/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

Taoism > Buddhism

[Anonymous No.]

I think enjoy the concept of this picture much more than the actual execution

[Anonymous No.]

...I'm sorry, what?

[Anonymous No.]

Seiga is the only non shitty character in that picture and the only shitty character the Buddhists have is Ichirin so I think you are wrong.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703916
how can Tojiko wear a bikini if she has no legs?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703935
it's not connected at the bottom, it's just two flaps

[Anonymous No.]

omg what is kaoru doing there?! lol

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703916

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703940
Stealth fundoshi!

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703935

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703949
>>10703940
so she can do anal?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703927
>only shitty character the Buddhists have is Ichirin

Don't you mean Byakuren?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10704133
No, he meant ur mom m8

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703916
i don't like lewd so no thank you, i'll go back to them conservative buddhists and reject worldly desires

[Anonymous No.]

Yoshika's hair is hot

[Anonymous No.]

>>10704202
and her body is cold

[Anonymous No.]

>>10704164
This smut is made by devil worshipers and the yakuza.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10704164
But how would you know if you have actually transcended lewd desires?

The only answer is to deliberately have sex without feeling desire for it.

Therefore, buddhists are sluts.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10704482
The desire to know if you have actually transcended your lewd desires is filthy.

True pure Buddhists doesn't need to prove anything, and such, doesn't have the need to have sex at all.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703916
Just look at that fucking Seiga. Just

[Anonymous No.]

We can all live together

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705162
I know

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705198
god-fucking-damnit Seiga

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705198

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705198
>>10705223
ah fuck i have to fap now

[Anonymous No.]

>>10703916
Seiga's ofuda could be money bills and it would still make sense.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705223
>>10705198
I want to put it in.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705321
Put what, anon?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705223
Taoists a shit.

[Anonymous No.]

eastern philosophy is a complete load of bullshit
still not as bad as continental philosophy though so that's something

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705324
It

[Anonymous No.]

All eastern religions are shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705392
Why didn't God just put a huge wall around the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil?

Humans could build a tower into the Heavens and he couldn't even put up a big fence?

[Anonymous No.]

I thought OPs pick was Guro by the thumbnail. I hate my head.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705434
I wouldn't know, all those middle-eastern religions went to shit when Babylon fell apart.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705392
All western religions are shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705434
Because the entire point was a practice of free will. You can't say you truly love something if you've never been given any other choice in life but to love that thing. God doesn't want to force us to love him so he gives us the option to disobey and run away from him, because the ones that choose with their own free will to turn back to God are the ones that truly love him.

With free will comes the choice to disobey God and suffer, or to turn away from the world and love him.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705552
Don't give me this shit. In that story, God had just finished creating everything personally, including every single aspect of the two humans in question. If there was anything that made them choose to "disobey," it was put there by God.

And just because of that, apparently the entire humanity is tainted and will be tortured for all eternity if they aren't converted to Christianity.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705552
That reminds me, did Lilith eat from the tree of knowledge?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705552
>Because the entire point was a practice of free will.

Now that's just bullshit.

Hey guys I'll just place all these lemmings on top of this cliff. No worries though, I'm TESTING them!

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705552
>With free will comes the choice to disobey God and suffer, or to turn away from the world and love him.

So, basically, every petty tyrant throughout history is simply emulating God.

[White Ren !YLuFFdRcFQ No.]

>>10705574
No, Lilith wanted to wear pants, so God told her to go to hell.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705568
>If there was anything that made them choose to "disobey," it was put there by God.

Maybe it was like a Three Laws of Robotics deal, and He overlooked a loophole or they did exactly as they were supposed to, but not what He wanted.

One of the reasons Linus Torvalds kept working on Linux was because he accidentally redirected the output of his modem to his hard drive that contained his non-Linux setup, so it overwrote all his data with internet postings or whatever. It's not the operating system's fault, it did exactly what it was told to.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705568
God did put it there. He opened up the option for man to have free will. In doing that man will spend the rest of his life tainted by free will and will probably give in to his whims and do sinful ungodly things, but man also has the option to do good and turn to God. God recognized that man would make mistakes and so offered a way to clear away their mistakes: through the sacrifice of animals and eventually his own self in human form as a permanent sacrifice.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705585
Humans are not lemmings. Humans are intelligent thoughtful creatures capable of logic and love as well as all the evil that we do in this world.

>>10705589
God is not petty, and he's no more a tyrant than you are over your very cells.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705615

I like how you say 'Humans are intelligent thoughtful creatures' and then the very next sentence compare them to cells.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705592
>>10705611
Apparently either God is not omnipotent, or this whole thing is just one big gamble where every single factor involved was created by the gambler and is therefore pretty meaningless, or the gambler just doesn't care and left the variables random instead of setting them personally.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705615
Destroying humanity except for one chosen family sounds pretty tyrannical, as does the whole Jewish-might-is-right.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705624
Hey don't knock cells, those guys work hard and got a lot going on. But if you expand the analogy it's not making humans look smaller but God look bigger. Because God isn't our equal ruling over us with the same thoughts and limits as us. He's infinitely greater and powerful than us. Does that sound a little less bad? Sorry if I made a bad analogy, I'm not always great on the spot.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705630
He is omnipotent. Have you heard of the paradox of "can God create a rock so big he can't lift it?" Well the answer traditionally is that yes, but he wouldn't because he is self-limiting. Therein lies the answer. God withdrew his all encompassing influence to leave room for free will. Our choice is so fragile a thing and yet God in all in benevolence lets it exist so that we could choose to love him if we want to though he'll also let us choose not to and suffer for it because that's just part of free will.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705237
Ara~ ara~

You shouldn't be doing that , what if your father sees us?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705660
>God in all in benevolence lets it exist so that we could choose to love him if we want to though he'll also let us choose not to and suffer for it because that's just part of free will
I really have a hard time seeing how this is benevolence. Somehow, damning someone for all eternity just because they were born in a heathen culture or because they lost their faith doesnt sound very fair. Same for all those trials characters in the Bible have to put up with.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705684
Don't forget: the cause of the "punishment" is finite, but the actual "punishment" itself is eternal.

Or so the "New Testament" says, anyway. Honestly, that entire thing makes no sense.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705684
Trials typically make a person better, there's many instances of that in the Bible. There are some instances of people being punished, and plenty of instances of messes people just made on their own and suffering the consequences of that. Taken person by person there's unique circumstances and lessons to be learned by the suffering everyone in the Bible goes through.

As for afterlife stuff, well that varies on who you ask. Really hell is simply death and distance from God. The lake of fire is where rebellious supernatural things are cast away depending on how literally you take Revelations. There's judgments where you're weighed and measured supposedly but it never digs into it that much. Much of what people think of as hell is just fanfiction stuff from Dante's Inferno. Really what you'll find in the Bible is how true immortality only comes through turning back to God...whereas the wages of sin are death.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705728
What do you mean "makes no sense"?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705733
Contrary to popular belief, the "devil" barely shows up in the old testament and when he does he is not that bad a guy. Also, if you thought the word "Satan" refers to this "devil" figure, you should probably go look up the term because it's something completely different. And for one of the most laughable things ever (I still can't get over this), Jesus calls himself "Lucifer" in Revelation 22:16. Who knew Jesus was actually the "devil"?

Until the "New Testament" came along, things like "eternal damnation" never even really came up, believe it or not. Honestly, the whole thing got twisted way out of control.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10705336
Lots of things can be "it". What is that it in this case?