, teenage girls here make me feel ill.

Anonymous Fri May 17 06:56:58 2013 No.10897953

>>10897939

As one of you myself, I can tell you they're right. Paedophiles are dangerous, shit even 12th Century Britian knew that fucking 9 year old's was wrong. Think about like this, you're a Dad, raising his cute innocent daughter, slowly molding her into a happy and fulfulling life. She's happy, she's learning, playing and enjoying her childhood. Then, so hairy guy older than you comes along and fucks her in the park. Now she's been introduced into the adult world and the complexities of sex and the feelings that come along with it, that not even most adults have come to terms with. And he no consideration for what your daughter would feel like, he just wanted to get his end away to some loli vulva. She can't concentrate in school, she's having tantrums, and growing more distant because of the feelings that arose from being exposed to it. She'll never be the daughter you loved and she'll have the life you wanted all because some guy wanted to jizz.

For all of our sakes, its best loli stays in 2D and these feelings also stay in that realm. It's natural to be wary of pedophiles, people aren't taking your feelings into consideration when they're thinking about their children, and its the same to any outside influence on them. Its burden we just have to bear.

Anonymous Fri May 17 07:07:14 2013 No.10897964

>>10897953
You're right as well, these kind of pedophiles are people that should get killed, really. If one is intelligent he can realize what consequences his actions bear, if you're a good human, you won't try to hurt another human being. There are sometimes exceptions to do that, probably, we can argue about how much adult-child relationship is harmful and its effects, but if I had a daughter, I'd just act as you say. I'm not the kind of human to do something as disgusting as attempt rape or even touch someone without their permission. Little girls (at least in my family) don't mind me hugging them, I just like them and this is as far as I will go if I don't want anyone to get hurt in the process.

I guess fantasy is the only place we belong to. Kinda sad, but what better alternative can we get? Hurting people, risking jail, living in fear?

Anonymous Fri May 17 07:18:11 2013 No.10897983

>>10897953
Paraphilias are not dangerous per se. Only those antisocial enough to act on those impulses can truly be regarded as dangerous. Just like how everyone thinks about hurting people sometimes for whatever reason; they don't become criminals until they take the next step--most people don't.

I fail to see the attraction of 3D besides the outright taboo nature of it. Loli is great because it's so fantastic in nature. I personally like really lewd, dominant lolis. Those do not exist in real life.

Anonymous Fri May 17 07:24:59 2013 No.10897991

>>10897964

Well, I wouldn't as far to say they should get killed, but people who act on it should be looked upon with disgust. Many Peadophiles often target rights to choose and physical harm as reason for why adult-child sex should be allowed, personally, I don't think children can choose because they make retarded decisions even in normal life, that's why parents do everything for them, and they're much more inclined to take risks than adults, they don't think things through. What they don't understand is that sex is an incredibly complex behaviour that can lead to a large range of emotions. Love is all fine and dandy when it goes right, but its terrible when it goes wrong, and for most people, it does. Even for animals, sex can be a distressing and confusing endeavour. I just don't think children, and even most young adults are ready for it. Plus, it distracts them from their education something awful.

>>10897983

No, of course not. There is nothing wrong with like guro, loli ect because you can't help it, although for a social retard like me seeing it in 2D is more distressing than 3D, because I love those characters. I trying to explain it from a parent's perspective about why they are so against pedophiles. But its not just them, many people are looked at someone who should be avoided when there's children around. Think of someone walks around swearing and calling people "cunt" all the time. You wouldn't your children hang about with him.

And I think you're right about the taboo thing, early humans did had all the chances in the world to fuck lolis, but they usually never had a fetish to an extent we do. Not even chimpanzees engage in that behaviour, despite having the opportunity to.

Anonymous Fri May 17 10:54:00 2013 No.10898420

>>10897953
Just because you're attracted to children doesn't mean you rape them.
Not only that, but child abuse is universally done by people close to the child. It's extremely rare for some creepy kidnapper to come and snatch your daughter away because chances are you're the pedo fucking her instead.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 16:55:47 2013 No.10899636 File: 195 KB, 888x637, a6b127329549a76466d7334ffcf2de26.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 17:56:46 2013 No.10899786 Humans have a natural preference for youthful features in mates and have feelings of affection towards children. These things can get mixed up. But it won't cause any problems in a non-degenerate culture.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 18:17:56 2013 No.10899857 >>10899786 >But it won't cause any problems in a non-degenerate culture. Well, looks like we're fucked!

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:04:31 2013 No.10900090 >>10896034 >>10896039 >>10896048 But that's a shitty 4 years old. That faggot is cheating.

Anonymous Fri May 17 19:16:46 2013 No.10900158

Could anyone kindly explain to me why the Comic LO 2013-06 Vol.111 raws haven't been scanned yet?

It's only $7 and was released almost a month ago.

I'm also seeing a bunch of Chinese translations of some chapters. What the fuck is going on? Are the Chinese hogging the raws again? Why would they do something like that?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:20:16 2013 No.10900172 Shota > Loli Prove me wrong, turbonerds.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:22:46 2013 No.10900181 >>10900172 You are completely right.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:31:16 2013 No.10900223 File: 184 KB, 650x918, 7b6449f7d48f52b28f3f9cb6cb0cc39c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10900172 It's not like there's much difference at that age.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 19:53:31 2013 No.10900323 >>10900223 Their personalities are completely different. And girls have better butts.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:00:16 2013 No.10900347 >>10900323 Lolis have nice butts.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:04:01 2013 No.10900368 >>10900323 >>10900347 Where do you get this information about butts from?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:05:01 2013 No.10900378 >>10900368 Butts Monthly

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:09:31 2013 No.10900391 >>10900368 Webcams.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:13:32 2013 No.10900407 File: 146 KB, 569x900, 85538710a89ea19587f3612d27b0ad94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10900368 Just by regularly looking at loli butts you can tell that on average a loli butt is nicer than the butts belonging to all other demographics.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:31:46 2013 No.10900502 >>10900158 They r raided by police. You have to wait till next month.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:38:16 2013 No.10900528 >>10900502 Wait, what? Who?

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:42:16 2013 No.10900539 File: 2 KB, 1091x17, no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10900502 Liar.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:44:32 2013 No.10900543 >>10900528 http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2013/04/25/cops-raid-comic-megastore-force-cancellation/ There should be topic about raiding comic lo too I suppose.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:46:31 2013 No.10900551 >>10900407 The Romans didn't seem to think so, and they created western civilization so they clearly knew shit.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:46:46 2013 No.10900553 >>10900543 >sankaku Kill yourself.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:47:31 2013 No.10900554 >>10900539 I wish i could by it.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 20:48:16 2013 No.10900557 >>10900554 buy *fix

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 22:01:02 2013 No.10900818 This thread is ass.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 22:02:02 2013 No.10900823 >>10897953 >Paedophiles are dangerous No.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 23:13:21 2013 No.10901079 I like loli cuteness. Lolis are unsuitable for sexualisation.

