Loli Thread.

File: 220 KB, 550x450, N (109).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Loli Thread. Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:14:51 2013 No.10345629 [Reply] [Original]

Talk about your loli related stuff here. Keep it clean though we don't want to be deleted.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:16:20 2013 No.10345636 File: 759 KB, 256x192, a.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Mmm... Lolis

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:20:35 2013 No.10345653 File: 91 KB, 638x750, Q (7).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345636 Yes, loli much loli

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:21:50 2013 No.10345657 I do not find prepubescent girls sexually attractive. I realize that this makes me a /jp/ heretic.

Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:24:50 2013 No.10345667

>>10345636
Pedobear is the embodiment of all misconceptions about pedophilia. I hate him.

I am here to tell you what paedophilia means, what paedophilia IS, and what paedophilia IS NOT.

Let's start with a solid definition we can all agree on.

PAEDOPHILIA (pae.do.phi.li.a)
The sexual attraction in adolescents and adults to prepubescent children

Alright, now let's make a list of words that did not include.

- Molestation
- Crime
- Disorder
- Disease
- Immoral
- Abuse
- Grooming
- Old man

Paedophilia is NOT any of these things.
- Molestation is the act of inappropriate touching. Fantasy is not reality.
- Crime is something against the law. Thought police do not exist.
- A disorder is developed. Paedophilia is genetic.
- Diseases are environmental. Paedophilia is genetic.
- Things which are immoral are acted upon. Paedophilia is thoughts.
- Abuse is harming a child. Most paedophiles would never harm a child.
- Grooming is luring. Most lurers are not paedophiles.
- Old men have nothing to do with this. A 15 year old girl could be a paedophile.

To harm a child in any way - physical, emotional, psychological, sexual - is a terrible thing and those who do should not be allowed near children. Paedophilia is not harming a child.

Anyways, don't you hate Pedobear, /jp/?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:26:35 2013 No.10345671 >>10345657 Do you find them cute?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:28:05 2013 No.10345678 File: 99 KB, 641x855, 20130110_121706.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] My favourite loli

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:29:20 2013 No.10345681 >>10345671 Very much so.

Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:29:35 2013 No.10345683

>>10345657
Sorry, I find it hard to believe.

What do you think about them? You know you can like prepubescent girls AND pubescent girls, right?

Both kinds of girls have good things and I can't really understand why most people don't fall in love with children. Are they really that uninteresting?

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:30:20 2013 No.10345688 File: 1.38 MB, 400x225, 1304949831630.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345653 Oh fuck Oh FUCK Those faces man.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:30:20 2013 No.10345689 I haven't been able to get off to loli since I read this http://www.psychohistory.com/originsofwar/08_infanticide.html It makes me feel like a monster even though I never think abusing loli.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:32:20 2013 No.10345698 >>10345667 >A 15 year old girl could be a paedophile. No they can't. You have to be 16 or older and sum years older than the subject.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:32:35 2013 No.10345699 I want to know more about that guy from the last thread whose two friends died horrible deaths.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:33:35 2013 No.10345703 >>10345698 That definition is bullshit. Every study ever made about pedophilia is bullshit. Everything you can find on the internet about it is a lie. I'm not even kidding. It's that bad.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:34:35 2013 No.10345709 >>10345681 That fine as well. That is also what most of us think as well.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:38:05 2013 No.10345720 How can you guys fall in love with the little brats? They don't even have a solid personality...

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:48:35 2013 No.10345746 File: 253 KB, 1200x1141, 1296267963472.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345629 Explain what's so great about Mitsuba. She's the worst character.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:50:05 2013 No.10345752 >>10345746 I think you mean best nee-chan ever.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:54:50 2013 No.10345765 File: 126 KB, 638x750, 1357878024106.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345653 >Their closed eyes are their smiles.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:55:20 2013 No.10345767 >>10345746 Because she is funny. Futaba is just plain annoying and I guess hitoha is alright but nothing great. Mitsuba is the MC and made the show. Cant spell MITSUdomoe her without her.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:55:51 2013 No.10345768 >>10345746 She is a good sister when she isn't being selfish.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:57:35 2013 No.10345774 File: 268 KB, 700x1050, Q (41).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345768 These lolis are classic.

>>	Anonymous Thu Jan 10 23:57:50 2013 No.10345776 File: 153 KB, 700x700, 2010-04-16-268234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:00:20 2013 No.10345785 >>10345776 This chibi-usa is a little creepy

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:01:05 2013 No.10345789

>>10345746
Whatshername's character is so two-dimensional she might as well be the tree in the background.
Hitoha is meh, but I guess everyone jumps the bandwagon because she's antisocial and quite. I did find the potential shipping of with the teacher cute though.

Obviously Mitsuba's the best.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:01:05 2013 No.10345790 File: 542 KB, 2048x1536, ZZwqX.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345767 There are more characters than the Marui sisters, you know.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:04:05 2013 No.10345798 File: 79 KB, 750x732, 1311038104652.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I heard Chichi was 14 when she first appeared, but she didn't look it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:06:50 2013 No.10345802 I despise mitsudomoe, their proportions are good because of the big thighs and hips, but the faces just look too horrible for me to really get into it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:08:35 2013 No.10345808 File: 303 KB, 796x900, 0cbc327fd21a7cee70048728d92441b10e760b2a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] It's past the end of the world but I still can't watch Nanoha A's movie

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:11:05 2013 No.10345819 File: 125 KB, 1280x720, 1296506574809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345802 They're not that bad. Also there's the manga which has a kinda different style and plenty of doujinshi, most of which don't look like the anime either.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:15:20 2013 No.10345825 >>10345802 I didn't like those either.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:16:50 2013 No.10345829 File: 34 KB, 350x577, Interested.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Actually here's a slightly worse character than Mitsuba.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:18:35 2013 No.10345831 Why did this thread turn from loli to anime?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:19:05 2013 No.10345833 File: 62 KB, 600x483, 17521.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:19:35 2013 No.10345832 File: 500 KB, 1024x1447, Maguro_Hon_.1_06a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] amidoinitrite?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:20:05 2013 No.10345834 File: 304 KB, 360x270, a483b85b3aefc411eb4e5030f98137e0.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Is there a word like trap for when you think someone is a loli but they really have big boobs?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:21:05 2013 No.10345836 >>10345834 oppai loli?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:22:05 2013 No.10345837 File: 281 KB, 700x376, 20080928141639.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:23:05 2013 No.10345838 File: 244 KB, 268x550, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345829 Zoomed in for clarification.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:24:20 2013 No.10345839 >>10345832 That my friend is there is a creepy picture.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:24:51 2013 No.10345841 >>10345834 gross abomination.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:25:05 2013 No.10345845 >>10345720 I think they have less personality when they grow up and become 1 dimensional bitches. My dislike of todays adult female is what made me like the loli.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:26:05 2013 No.10345846 >>10345837 The only word I recognize is "lolicon" Translate the rest, gomennesai.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:29:50 2013 No.10345851 >>10345846 ロリコン発見ロリコンてっなぁに？あの人のことですわ！本当にいるんだ！

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:32:20 2013 No.10345859 File: 49 KB, 640x464, [cLT]Bottle_Fairy_-_02_May_[dvdrip_dual_audio].mkv_snapshot_01.36_[2013.01.11_00.30.48].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345831 Post some light novel and VN lolis then. Otherwise, you can eat my Tama.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:33:05 2013 No.10345865 File: 102 KB, 531x525, pedophile scared.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] How do I avoid frightening lolis when I approach them?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:35:20 2013 No.10345870 File: 199 KB, 439x796, ichinensei-02-130.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345836 Oppai Loli

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:36:05 2013 No.10345872 >>10345865 Stick your dick up their mouth duh!

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:36:50 2013 No.10345876 File: 58 KB, 321x467, 1330693750497.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345865 Give them some candy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:37:35 2013 No.10345882 File: 323 KB, 1139x1669, 1299255303938.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345746 she will give you her tsundere love if you tell her she's more attractive than a model

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:38:05 2013 No.10345883 File: 192 KB, 800x1200, age.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345845 You saying you wouldn't like this?

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:38:50 2013 No.10345886

>>10345798
14 years old girls look like 12 years old girls in Japan.

I think it's the food.

That's why when someone translated a doujin where the loli is said to be 12, I get angry because they should have changed it to 10. It's called localization. If they did it, my penis would be really grateful.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:40:50 2013 No.10345891 >>10345667 >Paedophilia is genetic. No, it isn't.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:41:20 2013 No.10345894 File: 49 KB, 550x700, yoneda_taishou1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:42:05 2013 No.10345900

>>10345886
Indeed.

The Mashimaros are 11-12 but the only one to develop noticeable breasts is ana, the westerner.

It really saddens me that western children develop so quickly. If I ever have a daughter I'll probably under-feed her to keep the loli form going as long as possible.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:42:50 2013 No.10345899 File: 200 KB, 450x743, 2011-01-06-360294.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10345882 I find the fat cute and scrunchy face hot as hell, imo

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:43:20 2013 No.10345901
File: 728 KB, 1280x1462, 1289962976214.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10345882
She's not tsundere, she's sadistic(or so it's said, though she doesn't really act like it much)
>>10345870
>>10345836
I mean when it's not visible all the time. Like I thought that girl from Ar Tonelico was a loli until I saw her strip, the one that sings that cat song.

