/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Why did they censor they're eyeballs? Do they have pussies for eyes? Do people fuck eyeballs in Japan?

>>9489458

*there

>>9489458
Advanced dignity protection program

Rate them, you stupid pedos.

Does Japan use real lolis to voice loli hentai?

Rate them, you braindead pedos.

>>9489956
Rate what

>>9489966
Rate the lolis in order of who would you fuck sooner, you pimple-afflicted sex offender.

>>9489995
Which lolis?

>>9490029
All of them, retard.
Come on, let your pedo instincts loose now that you can.

I want to take the top right's virginity.

then bottom left. You guys can have the others.

>>9490060
Even the 3D ones?

2 1
4 3

>>9490072
I said all, can you read illiterate childfucker?

Pedos on /jp/ are so ballsless they couldn't even work up the courage to fuck a real loli. If one of them approached those fat retards on her own will and begged them to fuck her, they would get scared by her initiative and run away like pussies.

>/jp/edophiles voicing their childraping fantasies at the most inappropriate times
>/jp/edophiles suddenly falling silent when they're actually asked to do it

Being a socially-stunted fuckwad is suffering.

>>9490198
never occurred to you that they might have been trolling?

This picture is so fucking old all those lolis are probably nasty old hags with droopy titties by now.

>>9490205
>Joke's on you, I've been pretending to be a debauched pedophile ever since this board was created

What a likely excuse indeed.

>>9490216
>I'd love to fuck children

Okay, so which one would you take as your first victim?

>>9489421
Cinderella is balding; she's out.

Little mermaid has pig eyes; she's out.

I don't even know the story of Thumeblina; she's out.

By process of elimination, Snow White is the winner. That's good, because she's the cutest anyway.

>>9490221
>>9490227

is that you investment banker?

i bet it is.

fuck your thread.

and for the record, most of the people on here are pretending to be NEET.

>>9490227
>I'd love to fuck children

No, really, chief. Who ARE you quoting?

they are all fucking ugly

>>9490242
Don't lie to yourself. Children are alway cute and potentially fuckable, as opposed to the unsightly pedos you are.

>>9490229
At long last, a truPEDO. You must all look at his post and hold it up as an example.

>>9490262
yeah, gays also want to fuck any ugly dude

>>9490272
Her being a willing participant isn't always a necessary requirement.
Even if the little girl is against having sex with you, you can alway overpower her with your sheer lard mass. That's why you pedos are constantly overweight, isn't it?

>>9490205
fuck you, I am a real lolicon.

I wouldn't fuck any of them.

Top right looks like she'd be awesome to hang out with, though. Probably knows some awesome cake recipes and can shotgun beer no problem.

We could produce awesome house music together.

>>9490360
to me she looks like the kind who gets raped by her father/older brother but keep it a secret not out of fear, but because she doenst want to cause trouble or damage family honor. Would have as sister.

>>9490360
You're supposed to fuck and break them in, you stupid pedo, not to befriend them. Don't get out of your role, because you won't even be able to: being a pedophile is a genetic thing.

>>9490366
Well said.

Cute not pedo

Sorry I'm not pedo, I only fap to 2D lolis.

Who the fuck wants to touch children, that's absolutely horrible and disgusting.

>>9490387
Note to pedo in denials: trying to disavow your sexual kinks on the Internet only makes them more obvious. Don't worry about admitting to being a pedo, we are a group of freethinkers.

>>9490387
Oh, you're one of those people who thinks that being a lolicon is different from being a pedophile.

>>9490387
Sorry, you're still a pedo. You're just not a child molester.

>>9490411
For now...

>>9490407

Oh I still think it's pedo, just not a true pedo.

I don't fuck with 3D.

>>9490424
You're still attracted to children, 2D or not.

>>9490424
"im attracted to childlike features in drawins lol id fuk that little loli girl in her tight puffy vulva! real kids? ew lol thats gross im no pedophile."

-Anonymous 8/1/2012

>Play a game whose entire appeal is having a cast of prepubescent girls and nothing else
>Openly glorify prepubescent bodies and "glorious flat chests" like it's a normal thing to do
>Claim that having sex with a little girl who hasn't reached adolescence is the purest form of love
>Write overwrought and sickeningly detailed stories of how they would fuck a loli like a pro
>Proudly dub themselves "jaypedos"

>"B-But we're not real pedophiles ad all!"