>>	Anonymous Fri May 17 23:49:18 2013 No.10901170 When does a girl stop being a loli and a boy stop being a shota?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:00:48 2013 No.10901210 >>10901079 I like da cut of your jib, mister.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:06:49 2013 No.10901237 >>10901170 When they stop being innocent.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:16:48 2013 No.10901280 >>10901237 So Rin from Kodomo no Jikan isn't a loli?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:18:18 2013 No.10901288 >>10900823 You can't be serious

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:20:04 2013 No.10901304 >>10901280 There are exceptions like slutty lolis.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:27:27 2013 No.10901348 >>10901288 Not that guy, but that's like saying "Homosexuals are dangerous".

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:33:18 2013 No.10901377 >>10901348 Just look at the creepy stuff pedophiles talk about on Warosu. Those seem like dangerous people to me.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:50:18 2013 No.10901441 >>10901348 Not at all. Homosexuals have consensual sex. Pedophiles rape children.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 00:50:49 2013 No.10901444 >>10901377 Just look at the creepy stuff homos talk about on Tumblr. Those seem like dangerous people to me.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:00:49 2013 No.10901485 >>10901441 Some pedophiles rape children just like some homosexuals rape men.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:02:48 2013 No.10901491 >>10901377 Lately I've been wondering if Warosu is being monitored.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:15:59 2013 No.10901526 >>10901491 If it isn't already, I'm sure it will be eventually. I hope ZUN!bar doesn't get in trouble for posting there.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:28:14 2013 No.10901577 >>10901485 Adults cannot have sex with children without it being rape

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:32:14 2013 No.10901594 File: 677 KB, 2184x1706, vUlY2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10901588 Oops. Forgot my pic.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:32:29 2013 No.10901588 And then we have the gay men who are fucking evil/insane.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:33:45 2013 No.10901595 >>10901577 lel If you seriously believe that, then I'm ending this conversation here.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:36:30 2013 No.10901605 >>10901595 Not him, but if a child does not understand what you are doing to it, it is rape. Then again, we had the boy prostitutes in ancient greece who were, according to what I read, "too wicked". I suppose that corruption is a kind of maturity.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:36:59 2013 No.10901608 >>10901595 please don't think this unironically though the >lel tells me you probably are doing it ironically

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:37:14 2013 No.10901609 >>10901595 When they hell is it okay to have sex with children? I seriously hope you're joking.

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:38:29 2013 No.10901610

>>10901595
Different guy here.
While a paedophile myself, I understand that a child doesn't have the mental capacity to agree to have sex with someone. Unless we have different definitions for what a child is, I don't think it's really possible to have ethical relations with a child. Unless they happened to be extremely mature and intelligent.

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:38:29 2013 No.10901611

>>10901595

You actually think a child (who can't understand the concept of sex and relationships) would ever want to have sex with some gross old man who posts on /jp/?

People can't grasp these concepts until after puberty. The only way for a child to 'consent' would be through coercion and deceit

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:40:45 2013 No.10901616

>>10901605
>>10901608
>>10901609
>>10901611
Anecdotal evidence means shit, but I knew about sex before third grade.

>>10901610
There's also kids that are mature too.

I guess my point is "There are exceptions so don't use never or always when arguing about ethics/morals"

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:43:44 2013 No.10901625

>>10901616
The problem is that who gets to get the choice in the whole relationship. You?

I mean, most kids don't even care about the idea of fucking one another until hormones come in force. Yes, children do masturbate, but mostly as a means of self gratification rather then actual sexual arousal.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:43:44 2013 No.10901626 >>10901616 >I knew about sex before third grade. did you want an ugly old man to stick his penis in you?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:45:29 2013 No.10901635 >>10901625 I'm just saying there are exceptions. >>10901626 All pedophiles are ugly old men.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:47:14 2013 No.10901645 Yet another 2D loli thread turned into an "it's okay to fuck real children" thread. I hate all of you so much.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:48:59 2013 No.10901648 >>10901635 >All pedophiles are ugly old men. >not answering the question

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:50:29 2013 No.10901653 >>10901645 I'm not saying it's okay, I'm just saying not all sex is rape. We can talk about lolis if you want. It always ends up like this though. >>10901648 You couldn't tell my sarcasm?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:51:44 2013 No.10901655 File: 2.02 MB, 1000x1200, 29508394.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10901645 A verdict on the subject must be reached in order to render judgement. All angles must be seen, all evidence must be gathered and all opinions must be heard.

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:53:00 2013 No.10901659

>>10901653
>I'm not saying it's okay, I'm just saying not all sex is rape.
legally it most certainly is

do you really think your stupid anecdotal ``evidence'' is worth more than the decades of studying done to determine age of consent done by professionals?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:54:14 2013 No.10901661 >>10901645 >2D loli thread Enough of this already.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:55:59 2013 No.10901665 >>10901653 >You couldn't tell my sarcasm? You didn't answer the question

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:57:29 2013 No.10901673

>>10901653
>I'm just saying not all sex is rape
"Rape" and "abuse" are much too heavy and are inevitably attached to social stigma. The problem is that children cannot reasonably consent like an adult could because their brains aren't developed enough. That doesn't mean that children can't enjoy sexual activity. The problem is that most of that a lot of pedophiles will likely manipulate them into little more than sex toys.

By how we define consent, all sex involving children technically IS rape.

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:57:59 2013 No.10901677

>>10901659
>decades of studying done to determine age of consent done by professionals
Are you serious? It's completely arbitrary. If you want to go by frontal cortex, make the age of consent 21. Psychology? "What you did was very fucking wrong and you should feel dirtied" is not a very valid study in my opinion. Of course, you're welcome to cite any sources to disprove my thoughts about "decades of studying by professionals".

>>10901665
It's a loaded question. You're assuming that all pedophiles are a) ugly and b) old. By making it seem very unappealing, the only answer is "No."

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:58:44 2013 No.10901679 >decades of studying done to determine age of consent >by professionals Laugh out loud.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 01:59:44 2013 No.10901684 >>10901659 >decades of studying done to determine age of consent done by professionals? If it was done by professionals, the age of consent would be "married".