>>10345845
>>10345720
I like both and would like to have one of each.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:43:50 2013 No.10345903 >>10345891 You know less about it than me.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:44:22 2013 No.10345904 >>10345883 Meh in 2d it doesn't really matter, its the irl bitches that fail at being even barely interesting.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:44:52 2013 No.10345905 >>10345891 Is there evidence for that? Or are you simply saying that the claim "it is genetic" is unsubstantiated?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:44:52 2013 No.10345906 >>10345894 Way to no-ass, sis

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:46:50 2013 No.10345909 >>10345900 That's child abuse dude. And Japs are just flat and short anyway. They don't look any less developed.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:49:20 2013 No.10345911

>>10345900
Just don't make them eat meat more than once per week. It's full of hormones and shit.

They should stop being greedy sickfucks and let the animals grow up without hormones. But there are too many people in this world, so they can't do it. We are a fucking plague.

Hell, maybe that's why we are having so many earthquakes and natural disasters. The Earth is trying to kill us, the parasites, the cancer who is destroying it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:50:50 2013 No.10345918 >>10345900 You'd probably be better off having her do gymnastics. It slows bodily development and can stop the menstrual cycle.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:51:50 2013 No.10345921 >>10345909 They eat a lot of fish. I'd rather have my loli all grown up than killed by a fish spine. You have to be very careful while eating fish.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:53:20 2013 No.10345927 >>10345909 Not if he becomes a vegan. Then he can avoid red meats and milk for his family while maintaining the moral high ground.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:53:35 2013 No.10345928 Where can I find a Legal Loli gf? Then we have kids, we'll have truLoli NEET daughters who play eroge and Touhou all day.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:54:20 2013 No.10345929 >>10345921 Usually the fishermen debone them for you.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:54:37 2013 No.10345931 >>10345928 Legal lolis would die in child birth.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:55:05 2013 No.10345932

>>10345918
Girls hate that, they only seem to like it because it makes them feel important and successful.

We shouldn't have children at all. They will grow up to become annoying teenagers and bland adults. It's hard to escape from that. Let's just adopt some already created little girls and make them happy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:56:50 2013 No.10345935 >>10345932 I think if they didn't like it they wouldn't do it.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:57:05 2013 No.10345940

>>10345906
Little girls do not have asses.

That's disrespectful and humiliating.

Stop that.

If you are watching Card Captor Sakura and you see a toilet in the background, that's just a plothole. It doesn't mean toilets exist in their innocent world and of course they don't have to use them.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:58:05 2013 No.10345947 >>10345928 Be come a muslim and move to Syria. You can marry them there but, that is a whole nother thing,

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:58:35 2013 No.10345942 >>10345935 Kids can't do whatever they want.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:59:05 2013 No.10345948 Before I die, I would like to read a manga about a female lolicon in Libya who takes up arms to protect a primary school for girls from Gaddafi's African mercenaries and al-Qaeda fundies.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 00:59:50 2013 No.10345950 >>10345942 If a kid doesn't like doing something, what kind of asshole would force them to do it?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:00:51 2013 No.10345955 >>10345929 Most fish is processed in gigantic plants. Many of these plants are in China. Think about that the next time you pick up packaged, frozen fish fillets.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:02:22 2013 No.10345963 >>10345955 That is why its best to buy it locally if possible.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:02:22 2013 No.10345964 File: 187 KB, 1920x1080, 1320341368889.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Here are some things you will never experience. Such as being this muscular. http://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1742299

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:06:20 2013 No.10345972

>>10345948
I wish I was a fully grown woman.

I personally believe that lolicon women are able to achieve a purer and more enlightened bond with the girls they adore, as they themselves know what it is like to be a little girl.

This is also why I refuse to read/watch anything in the field that hasn't been drawn by a woman.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:07:05 2013 No.10345980 >>10345906 She's got plenty of ass enough to make onii chan happy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:07:20 2013 No.10345975 >>10345964 Yeah I suppose life could be unfair. That is why we have fantasy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:07:35 2013 No.10345976 >>10345927 Fucking vegans, thinking it's okay to murder just because it's plants. There's only one TRUE way. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruitarianism

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:08:05 2013 No.10345982 >>10345976 I've thought of trying this before. Maybe when it's summer and there are berries I can try living only on berries.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:08:20 2013 No.10345981 >>10345963 Buying locally can be hit and miss, especially where the market is completely unregulated. Ask around and find out what the word on the street/wharf is before buying meals for you and your family.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:10:50 2013 No.10345986 >>10345931 No they wouldn't. Also there's c sections if you're like 6'7 and making her pump out babies half the size of her body.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:11:05 2013 No.10345987 >>10345982 And then I can see how it changes the taste of my semen.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:11:35 2013 No.10345988 >>10345976 >Several children have died as the result of being fed fruitarian diets.[23][28] As a result, children have been taken from parents feeding them fruitarian diets.[29] Not the best option.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:17:35 2013 No.10345999 >>10345950 >If a kid doesn't like doing something, what kind of asshole would force them to do it? Pedos and parents.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:20:05 2013 No.10346004 >>10345932 If you adopt little girls... they still will grow up to become annoying teenagers and bland adults. It's not like orphans are immortal.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:22:50 2013 No.10346008 >>10346004 Well then wait for loibots. Besides teens can still look flat and small, and you don't actually have to live with adults. They can make you grandchildren. I swore that said immoral...

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:25:35 2013 No.10346018 >>10345999 Don't forget teachers and dentists

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:26:35 2013 No.10346024 File: 81 KB, 1200x900, 1356672506581.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:29:20 2013 No.10346032 File: 76 KB, 808x700, 974dfd22c7dbc1b2e61e0a15951b7871.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What are some of your favorite lolicon artists? I really like Sody.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:41:50 2013 No.10346071 File: 341 KB, 1200x1758, Sukumizu_Pettan_009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10346032 LEE, Meltdown Comet, Inuburo, Poyoyon Rock

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 01:49:35 2013 No.10346080 File: 1.11 MB, 2172x1600, 24_25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10346032 Sasahara Yuuki, Mochi, Kuma Puro.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 02:00:35 2013 No.10346098 File: 550 KB, 1152x720, flanpan.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 02:25:35 2013 No.10346200 >>10346098 WHATTA FUCK MAN

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 03:09:55 2013 No.10346308 >>10346071 >Poyoyon Rock Now we're talking. I'm gonna go to my local bookstore this weekend to grab his illustration book.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 04:51:22 2013 No.10346456 >>10345569 > It's hot and only retards deny it >I like torture and humiliation. I fantasize about torturing and raping people I really care about IRL. Spoiler: you are fucked up in the head, bro.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 06:47:04 2013 No.10346679 >>10346456 Fuck ya.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 07:27:05 2013 No.10346767 File: 150 KB, 473x738, are you excited.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 07:30:51 2013 No.10346778 File: 364 KB, 414x4000, 1290863023619.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 08:31:22 2013 No.10346894 Gentlemen, I love loli.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 09:08:36 2013 No.10346981 File: 203 KB, 499x850, 24616579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 09:13:36 2013 No.10346991 >>10346778 I've never seen something as unfunny as this.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 09:43:36 2013 No.10347035 >>10346894 We will remind them, that there are more things between Heaven and Hell than are dreamt of in their philosophy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 09:47:36 2013 No.10347041 >>10346778 Aren't Milky Holmes in high school or something? They usually have boobs when I see art of them except the pink one and the police looking one.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 10:18:21 2013 No.10347111 >>10345667 >Thought police do not exist. You wish.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 10:25:06 2013 No.10347131

>>10345955
>Most fish is processed in gigantic plants.
>frozen fish fillets.
>plant
>frozen

Your Americanness is showing.
Tuna and salmon hardly have any fishbones. And I don't meant the canned or frozen kind, the fresh one.

You should be ashamed for even thinking of not buying the best quality of food available for your loli.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 10:26:51 2013 No.10347134 >>10346981 ugly.sand.nigger

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 10:31:06 2013 No.10347145

>>10347111
Has anyone ever wanted to be something like a thought police? Everything I see something like futuristic NWO type worlds with those helmeted jerkass peacekeeper type guys, I can't help but think of how cool their uniforms look. Imagine if it were sci fi enough that there were really thought police, being able to go in people minds and judge if they're criminals or not or hook into the internet to combat cyber crime face to face.

You could sit there in your future van, recording all the disgusting desires of the people around you until you found a suitable target. Imagine the jail where they'd all be kept, a giant library of the most depraved thoughts of humanity that threatens to overwhelm your mind if you were to scan the area. It'd be amazing.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 10:36:51 2013 No.10347158 >>10347145 I'd think that the best part of that would be being exempt from regular checks, and thus you could get away with even greater crimes that normal people.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 10:38:36 2013 No.10347162 File: 65 KB, 771x580, minority-report-quad1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10347145 >>10347158

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 10:43:06 2013 No.10347168 >>10347162 Those aren't thought police, those are future police. They know all about your future. (they don't know when Otome Function will come out though)

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 12:04:06 2013 No.10347393 File: 180 KB, 800x1163, l6770.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 12:07:21 2013 No.10347402 >>10346308 I assume you live in Glorious Nippon then?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 13:39:06 2013 No.10347604 File: 263 KB, 1280x960, kiira02_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] A wallpaper for those who like loli.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 13:48:06 2013 No.10347625 File: 1.92 MB, 3500x2468, 20fujima_takuya.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10347604 That is lovely, this is my current desk. Dunno if I should change lolis.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 13:53:21 2013 No.10347630 >>10347604 Wallpaper? For your phone, maybe.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 14:11:36 2013 No.10347650 File: 199 KB, 700x1341, 32792167_big_p0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] 食べたい

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 15:27:21 2013 No.10347816
File: 221 KB, 1280x960, akamaru02_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10347625
I got another if your interested. Thanks for the new wall by the way.

