[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 78 KB, 276x177, 1350993708128.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10428935 No.10428935 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjsIk3I3U
What are the chances of this becomming a real anime?

>> No.10428939

>>10428935
0.

What a dumb question.

>> No.10428948

a·nime
/ˈanəˌmā/
Noun
Japanese movie and television animation, often having a science fiction theme and sometimes including violent or explicitly sexual material.

If this anime isn't real what is it, imaginary?

>> No.10428952

>>10428948
From where did you get that definition anyway? Source, asshole. Now

>> No.10428961

>>10428948
I don't know, why don't you ask the anime board.

That definition is pretty fucking stereotypical bad.

>> No.10428959

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2flBqwTBY
You just got patchyrolled.

>> No.10428962

>>10428952
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Anime+definitn

>> No.10428998

>>10428959
>パチュリーでごろごろもどりゅー

What the HECK does "もどりゅー" mean?

>> No.10429097

>>10428959
How about

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjk3N8ft8

?

>> No.10429101

>>10428998
戻る

>> No.10429109

I liked the first version of the first OP better, the art was worse but the choice of characters was much better

>> No.10429112

OP, are you an actual retard?

>> No.10429131

>>10429101
Thanks.

>> No.10429361

>>10428948

This is what normalfags think anime is after watching Adult Swim.

>> No.10430017
File: 610 KB, 800x608, 1259787490106.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430017

>>10428935
TRÖTE!

>> No.10430063
File: 50 KB, 500x281, trumpetah?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430063

>>10430017

>> No.10430066
File: 67 KB, 500x375, 1292646695475.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10430066

>>10430017
GEIGE!

>> No.10430069 [DELETED] 

>>10429109
I agree with you, I'm not even sure why this needed a 2.0 when the first was perfectly fine.

>> No.10430079

>>10430017
Trottel.

>> No.10433570

>>10428935
of course not, not with cirno as a shitty background character

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action