Anonymous Sat May 18 01:59:59 2013 No.10901685

>>10901659
>decades of studying done to determine age of consent done by professionals
Seems pretty arbitrary to me. 14-18 depending on where you go. That block of time involves a huge amount of development. Even then, brains do not fully mature until into the 20s. Picking 18 to give a person privileges is dangerous because that age range is marked by some of the worst rates of reckless behavior.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:01:14 2013 No.10901693 >>10901677 w I messed up and mixed child psychology with age of consent. You get my point.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:01:14 2013 No.10901694 >>10901685 >Picking 18 to give a person privileges is dangerous because that age range is marked by some of the worst rates of reckless behavior. think about that sentence for a second please

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:03:29 2013 No.10901704 >>10901694 What's wrong with it?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:07:59 2013 No.10901718 >>10901704 Why do you think ``that age range is marked by some of the worst rates of reckless behavior?'' The reckless behavior is brought on by the privileges.

Anonymous Sat May 18 02:14:47 2013 No.10901746

>>10901718
No it isn't. The privileges only allow expression of a developmental truism. In controlled studies, teens and young adults display greater risk-taking than older adults under the same conditions. Their frontal lobe development lags behind their limbic system development which explains this risk-taking.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:19:00 2013 No.10901770 >>10901718 If those privileges were given at a younger age, say 13, do you think 13 year olds would be as reckless as 18 year olds?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:21:59 2013 No.10901784 >>10901491 Does he run the place by himself? Why does it take so long to remove illegal content? Even an idiot would have made a script to autodelete posts with the line "check out this cp" by now.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:24:00 2013 No.10901796 >>10901770 Rates among young teens is generally lower IIRC 15-19 and 20-25 are the worst ranges, but, it's important to note that it only gets this high when peers are involved. Still, older adults display lower rates all around, as do children.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:30:59 2013 No.10901831 >>10901784 It seems to only be one admin on that site and they respond to reports made every few days. No use setting up a script to automatically delete stuff because then you might end up deleting threads that don't need to be deleted.

Anonymous Sat May 18 02:36:29 2013 No.10901854
File: 2.01 MB, 1786x2500, 1361110751165.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10897930
>>10897940
I feel for you guys. My imouto herself is a bitch of astronomical proportions. Just being around her and hearing her speak makes my heart hurt and gets me stressed out.

I want a cute loli imouto.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:39:00 2013 No.10901863 >>10901854 >I want a cute loli imouto. Don't we all. I wish I had a doting, but slightly clumsy loli imouto. Unfortunately that would mean another bitch down the line. Keep it 2D, anon. Cherish your dreams forever! Also, lewd flan garter!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:42:59 2013 No.10901872 >>10901770 13 year old boys are some of the worst juvenile offenders.

Anonymous Sat May 18 02:53:29 2013 No.10901888
File: 1.95 MB, 1786x2500, 1361111049562.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Is it really so strange for normalfags to not understand our appreciation for lolis?

For me I was sexually attracted to women and girls my age when I was around 7-8 years old. I liked them then and I still sort of do now. Attraction for me though depends a lot on the girls personality though so I'm never quite attracted to 3D lolis anymore since the maturity level is obviously quite huge. I still find them cute and I appreciate them very much though. Not saying I'm a pedo that goes around ogling little girls I only ogle 2d I'm just saying that I've always found all women - whether younger or older - rather attractive from a very young age

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:54:14 2013 No.10901892 >>10901863 Why do they always have to be bitches? Why aren't there any nice girls. 3D makes me weary.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 02:57:45 2013 No.10901896 >>10901892 Because humans are complex and thus disingenuous (or at least they possess that capability). With puberty comes ambiguity. Even "nice girls" can become bitches once you get to know them even a little bit. 2D doesn't lie. It's perfect.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:00:44 2013 No.10901905

There's nothing unethical or damaging about having sex with a young child. On its own, this causes no psychological harm, there is no risk of physical harm if vaginal and anal sex are avoided (and even this is possible for people with particularly small penises, I'd imagine.)

The other argument is that becuase children tend to be in a lower position of power than adults, allowing sex between the two can result in the adult manipulating the child. This is also a stupid argument. People manipulate children into doing things they don't want to all the time. Eating vegetables, going on road trips, flushing their dead goldfish. These things are just another type of manipulation. You can argue that they have a positive end which satisfies the negative effect of the manipulation, but so does sex (physical pleasure and the solving of curiosity.) Even putting this aside, it's fallacious to say that all children are incapable of understanding and consenting to sex. People develop thinking skills at different ages, not at the arbitrary, static line in the sand set by various countries.

The real reason sex with minors is outlawed is because people don't like the idea of adults having sex with their children. It is a selfish and controlling idea which doesn't consider the child's desires.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:06:59 2013 No.10901928

>>10901905
>The real reason sex with minors is outlawed is because people don't like the idea of adults having sex with their children. It is a selfish and controlling idea which doesn't consider the child's desires.
Haha, yeah let's just ignore the evidence of human development. It's all a big conspiracy.

And are you trying to compare a white lie and encouraging healthy eating habits to having sex with children? Just shut the fuck up. You're giving pedophiles a bad name.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:07:29 2013 No.10901929

>>10901905
>It is a selfish and controlling idea which doesn't consider the child's desires
Selfish? Adults are supposed to take care of children not let them do what they want and please whenever and however. The laws are set in place to protect children and although they may not be perfect it's surely better than making it okay for them to fuck around or be fucked.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:09:44 2013 No.10901938

>>10901928

>And are you trying to compare a white lie and encouraging healthy eating habits to having sex with children?

Yes, I am. They are both manipulation. Great job making an emotional appeal about how pedophilia is 'JUST PLAIN WRONG' in response.

>>10901929

>Selfish? Adults are supposed to take care of children not let them do what they want and please whenever and however.

No, adults are supposed to act in a child's best interest, not limit harmless things because of their own selfish feelings.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:14:44 2013 No.10901959 >>10901938 Just give it up. No matter where you go on the internet, there will always be retarded trash who argue with "m-m-muh morals" and refuse to see logic. 5-star post up above, though.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:15:59 2013 No.10901963 >>10901959 This post doesn't contain any rebuttal. I'm glad you knew when to forfeit the argument. Arguing for your views isn't so easy when you're not circlejerking with a bunch of your SRS buddies, right?

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:17:59 2013 No.10901964

>>10901938
>Great job making an emotional appeal about how pedophilia is 'JUST PLAIN WRONG' in response.
Nice. There's nothing wrong with pedophilia. There is something wrong with your rationalization. For one, it completely ignores any and all science. Two, it conflates guidance with sexual manipulation.

Whether you like it or not, people are inseparable from society; the girl will always be hurt. Kids are stupid. They are not smart enough to understand the implications of sex. It would be great if the older party was caring and selfless, but obviously that isn't the case.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:18:30 2013 No.10901966 >>10901963 It contains no rebuttal because I was 100% agreeing with you. Stop being so prickly.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:18:59 2013 No.10901969 Guys, please. Just post what you like most about the loli.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:19:14 2013 No.10901970

>>10901938
It's not about what the child wants it's about what's best for the child -
taking care of children and doing what's best for them =/= letting them do what they want and please whenever and however

Sex is not harmless especially if you're not ready for it - physically or mentally.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:19:44 2013 No.10901972 >>10901969 The shitstorm that follows any discussion of it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:20:44 2013 No.10901977 >>10901972 I guess another thread will be made to contain actual loli discussion and not sex discussion.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:20:59 2013 No.10901979 >>10901970 >It's not about what the child wants it's about what's best for the child - So when are we going to legislate bans on fast food for children?