>>10347630
Well, I got this from a long dead Galge website. So, I can't do much about the size.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 15:29:21 2013 No.10347825 >>10346080 >Mochi Mah nigga >>10346032 Noraneko no Tama

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 15:47:36 2013 No.10347864 File: 682 KB, 989x1400, 011.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 15:55:06 2013 No.10347889 File: 374 KB, 1280x800, Other (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10347816

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 15:57:21 2013 No.10347891 >>10347825 Noraneko-no-Tama is the circle's name. Use Yukino Minato.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 15:57:51 2013 No.10347893 File: 645 KB, 1126x1601, henreader imouto control 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Waiting for next works of this guy.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:09:36 2013 No.10347926 File: 314 KB, 1280x960, umekiti01_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10347889

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:10:21 2013 No.10347928 >>10347864 S-S-SAUCE

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:11:06 2013 No.10347936 >>10347893 That shit was hot I hope he becomes the next big thing.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:15:51 2013 No.10347947 >>10347928 http://exhentai.org/g/531909/664ae6f10b/

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:17:06 2013 No.10347953 >>10347893 Does this artiest have Pixiv. I would like to add him to my favorites up there.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:22:21 2013 No.10347968 File: 377 KB, 790x800, flanfly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10347953 http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?id=2278911

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:29:21 2013 No.10347992 File: 1.03 MB, 1023x1500, 27670210.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10347968 Thanks bro.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 16:52:38 2013 No.10348039 >>10345667 >Paedophilia is genetic. There are genetic disorders that lead to an increase risk for becoming a pedophile, but pedophilia isn't genetic.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:20:06 2013 No.10348126

>>10345972
>I personally believe that lolicon women are able to achieve a purer and more enlightened bond with the girls they adore, as they themselves know what it is like to be a little girl.

So this would be the theory behind why someone would be "gay" for kids? Because I never understand why any man would be interested in little boys.

As a man, I'd view a little girl as a woman that is younger. That way it seems obvious and natural to like them. It would be weird not to like them.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:27:06 2013 No.10348148 >>10348126 They have different body types, though. Someone who finds a little girl sexually stimulating isn't going to find a grown women sexy and vice versa.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:28:21 2013 No.10348152 File: 374 KB, 1280x960, hagane01_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] What are things you don't like seeing in loli related material?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:54:36 2013 No.10348237 File: 252 KB, 1200x1727, sorimura souji.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10348152 "Oppai loli", but I like this artist.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:57:09 2013 No.10348245 File: 684 KB, 2128x3016, adjhU2in.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Men who say they aren't lolicons are nothing but a bunch of liars.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:57:21 2013 No.10348246 "pedophilia" doesn't exist. It's called "not being an anal slave to retarded neurotypical moral constructs"

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:59:06 2013 No.10348248 I was listening to some loli hypnosis drama CD a few hours ago. I have no idea why audio files make me cum harder than visual stimulation.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 17:59:21 2013 No.10348251 >>10348246 It's not retarded, children can't reproduce, so you gain nothing by being sexually attracted to them. It's only desirable for people who aren't going to have sex or raise a family anyway, like /jp/ posters.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 18:00:06 2013 No.10348253 >>10348251 >children can't reproduce http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 18:04:40 2013 No.10348261 >>10348245 I'm not attracted to them. Sorry. Nothing I can do about it.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 18:05:55 2013 No.10348263 >>10348253 Children that have the body type someone who likes lolis would be interested in and not precocious puberty.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 18:06:25 2013 No.10348265 >>10348253 >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_youngest_birth_mothers So many perfect wifes. >Argentina So proud.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 18:18:55 2013 No.10348301

Are children capable of lewd thoughts and fantasies?
I don't remember having them at an early age. But later on, about 8-10, I would have love to have my virginity taken away by a cute pedo.
Rape is disgusting tough. I don't think that people that rape children are TRUEpedos..... They spoil them.
2D rape is another story.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 18:35:22 2013 No.10348343

>>10348301
I must have been...6 or maybe 7, but I remember at a young age I would always imagine myself as a naked woman. It was never really sexual, but I would just sit and think of myself in an empty room as a naked woman and I would just kind of walk around and sit down, etc.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 18:36:22 2013 No.10348346 >>10348301 They can without a doubt have lewd thoughts. They're mostly things like, "I wonder what his weener looks like," or, "I want to see her boobs," or thinking about butts. I don't think kids have fantasies like adults.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 19:35:24 2013 No.10348578 >>10345698 All pedophilia means is attraction to per-pubescent children, that would make pedophilia legal in Spain, Mexico etc.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 19:40:40 2013 No.10348597 >>10348578 Pedophilia isn't illegal in the first place.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 19:54:25 2013 No.10348663 >>10348148 I like both. I like girls 5 and up.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 19:56:10 2013 No.10348668 >>10348251 I don't get why people use this argument? Is it strange to be sexually attracted to sterile people.

Anonymous Fri Jan 11 20:10:10 2013 No.10348711
File: 239 KB, 604x800, 1352776549999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10348343
>but I would just sit and think of myself in an empty room as a naked woman and I would just kind of walk around and sit down, etc.
Sounds psychologist worthy.

>>10348301
Capable yes, but they don't possess them because they are largely deviance resulting from repressive societies. That is, they gradually learn things like boobs are wrong and showing the genitals is an embarrassing and private matter, so they start to get curious and eventually gain a fetish for things like nudity and whatnot or get turned on by the embarrassment. If they grew up in cultures where people wore less clothes, they wouldn't even understand why you were so aroused/embarrassed by naked boobs, even as adults.

The rest of it is learning. Outside of learning, they couldn't think any deeper than "I want to rub my dick/pussy on something". After being on the internet, I became capable of such thoughts as "I want to rub my dick between big breasts/thighs/ass", after not even imagining such things even in high school. Just the same, they probably wouldn't even know you could stick it in the butt, let alone desire it if no one told them.

tl;dr - they wouldn't think of lewd things outside of being horny unless they learned the actions from something.

>>10348126
>>10348148

There are people who just think of women as sex objects no matter the age, and there are some people who are gays who are also pedo. That and gays are hated anyway so gaypedos get more hype so people will think all gays are pedo. Honestly, people probably will think of gaypedo in USA more than straight pedo if you told them someone was fiddlin' kiddies. It probably goes 1 - gaypedo, 2 - female teacher/male student, 3 - looking at pictures of naked little girls; in terms of what people would think of. Some people would also be so inclined to compare a little girl to a little boy and say they look the same so it's gay anyway.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 20:13:25 2013 No.10348716 >>10348668 In the sense of gay, lesbian, pedo, or hermaphrodite, yes. "Normally" you wouldn't know someone was sterile without testing them, anyway, you you can't really be specifically attracted to sterile "normal" people in particular.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 20:41:55 2013 No.10348790 Interesting doco. that I watched last night that I think some of you might enjoy. I very much enjoy the work of Louis Theroux. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEt3-kuVl5Y

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 21:23:08 2013 No.10348910 File: 262 KB, 1280x960, sody02_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 21:26:23 2013 No.10348916 >>10348910 Why is that cat winking? Cats can't wink, that's just silly.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 21:31:53 2013 No.10348930 >>10348916 Your mom's cat winked last night.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 22:19:53 2013 No.10349063 >>10348790 Why are most of them gay pedophiles?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:03:08 2013 No.10349196 >>10349063 Perhaps there's a correlation between the two, or a correlation between being both of those things and having a chance of actually offending.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:11:23 2013 No.10349224 god was a pedophile, man up and join

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:26:23 2013 No.10349260 >>10349224 Where does it says God had a crush on a kid? Where does it says he had sex with a kid? Where does it's implied God is a paedophile?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:37:23 2013 No.10349291 >>10349063 I don't know, but it bothers me.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:43:23 2013 No.10349311 >>10349063 People are sympathetic to gays. Normal men are seen as perverts when they pursue adult women. Pursuing kid women will get them hanged.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:51:38 2013 No.10349329 >>10349311 So if I say I'm gay and I rape a kid everything will be alright, right?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:54:08 2013 No.10349342 File: 583 KB, 1280x960, mikadukimo02_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10349063 Perhaps they are the easiest to catch. I'd have to say female pedophiles are the hardest to catch.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jan 11 23:58:38 2013 No.10349350 >>10349329 Catholicism hasn't been banned yet, so sure. Just make sure you go at a kind of irregular pace so people don't catch on to your rhythmic noises.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:00:23 2013 No.10349358 >>10349342 Why do you need all that shit to take a bath? Also female pedophiles in what sense? It's not like there's more than 2 genders, so if men are easier, then women are harder.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:09:53 2013 No.10349380 File: 763 KB, 1200x1600, shouji_ayumu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:37:24 2013 No.10349474 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2260378/She-just-stopped-growing-Meet-20-year-old-woman-trapped-inside-toddlers-body--doctors-baffled.html >/jp/'s wife

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:39:53 2013 No.10349478 >>10349350 They are cracking down on that. The Church recently excommunicated a bunch of priests.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:41:08 2013 No.10349483 >>10349474 It says there she has the mental age of a 9 months old so no thank you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:41:23 2013 No.10349482 >>10349260 I've heard Mary was a child when he impregnated her.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:42:08 2013 No.10349486 >>10349474 I would really prefer a wife whose mental age is at least six times hers.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:42:08 2013 No.10349487 >>10349482 lol nigga u srs. Mary is the daughter of Jesus and she was impregnated by a pidgeotto.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:42:38 2013 No.10349485 >>10349482 God didn't have sex with Mary. >>10349474 While I'm cross posting http://images.4chan.org/sci/src/1357963321026.jpg