>>9490425

The 2D ones can actually be mentally mature or much older than they appear, and obviously are actually attractive.

3D just get scarred for life, whether they think they're ready or not.

>>9490439
From what source might you be transcribing?

>>9490437
Who the fuck are you quoting?

>>9490444
So you admit that you are simply repressing your feelings for 3D because they would be scarred for life? We're making progress here.

In the end, you're attracted to childlike features and are therefore a pedophile. Stop being ashamed, that's what /a/ normals do.

>>9490437
Saved for future use. It's funny how some pedos still haven't come to terms with their sexual preferences, especially when everyone knows that many 2D loli artists trace from real CP.

>>9490444
Sex is not a big deal, actually. The actual acts do not scar them.

>>9490444
http://www.amazon.com/The-Trauma-Myth-Children-Aftermath/dp/046501688X

>>9490451
>So you admit that you are simply repressing your feelings for 3D

I don't have any feelings for 3D at all.

>>9490454
I've been told children actually like it and take sex as a game.

>>9490459
Yeah, but then when they get older and society tells them they were abused and taken advantage of with disgusted faces. The narrative after "abuse" is what causes the actual trauma, see>>9490456

>>9490437
>>9490452
This is 4chan, buddy. If I fapped to 3D loli, I would've admitted it a long time ago. If you want to fap to them, go right ahead, but don't project your silly nonsense on others.

>>9490461
You're still attracted to child-like bodies.

>>9490461
>>9490463
Proof of the effectiveness of media brainwashing.

"Hey guys. I'm attracted to drawings of big muscular men with meaty cocks, but I'm not gay because they are just drawings!"

>>9490481
It's more like /a/'s retarded mindset of lolicon ≠ pedophilia.

>>9490485
Well I think they feel the need to separate themselves because of the connotations of the word "pedophile".

>>9490481
Oh god, now you're going to autismal about kikes and whatnot.

Just because you like an exaggerated version of something doesn't mean you like the original version.

>>9490485
>>9490485
Well I think they feel the need to separate themselves because of the connotations of the word "pedophile", which can largely be attributed to the media.

>>9490493
"Hey guys. I'm attracted to drawings of big muscular men with meaty cocks, but I'm not gay because they are just drawings!"

>>9490464
Yeah, we all know about society's indoctrination. The truth is that they love having sex and it's guild tripping that causes girls to lose confidence in their sexual urges. It's like how one century ago masturbation was regarded as a scandalous thing to do, when in fact it was harmless and good for our body. Eventually, we'll finally overcome our fears regarding preteen sex as well.

>>9490493
I'm sorry guy, but fapping to dudes is homo and fapping to lolis is pedo.

While you're busy debating on what's pedo and what's not, remember to cast your preferences. I want to know which 3D loli you'd like to fuck.

>>9490515
Upper right.

3DPD

>>9490524
>>>/a/

It's funny how pedos try to deny what they are. Reminds of 2D purists.

2D girls stem from 3D therefore it's impossible to not like 3D.

>>9490524
I know you're trying to be ``ironic as HELL'' but you don't see me going around talking about feels and faces when.

>>9490533
omg you go to /prog/ too??

おやゆび姫

>>9490532
The whole 3DPD thing is another joke /a/ took too seriously, just like waifus.

>>9490537
The whole otaku culture is a joke taken seriously, yet we are here.

>>9490541
What are you talking about?

>>9490493
you r the hurt of ur butt
own is my body adn tears is ur blod
I hvae creatid over a thosand macros
unknown to speling nor known to autism
[YOU] have withstod mad of create many farts
yet those gays will never range any butt [EXEPT URS LMAO]
as as pul my dik our of ur ass
Unlimited OWN Works

>>9490546

>>9490542
The whole otaku phenomenon was a marketing trick. People started buying things just because media deemed it to be otaku. So in a sense, it's just like the whole 3DPD thing or waifus. People believe in these so they can fit in more just like how people want to fit in the otaku culture.

>>9490528
嫌3Dブタ

OP here, please stop sageruing my thead. Being a pedo is a matter of pride, there's no point keeping it hidden.

>>9490555
Are you part of NAMBLA?

>>9490533
>that feel when 3DPD

Who are you quoting?

>>9490549
You must mean weaboo-ism

OP works for the FBI.

>>9490588
No, I mean the anime, manga, eroge in general. People mostly buy them because of the negative connotation. Why do you think anime like nyaruko was so popular? Because people view it as an otaku anime. So I find it funny that this man is looking down on people for fitting in when this whole culture revolves around that.