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:21:29 2013 No.10901981

>>10901964

>Two, it conflates guidance with sexual manipulation.

Because they are both manipulation. You should stop trying to change words into more negative alternatives because it isn't working. You can flip it around. "Sexual manipulation" can be called guidance, since it has a positive effect, and telling a child their dead fish will go to heaven can be called "ideological manipulation."

>For one, it completely ignores any and all science.

I can't ignore any science because you haven't even presented any for me to ignore.

>Kids are stupid. They are not smart enough to understand the implications of sex. It would be great if the older party was caring and selfless, but obviously that isn't the case.

Here are some real examples of scientifically unsupported, emotionally-fueled claims.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:22:59 2013 No.10901984 >>10901979 That isn't politically feasible. Fast food companies would stand to loose too much money and they have more than enough lobbyists to defeat any such bill.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:23:29 2013 No.10901987 File: 29 KB, 482x800, 1343917290352.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10901984 >loose Murrikan detected

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:25:29 2013 No.10901992 >>10901979 If it bothers you that much that kids can eat fast food go lobby for it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:25:59 2013 No.10901994 >>10901992 In my country, bribing politicians is illegal unfortunately.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:26:14 2013 No.10901997 >>10901987 Everybody cut loose, footloose. Kick off your sunday boots.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:26:59 2013 No.10902003 >>10901997 Just because you can act retarded doesn't mean you have to.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:27:00 2013 No.10902008 >>10902003 I have to, I am a retard. Look at that spelling error I made, clearly my points are invalid.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:27:30 2013 No.10902004 >>10901994 You just need to be more subtle about it. You don't just run up to some politician and shove money in his face.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:27:45 2013 No.10902005 >>10901994 Then go gather some people and protest. Do something about it. Or why don't you just take over your country and change the law yourself?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:28:15 2013 No.10902009 >>10901994 Bribing is never legal in most countries. It doesn't stop it from happening though.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:30:14 2013 No.10902013 File: 146 KB, 574x960, 1368443160364.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10901987

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:30:59 2013 No.10902017

>>10901981
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piaget%27s_theory_of_cognitive_development#Formal_operational_stage
Children are incapable of hypothetical/abstract thought. Because they don't understand abstract "if-then" relations they cannot reasonably give consent. If we're referring to children to include adolescents, they're frontal lobes are inadequately developed to allow for sound judgment.

>"Sexual manipulation" can be called guidance, since it has a positive effect
One, children do not naturally know about sex. Someone must introduce them to this concept. Because they cannot reasonably understand what this means in relation to them (because they haven't experienced it) they can ONLY be manipulated into a sex act. Two, please provide some evidence of "positive effect" in having sex with kids. It's so weird, I can only find cases involving extreme trauma! And please don't say "pleasure" because rape victims can still have orgasms due to stimulation. This doesn't mean they need it, want it, or benefit from it.

You really should stop. I don't give a shit if a guy likes children. You're further damaging the label.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:32:29 2013 No.10902021 >>10902005 >protesting in favor of pedophilia Even in "first world" countries, you'll get lynched for that shit in a heartbeat. The law equates pedophilia to child molestation, even if nobody has acted on those desires. No exceptions.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:32:29 2013 No.10902022 >>10902009 The ones where bribing is not only legal, but customary are amusing, though. Since the bribes end up being silly, like chickens and stuff.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:33:15 2013 No.10902026 >>10902021 I thought he was protesting for more strict food regulations in relationship to fat and salt.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:33:44 2013 No.10902028 >>10902022 The republicans accept poultry now?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:35:00 2013 No.10902038 >>10902028 Bribery in the US is illegal. That's why it has political action committees, as a legal loophole.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:37:14 2013 No.10902041 >>10902038 Changing the name you call it doesn't make it any different from bribery.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:38:14 2013 No.10902047 >>10902028 >>>/pol/

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:39:44 2013 No.10902048 >>10902041 If bribery were legal, you could just go up to a congressman and hand him a suitcase filled with money. The fact you have to basically launder it first shows the fact that it's at least attempted to be squashed out.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:40:14 2013 No.10902050

>>10902017

>Children are incapable of hypothetical/abstract thought.
There are no mechanically logical deductions required to realize that sex means actions which will result in a funny feeling in the genitals. People understand the implications and mechanics of eating, and there's no reason that they cannot then understand the implications and mechanics of sex.

>One, children do not naturally know about sex.
Children don't 'naturally' know anything aside from what's in their instincts. Are you saying that children instinctually know about dead goldfishes' fate, but not sex? The mechanics of sex are instinctually ingrained into children's heads (eg.: genital stimulation should be followed by a thrusting motion of the hips.) How do you think animals know how to get it on?

By the way, check out this section of the article you linked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piaget%27s_theory_of_cognitive_development#Challanges_to_Piagetian_stage_theory

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:40:44 2013 No.10902052 But if you marry her there's no problem. You just need to be good enough for her parents to let you.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:41:29 2013 No.10902055 >>10902048 So if I build a catapult to launch a knife into you, I won't get charged for assault with a deadly weapon? Interesting. > it's at least attempted to be squashed out. Biggest joke of the century.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:41:29 2013 No.10902056 >guysss pedophilia should be legal; cumming into little girls is good for them :((((((( Holy shit, /jp/, and you wonder why moot and the rest of 4chan hates you.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:43:14 2013 No.10902062

>>10902017

>Two, please provide some evidence of "positive effect" in having sex with kids.

Physical pleasure. The satisfaction of curiosity.

>It's so weird, I can only find cases involving extreme trauma!

That's because society tells children that people having sex with them will traumatize them. Touching a child with your genitals is no more harmful on its own than holding hands with them unwillingly (which people do all the time, in order to cross the road safely.)

>And please don't say "pleasure" because rape victims can still have orgasms due to stimulation. This doesn't mean they need it, want it, or benefit from it.