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:43:53 2013 No.10349488 File: 37 KB, 640x361, Pain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10349483 So you like those toddlers with the minds of adults? Pic related

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:44:38 2013 No.10349490 >>10349488 Yes. I like dominatrix lolis.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:46:08 2013 No.10349495 >>10349485 >http://images.4chan.org/sci/src/1357963321026.jpg I lol'd. Doing reverse image search.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:47:53 2013 No.10349499 File: 142 KB, 687x480, mitsuba.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] You will never be verbally abused by Mitsuba-sama. Reality is so cruel.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:49:38 2013 No.10349503

>>10349488
Are you the guy that recommended this last thread? I went and watched it today; pretty interesting, nothing super original or groundbreaking, but I liked the style of animation. It felt fresh after all this time of generally traditional 2D with occasional CG. Much less loli than I expected though, but that wasn't a problem.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:49:38 2013 No.10349504 >>10349490 >>10349486 >>10349483 So you like BanubeeFriends/Tetsu or something? It's not really much better though, if you ask me.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:57:53 2013 No.10349518

>>10349503
Yeah.
>Much less loli than I expected though, but that wasn't a problem.
What, it's like 2 and a half episodes of lolis being naked and kissing each other. Or is it just that there's only 4 of them?

>nothing super original or groundbreaking
It's like exactly the opposite of that. When it first came out and I watched it, I thought of it as being like all of the last 10 or so years of anime compressed into a short OVA. Not in an awesome way, but like "2000s anime: the movie" or
>/anime/

It's story is probably one of the more interesting things though, just because of how cruel it is when you think about, like ANYTHING.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 00:59:53 2013 No.10349524 File: 90 KB, 880x496, snapshot20080724194903.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10349518 Oh and that whole colony thing was cool.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:03:23 2013 No.10349535 >exactly the opposite of original and groundbreaking I mean.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:23:08 2013 No.10349573 >>10349380 dem tube bodies.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:25:23 2013 No.10349577

>>10349358
Look at any sex offender registry and you'll only find men. However on the darknet there is a even mix oddly. You don't many on the TV broadcasts unless it was a teacher who had sex with a student. That doesn't mean they don't exist its just means that they are harder to catch also socitey doesn't frown on it as badly either if its Female/male or female/male pedophile.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:25:23 2013 No.10349578 File: 496 KB, 1179x1705, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] not really related, but does anyone know if the artist mame / menosuke / 豆 has a home page? he apparently deleted his pixiv a while ago.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:37:23 2013 No.10349608

>>10349577
>Look at any sex offender registry and you'll only find men.
You know that isn't just for pedos right? Rapists and whatnot get on there too.

Most of the ones near here are for having sex with 14-15 year olds and the like, jailbait.

Also I never hear it on the tv if it's female but with male student and female teacher, but on the other hand I never hear about guys who weren't being gay either. I don't think I've ever seen anything on tv about male adult on girl pedo that wasn't just about cp or part of some other horrible crime that overshadows the pedoness. The closest thing was that R Kelly thing some time back.

If anything they just frown on on-boy pedoness and don't even bother to cover on girl pedoness.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:38:08 2013 No.10349613 >>10349578 Are there seriously people who wouldn't just hit her?

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:42:08 2013 No.10349624

>>10349518
Oh, I meant that the original poster implied that they'd all be nearly naked throughout the entire thing, whereas that wasn't the case (but I didn't watch it for the fanservice anyway). And it's from 2007, right? I feel like if I had watched it back then it would've impacted me more, but it's 2013 now, and I've seen the general themes too many times. Don't get me wrong, I liked it a lot, and the setting was really cool. Also, the fact that they didn't hold back on the violence was a bit shocking (even if all the damage sustained seemed to disappear very quickly). I'd recommend it, especially considering how short it is.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:43:38 2013 No.10349627 >>10349613 Hitting girls? No gentleman would hit a girl, even if cheeky and bitter. Remember I said a girl, not an abomination of one - feminists, whores et cetera. In 2D, you'll only see girls.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 01:58:53 2013 No.10349663 >>10349608 >If anything they just frown on on-boy pedoness and don't even bother to cover on girl pedoness. Indeed that might just be the case but, we may never really figure out society quirks.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 02:02:08 2013 No.10349676

>>10349624
I am the poster.

Technically their clothes are made out of synthesizing their skin or some such, so they're always naked. But maybe they wore their battle outfits less than I remembered. They were definitely lewd enough to feel it it was the entire latter part to me though. And eh, they're superhumans who can be exposed to vacuum and radiation and whatnot. Makes sense to heal quickly from brutal beatings.

You probably know better than me when it came out, but about then yeah. I didn't/can't explain it well, but it seemed to me then like it was some sort of combination of everything good and bad about anime of that time all at once. Like they were trying revel in being generic or make an anime-like anime by throwing in a bit of everything. Maybe it just fits my negative view of most 2000s anime (while still being entertaining.)

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 03:43:38 2013 No.10349928 File: 196 KB, 790x596, 1311939953666.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Do you like your lolis strong and able to fend for themselves or weak and to be protected?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 03:48:38 2013 No.10349947 >>10349928 Both, and I think that depends on the design.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 05:21:08 2013 No.10350173 >>10349928 What littlewitch game is this?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 05:23:24 2013 No.10350179 >>10349928 Now, I can suspend my disbelief just fine, but I do not see a battle hardened gladiator losing to a teenager girl who does not even know how to hold a blade.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 05:55:53 2013 No.10350266 >>10349380 I want a cute loli friend to come to my house every day.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 05:56:08 2013 No.10350267 >>10350179 That guy's mace skills suck. He lets too much chain go free. I think he is fucked. Judging of how close that little girl is with that wicked sword. Just one lunge and she could eviscerate that man. Scary, scary...

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 06:22:23 2013 No.10350329 File: 175 KB, 340x657, 310089092404cfc87bd4cd4ea5a27c8874035024.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10350173 I'm pretty sure that's Aria from Romanesque

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 12:26:23 2013 No.10351399 >>10348790 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEt3-kuVl5Y&t=13m53s Does that mean it doesn't count as CP if they're wearing bathing suits?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 12:38:18 2013 No.10351421 >>10348790 Disturbing to watch. I can't believe this is what we do to other humans.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 12:39:03 2013 No.10351422 >>10350266 That's because you missed out on that experience as a kid, right?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 12:43:33 2013 No.10351431 >>10350329 Littlewitch lolis are hawt.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 12:55:48 2013 No.10351472
File: 433 KB, 1280x960, makoto02_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10351399
Well, by Japanese law yes. Just look up Junior Idols and have a nice day.

>>10349928
I like loli with a little be bit of both. Wish I could think of an example but, all I come up with are weak type.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:02:03 2013 No.10351500 File: 494 KB, 1200x1734, tfw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >tfw you will never have a gaming tanned loli to rape you >tfw you wil never be this guy

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:12:18 2013 No.10351537 >>10351500 Excess sunlight is bad for little girls

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:14:18 2013 No.10351543 >>10351537 But not bad for us! u//_//u

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:16:33 2013 No.10351550 >>10351543 >>10351500 Never post on 4chan again, you piece of shit. You are the cancer killing /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:18:33 2013 No.10351562 >>10351550 Why are you so frustrated? Im posting loli related stuff.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:22:33 2013 No.10351579 File: 34 KB, 515x491, rustleface8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10351550 Whats got this guy so Rustled?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:23:18 2013 No.10351589 >>10351562 You're using /v/-level ``memes'' and abuse the quote function. You don't deserve to be alive.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:24:03 2013 No.10351601 >>10351589 >``memes'' Why enclose that word in scare quotes? Too scared to call things memes on 4chan?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:25:03 2013 No.10351603 /jp/ is /v/ little sister, i come from /v/. Therefore i can molest you anytime i want with my implications.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:25:48 2013 No.10351607 >>10351603 meant to quote >>10351589

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:26:18 2013 No.10351610 >>10351603 fuck you onee-san! I've had it with your bullshit!

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:52:33 2013 No.10351709 File: 1.59 MB, 850x1133, sample_2c0ef4993dcae6aa1adc673b97bc146c.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10351431 Only when they have clothes on. Otherwise they make >>10349380's lolis look like fat stumpy dwarfs. 1997-1999 is the best

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 13:54:03 2013 No.10351720 >>10351421 agreed. that place is soul-crushing, as it's designed to be. and that one female "doctor" was pretty damn evil, if you ask me.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:03:18 2013 No.10351734

>>10349063
The majority of men who are attracted to real children, and by that I mean not sexualized cartoon drawings, are attracted to boys. The institution that Louis visits is not for those who are actual pedophiles, not just those who raped children due because of power, loneliness, chance, malicious intent, etc. Another fun fact: pedophiles, on average, are shorter than those attracted to of-age people.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:05:33 2013 No.10351737

>>10351734
>The institution that Louis visits is not for those who are actual pedophiles
I mean "for those", not "not for those".

