/jp/ - Otaku Culture

>>9707873
I guess.

I honestly haven't been able to enjoy masturbation since learning the truth about circumcision.

Doesn't feel so great, Chirno.

>>9707877
it's chillno

>>9707942
Shut the fuck up.

>>9707877
I'm sorry for your loss, anon.

What does Cirno's chilly pussy feel like?

>>9707982
What does Cirnos filthy anus smells like after she take s a spicy explosive elephant shit all over my face?

>>9707877
And what would that truth be?

>>9707958
I haven't been able to take it easy for months.

>>9707988
How much pleasure I'm missing out on and how my foreskin was used to make some kike businessman rich.

>>9707998
The American Academy of Pediatrics released a study last month which concluded that, among other things, circumcision did not "appear to adversely affect penile sexual function/sensitivity or sexual satisfaction."

A PDF of the full report is available online.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/3/e756

Not to say that this report proves that circumcision doesn't reduce penile sexual sensitivity, but don't act like it's a cut and dry issue. It isn't.

>>9708081
Jewish propaganda.

>>9708081
But it is. Firstly, of course the AAP is going to publish a report defending a practice they maintain. And one that brings them in money for performing circumcisions and selling the foreskins.

Secondly, no sane individual can claim that removing 20,000 nerve endings (that's more than are in the clitoris, by the way) doesn't affect sensitivity at all.

>>9708081
>American

>>9708081
There are thousands of other studies proving circumcision worsens sexual function. I'm also doubting the poster will accept your study seeing as it was made by US researchers and israel pretty much own the US (I'm not trying to go /pol/ here, but it's pretty much the truth).

>>9708085
Nice ad-hominem, but how about you take a look at the actual report. Anything submitted to a peer reviewed journal of science and medicine deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Best thread on /jp/!

>>9708107
>Anything submitted to a peer reviewed journal of science and medicine deserves the benefit of the doubt.

It's going to be peer-reviewed by fellow cut men and Jewish shills defending the barbarous practice.

The fact that European and Asian doctors would laugh in your face if you tried to sell circumcision to them seals the deal.

>>9708094
>Firstly, of course the AAP is going to publish a report defending a practice they maintain.

More ad-hominem.

>Secondly, no sane individual can claim that removing 20,000 nerve endings (that's more than are in the clitoris, by the way) doesn't affect sensitivity at all.

That's not exactly what they're saying. Obviously with less skin there's less overall sensation, what they're saying is that it doesn't affect sexual pleasure in a meaningful way.

>>9708097
>There are thousands of other studies proving circumcision worsens sexual function

>proving

Don't abuse that word. There is no definitive proof on the matter.

>>9708111
>The fact that European and Asian doctors would laugh in your face if you tried to sell circumcision to them seals the deal.

Doctors everywhere actually prescribe circumcision to individuals with chronic urinary tract infections, you know. There are some real health benefits associated with it.

>>9708114
>Obviously with less skin there's less overall sensation, what they're saying is that it doesn't affect sexual pleasure in a meaningful way.

How does losing 3/4 of the erogenous nerve endings in your penis not reduce sensitivity in a statistically significant way?

>>9708116
I used that word to bring up the futility of throwing around peer-reviewed studies. Though, I shouldn't expect a poster of your caliber to understand those nuances. Your choice of images is more than enough proof I need.

>>9708123
75% of the erogenous nerve endings in the penis are not in the foreskin.

And has anyone even tried skimming the report yet?

>>9708124
No, they don't. What they propose are various surgery designed to loosen the foreskin without removing it. Same with phimosis. No one but Americans proposes chopping the whole thing off.

The only health benefits come if you're some disgusting pig who doesn't clean their cock.

>>9708094
>selling the foreskins
Wait, what?
Why?
What would anyone buy foreskin for?
Please respond, I need to know what they did to my foreskin.

>>9708134
Infant foreskin contains a rare cell type used in.lab research, particularly in studies on tissue repair and generation (skin grafts, etc.) Foreskin was a major source of it before a way to artificially develop it was created. If you are at the age where you are legally allowed to browse 4chan your foreskin was probably separated from the rest of the medical waste and sold to some biotech firm.

Give me a second and I'll give sauce.

>>9708155
I'll bet that's why ancient Semitic peoples invented the practice millennia ago! Certain sub-Saharan and Chinese groups also!

Those Jewish fiends!

Anyway apart from not getting a cut of the profits, what's wrong with having one's foreskin sold as opposed to thrown away?

>>9708187
>I'll bet that's why ancient Semitic peoples invented the practice millennia ago! Certain sub-Saharan and Chinese groups also!

The realization of how profitable foreskin was is just another in a list of reasons certains people continue the practice.

>what's wrong with having one's foreskin sold as opposed to thrown away?

Because having a monetary interest in performing circumcisions means there is an incentive to continue the practice despite overwhelming evidence that it's a bad thing.

>>9708187
>apart from not getting a cut of the profits,

Guys guys, I enjoy long masturbational sessions, and even circumcised I consider myself cumming too quickly, I think if I wasn't circumcised I would probably cum even sooner..

>>9708081
>cut and dry issue

>>9708196
>despite overwhelming evidence that it's a bad thing.

What overwhelming evidence? The reduction in transmissions of sexually transmitted diseases and the possibility or urinary tract infections?

Or the far from proven notion that circumcision makes sex less enjoyable?

Look /jp/, if there were actually any proof that circumcision was a bad thing then that AAP study wouldn't exist.

>>9708215
>Look /jp/, if there were actually any proof that circumcision was a bad thing then that AAP study wouldn't exist.

Yeah, because there's never been a case of a useless and dangerous medical practice persisting long after it was proven to be detriment and ineffective!

>>9708221

Evidence. You lack it. Hence why you're resorting to rhetoric.

>>9708221
In modern times? I don't think so.

Also a .002% serious accident rate is somewhat short of what could be considered especially dangerous, I think.

That number is from the AAP study, by the way.

There's no enough scientific date on STD transmission for that.

The only reason why people thought foreskins increased the risk of urinary tract infections was do to ignorance about foreskins in the first place.

People tell their children to flush out under their foreskins when the rule is really only wash what you can see, this is what caused the infections, by upsetting the natural colonies living inside, and introducing foreign material.

>>9707877
There are ways to restore foreskin, but you'll have to do it over the course of about a year and a half if you want to do it without surgery, which is a bad idea to begin with. It won't be quite the same, but it's much better than what you have now.

>>9708257
>There's no enough scientific date on STD transmission for that.

There's not enough scientific data on whether circumcision impacts sexual satisfaction either.

But there is much more data on rates of STD transmission because that's easier to assess.

>>9708270
>but it's much better than what you have now.

What makes you say that? The total lack of proof that foreskin is vital to sexual satisfaction?

>>9708281
>The total lack of proof that foreskin is vital to sexual satisfaction?

>>9708281
As someone that has restored my foreskin, I find that my penis become much more sensitive and that masturbation has been a lot better. Thanks though.

What's so hard to believe about Mother nature being right? She gives us what we have for a reason. The foreskin isn't vestigial. She only gives us what we need, and is constantly changing her designs, you're very foolish to think you know better than her, she's been engineering for at least billions of years, and you've been living for at most for 20-30 something.

>>9708300
With restoring your foreskin, does it at least look like an normal one.

I wanted to try and restore mine but I'm afraid it will be really loose and saggy, instead of somewhat tight like normal foreskin is supposed to be.

>>9708300
>restored my foreskin
I did a quick look up of this and apparently shoving your dickhead inside itself magically regrows the foreskin back.

>>9708313
Well, mother nature doesn't always give us what's best for us, considering viruses exist and all. But for the most part I will agree that the human body has no useless features, or anything that really needs to be taken away.

>>9708313
I think you meant to say God, not mother nature.

>>9708325
Well, it's not really exactly like that...

>>9708320
Just wait. There's no point in doing it when it's likely we'll have some better method of tissue regeneration soon.

>>9708327

Tailbones. Appendices. Male nipples.

>>9708285
>evidence in chart form equals proof!

No, evidence does not equal proof you moron. Give me PROOF.

>>9708332
I think the chances of me being able to go into a stem cell clinic and asking for my foreskin back while there are people in line missing limbs won't go over well.

>>9708327
What, your second point is good, but your first makes so sense.

>>9708330
Yes, sorry.

神様、ありがとう～

>>9708337
You forgot your pinkie toe. You don't need it to balance and very soon evolution will get rid of it.

>>9708333
These guys can't be serious

http://adult.eskimo.com/~gburlin/restore/image.html

>>9708347
Or shall I dump a chart saying that the removal of the foreskin does not impact sexual satisfaction?

I don't have one so I'll just have to referrer you to that AAP study posted here >>9708081

>>9708320
It looks pretty similiar, yes. However it is a bit looser as you said, not overly loose or anything, but still not the same.

>>9708332
There are already surgeries to further improve a "naturally" restored foreskin and make it tighter and more like the real thing. I haven't done it yet though, and might not at all.

>>9708359
lol

http://www.restoringforeskin.org/public/manual-tugging/method-2

The guy trying to start that Facebook job thread should post a Touhou picture without text then derail the thread into what he originally wanted to discuss. That, or the janitor thinks circumcision is /jp/-related material.

>>9708359
It's more like pulling the skin of your penis up, not shoving the head inside itself. That doesn't even make sense.

>>9708373
That's exactly what it is doing though...

That does not change the fact that this is ridiculous.

>>9708377
It's proven to work, despite how ridiculous it may sound to you.

>>9708385

ok