Having sex with children isn't rape unless the child says no.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:43:14 2013 No.10902063 >>10902021 No not in favor of pedophilia in favor of banning fast food for children. In fact why stop there? He should make it so that children can't eat "bad" food at all. I'm waiting to see your results.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:44:44 2013 No.10902076 >>10902062 Drugs can also be physically pleasing and mysterious for children. Then should we let children smoke and snort coke?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:45:15 2013 No.10902078 >>10902063 So raping the nutrition and growth of children is okay but consensual sex with them is not?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:45:29 2013 No.10902080 File: 21 KB, 500x375, 1368824696954.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902056 Epic strawman argument, crossboarder.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:45:29 2013 No.10902082 >>10902076 The difference is that drugs are harmful (with the possible exception of weed, and only if it is vaporized) and sex isn't.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:45:29 2013 No.10902083 >>10902063 The results would be a generation of healthy children and not fatass pigs.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:47:14 2013 No.10902088 >>10902082 How more stereotypical can you get? Get back to Woodstock, hippie

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:47:44 2013 No.10902089

>>10902062
>Touching a child with your genitals is no more harmful on its own than holding hands with them unwillingly
[citation needed]

>Having sex with children isn't rape unless the child says no.
So I can tape a child's mouth and have sex with him/her and it's not rape?
Or how about If I slip a little something into their drink and make them pass out and then do the deed? Not rape?
Or what if they can't talk at all ! Not rape right?

Fun story. one of my friends was raped as a young girl, she was forced to blow a dude and do you think she said "no" to him when he told her to do it? She didn't. Why you ask? Because he had a knife held up to her throat. Not very easy to say "no" when you're scared for your life.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:48:59 2013 No.10902095 >>10902082 You can't say sex isn't harmful.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:49:44 2013 No.10902098

>>10902088

It's good that you ducked out of the argument. Your argument was out of legs to stand on.

>>10902089

>[citation needed]

No, there isn't. You tell me what's harmful about it. Here's a hypothetical which is currently illegal and nearly universally regarded as immoral/harmful for a child (on its own): a child touching a bare penis with their hand, by their own choice.

How is this harmful on its own? Explain it to me. Physically or mentally.

>>10902095

Sex isn't harmful.

>>10902089

>So I can tape a child's mouth and have sex with him/her and it's not rape?
Or how about If I slip a little something into their drink and make them pass out and then do the deed? Not rape?
Or what if they can't talk at all ! Not rape right?

You know what I mean, idiot. It's not rape if the child gives consent.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:51:14 2013 No.10902104

>>10902062
>Physical pleasure. The satisfaction of curiosity.
One, not all pleasurable things are positive. Two, children are not naturally curious about sex. No matter what psychological model you apply, the universal tendency is asexuality into sexual awareness following puberty. Hormones in combination with emotional and cognitive maturation make this possible. Why do you think "cooties" exist?

>That's because society tells children that people having sex with them will traumatize them.
Or maybe it's because a guy is shoving his dick into a kid who cannot physically accept it. Not only are the organs underdeveloped, but a lack of overall maturation makes the concept of romance completely foreign to a child.

>Having sex with children isn't rape unless the child says no.
Oh wow. So date rape isn't rape? And again, a child cannot consent because they lack the mental faculties that make that possible. It's why you don't see kids in calculus classes. It's seriously like coercing a retarded person into sex; no matter how I look at it, it's exploitative.

Congratulations, I actually thought that under ideal conditions, sexual exploration with a child might be possible. Arguing with you has actually made me reconsider this position given my own evidence and points.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:51:44 2013 No.10902107
File: 716 KB, 1971x1920, 1367545303282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Age of consent laws are designed to punish beta males. A beta male in his 20s, unsuccessful with women his own age who are infused with a sense of feminist entitlement and deride all but the top alpha males who take interest in them, who seeks companionship with a younger, sexually mature female who desires him, should not go to prison for acting on that which is normal male sexuality. A society that criminalizes this is a society that values females over males and treats women as if they are children.

If we are to treat women as children then we should be consistent. Young women who have sex with older men are as much victims as women who have sex with a pick-up artist after meeting at a club. In both cases, feminists are angry because the woman has been “fooled” into having sex with a less than ideal mate in terms of value. In the first case, the male appears to be of higher value than he really is because he is older and more experienced. In the second case, the male appears to be of higher value than he really is because he has learned the elements of attraction. In both cases, women are presumed (by feminists) to have no responsibility for their own actions and to be little more than children, than animals who are guided only by instinct.

This is what makes feminists angry and this is why age of consent exists still today, because it is assumed women are not mentally mature enough to give consent AND because older women want to limit men’s options to increase their own value in the sexual marketplace. Older women, however, are generally not of a much higher intelligence level than teenage girls. The big difference between the two is that older women are less attractive and that is what makes them so damn angry.

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/jayhammers-blogspot-com-age-of-consent-is-misandry

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:51:59 2013 No.10902108 >>10902062 >Physical pleasure. The satisfaction of curiosity. What bullshit. This is something children should find out on their own, you fucking creep. You obviously just want to fuck lolis for your own selfish reasons.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:52:29 2013 No.10902109

>>10902083
Actually, it would probably create the opposite effect. People, especially children, want what they can't have. Disallowing them from eating junk food until they're an adult is a great way to get a lot of them hooked on the garbage when they grow up.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:53:00 2013 No.10902114

>>10902098
>No, there isn't. You tell me what's harmful about it. Here's a hypothetical which is currently illegal and nearly universally regarded as immoral/harmful for a child (on its own): a child touching a bare penis with their hand, by their own choice.

Diseases, bodily harm, death. Just a few of the things sex can cause.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:53:00 2013 No.10902115 File: 143 KB, 795x600, you came already wafuu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >300 posts bump limit reached >less than 50 on-topic posts before derail Good job /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:53:45 2013 No.10902112 >>10902108 >creep Get out, fujoshit.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:54:45 2013 No.10902118

>>10902104

>One, not all pleasurable things are positive.

All pleasure is positive. Pleasure is positive by nature. Pleasure isn't positive when it's accompanied by something detrimental - good thing there's nothing detrimental about sex.

>Two, children are not naturally curious about sex.

Yes they are. Ask a child if they want to know what sex is and they'll say "yes." You need to stop making appeals to nature, especially when you're not even right about them.

>No matter what psychological model you apply, the universal tendency is asexuality into sexual awareness following puberty.

No, plenty of kids want to try sex before puberty. I did.

>Or maybe it's because a guy is shoving his dick into a kid who cannot physically accept it. Not only are the organs underdeveloped, but a lack of overall maturation makes the concept of romance completely foreign to a child.

Sex =! vaginal penetration. Abandon this argument. It has no hope for you. Tell me: what's wrong with having oral sex with a consenting child?

>Oh wow. So date rape isn't rape? And again, a child cannot consent because they lack the mental faculties that make that possible. It's why you don't see kids in calculus classes. It's seriously like coercing a retarded person into sex; no matter how I look at it, it's exploitative.