And I'd suggest everyone watch the documentary. I don't have anything against drawn lolicon, but the sheer visceral reaction I had from seeing some of the people Theroux interviewed made me question even that.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:07:18 2013 No.10351741 >>10351720 I kinda feel bad for her, she looks like she deals with a ton of shit, and that job is probably horrible. Everything about that place is a lose-lose situation.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:09:18 2013 No.10351743 >>10351709 In my mind I still feel like it is 2000.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:10:48 2013 No.10351748 >>10351601 No, I think you're just new.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:13:33 2013 No.10351754 >>10348790 >all those comments It's kind of ironic that these people are making death threats, but would also fully support the banning of 2d since it could be "dangerous".

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:14:03 2013 No.10351760 >>10348126 >So this would be the theory behind why someone would be "gay" for kids? Because I never understand why any man would be interested in little boys. Having been a little boy myself, I am interested in them for that reason.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:41:48 2013 No.10351819

>>10351754
All them wannabe serial killers. I can't imagine they really would say stuff like that offline. You'd have to be an actual retard to think you could kill anyone you wanted for any reason and people would high five you and not just toss you in jail along with pedos.

In a way I wish there were people like that, so they could realize that they were also insane criminals.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:52:03 2013 No.10351847 >>10351819 The reason I brought it up is because I see these "put a bullet through their heads" comments to be on the same level as 2d loli in that they're both essentially thoughts (one in words, the other in pictures).

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 14:55:03 2013 No.10351855

>>10351741
on the surface, her actions appear to be blameless because it looks like she is just keeping "strong boundaries" about herself to protect her own well-being. but in practice, and from the way i saw it at least once in the vid, she uses her "boundaries" as a weapon to silence any dialogue that she simply does not want to hear. and because she is in a position of authority, she can silence others with impunity, and effectively coerce others into communicating with her only upon levels that she finds agreeable, while chalking up any other dialogue that she doesn't like as "abusive", so as to put the other person on the defensive. that is despotic.

so no, i don't think she has to deal with a ton of shit. that's what the guards are for, if any of the prisoners try to get out of line. the guards probably deal with a ton of shit, and they have my sympathies rather than her. if she doesn't like the job, she can quit. but i suspect she enjoys the power she has over all those guys on some level. and if not, at least there's probably a pretty nice gubmint paycheck she gets regularly from that swanky facility.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:00:03 2013 No.10351862 >>10351819 it's ok to hate pedos in this day and age. it's like a modern Two Minutes Hate.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:09:03 2013 No.10351899 >>10351855 >she is in a position of authority...and effectively coerce others How ironic

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:27:48 2013 No.10351943 >>10351862 It's still not okay to be murderous vigilantes though.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:32:03 2013 No.10351954

> The pedophile - similar to the autistic patient - misinterprets the child's body language and inter-personal cues. His social communication skills are impaired and he fails to adjust information gained to the surrounding circumstances (for instance, to the kid's age and maturity).

>Coupled with his lack of empathy, this recurrent inability to truly comprehend others cause the pedophile to objectify the targets of his lasciviousness. Pedophilia is, in essence, auto-erotic. The pedophile uses children's bodies to masturbate with. Hence the success of the Internet among pedophiles: it offers disembodied, anonymous, masturbatory sex. Children in cyberspace are mere representations - often nothing more than erotic photos and screen names.

>It is crucial to realize that pedophiles are not enticed by the children themselves, by their bodies, or by their budding and nubile sexuality (remember Nabokov's Lolita?). Rather, pedophiles are drawn to what children symbolize, to what preadolescents stand for and represent. With the advent of Feminism and gender-equality, women have lost their traditional role as socially-acceptable and permissible sexual "child-substitutes" (except in Japan). This social upheaval may account for the rise in pedophilia across the world.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:37:18 2013 No.10351976 >>10351954 I read the first words as >The pedophile simulator

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:38:48 2013 No.10351981 >>10351976 fund it

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:40:48 2013 No.10351992 >>10351954 Is this based off anything (ie - facts)?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:41:18 2013 No.10351994 >>10351954 >The pedophile uses children's bodies to masturbate with The definition of sex. What the hell do they view sex as? Some quasi-supernatural melding of minds.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:43:03 2013 No.10352001

>>10351954
>It is crucial to realize that pedophiles are not enticed by the children themselves, by their bodies, or by their budding and nubile sexuality (remember Nabokov's Lolita?).

what do you call someone that is attracted to childrens budding and nubile sexuality then?

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:44:03 2013 No.10352006

>>10351954
>III. Sex with children is a reenactment of a painful past

>Many pedophiles truly bond with their prey. To them, children are the reification of innocence, genuineness, trust, and faithfulness - qualities that the pedophile wishes to nostalgically recapture.

> The relationship with the child provides the pedophile with a "safe passage" to his own, repressed and fearful, inner child. Through his victim, the pedophile gains access to his suppressed and thwarted emotions. It is a fantasy-like second chance to reenact his childhood, this time benignly. The pedophile's dream to make peace with his past comes true transforming the interaction with the child to an exercise in wish fulfillment.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:44:18 2013 No.10352003 File: 69 KB, 511x906, d87bc314dc0a49f2998fc2b8eb05abe7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] it's been too many posts since a loli's been posted in this loli thread.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:45:03 2013 No.10352012 >>10352001 A lolicon, duh. A person with a lolita complex is a person with a complex for women who are reminiscent of Lolita.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:45:18 2013 No.10352008 >>10352003 kawhy

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:46:48 2013 No.10352015 File: 193 KB, 704x480, 1349461169755.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] If I learn to be a l33t-h4xor will I get cute lolis to come to my house, too?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:47:18 2013 No.10352018 >>10352003 I love thick eyebrows

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:49:48 2013 No.10352029 >>10352012 hmm, okay, good to know I'm not a pedophile then but yeah, lolita was a great book, humbert humbert had such a strong desire, you could be jealous of it

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:52:03 2013 No.10352036 File: 160 KB, 1152x720, 20121022223853e30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:52:33 2013 No.10352038 >>10352029 Post the one where he wants to turn her inside out

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:53:03 2013 No.10352047 >>10352036 They're both 18, get that shit out of here.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 15:53:33 2013 No.10352045 >>10352038 “My only grudge against nature was that I could not turn my Lolita inside out and apply voracious lips to her young matrix, her unknown heart, her nacreous liver, the sea-grapes of her lungs, her comely twin kidneys.”

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:00:18 2013 No.10352063 >>10352047 I always laugh when I see those disclamers. But yeah theyre over 18

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:03:48 2013 No.10352074 >>10352047 You silly goose no 18 year old could be that cute.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:04:18 2013 No.10352077 File: 1.11 MB, 1100x1600, 1357795795715.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] this was so cute and adorable that i just couldn't fap to it. that happen to anyone else?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:05:04 2013 No.10352080 >>10352045 Thanks. Now tell me what "nacreous" means, please.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:06:03 2013 No.10352085 >>10352077 >that happen to anyone else? Yes, but not with anything by Rustle so far.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:06:19 2013 No.10352081 >>10352074 my little 18-year-old couldn't possibly etc etc

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:06:48 2013 No.10352083 >>10352077 With that guy, it's just ugly. There are artists like that though, that I wish drew normal manga.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:06:48 2013 No.10352084 >>10352080 iridescent

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:21:00 2013 No.10352128 File: 59 KB, 500x655, 1356688832416.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10351954 >>10352006 Don't keep us waiting, where are you getting this information from?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:21:15 2013 No.10352126 File: 60 KB, 640x480, 1123318216175.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352074 >>10352081 >>10352063 >>10352047

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:22:15 2013 No.10352130

>>10351954
>>10352006
>http://samvak.tripod.com/pedophilia.html
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Vaknin
>Shmuel Ben David "Sam" Vaknin (born April 1961) is an Israeli writer
>Israeli
Well that explains a lot.... I wonder how long it would take them to make a pseudo-scientific book on the relation of pig eating and cannibalism.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:27:15 2013 No.10352144 >>10348790 That BBC guy... The definition of a normalfag. Shows disgusting face when the is encouraged by society to do so and doesn't give a fuck when he experiences some other people's suffering just because they are cast outs.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:30:45 2013 No.10352156 File: 201 KB, 800x600, 35584.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352126

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:36:00 2013 No.10352167

>>10352130
Read this guy's work. A lot of the pedophile traits he listed can be found in the relationship between parent and children. For example

>His ever-shifting whims exclusively define right versus wrong, desirable and unwanted, what is to be pursued and what to be avoided. He alone determines rights and obligations and alters them at will.

>he demands complete obedience from his "partner". He feels entitled to adulation and special treatment by his child-mate. He punishes the wayward and the straying lambs. He enforces discipline

That's a traditional parent-child relationship right there. Your parents dictate right and wrong, they determine your rights and obligations and they expect differential treatement. If you don't provide those as a child then you are punished.

That also seems to describe old-fashioned marriages with the man as the head.

Is this guy implying that aspects of marriage and parental care are found in pedophilia?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:40:30 2013 No.10352178 File: 868 KB, 842x946, 1344733296467.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352144 It's me again, this video has really rustled me. What a judgmental guy.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:43:00 2013 No.10352186

>The marriageable age in Britain until the end of the nineteenth century was 10. Sex and genital foreplay with children was common, encouraged and even medically-prescribed literally all over the world until 150 years ago. Incest and pedophilia were often linked and sanctioned.

>Various religious texts – including the Jewish Talmud, surprisingly progressive for its time – permit sexual relations, including incest, as early as age 3 (for a girl) or 8 (for a boy).