The ``IM A RORIKON NOT A PEDO" Is a normalfag thing through and through, the average normal feels ashamed after having fapped to little girl porn and, instead of dealing with the raw facts, starts spewing random bullshit justifications about him being attracted to little girls while not being attracted to little girls, while the aderent of any other fetish/sexual interest, say, a MILFfaggot, will admit that his attraction towards this kind of porn stems from reality, and that, although he may be interested mainly in drawn MILFS, he won't deny the fact that somewhere, out there, maybe on in a hundred chance, there may be a female that would satisfy his interests, same with feet fetishists, a feet fetishist will be attracted towards feet, real or not, and if unreal, he will still be able to get hard by a pair of well-grown ``3d" feet, but a ``lolicon", note that this term means ``pedophile" in japanese, will claim that he's into drawn and drawn innocent little girls only, not only that, but going to the extent of claiming that drawn porn about little girls somehow has no relation with reality at all! As if repeating the same thing over and over again makes it true, but this becomes paradoxically ironic-idiotic when you realize the glaring similarities between a drawn loli and a real one.

>>9490658
almost as idiotic as the slightly popular ``she's 3, and that's a toddler" debate about how the general age of a loli somehow makes her lose the actual features that lolis have, again, a short-lived normalfag fad that's created in justification of not being a normal person.

These are idiotic, deluded, retarded, and nonsensical circular arguments, that have no place on /jp/.

I would also like to complain about the ``3d a shit" thing that seems to have some links connecting it to /a/, but i fear it might bring the normalfags into this last bastion of truNEETness and general qulity.

>>9490658

>>9490688
Typical rebuttal from a pedo in denial.

>>9490698
No point in arguing with a dumbass who believes that people who fap to little girl porn feel bad about it afterwards. Just came by the way, and it was so damn good and I am still not a pedophile.

>>9490705
>>9490705

>No point in arguing with a dumbass who believes that people who fap to little girl porn feel bad about it afterwards.

I think his argument wasn't that they feel bad afterwards, it's that they deny that they're pedophiles.

If you masturbate to child pornography, 2D or 3D, you're a pedophile, that's just a fact.

``I FAP TO DRAWINGS OF MUSCULAR MEN, BUT I'M NOT GAY BECAUSE THEY ARE DRAWINGS, IM A DOISEAISHA AND THAT'S A GUY WHO'S ATTRACTED TO DRAWN GUYS, THERE'S NO, AND I REPEAT, NO CONNECTION BETWEEN DRAWN MUSCULAR HOT BODIES AND ACTUAL MUSCULAR GUYS, THE FACT THAT I WANT TO SUCK A HOT, BEAR-LIKE GUY OFF IS JUST ME BEING ATTRACTED TOWARDS DRAWN MALES, feels god not being a homo, there's no point in arguing with u anywais, u silly boi, lol"
anonymous poster no.9490705, 4chan's /jp/, 8/1/12.

>>9490723
what if you did it once, hated it and felt horrible about yourself for a week, and then didn't do it again?

>>9490728
Screencapped and forwarded this thread to the FBI. Don't bother deleting your post, I included an archive link too. You're fucked.

I hope this serves as an example to all other sick pedophiles on /jp/, discussion of raping children is not tolerated.

>85 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
Just die, all of you.

>>9490731
whuqt

>>9490734

>>9490723
>the average normal feels ashamed after having fapped to little girl porn and, instead of dealing with the raw facts, starts spewing random bullshit justifications about him being attracted to little girls while not being attracted to little girls
These are his words. Plus, he is using the word truNEET, I can't really take him seriously.

>>9490742
>>>/a/b/v/

>>9490749

>the average normal feels ashamed after having fapped to little girl porn and, instead of dealing with the raw facts, starts spewing random bullshit justifications about him being attracted to little girls while not being attracted to little girls
Prove me how anything of this is wrong ad you'e just not a pedo normal in denial.

>>9490749
"Hey guys. I'm attracted to drawings of big muscular men with meaty cocks, but I'm not gay because they are just drawings!"
"Hey guys. I'm attracted to drawings of big muscular men with meaty cocks, but I'm not gay because they are just drawings!"
"Hey guys. I'm attracted to drawings of big muscular men with meaty cocks, but I'm not gay because they are just drawings!"
"Hey guys. I'm attracted to drawings of big muscular men with meaty cocks, but I'm not gay because they are just drawings!"

>>9490759
Because I just got done fapping to little girls and didn't feel bad about it.
>>9490763
"Hey guys. I like animals but I am not a furry." I can false quote too. Plus, can you stop repeating the same shit? It's like you have a signature.

>>9490781
>Because I just got done fapping to little girls and didn't feel bad about it.

Good, there is no need to be ashamed that you're a pedophile.

>>9490748

No.

Although, there is nothing wrong with /a/, or /g/. Hell, I even started going to /b/ again after a long hiatus.

/v/ is a shithole, I don't even really like video-games, nor their genre of shitposting.

>>9490734
jokes on you, i was 14.

limewire had a tonne of gore and stuff on it. in honesty it ruined my psyche before i even got to this piece of shit website.

I'm an art pedo™.

>>9490798
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/3-teens-arrested-in-sexting-case-893413.php
Your age won't save you.

>>9490793
Not a pedophile.

Fuck off 「nerds」

>>9490814
For the record, since you seem to be avoiding addressing this..

Is it completely heterosexual to be masturbate to images of muscled men fucking each other with 12 inch dicks? In your mind, being attracted to drawings of men does not mean you are gay?

>>9490822

Is this hypothetical man attracted to real men?

>>9490819

Who are you quoting?

>>9490781
>"Hey guys. I like animals but I am not a furry."
A furry is a human-animal hybrid, reminiscent of western cartoons, see looney tunes,someone who's attracted to them enjoys the misture of human and animal characteristics in the pictures he faps to.
A zoophiliac is a person who faps to animals, quadripedal beings, mostly mammals, he's attracted towards animal features in the pictues he faps to.
A pedophile is a person who faps to pictures of little girls, underage females, he's attracted towards the childish features in the picture he faps to, such as flat chest etc.
A rorikon is a person who faps to pictures of little girls, underage females, he's attracted towards the childish features in the picture he faps to, such as flat chest etc.

There's no difference between the latter and the quasi last character, there's no difference in status if the first or the second faps to drawn pictures or not, and there's no difference if a pedophile surprisingly decides to fap to real pictures or if he has a predisposition towards drawn little girls more than real ones.

And for the record, i fap to loli too, but i get frustrated when there's another pedo piece of shit who acts high and mighty because he fapped to the tracings of CP porn videos.

>>9490841
If a male is attracted to drawings featuring naked men and their rock hard cocks, that does not mean he is gay?

Stop avoiding the question.

The word everyone is looking for is toonophilia, or toonophile.

>>9490861
That sounds about right.

Okay, I'm a toonophile not pedophile.

"Mmm those cocks look so delicious.. and those rock hard abs are making me so hard. W-What? I'm not gay, they are just drawings!!"

-Anonymous 8/1/2012

>>9490850
Furry likes animals
zoophiliac likes animals.
Therefore, they both are the same.

Pedophile likes children.
Lolicon likes children.
Therfore, they both are the same.

It goes to show with enough effort any thread can become a success.

>>9490855

Only if he is attracted to real men and not women at all.

Otherwise he falls under bi-curious at best.

>>9490915

I think you need to look up the definition of homosexual.

A homosexual can be attracted to women and fuck all the women he wants, and still be a homosexual.

>>9490850
You are so goddamn retarded.

A pedophile is someone who has primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children while lolicon's don't mind secondary sex characteristis such as tits and what not.

>>9490942

Homosexuality is not bisexuality.

>>9490946
>while lolicon's don't mind secondary sex characteristis such as tits and what not.

Nope.

>>9490951
>As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children
>Lolicon (ロリコン?), also romanised as lolikon or rorikon,[1] is a Japanese portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex". In Japan, the term describes an attraction to underage girls (whether prepubescent, pubescent, or post-pubescent)[2][3] or an individual with such an attraction

Notice how one says primary while the other doesn't, sorry, but you are a false pedo. Eat shit.

I want /a/ to leave.

Drawing are modeled after the bodies of human prepubescent kids. You are pedophiles, It's sad to see how desperate you kids are to deny what you are. Guess what the difference between the word "lolicon" and "pedophile" is in Japanese? There isn't one, they are the same word.

>>9490949

Look up the fucking definition of homosexual.

Technically you're bisexual ALSO, but you're still a homosexual. You can fuck all the girls you want and still be a homosexual.