Again: you know what I mean. I'm not going to glorify this with a response.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:54:45 2013 No.10902119 >>10902114 >death >by sex We're not talking about your fantasies.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:55:29 2013 No.10902122

>>10902109
When you become an adult you crave to eat the food your mother fed you as a child due to nostalgia. Now imagine if that was healthy food. Sure, you would still have junk food as a guilty pleasure, but it wouldn't be the foundation of your diet.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:55:29 2013 No.10902123 >>10902114 All of those things can happen to adults. Adults shouldn't have sex, too, right?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:55:44 2013 No.10902124 File: 20 KB, 390x399, 1311571307945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902107 You mean westernized society values women over men? That's a shocker.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:55:59 2013 No.10902126

>>10902098
>No, there isn't. You tell me what's harmful about it
You don't understand how this works. You're going against the majority. You have to explain why you're in the right, I don't have to defend anything.

>Sex isn't harmful.
That's not true.
It's harmful in some cases, and not in others. You can't say that it isn't since there exists cases where it is harmful.

>You know what I mean, idiot. It's not rape if the child gives consent.
Define consent

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:56:14 2013 No.10902128 >>10902119 You could get AIDS and die or become pregnant and die from birth complications.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:57:00 2013 No.10902137 >>10902118 >Tell me: what's wrong with having oral sex with a consenting child? Oh, so you're the same mentally ill pedophile from the other threads. I'm glad to know that at least /jp/ isn't overrun with scum like you.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:57:00 2013 No.10902138 File: 77 KB, 453x435, 1367979854925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902118 >All pleasure is positive >Pleasure isn't positive when it's accompanied by something detrimental Stop contradicting yourself.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:57:14 2013 No.10902131 >>10902122 >When you become an adult you crave to eat the food your mother fed you as a child due to nostalgia. Calling absolute bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:57:29 2013 No.10902133 File: 181 KB, 500x500, 1307848308017.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902128 >die from birth complications. I hope you're laughing as hard as I am.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:57:44 2013 No.10902134 >>10902123 They shouldn't, but adults have more legal privileges and you can't boss them around as easily as you can kids.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:57:44 2013 No.10902135 >>10902128 Nah, surely a seven year old will make him wrap it up first. You don't think she's a slut, do you?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:58:15 2013 No.10902139 >>10902133 You are one morbid individual.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:58:44 2013 No.10902142

>>10902126
>You don't understand how this works.

I hate to stop your catfight, but he's actually right. Burden of proof lies with the claim bearer. You claim that a child touching a penis causes damage somehow, so you need to provide evidence for it. The majority opinion has absolutely nothing at all to do with it.

Anonymous Sat May 18 03:58:59 2013 No.10902143

>>10902126

>You don't understand how this works. You're going against the majority. You have to explain why you're in the right, I don't have to defend anything.

No, I'm not obligated to explain to you how it isn't harmful when you haven't explained any way that it is. That's not how the burden of proof works. I cannot refute an argument that isn't there.

>It's harmful in some cases, and not in others. You can't say that it isn't since there exists cases where it is harmful.

It can be harmful for adults too. Should adults be disallowed from having sex?

>Define consent

I'm not going to play this game. Look up consent in a dictionary.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:59:30 2013 No.10902145 >>10902142 Thanks for this.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 03:59:45 2013 No.10902146 >>10902142 >You claim that a child touching a penis causes damage somehow I never claimed that.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:00:15 2013 No.10902148 File: 51 KB, 500x347, 1363591380417.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Guys? I'm sensing an absolutely INCREDIBLE amount of rage in this thread and I want to get in on it. Where do I start?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:00:29 2013 No.10902149 >>10902146 So you just complicity believe it without 'claiming' it? Do you know what a claim is? Or do you agree with me that it isn't harmful? Do you realize this sabotages your argument?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:01:15 2013 No.10902152 >>10902142 Look at >>10902062 he's the one who makes claims first, so no burden of proof is on him. Specifically >Touching a child with your genitals is no more harmful on its own than holding hands with them unwillingly

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:01:30 2013 No.10902154 >>10902146 You did, even if you didn't use those exact words. I'm not going to argue semantics with you.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:01:45 2013 No.10902156 >>10902149 Do you know what a claim is? Prove that I claimed that touching a penis causes damage for children.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:02:29 2013 No.10902161 >>10902154 I'd like to see the proof. Oh right, there is none. Good show.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:02:29 2013 No.10902164 >>10902156 Nevermind that. Do you believe it or not believe it?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:04:59 2013 No.10902170 >>10902164 >Nevermind that Yeah you do that. >Do you believe it or not believe it? Depends completely on the context

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:05:14 2013 No.10902171

Tumblr is retarded. SRS is retarded.

This thread is a great example of how their arguments crumble outside of a controlled environment where people who argue against them are banned or ridiculed to death. They thrive on social manipulation and fail at backing up their claims.

Why do they put so much energy and manipulation into furthering their obviously shitty views? They must know themselves that they're wrong, surely. Or maybe it's like the story of the faux karate master who has perpetuated his lie for so long that he's began to believe it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:06:14 2013 No.10902174 >>10902170 It's a 'yes' or 'no' question. Here's your context: a child is touching a penis with their hand, with their given consent, for the sexual gratification of the penis's owner, and the curiosity of the child. Is this wrong, yes or no.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:06:59 2013 No.10902179

>>10902118
>Ask a child if they want to know what sex is and they'll say "yes."
No they will not. Sexual precociousness is actually correlated with abuse, but not otherwise (recent media influence notwithstanding). Huh, go figure!

>No, plenty of kids want to try sex before puberty. I did.
Oh boy, more anecdotal evidence! It's so weird that rates magically increase when puberty hits and pre-puberty sex rates are practically nonexistent!

>what's wrong with having oral sex with a consenting child?
Maybe because they can't offer consent.

> I'm not going to glorify this with a response.
Right. Because it's a little hard to argue against science.

Read up about human development, just a little bit. It should be obvious why kids shouldn't be involved. Seriously, think of them like little retarded humans.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:06:59 2013 No.10902181 >>10902171 Most people don't have degrees in psychology, so it's hard for them to back up their views.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:09:14 2013 No.10902188 >>10902174 Depends, is it African or European?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:10:59 2013 No.10902192 File: 8 KB, 238x212, 1317697846423.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902181 >implying that a degree in psychology magically makes your claims valid

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:11:14 2013 No.10902198 >>10902195 Here's something most people don't have, as well, sweetie whips out 14-incher You know what to do.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:11:29 2013 No.10902195 >>10902171 The thing is, most people aren't pedophiles like you. So please just suppress your urges, keep your hands off of our children, and deal with it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:11:29 2013 No.10902196 >>10902179 Socialization develops via interaction. Do you even psychology?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:12:30 2013 No.10902199 >>10902192 It doesn't, it just lets you know what you are talking about instead of relying on experts to tell you what is good and bad for children.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:13:15 2013 No.10902201 >>10902174 Define child.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:13:29 2013 No.10902203 >>10902192 >Implying being a "ephebophelic" neet magically makes your claims valid

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:13:30 2013 No.10902206 >>10902198 Yeah, most people have 12 inch rulers. Don't see how that's relevant, though.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:14:44 2013 No.10902209 >>10902201 A 8-year-old.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:14:44 2013 No.10902210 >>10902201 A person between the growth stages of baby and adolescence.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:15:45 2013 No.10902214 >>10902174 Is it a European or Canadian swallow?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:15:59 2013 No.10902217 >>10902209 Define 8. >>10902210 Define person.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:16:29 2013 No.10902218 >>10902217 Define 'define.'