Nice.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:45:15 2013 No.10352195

>>10352167
I don't want to read the work of a guy that made millions in self-help books like any filthy jew would do.
Even you can stand in a fair ground with him. I don't see any more than rigorous speculation. And flowing him, I think: yes parenting implies pedophilia.
But that is ridiculous at some extent. There is way more to pedophilia than that.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:49:30 2013 No.10352203 >>10352156 What does "river five" mean?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:52:00 2013 No.10352217 File: 234 KB, 799x602, Stay_classy_shiritsu_sakuranbo_devs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352156 I love that doujin circle.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:54:00 2013 No.10352223 >>10352203 That's “小” not “川”

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 16:57:30 2013 No.10352232 >>10352223 What does "small 5" mean?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:00:30 2013 No.10352240 >>10352232 小学 is primary school I think you can figure it out from there.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:00:30 2013 No.10352241 File: 266 KB, 1024x768, egg_laying_fetish_show.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352232 It means they're in the 5th year of elementary school. Which makes them 10 or 11 years old.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:04:45 2013 No.10352254 I'm bumping this glorious thread.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:13:00 2013 No.10352285 >>10351855 >if you exclude me from the conversation that is abuse I hate that woman.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:14:00 2013 No.10352288 File: 406 KB, 718x1013, 49681fae076514627b18516f9d379e1f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Lolis are sacred creatures that should never be harmed.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:15:00 2013 No.10352289 I finally got around to playing Sengoku Rance. The part where Ranmaru gets the lolicon to marry her by adopting a cute little war orphan is probably the funniest thing I've ever seen in Japanese media.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:17:00 2013 No.10352294 >>10352289 You must not have consumed much Japanese media then.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:17:30 2013 No.10352293 File: 707 KB, 600x4767, 1345340148080.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352288 Hey, I remember that

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:19:15 2013 No.10352297 >>10352294 The humor was in her clever and unconventional solution to a problem. Not a lot of Japanese humor involves that.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:20:30 2013 No.10352300 >>10352288 And that's why you posted one of yukino minato's works? You know the guy who specializes in harming lolis?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:20:30 2013 No.10352301 >>10352297 >The humor was in her clever and unconventional solution to a problem. ...and also how horribly fucked-up that situation was.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:21:00 2013 No.10352306 >>10352300 I clearly do not know of his existence.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:22:00 2013 No.10352309 >>10352301 >how horribly fucked-up that situation was. Nobody gives a single shit about your normalfag morals.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:23:00 2013 No.10352312 >>10352309 I need to save that guy leaning against a wall picture some time.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:24:00 2013 No.10352313 >>10352309 He didn't really love her, and she knew it and was willing to settle for him maintaining a farcical relationship. That's the messed-up part.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:27:01 2013 No.10352320 >>10352288 I do not know why I read the entire thing and its sequels. i really don't know what I was expecting.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:28:15 2013 No.10352325 >>10352306 Search for noraneko-no-tama on sad panda.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:31:15 2013 No.10352333 >>10352320 I was hoping the little brown girl would be okay.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:33:15 2013 No.10352345 File: 432 KB, 1280x720, 39789.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352217 best of the best

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:35:15 2013 No.10352353 >>10351760 So you are interested in little boys now because you as a little boy wanted an old man to play with you? Else I'm afraid I'm not following your train of thought.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:40:00 2013 No.10352372 >>10352320 Because you enjoy seeing little girls abused and raped?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:41:00 2013 No.10352375 >>10352345 10 sai? I want to play this.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:41:15 2013 No.10352373

>>10352006
That is sort of accurate. When I think of a child having sex, I am in fact considering how I myself as a child would have loved to experience it.

Which means pedos are children who didn't get sex as kids, and the only way to stop pedos from appearing, is having sex with kids.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:43:00 2013 No.10352382 >>10352373 I think this hits the nail on the head perfectly anon.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:43:30 2013 No.10352380 >>10352373 What?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:45:00 2013 No.10352391 >>10352373 10/10 flawless logic. I can get behind that shit.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:48:00 2013 No.10352398 >>10352373 Can't argue with you on that one.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:53:30 2013 No.10352409 >>10352373 May be more to it than that, but in general you may be right. They were never satisfied so they never sexually developed.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:55:46 2013 No.10352418 >>10352372 Abuse/Rape makes me completely flaccid so I don't think so.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:58:15 2013 No.10352425 >>10345689 The thing is, most people accept pictures of characters like May or Dawn from Pokemon sucking cock, and getting raped anally, but then forget that they are supposed to be 11. Some loli's are 12. Has any one else noticed this phenomena?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 17:58:30 2013 No.10352428 File: 342 KB, 800x600, 33652.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352375 Not even the youngest from them either. http://vndb.org/c6016

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:01:00 2013 No.10352437 >>10352425 No one cares because they are animated and not real. Why would they care?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:02:45 2013 No.10352441 >>10349627 Nobody who was more than a nigger would hit anybody.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:07:30 2013 No.10352448

>>10352437

What I mean is that loli art is frowned upon and even criminalised in Britain. Yet Pokemon girls and other popular characters are seen as fair game, even though many of them are younger than the lolis many people post.

An example would be Salads doujins. In one, there's an 11 year old girl who gets paid to fuck two guys. On /b/ people were going apeshit about it when some dumped it, yet I could go there and post picturees of Saphire right now and people would be fine with it, even though she's 10.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:14:00 2013 No.10352460

>>10352448
>What I mean is that loli art is frowned upon and even criminalised in Britain.

Well not really. It was only recently made illegal and there have been no convictions for it and likely never will because its a stupid law (conservatives of course).

>An example would be Salads doujins. In one, there's an 11 year old girl who gets paid to fuck two guys. On /b/ people were going apeshit about it when some dumped it.

People raging about loli on /b/? I find that hard to believe. But still I would disregard their opnions because its animated.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:14:15 2013 No.10352459

>>10352448
>on /b/ people were going apeshit about it
>on /b/
Yeah, that casual board where people become "anonymous" and go fight pedophilia wearing masks of Guy Fawkes. They really believe they are doing the right thing. It's fucking sad and ridiculous.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:15:00 2013 No.10352464 >>10352448 I thought /b/ liked that stuff? Theres no way they're becoming normals

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:15:45 2013 No.10352462 >>10352460 *and because its /b/ I meant to add

>>	Puffer Sat Jan 12 18:19:45 2013 No.10352471 >>10352428 http://vndb.org/v6746/chars Puffy/10 would play!!!

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:20:00 2013 No.10352474 >>10352464 >they're becoming normals >becoming Uh, I got something to tell you...

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:20:30 2013 No.10352472

>>10352448
Loli art is not criminalised in Britain. I used to watch CP a few years ago and completely switched to 2D loli. I told my psychologist this and he immediately got me arrested.

A few days later, after they checked my computer with at least 20GB of deleted lolicon and most of Wanyanaguda's work clearly visible they just gave back my computer and said they didn't find anything bad.

Having a quick look around the internet I found that unrealistic depictions of child porn is totally ok, just keep it to yourself.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:43:14 2013 No.10352543

>>10352472
Was this before or after April 2010, when the relevant sections of the Coroners and Justice Act (2009) came into force? Because whilst they've yet to be used in trial, the sections involved in that seem to criminalize any cartoon that depicts a child.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 18:48:29 2013 No.10352560 >>10352543 After. Happened in 2011 if I recall correctly.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 19:08:44 2013 No.10352630 File: 304 KB, 1037x1460, SHELL_056e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 19:32:27 2013 No.10352725 File: 482 KB, 1061x1508, 01[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352630 Wanyan Aguda makes me want to watch every episode of Detective Conan.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 20:47:27 2013 No.10352931 File: 460 KB, 1125x1600, [HD]_0035.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10352725 I do like his art.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 20:57:27 2013 No.10352957

>>10352472
>I told my psychologist this and he immediately got me arrested.
What a fucking faggot cunt. Seriously? I thought psychiatrists/psychologist had that honor, that they won't give you out unless you're a threat to someone and can hurt. That's why I stopped going to my psychiatrist and never dared to admit I'm a pedophile. Fuck them.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 20:58:27 2013 No.10352962

>>10352425
No one gives a FUCK about Pokemon's cartoon canon. I only know them from the games and it doesn't mention their ages there.

Also the only pokemon girl ever to be drawn to look 11 is Hikari.

Loli in pokemon is like that girl with one hair loop, that black girl, and those twin NPCs.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 20:59:27 2013 No.10352968 >>10352957 seriously, isn't there supposed to be patient-doctor privilege, or some kind of expectation of confidentiality?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 21:12:27 2013 No.10353032 >>10352968 Patient-doctor whatever is an American thing I thought? Also >psychologist >Real doctor I'm quoting Psychiatrists are doctors, not Psychologists.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 21:15:27 2013 No.10353043

>>10352957
>>10352968
If you're considered a threat to yourself or anyone around you, the psychiatrists/psychologist, by law, must inform the police. I don't know if 2D loli makes them consider you a threat but 3D certainly does.

>>10353032
Psychiatrists and psychologists both must have confidentiality with the client/patiient/whatever unless they are considered a threat.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 21:25:27 2013 No.10353076 File: 321 KB, 500x745, 27474.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 21:28:27 2013 No.10353085

>>10352957
You shouldn't trust any psychiatrists or doctors, they don't want help you or even give you sympathy. They just wanna shove pills down your throat and get their money. You shouldn't admit those things to anyone you don't trust to the absolute fullest extent will not back stab you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 21:47:27 2013 No.10353168 >>10353043 Watching any kind of pornography, child or not, is not a threat. What bad do you do, exactly, and how does that hurt anyone? If you watch porn does that mean you will start raping women?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 21:59:27 2013 No.10353210 >>10353168 I don't agree with it either, so you're asking the wrong person these questions. Watching child pornography makes you a threat in the eyes of the law.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:13:27 2013 No.10353254 >>10353168 The thing is when Detectives or FBI or whoever is the one that deals with taking any child pornography reviews the films the child is pleading for someone to help them or something along the lines of it hurts. So it's hurting the child.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:15:27 2013 No.10353267 >>10353254 It certainly hurts them during filming, but I think the question was whether or not it hurts them every time the video/image is viewed again (obviously it doesn't outside of hurting perhaps their pride).

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:16:27 2013 No.10353268 >>10353254 [citation needed]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:19:27 2013 No.10353277 >>10353267 It doesn't literally hurt them but if I had a record of every stupid thing you've done on the internet and could tie it to you, and I posted it everywhere at every opportunity, would you be okay with that?

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:28:27 2013 No.10353310

>>10353268
The link is not working at the moment which is pissing me off but when it works then I guess you can read it
http://www.buffalonews.com/339/story/184849.html

But I think it is a given..their sex organs are just not fully developed and especially if it is being forced it will hurt them. If it hurts an adult man/woman when they are raped then a child will feel it even more

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:30:27 2013 No.10353319

>>10353268
Oh but there is a quote and it's on Wikipedia
There is an increasing trend towards younger victims and greater brutality; according to Flint Waters, an investigator with the federal Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, "These guys are raping infants and toddlers. You can hear the child crying, pleading for help in the video. It is horrendous."

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:35:27 2013 No.10353347 >>10353268 http://www.csecworldcongress.org/PDF/en/Stockholm/Background_reading/Theme_papers/Theme%20paper%20Pornography%201996_EN.pdf

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:35:27 2013 No.10353350 >>10353277 I don't think you should go to jail for 20 years and be considered inhuman for it. Seems like more of a civil case.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:36:27 2013 No.10353351 >>10345689 That was an interesting read

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 22:47:27 2013 No.10353393 >>10353319 I'm not bothering to check if that's a real quote or not, but without supporting the other side, that sounds like the kind of shit they would say during the war on drugs in order to monger fear.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:00:27 2013 No.10353451

>>10353393
Many have argued that the distribution of obscene adult material is a victim-less crime, that no one gets
hurt and that what one does privately is his or her own business. In the case of child pornography,
however, where a real child is videotaped or photographed, there is always a victim. The distribution
of that depiction repeats the victimization over and over again, long after the original misdeed took
place. Likewise, when the face of a child is superimposed on a sexually explicit photo, even though
that child never participated in any sexual act, the distribution of the altered image arguably produces a
similar effect.
There are two ways in which children can potentially be harmed by child pornography--by being
exposed to child pornography or by being filmed themselves. Children who are exposed to pornography are in danger of being desensitized and seduced into believing that pornographic activity
is "normal" for children.
2

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:13:27 2013 No.10353494 >>10353451 >there is always a victim. The distribution of that depiction repeats the victimization over and over again This would include any other type of picture with victims in it like photos of natural disasters and such, right?

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:16:27 2013 No.10353503

>>10353494
Well yes.
But don't get to that. When I see that it sounds like you are trying to defend CP (I may be wrong so forgive me)
Children are very much so harmed in the development of those things. There is a scale for how bad the pictures of child pornography can get and 10 is that it involves; infants, toddlers, pre-pubescent kids and children performing sexual acts with NSFW and/or bestiality. We're talking INFANTS and TODDLERS

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:19:27 2013 No.10353523 >>10353494 Only if you masturbate to it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:20:27 2013 No.10353534 >>10353494 You have to see too that the vast majority and I do mean the majority are sold as sex slaves and they are involved in child prostitution.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:21:27 2013 No.10353538

>>10353503
I'm not trying to defend or offend it. I'm simply pointing out a flaw in the argument. It's a rather big flaw.

Also, in this post, your arguments are about the act rather than the picture itself. I'll definitely agree with you in that the act can be very terrible, but that doesn't mean possession of evidence of a crime is comparable to the crime itself.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:34:27 2013 No.10353616

>>10353538
What you may be seeing might be right but you're comparing apples and oranges
Having the image is itself bad. We're talking about Child Pornography here. I have no problem with discussing this at all; otherwise I wouldn't be here; but the problem is when you obtain the image and keep it you are not reporting it or whatever. The picture keeps on flowing throughout and that child's identity is just out there

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:36:27 2013 No.10353632 >>10353616 So what if there was perfect censoring of that child's identity? If their face and voice was covered up, and any distinguishing marks erased in postprocessing. What then?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:40:27 2013 No.10353644 >>10353632 The child still went through what you are seeing. You keep on distributing so it's therefore "okay" to keep watching it meaning it's therefore "okay" for the child to keep going through that

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:43:27 2013 No.10353654 File: 54 KB, 1280x720, screenshot-2013-01-12-23h40m15s188.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Didnt the loli ban get passed in nip-land? Is this why there arent any good shows like Mitsudomoe?

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:47:27 2013 No.10353668

>>10353644
>"okay" to keep watching it meaning it's therefore "okay" for the child to keep going through that.

Let's apply this logic generically:
If there is some indecent x with photographic evidence, possession of that evidence implies the indecent is justified. Furthermore, possession of the evidence should be punished.

Do you agree with that statement?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:48:27 2013 No.10353673 >>10353644 That's the most retarded thing I've ever heard. That's like saying every time you watch the titanic you're saying it's okay for hundreds of people to die.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:50:27 2013 No.10353680 >>10353668 >indecent I mean incident. I should clarify, by incident, I mean illegal incident.

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:53:27 2013 No.10353692

>>10353668
Don't waste your time. There is no real way to prove that possessing child porn hurts the victim unless you shove it in their face.

The reasoning of people goes as follows.

1. Any sexual relation with children is rape
2. Anyone who enjoys watching others get raped is a sicko
3. Sickos deserve to be in prison.

The rest is just window dressing.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:55:27 2013 No.10353697 >>10353668 Yes. I don't think that it's good for a person to have pictures of child pornography at any time

>>	Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:55:28 2013 No.10353700 >>10353673 Please understand that we are applying this to child pornography. You're also comparing oranges and apples

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:58:27 2013 No.10353706

>>10353692
Whatever, you guys can keep thinking that way.
I'm not letting go of that, that I think child pornography is just plain wrong.
I'll stick with what I believe but just because I'm viewing that with what you said doesn't mean I view everything like that

Anonymous Sat Jan 12 23:59:27 2013 No.10353708
File: 301 KB, 1681x1400, bank_robbery_in_prospect_suspect_photo_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>10353697
>yes
Just to clarify, that was a generic statement which would be applied to all such cases. If it cannot be applied to all such cases, you must provide reasoning.

But anyways, that would mean if you had a photo/video of a robbery, you support robbery and should be punished.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 00:02:28 2013 No.10353715 >>10353708 Well no in that case no. You have the rule of thumb there and I will admit defeat so I give my hand to you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 00:03:27 2013 No.10353720 >>10353715 Well, if you come up with anything, please post.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 00:11:27 2013 No.10353738 >>10353720 Please? Had fun discussing? You bring up good points and I hadn't talked with anyone about this like that so thanks

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 00:26:28 2013 No.10353776

>>10353451
>Likewise, when the face of a child is superimposed on a sexually explicit photo, even though
that child never participated in any sexual act, the distribution of the altered image arguably produces a
similar effect.
This is retarded. This is actually and truly retarded. This is honest to goodness, the writer should kill themselves retarded. This is dumber than saying drawings hurt fictional children because maybe they WERE traced. This is bordering on incomprehensibly retarded.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 01:24:27 2013 No.10353956
File: 653 KB, 1500x2000, 3cf4f0ff5985b56b3ec5d330e4a86c90.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

sheesh. i leave the thread for a few hours and you guys quit posting loli again.

>>10353776
yep, let's shoop shirley temple's face on sasha grey's body and, presto, shirley temple has now been traumatized as a child.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 01:44:27 2013 No.10354018 >>10353451 MOST cp is created by the kids themselves because their parents bought them a webcam. Who the fuck is the victim here?

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 01:51:27 2013 No.10354034

Our society thinks that there's some kind of "market" of CP where pedos buy it, allowing it to keep existing. Also, the child molesters who make the CP are actually pedophiles and love them, so they rape them. Makes total sense. But they don't do it because it feels good, they do it for the money and would stop if no one bought it. Also, 90% of CP is sex and rape and all that shit.

The reality is that no one buys anything, anyone can get it for free (hell, it's the only way) and you can download tons of it without helping the molester in any way. The child molesters don't love children, they are often fat losers who can't get women and rape kids instead, do it because they like sex and would keep doing it even if they didn't upload the CP to the internet. Also, most CP is just kids being camwhores. Seriously. Kids. A shitload of 9 year olds showing it all without anyone forcing them.

But NO ONE can say the truth and crush society's delusion, because if you know the truth that means that you watch CP and it's illegal. And since it's illegal, you are a bad person and deserve to go to jail.

Fuck this world.

(This was posted by another anon in a different IB, I'm not him, etc.)

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 02:22:27 2013 No.10354143

>>10354034
>(This was posted by another anon in a different IB, I'm not him, etc.)

Doesn't really matter who posted it. Dude's completely, objectively correct.

As an aside, I can not fathom how retarded you would have to be to believe that stupid bullshit about how "viewing an image of CP is tantamount to abusing the child all over again forever and ever."

Goddamn that is fucking stupid. How idiotic do you have to be to even believe that kind of shit?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 02:33:27 2013 No.10354192 >>10354143 it's called scaremongering. works well on people who don't think critically.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 02:42:27 2013 No.10354223 >>10354192 That's why democracy is retarded. It's too fucking easy to brainwash the masses into thinking what you want. Their votes shouldn't count and only intelligent, good natured and open-minded people should be allowed to rule a country.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 02:44:27 2013 No.10354227 File: 51 KB, 426x388, 1170986984295.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>10353956 Sorry, that other thread is sapping our loli. Even that Galge.com guy is posting with those trannies instead of us.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 02:51:28 2013 No.10354244

>>10354018
>MOST cp is created by the kids themselves because their parents bought them a webcam. Who the fuck is the victim here?

I used to say that, I don't think many have really been busted over that. Occasionally if it's something public like stickam, they'll be like "pedo men enticing young girls to strip naked!" But no one's ever been arrested for looking at youtube and I can't think of any incidents of private conversations or omeagle or skype or gaia or whatever. I don't think they actually care about stuff like that, as long as it's not like some girl emailing pics of herself to her whole school.

Never forget there's caveats like "she doesn't look 12" and "I was seduced/blackmailed" that have happened and gotten people off. More likely I don't think they give a fuck about ambiguously aged girls taking their own clothes off. No 5 or 8 year old is going to give you a strip show or anything.

Except that one ugly loli cam whore that was on /b/ a long time ago, but they found out her school and got her arrested or something so that crisis was averted.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:05:42 2013 No.10354284 File: 654 KB, 960x544, CG007.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:16:27 2013 No.10354308

So I Googled 'pedophile' to see what the results were. On the first page was a link to some 'Profile of a Pedophile' site. Some of these things (which I will list) seem fairly unrelated to pedophilia. I won't be posting the whole lists to keep the size of this post down.

Single or with few friends in his age group.

He is often vague about time gaps in employment which may indicate a loss in employment for questionable reasons or possible past incarceration.

He has hobbies that are child-like such as collecting popular expensive toys, keeping reptiles or exotic pets, or building plane and car models.

Is it just me or are those things just unrelated? Model building simply isn't a childish hobby, time gaps in emplyoment history is most likely an indicator of laziness, and not everybody enjoys having a ton of friends. This doesn't happen, but quite frankly, as a bit of a nerd, I'm actually offended.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:23:27 2013 No.10354324

>>10354308
You can't find anything about pedophilia on the internet.

Everything, everything is a lie. Every study ever done about it is full of misconceptions and extremely biased. There isn't a single article which talks coherently about this topic.

It makes me want to watch the world burn.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:23:27 2013 No.10354325 >>10354308 these are similar characteristics they apply to killers and such anyone who deviates from the norm is considered strange and dangerous and is studied nothing new, really

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:26:27 2013 No.10354328

>>10354308
did that profile also mention that they typically have glasses and facial hair?

as an aside, why the hell did you use google to search for a term like that? be safe, and use a search engine that doesn't track you or log your search terms + ip address.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:28:27 2013 No.10354335

>>10354034
>>10354143
What about trading? This people often film their kids so that they can trade with other pedos pics and videos of their child, thus increasing the children that are abused.

What do you expect? It would be stupid if they'd legalize CP because viewing doesn't hurt the child, it's a chain.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:37:27 2013 No.10354350 >>10354328 It was a simple search for 'pedophile'. I don't think it means much.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:44:28 2013 No.10354362 >>10354350 A good member of society would never search for such a disgusting term. The mere sight of that word would make them vomit. So you must be some kind of pervert with dangerous ideas! That's what Google must think, at least.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:51:28 2013 No.10354374

>>10354335
The percentage of assholes who do that is really small. Children show their bodies and have fun, some perverts record and upload it to a place where the average normal will never be able to enter without a specific program, so no harm is done to the child's pride.

The adults involved in these things are very few compared to the innocent camwhores. And they all get caught eventually.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:54:27 2013 No.10354381 >>10354374 I really don't think all those toddlers and elementary kids are showing their bodies for fun. Middle school and up, yeah sure. But with the really young kids, there is definitely someone behind it, and it is definitely against their will.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:54:28 2013 No.10354382 >>10354350 well if it's all the same to you, then fine. i'll admit i have a high paranoia level.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 03:55:28 2013 No.10354385

>>10354335
>What about trading?

What about it? Trading pictures has absolutely nothing to do with the belief that simply viewing an image of child pornography will, magically, harm the child repeatedly.

Furthermore, the children who get filmed usually give their consent to be filmed in such a manner. How is that abuse?

>It would be stupid if they'd legalize CP because viewing doesn't hurt the child, it's a chain.

By your logic, legalizing CP would reduce this "chain" and therefore reduce the amount of children being "abused." So, legalizing it would be an incredibly smart thing we should do right this minuteness.

This ignores, of course, the fact that legalized CP laws has a direct correlation with lessened child molestation, in general.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:00:27 2013 No.10354404 >>10354381 No, there are a lot of kids from 8 to 12 years old doing that by themselves. There's no one behind it, you'd realize it if you were able to download some without the FBI breaking into your house. I'm clean, btw. Don't even try, Hansen.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:03:27 2013 No.10354421

>>10354335
>What about trading
Even if no one in the planet wanted to trade videos with them, they would still rape kids.

I mean, wake up! They don't do it for the money or for trading, they do it because they like it. Filming the whole thing and trading it isn't the purpose of the rape at all. It would still happen even if it wasn't filmed.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:03:28 2013 No.10354415

>>10354404
Okay, yeah, it's totally the little 8 year old girl doing up to her father and saying, "Hey Daddy, I want you to take pictures of me naked in sexual positions while I look obviously uncomfortable. And then I want you to rape me, film it, and upload it to the internet so all your friends can enjoy it too!"

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:03:28 2013 No.10354416 /jp/ - loli lets have 3 loli threads on page 1! bump

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:09:27 2013 No.10354435

>>10354415
>Hey Daddy
No adults involved.

>Take pictures
Shitty pictures taken by the girl herself.

>uncomfortable
No one is forcing her, she is giggling the whole time because there are people watching her naked body from some russian videochat thingy. She doesn't even know about the deep web, goddamit.

>rape
She can't rape herself.

Stop talking like you know anything at all about this, please. Everything you can hear from anyone is a complete lie, it's incredible.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:10:27 2013 No.10354439 >>10354435 Oh? And how do you know what CP is actually like? How are you so sure that the only CP that exists in the world is all created by the kid him or herself?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:13:28 2013 No.10354446 >>10354439 >the only CP that exists in the world The majority of it. See why this is a dead end? Everyone keeps twisting the truth but no one can legally see it by themselves. What the fuck.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:15:27 2013 No.10354458

>>10354446
You didn't answer my question as to why you're so sure that the majority of CP is made by the kid him or herself. How do you know if, in your own words, no one can know because it's illegal? How are you so positive that everyone is wrong about CP except you?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:17:27 2013 No.10354463 >>10354458 Why are you so mad at me all of a sudden? And what do you know about this? I'm certainly more informed than you.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:19:27 2013 No.10354468

>>10354463
And again, WHY are you more informed than me?

I'm not mad, I'm frustrated. You're acting like a conspiracy theorist. Like, the whole world perpetuated this myth about CP for some reason. That it's really not bad at all, no kids are hurt, everyone else is biased except me, even though I'm acting totally biased.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:20:27 2013 No.10354472

>>10354458
You're both talking about the completely opposite ends of the spectrum, here. Extremes are usually not based in any sort of reality.

Regardless, that guys perspective is certainly closer to correct than the absolutely absurd and idiotic "all children who participate in cp are forced and raped" idea you're vomiting all over the board.

Please, for the sake of all reasonable men on the planet, do a little research before you open you mouth.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:21:27 2013 No.10354474 >>10354468 Is it really so hard to understand? Just think about it for a while.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:22:27 2013 No.10354476 >>10354474 Why won't you just admit you like and have looked at and probably have CP then? Is it because your bias in favor of CP will be exposed?

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:25:27 2013 No.10354479

>>10354476
If he admit he had 99999999999999999999999999999999999999 images of CP on his computer at this moment in time, what the FUCK would that change?

If anything, that'd give him more credibility than some idiot that can not see the absolutely disgusting hatemongering that goes on in the world for pedophiles.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:25:28 2013 No.10354481 >>10354472 HOW do you know what is closer to correct? You admit it too, you criminal!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:28:27 2013 No.10354486 >>10354479 You know what I find disgusting? Little kids being molested against their will. Little kids being abused, then having that haunt them for the rest of their life.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:31:27 2013 No.10354490 >>10354486 Me too, brother. Rape is not okay. If they are not 100% with you, then you should stop immediately. This is not the case a good majority of the time.

Anonymous Sun Jan 13 04:39:28 2013 No.10354507

>>10354486
I find it disgusting too, because I actually love children. You only find it disgusting because that's how you are supposed to feel.

>Little kids being molested against their will
This is rare and doesn't happen that often.

>having that haunt them for the rest of their life
Yeah, because sending them to dozens of psychologists and making them feel even more like shit (if they even felt bad to begin with) doesn't hurt them. Riiiiight.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 07:21:27 2013 No.10354836 I want normalfags to leave.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jan 13 12:26:23 2013 No.10355773 >>10354486 Can't both be disgusting?

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture