[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 23 KB, 468x60, 1347997840529.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10816168 No.10816168[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>> No.10816173
File: 91 KB, 331x331, alicedowns.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10816173

>> No.10816177

Cool backseat moderation, goon bro.

>> No.10816188
File: 43 KB, 808x739, shiidophile.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10816188

Still ticked off he deleted most of his site. Guy is a huge faggot, but there were some gems on there.

I guess he wants to be taken more seriously as a Buddhist Japanese culture expert, rather than some creepy otaku paedophile.

>> No.10816193

When did /jp/ become overrun with goons? Where we always here or are we just become more vocal?

>> No.10816204

I'm upset he blocked bots in his robots.txt. When he was about 17, he got all butthurt about the anti-pedo thing on SA, so he marked all the Overchan sites that contained questionable content with ironic "OH BOY I SURE HOPE THE GOONS TAKE DOWN THIS PEDO RING NEXT" type comments.

>> No.10816205

>>>/fyad/

>> No.10816215

http://forums.somethingawful.com/banlist.php

Some real gems today.

Remember kids, misogyny and homophobia are bannable, but insulting people with racial or disability slurs in the ban reason is A-OK!

>> No.10816217
File: 24 KB, 133x186, fair honest and just.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10816217

PYF mods.

>> No.10816231

>>10816215
It says very clearly in the rules racial slurs are ok but to use at your own risk. You're not going to stop the internet from using nigger, retard and faggot but you can ban people for being overtly racist or bigoted.

>> No.10816225

>>10816215
>Regardless of your motivations, would you please not post about whatever "explicitly child-pornography containing" visual novels you've watched? Yes you checked out a thing for the train wreck factor, and then made clear that you were exaggerating for comical effect, but I've made it very clear that I'd rather people not talk about that kind of thing in this thread or forum. Thank you. User loses posting privileges for 3 days.

Zorak is the hero ADTRW deserves.

>> No.10816229

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3M_wGfYewo

>> No.10816243

>>10816231
I saw someone banned for ironically being racist a few days ago because it was only ambiguously ironic.

>> No.10816252

>>10816243
but ironic shitposting is still shitposting ESPECIALLY on SA.

>> No.10816255

>>10816231
If I was a black person, I'd be much less offended if I was called a nigger on 4chan than on Something Awful, no matter how hateful or playful the person was actually being.

We've done more for reducing offensiveness through casually acting like morons than Something Awful has by trying to actively censor people.

>> No.10816264

Why are you guys even acting surprised or interested in the fact that SA is being shitty as usual?

>> No.10816265

>>10816229
I like how he realized he was gonna get his ass kicked so he pretended he was losing on purpose.

>> No.10816269

>>10816255
It's image, most people avoid 4chan because the casual usage of racial slurs and general bigotry. Look how great it's working for ad revenue and general population.

>> No.10816275

>>10816264
How is it being shitty? Pedos aren't allowed on SA so how is it being shitty when one gets banned?

>> No.10816278

I can't think of any communities I despise more than SomethingAwful.

On the other hand, plenty of people here seem to feel identically, and I could incorporate it into my shitposting/whimsyposting scheme.

/jp/ survey: from a scale of one to four, how angry would it make you if /jp/ was filled with seemingly unironic comments about how misogyny and patriarchy and pedophilia are destroying the Internet, and anyone who disagreed with these things was ridiculed?

>> No.10816289

Sometimes I think the whole anti-pedo and feminist crap is just SA trolling /pol/. I'm probably thinking about it too hard, though.

>> No.10816283

>>10816275

It's shitty that 'pedophiles' aren't allowed on SA. No one thinks about what it means to be a pedophile or considers that it's not wrong, they just go with the gut emotional reaction.

>> No.10816286

>>10816278
Zero. I believe that women deserve equal rights. I support feminism 100%.

>> No.10816285

>>10816264
Because OP got banned from SA and is now astroturfing the shit out of /jp/ in order to feel warm and wanted in a place he abandoned in hopes of gaining popularity in a place that allows for identity.

>> No.10816287

>>10816278
With four being the highest? Probably a six.

>> No.10816291

>>10816278
Not all of SA is like that dude, stop haning around D&D.

>> No.10816300

>>10816286
>I believe that women deserve equal rights.
>I support feminism 100%.

I just want you to know that these two contradict each other.

>> No.10816302

>>10816283
Pedophiles are allowed, just don't talk about it or run a website glorifying it. If you want to talk about how unjust pedos are treated you come to 4chan and post anonymously about it. You don't participate in a community known for crucifying pedos and accuse them of being wrong, that's just common sense and a good way to lose 10 bux.

>> No.10816303

>>10816300
Rape enabler.

>> No.10816304

>>10816275
Double standards. You can be a feminist and support sexual liberty and get "slut shamers" banned, but you can't be a pedophile and support pedophile rights without getting banned? There is nothing illegal about being a pedophile or supporting pedophile rights, and plenty of goons use and encourage the use of recreational drugs so I doubt it's a legal issue.

It really boils down to "I am Lowtax and I hate these people, so I will censor them like a whiny manchild."

>> No.10816312

>>10816278
About 1. Not because of the subject matter, but because it's off-topic.

>> No.10816313

>>10816302

holy shit, that cognitive dissonance

i don't even know what to call this

>> No.10816322

>>10816302
``Blacks are allowed in our school, they just have to be white.''

>> No.10816328

>>10816304
>>10816300
>>10816286
Shut the fuck up about feminism

And fuck you

>> No.10816329

>>10816313
It's not cognitive dissonance it's not being a retard. No pedo with an IQ above 80 is going to spend 10 dollars to post on a forum that is outspoken against pedophiles and talk about their disorder. You can be a racist, pedo, or a murderer and post on SA as long as you don't mention any of it. It's whiny fucks that complain about unjust treatment when it's not present are the problem not "nazi mods".

>> No.10816335

>>10816322

Yes, that's the most hilariously faulty logic.

Same thing but with more irony: "I'm okay with gay people, I just HATE when they feel the need to display it in public!"

(a few moments later: goes to write some comments about how much he loves breasts on a picture of a woman playing sports)

>> No.10816343

>>10816329

stop trolling me

i am raging epicly... please stop ok...

>> No.10816355

many tricky trollers in this thread right now

>> No.10816351

>>10816343
I'm not trolling you, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with being a pedo, just don't talk about it on SA. Why on earth do you want equal treatment there of all places? It's like joining the KKK and preaching racial equality.

>> No.10816357

>>10816335
>I'm okay with gay people, I just HATE when they feel the need to display it in public!

I strongly agree with this sentence. Straight couples have a sense of decency and hardly display their love in public in the same flamboyant way gay people do, which strikes me more as them trying to shove their lifestyle in people's faces rather than performing a sincere demonstration of love for their significant other.

>> No.10816365

>>10816351

do you not understand how retarded your argument is though

i don't know how to exactly explain it

someone said that they hate SA for banning pedophiles, right. then you said 'no you aren't allowed to hate it for that, because that's just their policy'

it's like circular logic or something? SA is right because SA says so? i don't know, my head hurts thinking about it

>> No.10816366

>>10816355
It's very subtle.

>> No.10816367

>>10816335
In that case I think you should have both or neither, not one or the other.

If you're allowed to share your views on drugs, sex, or climate change (which I fully support, by the way, no matter how much I might (dis)agree with you), then you should be allowed to share your views on pedophilia.

>> No.10816371

>>10816357

>Straight couples have a sense of decency and hardly display their love in public

no

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action