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:16:44 2013 No.10902221

>>10902196
That does nothing to justify his argument. The whole point is that prepubescent sex is premature by the very biological function of puberty. Also, socialization occurs under very broad conditions because people are inseparable from the social context. That said, why is the general trend still asexuality in childhood and higher rates of abuse amongst sexual precocious kids? Fuck, I don't even know what your point is.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:16:44 2013 No.10902222 >>10902217 define define

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:17:14 2013 No.10902228

>>10902221

>The whole point is that prepubescent sex is premature by the very biological function of puberty.

So? Are you saying that anything which defies the 'natural' way of things is wrong? This is called an appeal to nature, and it's a shit argument.

Our natural default stance on romance is to rape the most sexually-fit female, and to kill any other suitors who would challenge us. Is the current model of romance unnatural, then?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:17:29 2013 No.10902225 >>10902214 >European or Canadian swallow Neither, African swallow.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:17:44 2013 No.10902227 File: 10 KB, 286x307, 1312522759226.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902203 >implying that I even made an argument in this "debate" >implying that you're not making a butthurt strawman argument right now

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:18:29 2013 No.10902230 File: 49 KB, 886x391, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902217

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:18:29 2013 No.10902231 >>10902221 Half of the point is trolling. The statement's true but I'm going nowhere with it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:19:59 2013 No.10902236 >>10902195 Epic argument, sister! You crushed that nerd with your awesome intellectual power!

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:20:00 2013 No.10902241 >>10902210 >>10902209 Define the stages between baby and adolesecence

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:21:00 2013 No.10902246 >>10902242 A small rod-shaped object not longer than 4 cm.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:21:15 2013 No.10902242 >>10902241 Define THIS. whips out cock

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:22:15 2013 No.10902253 >>10902246 Iceburned.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:22:45 2013 No.10902251 >>10902246 You need to get the latest Webster, sweetheart. cums in your hair dick is 20 inches

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:25:00 2013 No.10902269 >>10902242 Child-like. Compatible with lolis.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:25:15 2013 No.10902266

>>10902228
>Are you saying that anything which defies the 'natural' way of things is wrong?
It depends on what it is. When it involves the harm of children: yes. Just what is your argument, exactly? You're talking about sex with consenting kids, but kids cannot give consent by their given capabilities, nor is there any evidence that they would find sexual activity pleasurable.

>Our natural default stance on romance is to rape the most sexually-fit female, and to kill any other suitors who would challenge us
Completely unfounded. Humans have survived on social structure and cohesion for over 50,000 years. Rape and murder is not default.

Stop thinking about fucking kids for a second and go read something.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:27:01 2013 No.10902280

>>10902266
>nor is there any evidence that they would find sexual activity pleasurable.

Not the fag you're arguing with, faggot, but...what? There's a shitload of evidence that children find masturbation enjoyable, and can have orgasms even before their teen years. Why don't you look that shit up.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:28:00 2013 No.10902286 >>10902283 eyes

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:28:30 2013 No.10902283

>>10902266

>but kids cannot give consent by their given capabilities,

Yes they can.

>nor is there any evidence that they would find sexual activity pleasurable.

I can show you diagrams detailing the fact that children have nervous systems.

>Completely unfounded. Humans have survived on social structure and cohesion for over 50,000 years. Rape and murder is not default.

I don't actually know what humans did 50,000 years ago, and it's completely irrelevant anyway. If you would take your ego out of your eye's you'd realize I'm using it as an example to show that the 'natural way' is not automatically the best way, and is often the worst way. Which is why it's not the current way.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:28:45 2013 No.10902285 >>10902236 It's the truth though. You can justify why it's okay for you to stick your penis into my little sister all you want, but the majority of us aren't going to agree with you simply because we don't have the same desires as you.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:29:15 2013 No.10902288 >>10902285 Desires are not actions.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:30:15 2013 No.10902292 >>10902285 You're probably 'trolling.' Even if you're not, there's no point trying to convince someone like you.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:30:30 2013 No.10902295 >>10902283 >Yes they can. Prove it.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:31:01 2013 No.10902302 >>10902285 I'm not even a pedophile. I'm just calling you out on being a dumb cunt.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:31:46 2013 No.10902301 >>10902295 An adult asks a child if they want to have sex. The child either already knows what sex is, or is told on the spot, and says yes. The child has given consent.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:33:45 2013 No.10902305 File: 18 KB, 539x647, 1328302218291.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902285 >stick your penis into my little sister So that's what this is about? You have a cuckold fetish? Oh geez, it can't be helped I guess! Where is she?

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:35:00 2013 No.10902313

>>10902280
I was going to amend that very statement since I meant with another person. Masturbation is non-issue because they're doing it to themselves. I remember reading an article about what you mention, but it seemed to be anecdotal.

>>10902283
>Yes they can.
Jesus christ. If a person is incapable of hypothetical-deductive logic, they can't consent to anything. Children can only think inductively, which means any ideas they form about sex occurs AFTER the fact. This is not fucking consent.

>If you would take your ego out of your eye's you'd realize I'm using it as an example to show that the 'natural way' is not automatically the best way
You should come up with better analogies and understand that even though the "natural way" isn't always the best way, this doesn't mean the "unnatural way" is. Do you really think that a lazy accusation of an appeal to nature somehow supports your argument? I've already given you the starting point: Piaget's theory of cognitive development. You still have not provided any evidence to support your position. I'm done.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:35:15 2013 No.10902309 >>10902285 I bet you think that all men are secretly rapists too. Fucking moron.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:37:01 2013 No.10902319 >>10902313 No, it's not a non-issue, because you blatantly stated that children were incapable of feeling sexual pleasure. It's a separate argument from the main pedophilia one in this thread. And treated as such, it's wrong.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:38:30 2013 No.10902321

>>10902313

>Jesus christ. If a person is incapable of hypothetical-deductive logic, they can't consent to anything. Children can only think inductively, which means any ideas they form about sex occurs AFTER the fact. This is not fucking consent.

Where's the proof of this? One psychologist's opinion isn't proof, especially when it's contested by every other psychologist ever.

Also, what a generalization.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:39:15 2013 No.10902324 >>10902313 >this doesn't mean the "unnatural way" is No one said this. Stop making irrelevant arguments.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:40:15 2013 No.10902329

>>10902292
>>10902302
>>10902305
Awww did I make the poor little pedos upset?

>>10902309
When did I imply that? Of course there is nothing wrong with fantasizing. What worries me is how these people want to touch actual children, while making up excuses about how there is nothing wrong with doing so.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:41:00 2013 No.10902336

>>10902329

>What worries me is how these people want to touch actual children,

I have no attraction to children. You can argue for someone's rights without holding their views yourself. Not all supporters of gay marriage are gay. Abraham Lincoln wasn't a slave.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:43:00 2013 No.10902344

>>10902321
>Where's the proof of this?
His experiments perhaps? Brain scans, maybe? You can be a scientist too! Go outside and present an absurd if-then statement. They won't understand it.

>specially when it's contested by every other psychologist ever.
Now where's the proof of THIS? Piaget practically led the field of human development. Granted some of his theories under/overestimated childhood abilities, but they're pretty spot on in terms of general developmental trends.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:45:00 2013 No.10902353 >>10902344 >Brain scans, maybe? Do you know how brain scans work? Hint: the output isn't something like "RESULTS INDICATE THAT THIS BRAIN DOESN'T POSSESS THE ABILITY FOR DEDUCTIVE REASONING." Life isn't a sci-fi film.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:46:45 2013 No.10902355 >>10902344 >Now where's the proof of THIS? I already linked it in this thread. Go re-read my responses. It will do you good since you're bringing up the same points I've refuted over and over again.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:50:20 2013 No.10902368

>>10902329
What worries me more is that there are braindead women running around (ie: you) dragging down modern society as a whole. I'm not here to argue for pedophiles as much as you'd love to believe it to fit your own agenda, but you said it yourself: they're rare. Your kind is sadly becoming common, and thus I believe you to be more harmful to society.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:51:20 2013 No.10902372 >>10902089 I'm pretty sure the knife to the throat was a whole lot more threatening than the penis in the mouth. Isn't it funny how the later is considered worse and more traumatizing? Do you even realize how illogical it is?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:53:20 2013 No.10902377 >>10902372 Welcome to feminist society, enjoy your stay.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:53:20 2013 No.10902379 >>10902372 But it's really icky and probably tasted bad. The knife was just cold.

Anonymous Sat May 18 04:56:21 2013 No.10902391

>>10902353
Comparative brain scans. Are you happy now?

>>10902355
The section in the Wikipedia article is not "every other psychologist ever", nor does it render his theory unusable. Read what comes after what you quoted. Of course some kids develop earlier than later, and some learn better than others and it's all very complicated, but the fact remains that the majority of children who have not reached puberty are incapable of formal thought.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 04:58:20 2013 No.10902395 >>10902391 >but the fact remains that the majority of children who have not reached puberty are incapable of formal thought. That's not what it says.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 05:00:21 2013 No.10902400 File: 97 KB, 488x650, 1330034324459.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Guys, can I just fucking look at my loli without some dumb feminist asshole sending me death threats? Please?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 05:02:20 2013 No.10902404 >>10902400 Cute picture, dude.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 05:04:20 2013 No.10902411 This thread is comedy gold

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 05:05:20 2013 No.10902414 File: 561 KB, 240x180, 1367736120333.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10902411 It should have just been about cute 2D lolis, though.

Anonymous Sat May 18 05:09:20 2013 No.10902421

>>10902368
I do admit that I typed some stupid things in this thread out of anger, but I am tired of these pedophiles telling me that I'm "brainwashed by society" just because I find their views repulsive.

I can't think of any situation where it's okay for an adult to have sex with a child. My conclusion is that these people are just selfish, they don't care about the child's feelings, and they just want to have something to ejaculate into.

Anonymous Sat May 18 05:14:21 2013 No.10902440
File: 253 KB, 628x800, ab443ec46a06f0a019c14ff406699473527b6000.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10902400
I'm probably the "dumb feminist asshole" you're talking about, and even I like loli. I just want these pedophiles who talk about real children to stay out of here and go back to tor or wherever they usually hang out.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 05:18:20 2013 No.10902448 >>10902440 But there's nothing wrong with pedophilia.

Anonymous Sat May 18 05:42:21 2013 No.10902499

>>10902395
It doesn't seem to say anything to the contrary. It only proposes other explanations that fill in the gaps or challenge the weaknesses in his theories. His experiments show that kids before their teens can solve problems but only through trial-and-error while older kids (teenagers) can systematically work out the details which suggest formal, abstract thinking.

If there's something to the contrary, post it. I'm tired and drunk and I'm in no mood to go through all that shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 07:30:20 2013 No.10902697 >>10900539 Should I get my hopes up and assume you're going to scan that?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 07:49:20 2013 No.10902721 Why have naughty things with a loli? Why not be content with hugging them, kissing their cheeks and keeping safe in your arms?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 07:51:20 2013 No.10902722 Why do naughty things with a loli? Why not be content with hugging them, kissing their cheeks and keeping them safe in your arms?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 11:24:20 2013 No.10903299 >>10902421 Brainwashed people don't realize they are brainwshed.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 11:26:21 2013 No.10903309 >>10902421 >these people are just selfish, they don't care about the child's feelings, and they just want to have something to ejaculate into Do you seriously believe this bullshit?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 13:21:20 2013 No.10903763 Man, this thread derailed into pedophiles trying to argue logically as best as they can, and trolls taking easy bait.

Anonymous Sat May 18 14:21:20 2013 No.10904084

>>10903763
Pedophiles feel good when they get the chance to speak the truth. The only person who's really bothered is the person mindlessly speaking out against the EVIL PEDOS and the people who wanted to keep this thread on-topic.

>>10902440
All you did was further derail the thread. People who like loli but hate pedophiles (which really just comes off as an attempt to make themselves look morally superior) cause more problems than anyone else in these threads. Hell, I don't even like real children the way I do 2D children, but I'm definitely a pedophile, and anyone else who's sexually attracted to 2D children is too. It's like masturbating to 2D dicks and claiming you don't like dicks. It's just plain stupid.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 15:37:20 2013 No.10904409 Would it be immoral to go back to the past and rape yourself as a child?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 16:28:21 2013 No.10904632 >>10902499 >kids before their teens can solve problems but only through trial-and-error Do people who age slower grow out of that slower? Because despite being smart, I rarely solved math problems the proper way in school.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 18:09:02 2013 No.10905103 Lolis are gross

>>	Anonymous Sat May 18 23:35:03 2013 No.10906573 >>10904409 It would be just counted as masturbation since technically you only pleasuring your both self not another person.

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture