/jp/ - Otaku Culture

They aren't disgusted by lolis, they're disgusted by lolicons.

I don't think anyone is seriously against incest, just that it is generally illegal. Probably anyone would fuck their step-sibling if they were hot.

Are perverts just pretending to be turned on by piss or are they really that disgusting?

What is your picture from, OP?

>>9718540
I really am turned on by piss, but I do understand that it's unusual. Wanting to fuck your relatives and cute things with vaginas, on the other hand, just seems entirely natural to me. It confuses me when normals blow up anyone who shows interest in those things.

>>9718542
Real Imouto

>>9718562
Good taste.

>>9718532
Are /jp/ers just pretending to be greatly confused by normals (to feel special/superior?) or are their brains really so defective?

>>9718574
They're the ones who are always acting superior to my kind of people everywhere I go on the internet. I just wanted to vent about it a little. They really piss me off sometimes.

>>9718588
And what is "your" kind of people you're speaking of?

>>9718588
People you see on the internet are not "normals"

Perhaps you are meeting "moralfags"

>>9718609
Like-minded individuals who don't feel the need to tote some sort of moral superiority about everything and who are instead honest about their desires.

>>9718612

They're both scum. Almost as bad as those Christian extremists you see telling everyone they're going to hell.

>>9718620
Attaching greater value to desires while despising morals really is just another moral system.
And you're the one sounding arrogant here.

>>9718638
I don't despise morals, it's just that some of their morals are plain stupid. What's with this sacred code of what you can and can not stick your dick in? Even crazier is that some of them would like to restrict what people FANTASIZE about putting their dick in. It's absolutely ridiculous.

>>9718638
What bothers me most of all, though, is when people lie about who they are, what they want, and how they feel in order to be "politically correct." It's understandable if you're talking to someone in person, but even doing that shit on the internet? Come on.

My friend told me he saw a video of an 11 year old camwhoring and masturbating and said he was really disgusted. When I asked why, he could not give a satisfactory answer beyond "cause it's gross" or something of the sort. I'm pretty sure they are all in denial.

Sorry for being such an idiot, but can you give me a link to the download of Real Imouto?

Incest is gross and I'm not even a normal

>>9718689
Why?

yeah im disgusted by women without tits

>>9718693
Because I actually have a sister

>>9718700
easy on the projecting

>>9718700
Ah yes, I'm sure all the people that enjoy mother-child incest are orphans too.

>>9718700
I have two sisters and I love brother-sister incest.

>>9718707
>>9718705
>>9718708
I couldn't have answered differently, it's just all there is to it for me.

>>9718700
So do I, but it's not like my fantasies involve her in any way (shes older too). I just find incest to be hot in general.

>>9718649
Stupid? Common morals (and common sense, honestly) are meant to preserve society as a whole. Of course you can't fuck 9 years old children, because it will ruin their lives. Of course brothers aren't allowed to fuck their sisters, because that would spawn tons of birth defects and invariably instate some sort of nasty, base-raped family hierarchy.

Those "rules" have the same goal as "killing is wrong". Even if I absolutely wouldn't mind shooting a random stranger because I don't give a care about them, and even if the sole thing that restrains me is the fear of getting arrested, I can still understand this train of thought just fine. The concepts of "others" and "society" don't have enough importance for me to absorb those rules as morals, but at least I'm aware I have the wrong mindset, whereas the "normals" ARE right.
Whether you like it or not, we are all forced to live in a societal world from our very births. And it makes much more sense if you adapt to it, and even come to like it, to the point where it becomes natural to want to protect it.

>>9718715
>because that would spawn tons of birth defects
No it wouldn't. It would just increase the presence of genetic traits they both shared.

>>9718730
Which in turn will make the recessive genes that cause defects more likely to appear

>>9718734
Only if they have them and only through generations.

>>9718730
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inbreeding

>>9718715
Also
>Of course you can't fuck 9 years old children, because it will ruin their bodies

Fixed that one too. Sex doesn't ruin lives unless it results in pregnancy or was legitimate rape.

Social constructs.
There are probally much more people who would fuck their hot sister or have lewd thoughts about lolis but of coursr they'll keep that secret since there is no reason to come out

>>9718678
If I would have to talk with anyone about that kind of things I would watch my back too.

I met someone who was really naive and childlike and knew most of my secrets and I had forbid her to use the word pedophile or when we met outside.

>>9718746
You really think a 9 y/o girl is going to tell you "go ahead and destroy my hymen, I'll be just fine"?
You really think a 9 y/o boy is going to enjoy having an adult cock shoved in his anus?
The only instance where it wouldn't be rape is if you trick the child into it, but in any case they have no idea what having sex really implies and they will greater suffer through it.

>>9718532
For you, OP:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepcha_people

>>9718760
>implying 'dick in vagoo/anus' is the only way to have sex
>implying only men are attracted to 9-year olds

>>9718766
LOLOL YOU SURE TROLLED HIM GOOD XDDDDD

>>9718760
When I was 9, I was VERY aware of what sex meant, and I don't thing I would've been too adverse to the idea of being inside a girl.

Not that I was abused or anything - I wasn't. It's just that my parents didn't lie to me about shit, and I knew how babies were made before I even started going to preschool, and I was an inquisitive and heavy reader with a big home library, so... yeah, not all kids have to be forced or tricked into fucking. They might have just been smarter than you were at that age.

>>9718760
I didn't say it wouldn't hurt, I said it wouldn't ruin their lives unless it traumatized them. That is, if they were kicking and screaming to get away and the like.

Not being able to consent isn't the same as rape and doesn't imply that they will become traumatized by it, even though it would probably hurt (I say, probably, because you apparently didn't consider an adult female and young male/female, which wouldn't cause any damage either)

>>9718540
>step-sibling
>incest

This is the most infuriating shit, man. Not blood related, not incest.

>>9718787
Still carries the exact social stigma, I guess.

When I was a boy, my cousin and I who aren't blood related messed around a little bit. We never actually had sex, it was more like playing doctor kind of shit. But when her mother found out I was in trouble and there were times where she would be nervous about leaving us alone together and she would generally treat me like a huge pervert and that kind of fucked me up and made me feel really self loathing about it for a number of years before I stopped caring. So, sometimes it really is the stigma that is more damaging than the act is what I'm trying to say I guess.

they need to fit with society rules

we dont

>>9718784
You're perfectly right, we should revise the Constitution. From now pedophilia is legal for adult women (but without strap-ons!). Oh and you can suck their balls and massage their clits with vibrators too.

And FYI, you CAN develop a trauma even if there's no physical pain involved, just from the weirdness / the fear of the unknown, or even something insignificant.
Children minds are much more sensitive to what's happening to them. I have several bad memories about stuff that I would completely ignore if it happened to me nowadays, yet I keep remembering them regularly just because they were made at a young age (and no, I'm not the only one like that).

>>9718819
>without strap-ons
Where's the fun in that?

Fuck your shit! Outlaw fo' life!

>>9718759
>>9718678
If you have those kinds of interests, why would you ever even tell them to anyone? That's asking for trouble.

Hell, even telling people about loli/shota is too much. It's sad, but you can't be 100% honest with people in the world we currently live in.

To answer OPs question, it's because of social conditioning.

>>9718819
>massage their clits with vibrators too.

That should be legal. Masturbation is neither sex nor painful

>you CAN develop a trauma even if there's no physical pain involved, just from the weirdness / the fear of the unknown, or even something insignificant.

If you're that kind of person, then you're going to develop a trauma no matter when you start having sex.

>(and no, I'm not the only one like that).
Nor do your personal experiences speak for everyone (or anyone) else.

>>9718819
You know that the majority of history considered that to be normal, right?

And the start of puberty is when people are the most horny. People just shouldn't fuck up their lives, but people have masturbated and done stuff throughout the ages.

Of course, the main problem is that people tend to see ephebophilia as pedophilia even though it's not the same thing.
Yes, pedophilia is actually a big no-no because it can cause permanent damage to their genitalia and they have no desire for any of that stuff at that stage.
Ephebophilia however is just natural. Social constructs might promote the idea that it's better to hold of such acts until later when the parties involved are more mature, which may very well be an incredibly wise idea. But people shouldn't fool themselves into thinking that ephebophilia isn't normal.

>Anyone who doesn't regular 12chan is now a normal

No wonder /jp/ has become so shitty.

>>9718838
>That should be legal. Masturbation is neither sex nor painful
Sigh. OBVIOUSLY, if people are allowed to do that, they will crave for more and WILL end up doing more. Just like you're not allowed to keep a nuclear bomb in your house, even if you're not planning to use it.

>Nor do your personal experiences speak for everyone (or anyone) else.
There are tons of similar reports everywhere. Whether its a stupid emo blog, in a therapy session or some random student I talked with, I met tons of them, and I'm sure you did as well.

Oh well, I give up. You're either totally unable to see the whole picture by yourself, or you're simply trolling.
You win ; now, back to watching "WHO IS IMOUTO?".

>3D lolis don't hate it when I fondle them! They actually enjoy it! >There's no damage being done because everybody is horny at that age!

how i psychology

>>9718878

I did as well what? I knew what sex was when I was 9. I jacked off all the time when I was 9. I also don't remember being traumatized by anything either. I was burned quite a few time by happenstance, but I'm not scared of hot objects. I also received a few bad chemical burns from a pool which made me wary of pools, but "I would completely ignore if it happened to me nowadays" is not something I would say about that. Don't project onto me.

>>9718883

<psychology/psychiatry
>Implying they hold any legitimate authority over any subject or that what they think matters.

>>9718883
Refer to (>>9718764).

But yeah, whatever you learned in your psychology class must be absolute truth, no exceptions! You should write a post on Reddit about it with your fellow like-minded intellectuals.

>>9718905
Normals are ethical absolutists, it's no use.

>>9718905
>all psychology is corrupt and it's a massive conspiracy! back to reddit

Piss off, /v/.

>>9718918
Hahaha, that's exactly what I said, "bro". Thanks for misusing the quote function to paraphrase something I never implied!

>>9718878
>Sigh. OBVIOUSLY, if people are allowed to do that, they will crave for more and WILL end up doing more.
Nice slippery slope.
You sound like those fanatic religious sandniggers in the middle east.
Please stay in the middle east.

>>9718942
what's wrong with that, you liberal scum

Why isn't this psychiatry-trolling retard banned yet.

>>9718942
oh yeah, i'm not the >>9718878 by the way
me >>9718959

>>9718959
Nothing as long as you stay in the middle east.
Enjoy the oppression.

>>9718897
>I met tons of them, and I'm sure you did as well.
>met
>did
Those words are so close, yet sooo hard to connect.
Really? Like, really?

Besides you're not the only one in the world. Laws are made for the masses, not just the few rare children who somehow wanted to stick their wee wee in the honey pot at age 9.

>>9718975
His post is perfectly grammatically correct. Independent of whatever argument you're having, you're a retard.

>>9718962
Why aren't whiny little shits like you banned yet?

>>9718973
actually, i'm not from middle east
those people take their religion too seriously, i dont like it

>>9718980
I wasn't referring to the grammar. You just ridiculed yourself. I was merely pointing out his misunderstanding. Besides the post I quoted was MY post to begin with, ha.
That's where I should say "You're the retard", I guess.

>>9719001
>Besides the post I quoted was MY post to begin with, ha.
That's not what it looked like. I guess I should follow the backlinks in these shitfests more carefully.

>>9718764
So this is the only person who brought up an interesting bit of information, yet everyone almost ignores it. This leads me to doubt wither it's just the act itself of sex on a child, or how we in society raise us that it's horrifying.

>>9718980
You wouldn't type that if you've read his easily-identifiable posts. Step up or shut up, dweeb.

>>9719009
Humans can tolerate almost anything, so long as they believe it's normal. This is as true of having sex with children as it is of spending every day hunched over a hunk of metal and plastic.

>>9719009
>>9718764
BUT LOOK AT THAT FACE
I DON'T WANNA LOOK LIKE THAT

>>9718863
/jp/ has always been like this.

Back to >>>/v/ newfriend.

>>9718532
I like to think my tool as ultra functional since it can work in extreme conditions.

>>9718746
holy shit you're actually using the term legitimate rape seriously

>>9719009
I expect it's mostly a societal thing, but the issue is that we don't have enough data to be able to make a judgement with any degree of certainty, and the only way to acquire such would be potentially horrifically unethical.

When it's a toss-up between "We ban something that might be harmful to children in case it is" vs. "We risk harming a large number of children to know if it is or not" most people will go with the former because it minimizes potential harm. While I, personally, might hold the belief that the view is (at least in some respects) erroneous, I'm not willing to take the risk that I'm wrong and end up advocating something which could well be ultimately harmful for the sake of a freedom that we don't really need to engage in anyway.

Hell, if it's not harmful to kids, they're the ones who lose out the most, what with being stripped of the right to have sex because we think they'll hurt themselves. But we take that attitude with a bunch of things, on the grounds that it's better to prevent some of them coming to harm than it is to give them freedoms that a number of them may not be able to deal with adequately.

>>9719176
>>9719024
>>9719009
>beginning at age 10 or 11 and lasting throughout their lives
ahahaha https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
thats barely even pedophilia, and nothing if theyre the same age! sex is recreational in most any, nay, ALL societys without shortage of food or other resources like christians who were almost and should have been wiped out 500 years ago by famine
>those chinese tribes with no notion of marrage who raised kids communily (until ironically the communists forced marrage on them)
or indian brothers marrying the same woman from the begining of time

>>9719176
ROFLMAO
>implying you're not authortarian
>the sake of a freedom that we don't really need to engage in anyway.
yeh, its not like freedom is something we actually NEED or anything >.<

>>9718532
Sauce

>>9719176
>implying you're not an absolute-ist
> it's better to prevent some of them coming to harm than it is to give them freedoms that a number of them may not be able to deal with adequately.

>>9719199
> its not like freedom is something we actually NEED or anything
>a freedom
>the freedom to fuck small children
>something we actually NEED

We seem to be doing fairly well without it, man.

>>9719202
sure, give me 3 examples why please thx

Real children are dumb as hell. It is manipulative and a waste of time for people to go after little children when they could be normal and court someone their age capable of safer reproduction. I think that's how they see it.

>>9719206
That was more a comment on how society tends to structure laws and decisions relating to children. As in "Sure, X might be fun, but SOME OF THEM COULD HURT THEMSELVES so everyone is banned forever from doing this".

>>9719208
I'm confused. You want 3 examples of why we don't need to be allowed to have sex with children in order for society to function?

>>9719202
1 for no, and not deliberaltely arguing FOR, just devils advocate coz everything needs evidence, but the fact that their 4/5 y/os do what they do theres no evidence in that article that it has an adverse effect on any individual, though if conventional thinking is correct, it should not only have that effect, but should also corrupt the society to a large degree

>>9719216
no, 3 examples why having sex young AT ALL is harmful

>>9719218
>>9719210
though in this context, there seems to be little contact of adults and children sexually, making the only difference with our society is we have formal rules for children like sex w/in 2 years of their own age and responsibility of adults for sexual exposure or any many diff kinds to pre pubescents, escentially making it illegal for anyone under 16 to have sex under 90% of circumstances

>>9719228
sorry, i mean 3 egs of why society is not better off with it on the whole

>>9719218
Oh, I totally agree, anon. It's good evidence that the negative effects are from the general effects of cases where people force themselves on kids combined with the social outlook of "Do you feel bad? You should feel bad, that was terrible! Something terrible was done to you! It's ok to feel bad; feeling bad is normal and you're normal!"

My point there was simply that to get anything equating to enough proof of such that a change in general outlook could be enacted, would necessarily require something that would be rejected on the grounds of the belief it's trying to disprove.

We can't gather evidence that a crime isn't harmful by committing the crime, because that just gets the people involved locked up and any outcomes invalidated by the pressures that cause the whole thing in the first place.

>>9719230
Ah, yeah. Sorry, I seem to have horribly fucked up my point there. My bad.

I'm not trying to say that it's inherently harmful, or even that society wouldn't be better off in general if it were permitted, but this is granting the assumption that it isn't harmful to kids, and that the general belief held by society is wrong.

While I, personally, agree on that point, it's not one that can be changed by gathering proof, for reasons I stated in >>9719236. It's a pain in the ass, but it basically comes down to the general view of society, and the people in charge of legislating this stuff, being that it's better (in their opinion) that kids not have sex in case it's harmful.

Of course, they take any evidence that corroborates their view as unassailable fact, and reject any oppositional claims by decrying anyone who disagrees with them as a child molester. Which is a rather efficient tactic for utterly swamping debate, when accusations alone are enough to get a person killed in some places.

>>9719236
>Do you feel bad? You should feel bad
When you think about it, you could traumatize a child with a lot of stupid lies. You could tell your offspring that eating ice cream is evil and sends them to hell and they would absolutely believe that.

Lolis really are horny, trust me. If it wasn't for morality I'd have done it with at least 5 of my little cousins, you'd surprised to see how easily they rub this against that when you're leaning with a lazy air on a sofa. Especially one, I had to brush her away fast, several times, before anyone notice what she was doing on me, she almost rape me when I think about it.

>>9719210
Kids don't have to be dumb (I'm sticking to the ~ puberty age types that have been the topic. I don't mean like 5 year olds.)

It's more the lack of education and trying to hide sex and responsibility from them. Deciding whether or not you want a dick inside you isn't rocket science and your only ignorance of it is the lack of being told about it by anyone. Somehow it's become some sort of big deal life choice in modern societies, and it's become fashionable to keep people ignorant of life as long as possible.

I mean, shit, even dogs can make that kind of decision, and a dog's first time involves finding out they're stuck to their partner by means of a huge bulb for a while.

Also courting people is manipulation. It's just not wrong anymore past a certain age. If you gave a 12 year old a drink to convince her to fuck you, it's horrific, but it's fine for a 30 year old for example. It's more like taking advantage of ignorance than manipulation if they don't know what sex is. Anything else, you could do to an adult and be just as wrong.

Daily reminder.

http://translate.google.com/#en/ja/pedophile

>>9719258
"You know how sometimes, in the middle of the night, you can hear the house creak? It's not monsters, don't worry. It's just the floorboards screaming as they remember the pain of being cut apart alive and nailed back together. Sweet dreams."

>>9719279
OH GOD.

>>9719278
Use the suggestion form and change it to something else yourself. Google translate is not an official encyclopedia, it's wiki-tier.

>>9719282
Why do you type like a woman?

>>9719288
/jp/'s writing style is 60% feminine.

>>9719293
そう　ですわ。

Look at all this greentext, stupid shit like thx and emotes. These normals don't even try to hide they're from somewhere else.

>>9719293
There's a difference between feminine and tumblr blogging.

>>9719288
I'm sure you swallow like a woman
*unrobes phallus*

>>9719302
I don't see any tumblr blogging in here.

Not that I don't see a lot of shitty posts, but I don't see the blogging.

>>9719302
Given that I have no idea what you mean by "tumblr blogging" and don't even know what tumblr is other than some website that causes people to type "＞tumblr" when they see images with names such as tumblr102_10329131.jpg, it's safe to say I already won this fight.

owned8lyfe, nerd. (the 8 is like infinity, so you are owned forever).

>>9719328
ok

Fuck that shit, let's have a peeing thread again.

>>9719334
God I haven't seen this posted in a while.

Sage for off-topic

Test.

>Deleting piss images
>Not the thread

>>9719457
The report queue shows single posts.

>>9719457
It's not specified by the OP if he's talking about 2D or 3D, so it can be related.

>and invariably instate some sort of nasty, base-raped family hierarchy

Nope.

>Sex is a common recreation for the Lepcha, beginning at age 10 or 11 and lasting throughout their lives. Extra-marital sex is expected and not viewed as a problem. During the harvest festival time, the Lepcha produce homemade liquor to enhance the harvest. At this time, 4- and 5-year olds mimic copulation with each other, at the encouragement of their elders.

SOUTHWESTERN BHUTAN FUCK YEAAAAH!

It's like they are litteraly living in a doujin.

>>9719457
Who are you quoting?

>>9719519
It's funny because countries on that region are among the happiest, yet poorest, in the world.

source: just go google "nepal + happiest"

I'm a normalfag and I like loli and incest...

>>9719579
why do you say you're a normalfag?

Well it mostly seems like people just dont want to be criticized by society and stuff, like in 'ancient' Sparta, incest was normal to preserve the 'pure blood'.
Im into incest, tho not mother-son, and lolis, like the one in my class, and other things, but if I go and tell people they would criticize me, even more as I have a sister, so I guess people avoid the 'reality' so they dont get annoyed by others? :|

>It's funny because countries on that region are among the happiest, yet poorest, in the world.

Who wouldn't when you have illimited access to snoo-snoo with little girls and milfs? (If possible at the same time)

>>9719590
This has been bugging me for a while. Is there a concrete definition of ``normalfag'' or is it something like gensokyo i.e, everyone has their own version?

>>9719943

I'm pretty sure normalfags don't wish to violently defile little girls/boys, rape schoolgirls, fuck traps and be a little girl. The exact opposite of /jp/.

>>9719024
is that the guy from raid redemption?

>>9719966
does /jp/ actually want all of this? I'm not a regular here but I'm pretty weeaboo and none of that seems appealing. Maybe I'm not hardcore enough.

>>9719994
Not all of us are controlled by lust.

>none of that seems appealing.

Then you must leave and never come back.
Filthy normalfag.

>>9719997
Not all, but the vast majority is. So referring to that majority as the whole /jp/ is perfectly fine.

>>9718562
Okay i am looking for a torrent for "real imouto (ga iru ooizumi kun no baa)"but it seems that google has now started to block torrent search.
How do we find visual novel torrents now?

>>9720038
Sukebei

>>9720038
>google has now started to block torrent search.
That's terrible. I didn't know about this. What else are they blocking from their searches?

>>9720046
Tried Nyaa
>>9720048
They have started to block Pirate Bay and other torrent sites from search results

>>9720038
>google has now started to block torrent search.
Luckily, I only buy VNs.

>>9720059
Well some of us don't speak moon

>>9720038
Don't be an /a/-tier pleb, use Share or PD

>>9720067
Not all of them are in moons

>>9720070
>Share or PD
erm... whats that

>>9720079
You should probably delete your posts and go back to your homeboard.

And stop avatarfagging.

>>9720087
I'm sorry - not used to posting on /jp/.
I would appreciate a answer to this though:
>>9720079

>>9720091
Google "Share P2P" And "Perfect Dark P2P" A wealth of information awaits you. Do not come back until you master their usage.

>>9720057
>Google blocking
isn't it only from the autocomplete? I just googled a bunch of torrent-related stuff and it all seemed fine.

>>9720091
Don't worry, /a/sshole, I don't understand what the fuck he meant anyway.

>>9720105
If you're not samefagging, then maybe you should fuck off too.

Dude. I'm sorry is it really unreasonable to not know what share is?

>>9720126
It is for regulars of this board, unlike outsiders who most likely come to /jp/ to be spoonfed.

i see, thanks then

>>9720126
On this board? Yes.
On /a/? Probably not.

>>9720113
Wooooo, somebody playing the tough guy on 4chan. The only thing I hate more than /a/ssholes are these fucks on /jp/.

>>9720139
if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

>>9720146
I can play this cat and mouse with an internet tough guy all day.

>>9720153

>>9720126
They shouldn't be recommending it anyway since you're obviously looking for the English version.

Try erogedownload.

>>9720158

>>9720159
Thanks, at least some people are cool on this board.

>>9720178
fuck you fag

>>9720183
hai

Option 3, option 3!

What does a little sister's pee taste like?

>>9720238
>tasting pee
oh shit man, you don't want that. I did that thinking I was drinking water, I spit it out all across my room and had to fucking clean it. I keep my piss bottles near the water bottles and one day when I was reaching for a water bottle... I grabbed a one full of piss and just drank it, I realized it was piss when I tasted it.. fucking awful, it doesn't matter how strong your fetish is, you won't be able to taste it after you try it for the first time, believe me

>>9720265
Well, that's different though, and my fetish isn't pee, it's peeing-the arousing part is drinking it FROM the cute girl as she blushes and moans in embarassment but can't stop.

Not to mention pee isn't static. People who drink a lot of water have very clear and pure pee, whereas people who drink little liquid have yellow pee full of ammonia.

>>9720276
Somehow I got a boner, but drinking piss even if it's transparent as water.. that's hardcore, i'll leave that to you

Pee fetish, alright!
I started when I was a teenager. I was alone and pissing myself, but decided to masturbate in bed anyways. I was stroking and stroking, and then this urge to pee came. I said "to hell, I'm really close to coming, I'll hold back". I just proceeded, but I wasn't coming... I didn't want to lose my boner, so I went to the tub and decided to pee anyways. I was completely unsure but I was just brutally horny. I laid myself on the tub and grabbed my erect cock, and started forcing myself to pee. It wasn't coming, no matter how I tried, I involuntarily stopped. I decided to force myself, and I started pushing my muscles as if I was forcing myself to take a dump, and it came out, just a little though, because when I saw it coming, I stopped. It slid extremely warm on my hands, between my fingers and then my cock, warm, warm pee. I was still for a moment, and then, forced again, this time a squirt came out, and landed on my belly. God, the small drops heating my hand and the warm splash on my belly, deliciously sliding down on to the tub, I was hot. I started rubbing again. I forced myself while rubbing, and it came out, it landed on my nipples and a long mark on my belly.

Do you want to hear more?

>>9720306
Do continue

>>9720281
Tasting it isn't so bad and can be hot. But actually drinking non-trivial amounts? It's like drinking seawater. I don't know how people manage it without coughing it up.

>>9720318
It landed on my nipples, so warm and... out of place. It seemed wrong, and that turned me on a lot. It was pee, for god's sake. I'm loving it!
I then put aside any normal mentality, and held my cock high and forced. It came, and it was about to stop until I forced it to be flowing constantly. It started landing some on my knees, my nipples, very few drops on my face, and a lot landed deliciously on my belly, it was extremely warm, it tickled me and felt great, since it was coming out of my penis. I just kept rubbing and peeing, fast and warm drops climbing up my neck and then going down, it was ticklish and delicious. When I started feeling the stream sliding down my balls and going between my penis and anus, I was in climax. I started rubbing furiously, and then, it touched my anus, which made me cum.
I was full of semen and pee in my belly, and the tub had thin streams of pee on the corner.

I took a shower, and made sure to drink a lot of water.

>>9720336
I did something similar after I saw the Silvie peeing scene on Wanko.

>>9720328
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2115945/I-like-warm-pee--comforting-Meet-woman-drinks-bath
es-urine.html

Why

>>9718734
>Which in turn will make the recessive genes that cause defects more likely to appear

Le Sigh. Another casual who cannot into genetics.

Incest does not increase the frequency of deleterious genes. Indeed, moderate amounts can reduce the mutational load over time, but note this assumes a large overall population.

In the popular mind, Incest effects are often conflagrated with founder effects (since a population bottleneck often leads to inbreeding), which most certainly can increase frequency of deleterious genes.

However, note that inbreeding increases the phenotypic expression of deleterious genes. This is a very real risk for the individuals involved, but does not lead to genetic "degeneration" for the population as a whole.

>>9720448
ur a le faget

A text I got from my ex-gf / friend just now. "David" is her boyfriend with whom she just had a child.

>"David" got arrested this morning

>He had naked pornographic photos he took of his 15 year old gf on his computer

>I called the cops

What do, /jp/?

Normals don't get that some people make a distinction between 2D and 3D attractions so they make sweeping generalizations based on their own fetishes and perceptions.

>>9720486
He deserved it. Pedos like him should just rot in jail.

>>9720499
Some people also don't understand that attraction doesn't imply you'll rape anyone.

>>9720486
I think the problem isn't the pictures, it's having a girlfriend separate from his baby's mother.

>>9720511
I thought the pictures were of his current gf when she was 15

>>9720499
Pedophiles that draw arbitrary lines between attraction to 2D kids and 3D kids in an attempt to distance themselves from child rapists are annoying. When will they realize pedophiles and child molesters are not the same thing?

Just be honest with yourself.

>>9720524
Schrodinger's Child Molester never has to actually molest a child. because he's always quantum-molesting quantum-children

>>9720524
0/10. Is it that difficult for you to look at an image of, oh say... Kirino Kousaka and a picture of your average teenage girl and realize there is a dramatic difference in looks? Say whatever you want to make yourself feel better about yourself, but it's common sense.

>>9720507
I was just having a discussion about this the other day. It's a slippery slope. There's so much qualifying information required. Obviously, you can't police someone's thoughts. I've thought about killing someone before but I'm not going to do it, etc...

Like, OK. What is the personal definition of a loli in 2D? The typical anime girl age is between 13-16, which in most countries, is considered too young to make a responsible decision about sex. Which I agree with. People who take advantage of kids are awful. But does that suggest that everyone who looks at an Oreimo doujin is a pedophile? How about K-ON? Where do you draw the line. I think toddlercon shit is fuckin' creepy as HELL but in the end, it IS still a drawing, therefore... not criminal, imho.

I would really like to hear other people's perspectives on this.

>>9720578
Sorry, I don't pay much attention to trips, but is this guy a frequent troll, or something?

Liking Oreimo doesn't make you a pedophile but I would wager that most people who like oreimo are attracted to women.

I'd also wager that most people attracted to lolis are pedophiles.

>>9720604
here's some extra information on trolls since you are interested

hth

>>9720578
If I find drawn muscular men with nice meaty cocks attractive I'm not gay because they are just drawings, right?

>>9720604
No.

Pedophiles are those who are primarily attracted to pre-pubescent children. I would guess that most people who jack it to loli would probably find a pretty fifteen-year old as or more more attractive as a pretty eight-year old.

But, then, I can't really say.

>>9720604
>is this guy a frequent troll, or something?
You're new around here, huh? It's fine, though, man. We can continue our discussion.

>Liking Oreimo doesn't make you a pedophile but I would wager that most people who like oreimo are attracted to women.

-proves my point. I agree with you, by the way. That is YOUR perception of not only what constitutes pedophilia but also branding sexuality on ALL the people in your reference.

What did I say about sweeping generalizations?

>I'd also wager that most people attracted to lolis are pedophiles.

OK, but let's continue with Kirino. If liking that character doesn't make you a pedophile, then does it make you an ephebophile, which in the eyes of the world at large is tantamount to the same thing?

>>9718532
Sorry faggot but i just don't feel any kind of attraction to lolis
I love curvy womens, that's just how i am. Deal with it nerd

>>9720578
>I think toddlercon shit is fuckin' creepy as HELL but in the end, it IS still a drawing, therefore... not criminal, imho.

Nobody is arguing that drawings should be criminal, we're talking about the attraction towards drawings of children. It's the feeling of attraction towards prepubescent features that makes you a pedophile, whether it be 2D or 3D.

Please stop lying to yourself.

>>9720616
There's a difference. One is a man and one is a woman. Age is very nebulous in 2D. With gender, it's either you have a dick or you don't.

>>9720621
> I would guess that most people who jack it to loli would probably find a pretty fifteen-year old as or more more attractive as a pretty eight-year old.

[citation needed]

>>9720511
>>9720520

The pictures were of this 15 year old runaway he fucked a few years ago when he was like 26. She called the cops when she first found out about it, but I guess the cops didn't have enough information to press charges or something.

>>9720635
So if someone is attracted to 2D drawings of muscular men, they are gay. But if someone jacks off to drawings of 2 year old babies wearing diapers they are a perfectly normal heterosexual male that in no way has pedophilic tendencies?

Are "lolicons" this delusional?

>>9720638
Citation provided: Personal speculation, by me, today.

>>9720629

>>9720630
I disagree with this logic, since what people prefer in 2D isn't necessarily what they like in 3D. For example, many monster girl fetishists would probably be terrified by real live ones...especially if they're mutated human women.

And "prepubescent features" you mentioned probably involves eyes larger than hands, which isn't grounded in reality

>>9720630
>Please stop lying to yourself.

Please stop thinking for me, man. I'm totally fine with who I am and what I'm into, which just as an aside is NOT loli. You're the one who feels the need to pass your judgment and label people based on your perception of their fetishes.

I think you might have some unresolved inferiority issues. Why does this even matter to you?

>>9720641
>drawings of 2 year old babies wearing diapers
This isn't really what I'm talking about. The age of the subject of that drawing is what is attracting the viewer, not the art or beauty of the character. The age IS the fetish there.

In a lot of doujins, the age is kinda ancillary to everything else going on.

Reminder that if you want to fill this child's orifices with your sperm, that does not in any way mean you are a pedophile because it is just a drawing. You are a completely normal heterosexual male.

>>9720655
You should find a sexier picture of a slightly older child. I'm not really into ripping apart vaginas.

>>9720649
>And "prepubescent features" you mentioned probably involves eyes larger than hands, which isn't grounded in reality

Exactly. Or what if you, like me, just really like DFC? Or shaved pubic hair? A drawing of a 2D character with both of those attributes is LIKELY to be viewed as lolicon, when it's the physique that is attractive. Not the age.

>>9720654
>The age IS the fetish there.

Really? Because I was under the impression that lolis that are actually 300 years old was a common cliche in Japanese media. Try again.

>>9720649
> prepubescent features
I like lolis for their flat chests and small bodies. And the fact that they look cute and adorable and innocent. Normal sized girls with DFC aren't the same for me.

Notice how all of these things are shared by 3D lolis.

I feel like there's a lack of small-breasted non-loli porn out there.

Maybe I'm just looking in the wrong places.

>>9720677
No 300 year old loli is going to still wear diapers. Find me one and I will recant.

>>9720675
Speaking of this, I am annoyed as hell that it has been a trend on e-hentai/exhentai recently to label everything with girls that don't have breasts larger than their heads "lolicon". Jesus christ, not even DFC, pictures with breasts that would be considered big in real life are being labeled "loli".

>>9720685
What? The point isn't the diapers, it's the attraction to a young children which you claimed was a fetish based on age. Keep on trying to move the goalposts when you start to look like an idiot though.

>>9720685
CANON loli, that is. Not some fanon Flandre bullshit.

>>9720654
>The age of the subject of that drawing is what is attracting the viewer, not the art or beauty of the character
I can agree with this. On the rare occasions that I masturbate to toddlercon, what's usually fueling my pleasure is the thought of how ridiculously young the girl is, and not their appearance.

>>9720691
Oppai loli, or characters with breasts who are actually five heads tall?

When will /a/ leave? We have been over this 100 times before, lolicons are pedophiles. No, being a pedophile is not bad. No, it doesn't mean you want to rape kids.

>>9720694
Nice getting combative as you're getting served, bro. I'll keep going, though.

Diapers designate age unless we're creeping into a whole OTHER fetish and you know that's not what you meant.

Keep wafflin', bro.

>>9720678
>there's a lack of small-breasted non-loli porn out there.
There's lots of that! You just don't know where to look.
Here you go >>>>/cm/
>>>/hm/
>>>/y/

You can be attracted to twelve year old girls without being diagnosed as a clinical pedophile anyway.

These threads are always retarded.

>>9720705
The diaper is irrelevant you fucking retard, jesus. You made the claim that a fetish for age is the basis for attraction to young girls, but the fact that "300 year old lolis" are a common occurrence proves you are wrong.

>>9720703
Normals are taking over 4chan. They'll spread everywhere.

>>9720717
No, he didn't. He was talking about your particular example.

>>9720708
While the lack of breasts is a plus, they've got a certain other thing sticking out that I can't completely get into.

Y10NRDY once again proving he's a terrible poster.

>>9720682
Well, that's you; it doesn't make the line of logic sound.

While I don't know about loli since I'm not a lolicon, I am here because I thought this was a piss fetish thread, and that's a great example. I have a huge fetish for 2D girls peeing. I have no such fetish in real life. I like it because I can imagine their pee being pristine clean and only taste of their "essence"...whatever the hell that even means. It's not grounded in reality, and I have no desire to drink pee in real life.

In fact, a lot of traits I like in 2D are precisely what I would not like in real life. Things such as elven ears, blue hair, third eye...the entire appeal is that it's fantasy and we can imagine them being beautiful the way we want. There are in fact people in real life with mutations resulting in similar traits, and trust me, I have no desire to even see photos of them.

>>9720727
But penises are fucking delicious, man. And I'm not even gay.

>>9720731
I'm sorry, dicks are just something I can't really get into.

I'm clearly a lesbian or something.

>>9720717
>The diaper is irrelevant you fucking retard, jesus.

No, it's not. I'm sorry you have the mental acuity and articulation of an third-generation inbred, but calm the fuck down. Only three kinds of people wear diapers - babies, old people, and diaper fetishists.

The 300 year old so-called "loli" is a misnomer. If you are 300 years old, you are an old woman no matter what you look like. I allowed for the categorization because I thought we were talking about "that type of character" - not debating on whether that type of character is or isn't a loli.

But, no, technically, it is not.

>>9720727
>No, he didn't. He was talking about your particular example.

The diaper was merely an accessory to the fact that you're masturbating to a baby. If I added that the baby in question had brown hair would you idiots be harping on that detail too?

Whether or not the baby is wearing a diaper is fucking meaningless.

Everyday until you accept the truth.

http://translate.google.com/#en/ja/pedophile

>>9720719
Y10NRDY once again proving how easily he hands out ownage.

>>9720739
Since you're mentally retarded, I'll rephrase what I said.

"So if someone is attracted to 2D drawings of muscular men, they are gay. But if someone jacks off to drawings of 2 year old babies that are not in any way wearing a diaper, then they are a perfectly normal heterosexual male that in no way has pedophilic tendencies?

Are "lolicons" this delusional?"

>>9720746
Please stop samefagging, you are embarrassing yourself.

I can never tell what people are actually arguing about in these threads.

Is it "all people who enjoy lolicon pornography are pedophiles?" Or just "enjoying lolicon pornography and pedophilia are correlated?"

>>9720754
I'd go with the second as it's possible to be 2D only.

>>9720758
Well, they are almost certainly correlated, and I'm sure everyone can agree on that. So what is this little shitfest actually about?

>>9720754
>enjoying lolicon pornography and pedophilia are correlated

That's all I'm arguing, but Y10turbonerdy seems to have gotten himself into quite an uproar over the thought of being associated with evil pedophiles the media told him were bad people.

>>9720764
The strongest thing I've heard him argue is that some people are into 2D children but not 3D children. That isn't saying that all of them are, or even most of them.

>>9720765
> everyone can agree with that
Start this conversation on /a/ and see how wrong that is. /jp/ is more accepting of this fact but there are still people who disagree.

>>9720753
Maybe they have a sexual attraction to memes and can't resist Billy Herrington just because they automatically think of all the touhou remixes

>>9718532
Let me guess
Are you disgusted by huge tits?
Is your penis really so defective?
I'm pretty sure you are in denial, every single men on earth loves huge fucking tits and wide hips, is't in our blood.

I can feel that tripfag typing up a 20 page response as we speak, I can't wait to witness his rage.

Don't bully Nerdy, his answers are interesting to read.

>>9720753
>Since you're mentally retarded, I'll rephrase what I said.
Sorry you can't defend your position without getting mad, chief. Maybe you should stop posting.

No, I would say someone jacking off to a drawing of a baby is probably pretty pedo.

HOWEVER, there is a gray area on what is or isn't pedo. Someone jacking off to a Remilia doujin might NOT be...

Can you make that distinction? Or does the Asperger's make everything too black and white?

>>9720764
No, I'm not. I'm just making a distinction.

I don't really give a shit what people are into as long as they're not hurting anyone else. I've got pals who are exclusively into lolicon and it doesn't even register. It's artwork. It's cool.

If they told me they had a cellar full of actual children I would probably feel differently.

>>9720797
>Someone jacking off to a Remilia doujin might NOT be.
Behead those who degrade Remilia.jpg

>>9720797
So wanting to fuck a drawing of a 3 year old makes you a pedophile, wanting to fuck a drawing of a man makes you gay, but wanting to fuck an 8 year old loli has nothing even remotely to do with pedophilia? Is the cognitive dissonance you're experiencing painful?

Just admit that there is a strong correlation between liking loli and being a pedophile, and let's call it a day.

>>9720789
And here you are wrong.

I was going to say large breasts are great, but looking at your picture changed my mind. As a matter of fact, yes I may be if they're that large, because then I would feel they could be breast implants. I like naturally large breasts, but implants to me aren't real breasts. Many here are obsessed with virgininty, but to me implants are an even greater loss of bodily purity.

>>9720814

Well, I'd have to point out that a correlation is different than an absolute.

Again, take my example. There are people out there that like a certain body type that (especially in 2D) can easily share fandom with the lolicon. Doesn't necessarily make them lolicon.

I mean, do you really think that everyone who doesn't exclusively jack off to tittymonsters is a pedophile? I mean, really? Is that what you honestly think?

>>9718700
I have a younger sister. She's 11. I may be a little physically attracted to her, but she's a bit chubby (really a bit, I'm not trying to minimize bad traits while anonymous, or anything) and her personality makes her insufferable. She's rebelious and dumb and barely has any admiration or respect of me or our parents... I'm afraid she wasn't raised right.
But luck me, because I'm morally corrupt enough (or so I believe), if she were the perfect imouto, to sneak to her room at night while the parents are asleep and make some tender loving.
My dick is only 6", so it's not too small, and not too big to penetrate a developing pussy. Win-Win.
I am very afraid of persecution. That shit is nasty. I wouldn't want to go to jail. That's why I'm an Anarcho-Capitalist.

2D loli = pedo same
I don't get why anyone would say otherwise.

>>9720866
Of course you are still a pedo, the difference is that it doesn't matters because you don't go out to rape childs

>>9720866
You like 3D? Seriously, get the fuck out.

>>9720855
You too, creep.

>>9720833
>I mean, do you really think that everyone who doesn't exclusively jack off to tittymonsters is a pedophile? I mean, really? Is that what you honestly think?

I don't think I have implied that anywhere. There is a clear difference between a 50 year old woman with a flat chest and pic related. Anyway, I'm over this back and forth since clearly you refuse to change your mind.

I will close by saying that it's apparent to anyone who isn't delusional that being attracted to prepubescent lolis strongly correlates with pedophilia.

>>9720866
Of course not, because for starters, many /jp/ers find 3D pig disgusting.

/jp/, what's happened to you?

>>9720833
I'm a huge fan of DFC but I don't masturbate to lolicon. It's not exciting if it looks like a kid.

>>9720870
Awesome, so does that mean I can start posting pictures of hot 3D chicks now?

Sweeeeeet! /jp/ just got awesome!

>>9720877
Finding 3D disgusting has nothing to do with being a pedophile.

>>9720877
In before that annoying guy who always claims it's a meme.

>>9720879
To me the biggest appeal of DFC is that the woman is insecure about non-existent breasts and super embarrassed.

Kids have no reason to be truly embarrassed about it and lose the appeal.

>>9720868
I don't like 3D, but it's the closest relative to the 2D loli, so I have to settle.

>not imagining you have sex with your waifu while having sex with a random 3D slut

>>9720887
>>9720877
Take your epic /a/ memes to the board they belong.

>>9720876
Actually, you JUST implied it.

Because nobody here jacks off to 50 year old women, and you refuse to address the example I have sited THREE TIMES now of a typical anime age girl with DFC being distinguishable or not from lolicon.

>>9720891
>not liking 3D only a meme

This is what normalfags from other boards actually believe.

Go home.

>>9720892
>nobody here jacks off to 50 year old women

[citation needed]

>>9720896
OK, sorry about that.

EDIT: Because no one was talking about jacking off to 50 year old women

>>9720896
Well, let's just a wait a day or so and see if anyone volunteers.

>>9720896

>>9720877
I don't really like 3D women for various reasons, but 3D children are cute as fuck.

>>9720892
>Because nobody here jacks off to 50 year old women
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NZ6C6wGpAE

>>9720895
/jp/ is more than one person and what they find attractive varies. Please leave with your hivemind shit.

>>9720911
Right, as long as we're all in agreement that no one here actually doesn't secretly want to bang 3D chicks, right?

PFfft. Like I'd believe that.

>>9720877
>>9720895
They don't like 3D only cuz they can't get 3D.
If you can't get it HATE IT

>>9720916
News flash: Asexuality exists

>>9720911
He's not saying everyone here is anti-3d, he's saying it however is not a meme. I've seen you do this shit in a few other threads, please read more carefully.

>>9720918

>>9720918
EXACTLY BRO. HIGH FIVE LET'S GET SOME PU$$Y! FUCK THESE PEDOPHILE NERDS!

>>9720926
But is astoundingly rare among people without genetic or hormone disorders.

Mod/Jan, could you please check out this thread and release the hammer? I'm not sure what to report because there's so many choices, but the entire thread has the OP kind of /jp/-related, so yeah.

I can't believe we have so much normal lurking around here. You are all seriously disgusting.
Orthography errors everywhere, emotes, >le, normal-moralfag behavior. You all just suck.

>>9720929
Still exists. Suck it, nerd.

>>9720921
Saying 3DPD is not being anti-3D?

ITT: creepy pedofiles

>>9720931
This, please ban all of the /a/ posters who think there is a substantial difference between pedophiles and lolicons.

>>9720933
Not always.

>>9720934
Just look at this
>>9720901
>3D children

they're not pedofiles, they just never had a girl in rl

drawings get boring

>>9720932
But do they exist in /jp/?

>>9720938
Is there a significant difference between 2D and 3D girls?

>>9720918
I think everyone can get 3D if they try, there are just certain things that come along with that.

I guess you're going to start squawking about "haters" like you're some fresh out of the jungle jiggaboo now?

>>9720933
Christ what is with you fucking mincing faggots? One anon-mentioned 3dpd, some other faggots said it wasn't a meme, and then finally a third idiot said "everyone here isn't against 3d". So I just used anti-3d rather than something like 2d love to describe the phenomenon read into the context. It's not trolling when your IQ really is as low as your posts make it seem.

>>9720939
Whatever you say queer. Calling something pig disgusting seems pretty anti to me.

>>9720931
OP just got mad

>>9720943
Of course not. There's no difference at all between 2D and 3D. Shit is exactly the same.

brb gonna go fight kaiju and become Student Council President of Uranus.

>>9720901
>>9720933
>>9720941

>>9720953
Follow your dreams, Anonymous.

We're all rooting for you.

>>9720943
>Is there a significant difference between 2D and 3D girls?

Significant enough for there to be a whole new sexuality for people masturbated to "2D only"? No. Being a normal healthy heterosexual male still encompasses 3D women, but you could still prefer 2D. Just like pedophiles can prefer to solely masturbate to 2D and refer to themselves as lolicons. They are still pedophiles though.

There's nothing wrong with being a pedophile.

>>9720954
whoops i quoted the wrong posts here
>>9720901
>>9720934
>>9720941

>>9720945

Dawww will you just hide behind a mental ill man?
Is he your hero or something?

>>9720945
Saying 3DPD is the same as being anti-3D, please take your /r9k/ whining about how all women are whores to the appropriate board.

>>9720965
What the picture you mean? I don't even know who it is turbonerd, it's just a funny picture I saved. Can you please stop your "trolling" here? You're fucking awful at it.

>>9720970
Not that guy, but I just feel that if someone were to ask for my opinion of a girl, who I felt was ugly, I would just say 3DPD.

But attacking people for talking about 3D is a bit much.

>>9720960
>Significant enough for there to be a whole new sexuality for people masturbated to "2D only"?
There's an effect significant enough for there to be a whole new sexuality for people who masturbate to "children only," although I'm sure they could get it up to adult women if they tried.

If you don't think sexual thoughts about 3D children, are you still a pedophile? I don't think it would be hard for your average lolicon or normal society person to find a 3D prepubescent child sexually attractive if they tried; they just don't because they've conditioned themselves to think that way.

Loli and incest are really the only things out there making sex interesting these days.

>>9720992
You surely have had lots of sex

>>9720970
Again the dipshit who can't read. I used anti-3d to mean 2d love while referring to someone talking about 3DPD. I agree that saying all 3D is Pig Disgusting is probably an anti-3d sentiment, that's why I used it. I basically agree with you and in your ongoing battle with illiteracy you've yet again failed.

Are you just quoting the wrong person, or are you so fucking unable to read English that you're just viciously flailing at your keyboard?

>>9720980
I agree, people who are jacking off to cartoons only aren't far enough gone to be lumped in with someone like Jerry Sandusky.

Some people are just not attracted to Loli and incest. When I see Loli I just don't get erect. Not my fault.

The worst thing about normals is how they enter into a community and adamantly demand that everyone conform to their standards as obnoxiously as possible, making very little or no effort at all to understand others through observation.

Just wanted to get that off my chest.

>>9720739
>Only three kinds of people wear diapers - babies, old people, and diaper fetishists.
You'd think somebody who goes to /jp/ would know that incontinence isn't all that uncommon even among teens and adults.

>>9721395
Less than 3% of the population isn't exactly "common".
But, well, continue telling yourself that if it can make you feel better, Diaper-kun.

>>9721542
That's more than 1 out of 100, so yes, it's not all that rare of an affliction.

One subject you haven't brought up here is the emotional context in which one finds erotica sexually appealing.

For example, I find DFC and lust a sexually appealing theme, and 3D children simply aren't on an emotional, mental, or physical level to understand lust.

I think the emotional appeal is the kicker here. If you like lolicon because you like the idea of corrupting children, you're probably a pedophile. If you like flat petite girls, I don't think you're necessarily a pedophile.'

Had to delete this post twice, I've been up too many hours.

>>9722902
That's an excellent point, as well. I agree.

I would probably have gotten around to it if normalfag up yonder hadn't continuously tried to derail the thread, making it very difficult to discuss the nuances of the subject.

It's just the social pressure that has been hammered into their simple mind throughout their lives. Like many other things.

>>9722902
This doesn't make any sense. Even if you like the idea of corrupting children you're only a pedophile if you have primary or exclusive interest in children. It has nothing to do with your morals.

>>9723848
If you can't figure out such a simple concept, you should probably lurk instead of posting because you're contributing absolutely nothing to this discussion.

>>9723848
actually what you just said makes no sense.

go away and let the grown ups talk.

/jp/ - just predictable

why do you guys go into /v/-style argument mode every time someone mentions paedophilia? This thread should never have received as many replies as it did.

>>9723905
This is the way it goes on almost every board...it's a touchy subject

>>9723870
>>9723878
>As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children

First sentence from wikipedia.

>>9723905
>/v/-style argument mode
What exactly is this?

>>9722902
This is one of worst posts in this thread. Holy shit.

>>9723990
Too bad this isn't the *legal* definition of pedophile.

Girls under age 18 shouldn't be allowed in public.

/b/ and /v/-esqeue pseudo-trolls are prevalent in this thread

>>9724001
Laws vary a lot according to time and place. Are you sure that the law isn't actually about child molestation? Scientific definitions strive for truthfulness and objectiveness.

>>9724001
The legal and morale definition of pedophilia various from country to country and culture to culture. You can't expect everyone to have the same moral standards and laws that you do.

>>9724001
I agree.

Woman should also dress up like this all the time because this is what I find morally acceptable.

>>9724020
Well I just mean people shouldn't be so accusative and assuming just cause you happen to look in the general direction of some teenager.

It's a social taboo more than anything else.