/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

You would never live with a girl that is your childhood friend, cousin, little sister, bride candidate that will be your maid, educator, guardian and arbitrator.

[Anonymous No.]

I don't care. Why would it matter?

[Anonymous No.]

i just want to kick her ass

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678118
What if she's a /jp/sie?

[Anonymous No.]

That's gross dude.

I only want a /jp/sie friend

[Anonymous No.]

Why did I read one of those choices as "castrator"?

[Anonymous No.]

Can someone please teach me how to suck a cock? I'm virgin and I don't know how.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678118
moot there's your excuse

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678077
Holy shit it really is her! This is what happened to her!

Poor thing! ;_;

"Uguu am I moe now?"-her last words

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678121

Women can't be /jp/sies.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678160
Yes we cum

[Anonymous No.]

If she's your cousin, she must have at least one parent who is a sibling to one of your parents. And if she's your little sister, she must share a parent with you. Only way this works out is if her parents are sibling.

[None !FIreFlyLqM No.]

>>10678178
So you'd even be upholding the family tradition.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678178
I still don't understand

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678178
Your dad dies, your mom marries your uncle, she's now your cousin and your imouto.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678761
Oh i see. Thanks for that.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678761
It doesn't have to be through marriage.

If a guy impregnated two sisters then the kids would be siblings and cousins.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678777
I'm trying to keep it respectable. That's why the dad died. In the good old days, widows would marry their brother-in-law all the time.

Nobody wants to be a childhood friend with the daughter of a manslut.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678761
So they were childhood friends before the remarriage?

[Anonymous No.]

Very relevant:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0s5Kn9QXtU

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678843
I don't even...

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678843
Way to rip off superior Canadian-Corean VNs, Japs.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678930
How is the earlier one? The one in space?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678843
>Tomaru Sawagoe
The fugg?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678761
Would that be legal?

She'd just be your first cousin then right?

[White Ren !YLuFFdRcFQ No.]

>>10678967
It would be legal. As long as the marrying parties are unrelated, the genetics of the existing kids are irrelevant.

There is, historically, a long history of brothers marrying their brothers' widows.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678843
What in the fuck is this

That's not even possible in a human lifespan.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678843
I will never accept their stupid idea that Sister Princess has any place in that clusterfuck.

[Anonymous No.]

Why is incest illegal?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10679413
I've asked this here maybe three times.

It makes no sense. Homosexual sex is legal. Contraception is effective. We need to get over the idea that sex is somehow metaphysical or entirely for procreation, or at least go back to the good old days of only allowing sex in strictly romantic contexts.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10679413
Incest is illegal due to producing offspring with defects. Wouldn't matter much if it comes from the mother's side of the family though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10679427
Apparently shagging relatives might bring undesireable genetic defects. Mixing the gene pool around keeps it fresh.

Ever noticed how people that live in islands are both ugly AND diseased?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10680843
>>10680901
But doesn't it take a long time for the defects to become pronounced, or even happen at all?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10680918
People of two unrelated families sharing the same latent defective gene have a very high change of having a retarded/crippled/diseased/Sin against God kind of baby.

And unless we have a couple of siblings with perfect genes living in an enviroment where no random changes over time happen, ever, having retarded babies is just a matter of time. Hell, they knew this stuff back when people didn't know how to write.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678077
>You would never

You got it wrong, retard.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678118
You want this thing as a friend?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10684383
cute

[Anonymous No.]

Cousin and little sister at the same time ew gross.

Also relatives are disqualified from childhood friends.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10680843
Why isn't it illegal for retards or older women to have children then?

[Anonymous No.]

>>10684447
I dunno but it should be. The retards in my university fuck much more than anyone else.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10684425
shut up ticks

[Anonymous No.]

>>10684451
I agree. It would be a disaster if I ever raised a child. They would probably kill themselves at 12.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10678077
Not a robot
Not an animal girl
Not a loli
Shit heroine.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10684447
Or those with recessive gene disorders? It sounds like illogical conservatism to me. I mean, contraception exists. Sex and reproduction are two distinct things.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10684610

Most people have sex with the eventual end of reproduction, so they're pretty much irreversibly intertwined in the minds of most people.

[Anonymous No.]

>>10684672
That is the mode of reproduction, but it would be foolish to think that all sex is done for that sake alone. We shouldn't conflate the two. The majority of sex that occurs isn't for the sake of procreation. I would not be surprised if someone found that most children are not planned.