>>9490963

There is actually a word in Japanese for pedophile that isn't lolicon.

>>9490961
So this is a loli?

>>9490976
Pedophile and lolicon mean the same thing in Japanese, is my point.

>>9490978

She's 16 so yes

>>9490978

Yes.

>>9490990
>>9490989
>>>/v/

>>9490961

>As a medical diagnosis

Psychiatry!!!

>>9490992
>>>/a/

>>9490997
Only an /a/ poster would actually believe liking lolis doesn't make you a pedophile.

>>9490978

Would pedo.

This is just a drawing, so if it makes me hard I'm not gay.

>>9490978
You even have trouble reading, how sad. If you exclusively fap to children drawings, then you are a pedo. If you fap to children and fap to other stuff as well, then you are a lolicon.

>>9490992

?

She's a lolita,no doubt

>>9491000
>>>/a/

>>9491010
Most pedophiles are also attracted to women over 18 as well, so once again you're wrong. If you want to leave now and avoid further embarrassment, I understand.

>>9491000
This is what false pedos really believe.

Normalfags can't tolerate loli or moe and wish to smear all who like it as pedos.

Thank you for the raid, but don't you have any friends in real life? Why are you inside on a wednesday trying to troll us otaku? Surely you have better things to do, even if you don't have a job. What about friends? Don't you have awesome things to discuss on your own premium websites?

>>9491018
Then they are lolicons.

And if you are going to start telling me about how the mainstream usage of the word pedophile is, don't forget
>It is also commonly used when referring to lolicon manga or lolicon anime, a genre of manga and anime wherein childlike female characters are often depicted in an erotic manner, in an art style reminiscent of the shōjo manga (girls' comics) style. Outside Japan, "lolicon" is in less common usage and usually refers to the genre.

I see the "lolicon=/= pedo" shit has leaked over here from /a/.

I see the "lolicon=pedo" shit has leaked over here from Fark.

>>9491023
According to a U.S. study on 2429 adult male sex offenders who were categorized as "pedophiles", only 7% identified themselves as exclusive; indicating that many or most child sexual abusers may fall into the non-exclusive category.

Majority of pedophiles are also attracted to older women, once again you are wrong.

if the age of consent is 16, why do people who think loli should be illegal literally want to send you to Guantanamo for drawing Rainbow Brite's anus

not even off-board raid people can answer this

>>9491021
Only a normal would consider "pedophile" a smear. Please stop trying so hard to fit in.

Not pedo 2D onry.

This is really just a realistic drawing, so I'm not a pedophile for wanting to fuck these kids. Right guys?

>>9491033
> Exclusive (i.e., "true pedophiles") and non-exclusive (or, in some cases, "non-pedophilic")
Hah, even the wiki sees you as a false pedo. Also, love how you left out the last part out. Sorry, but you are nothing but a fake trying to take pride in something that you are not.

Nice try FBI.

>>9491042
Na, a lolicon like me would never go through with the actual act.
>A behavioral analysis report by the FBI states that a "high percentage of acquaintance child molesters are preferential sex offenders who have a true sexual preference for [prepubescent] children (i.e., true pedophiles)."[

>>9491044
What are you even talking about? I'm attracted to actual kids, not just loli.

Why are you acting like this is some badge of honor or something?

>>9491034
>why do people who think loli should be illegal literally want to send you to Guantanamo for drawing Rainbow Brite's anus

Because there's a certain kind of person who needs someone to dehumanize so that they don't feel sick with horror at their own failings. It's common in the south, but they use niggers. You can't see skin color through the internet, though, so some people need other targets.

>>9491047
So being attracted to these "drawings" of kids would not make someone a pedophile in your opinion?>>9491042

You guys are all fucking retarded. Top right is shit; bottom left actually looks decent.

>>9491050
Why don't they just learn to accept themselves?

>>9491056

Photo realistic is disgusting.

>>9491061
But someone who is attracted to that is not a pedophile, right? It is just a drawing.

>>9491050

So whether it's actually right or wrong, or leads to harm, or whatever- that's not even a factor? They just need someone to shit on?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

Holy fucking denial.

Am I mistaken in thinking it would be fun to be friends with a loli? I'm not sure what she'd get out of a relationship like that, but I'd get to enjoy her company. Just having silly adventures or something. Nothing sexual! If I had a taste for a certain type of food, or even if I just felt like going out and seeing where the wind takes me, I think it would be fun to bring her along to hear her input on the world. It would certainly be nicer to bring her than someone my age. Does anyone agree?

>>9491065
Now you're getting it.

Any target, doesn't matter who, so long as the majority will agree with them. Anything to avoid the gaze being directed upon them.

It's scummy and dishonest, but I suppose you do what you have to.

>>9491056
If I fap to it then later fap to some old girls, then I am not a true pedophile.
>>9491048
That's fine but there is a high chance that you aren't a true pedo. And you are the one who is taking honor in it, calling people who label themselves as lolicon as normals or /a/b/v/ posters, but I am not sure if that was the same poster as you.

>>9491071

Sounds like you want a daughter.

Adopt?

>>9491075

I wondered why the lack of positive correlation between the rise of the loli aesthetic and actual child abuse never seemed to engage them. They probably don't even care about actual children.

>>9491078
You think that could be it? I'm 22.

>>9491077
>If I fap to it then later fap to some old girls, then I am not a true pedophile.

I don't know how many times I have to say this, but most pedophiles are not exclusively attracted to prepubescent kids. If you are attracted to kids AND older women, you are still a pedophile.

>>9491087
Well, what can you do?

Take heart, though. They're mostly American, and mostly from the South. I think that has something to do with the anxiety that drives them to demonise people.

Hey /a/, being attracted to >>9491007 does not make me gay right? Sure, it makes me rock hard, but it's just a drawing.

>>9491034

>why do people who think loli should be illegal literally want to send you to Guantanamo for drawing Rainbow Brite's anus

Because Americans need a large supply of convicts to keep their economy running, and criminalising ever smaller things is the only way to sustain that system.

Oh boy, another lolicon debate. It's not like we have 100 of these every week or anything.

Listen, kids, you find loli arousing because you are attracted to prepubescent features, but in drawings they are idealized the same way older 2D women are(big breasts etc). Pedophile is not a dirty word, stop being brainwashed by the media. Accept your sexuality and move on.

>>9491034
>why do people who think loli should be illegal literally want to send you to Guantanamo for drawing Rainbow Brite's anus

Because arresting people for talking about things opens the door to arresting them for talking about other things.

Bear in mind, this isn't really a concerted effort, it's just a manifestation of the increasing authoritarianism of our times.

>>9490387

Wow, started some huge debate.

In this case lets just stick to lolicon=2D pedo, which I am, and pedophile=3D pedo, makes everything easier.

I no touchy the children.

>>9491118
Yeah, just accept that you're attracted to cartoons and not real people. It's not that big a deal.

This is a drawing, wanting to fuck her does not make me a pedophile.

I'm a lolicon.

>>9491137

You might want to seek help.

>>9491132
see>>9491108

>>9491148
Why? It's just a drawing so I'm not a pedophile.

Right, /a/?

>>9491137

You've lost, you know it, and now you're repeating yourself. You can't handle this website. You don't have the rhetorical skill. Go back to the minors, ``kid''.

As for the debate, this is fact: Those who wish to imply that loli = pedo, do this because it opens the door to loli being criminalized. Loli being criminalized will help legitimize the idea of criminalizing other fiction.

>>9491172
What? I'm agreeing with you.

I want to fuck this little girl. By the way, it's a drawing, I'm a lolicon.

>>9491168

That's a copy of a photo, so the same as any photograph.

>>9491098
And that is why researchers think that the criteria for pedophilia is retarded. There are different levels of pedophilia.
>Exclusive pedophiles are sometimes referred to as "true pedophiles". They are attracted to prepubescent children, and prepubescent children only. They show no erotic interest in adults their own age and can only become aroused while fantasizing about or being in the presence of prepubescent children, or both.[20] Non-exclusive offenders—or "non-exclusive pedophiles"—may at times be referred to as non-pedophilic offenders, but the two terms are not always synonymous. Non-exclusive offenders are attracted to both children and adults, and can be sexually aroused by both, though a sexual preference for one over the other in this case may also exist. If a preference for prepubescent children, such offenders are considered pedophiles in the same vein as exclusive offenders.

Oh and also, if you like milfs but occasionally fap to lolis, then you aren't a pedophile by ICD-10's definition.

>>9491154
>>9491168
>>9491137
Dude, you are pants on retarded. It's like you don't even know what we are arguing about.


Many of you guys claim to be pedophiles but don't seem to know about the issue much. Just that "OH IT'S A LITTLE GIRL AND I LIKE HER THEREFORE I AM PEDOPHILE, AREN'T I OTACOOL YET /JP/, LOOK AT ME, I AM SO DIFFERENT."

>>9491180

Who on the internet thinks that it's a legitimate debate tactic to string together words and just repeat themselves? Even /b/ has more pride than that.

>>9491192
>Even /b/ has more pride than that.
I'm pretty sure they don't.

>>9491175
It's a drawing so that make me a lolicon, I would never be attracted to an actual photograph, that's total different because it's an actual kid.

This is one of my favorite drawings. I'm glad it's a drawing an not an actual photo because I'm a lolicon and not a pedophile, lol pedophiles are gross.

>>9491192
Republicans. That's who.

It's a Republican tactic to just say it again but louder. Oh, and look, it's blatantly fallacious and part of a plan to demonize a minority AND abrogate protection of speech.

The worst part is, if you asked this troll, he'd probably say he's a leftist.

>>9491193
>>9491209
Are you acting retarded on purpose?

>>9491209

That is a photo, not a drawing.

my auntie said im not allowed to fug 3d roris or im grounded

sorry...

Doesn't it make you feel sick when you see CP? Sorry I only date 3D girls if their legs are able to touch the floor when they sit on the toilet or if they have grown pubic hair.

Until they can lose their 3rd dimension or reach the stage where it's acceptable to be impure, then they should be treated lovingly and innocently.

>>9491209

So mad desu.

>>9491220
Wtf? Stop lying. If it was an actual drawing I would not find it attractive because I'm a lolicon, not a pedophile.

Are you stupid or something? Pic related, one of my favorite drawings.

>>9491224
>>9491228

These are photorealistic, not drawings.

>>9491228
You sound butthurt and are stuck in the first half of this thread but we have moved on from that, try to keep up please.

So much disgusting 3D shit.

This thread is still going?

>>9491224

That's kind of badass.

>>9491233
I do not find children attractive, only drawings. I'm not a disgusting pedophile creep, I'm a lolicon. Learn the difference.

>>9491254

That is a photo, not a drawing.

>>9491254
>I'm not a disgusting pedophile creep, I'm a lolicon
this is what pedophiles actually think

Legitimate drawing. Well, painting.

I think it's safer to assume >>9491254 isn't as serious as you've given them credit for, whether they are or not.

>>9491254

>>>/b/

>>9491265
That's the joke.

>>9491268
Man I want to fuck that girl, feels good being a lolicon and not a pedophile.

>>9491273

But... that's not funny, because it's not true.

>>9491254
But you're shitposting under the assumption that (1) /jp/ cares what you think, (2) you are qualified to judge anyone based on their sexual preferences, (3) /jp/ likes 3D children and not 2D.

A 2D loli has very little in common with a 3D little girl. 2D comes idealized, clean, safe and tailored to suit the needs of specific fetishes. 3D little girls aren't like that, and are so only appreciated by paedophiles or those (like me) that think they can be cute but nothing more.

Trying to use sarcasm isn't going to work because /jp/ is 2D only except a handful of people that might have CP.

Pic related, a 60 year old loli.

I wish this wasn't a drawing because this girl is super hot! Just kidding, if she was real that would be 3D and I'm not a pedophile, I'm a lolicon.

>>9491298
>except a handful of people that might have CP
>handful

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

>>9491311
I don't need help to sleep. You sound like you might, because your shitposting makes you sound very frustrated. Do you need a blowjob? Your friends over in /v/ or /sp/ or whatever might help you out with that.

Fixated pedophiles are fixed in a certain developmental stage, and are exclusively attracted to kids.

Regressed pedophiles, using the original definition, prefer adults but, if stressed, will regress to an earlier developmental stage; this regression leads them to prefer children. The regressed pedophile likes kids because he himself has "become" a kid (more technically: he regresses to a pregenital sexuality, which finds its satisfaction in oral (e.g. masturbation, fetishism) or anal impulses (e.g. sadomasochism) and its natural compatriot, the child.)


tl;dr: Most of you are still kids

http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2007/03/a_primer_on_pedophilia.html

Anyone know this artists name? I really like how he draws his lolis, they are sexy as HELL.

Anyone other lolicon(which I am btw, not a pedophile) bros wanna help me out?

>>9491362

Where do you hang out, that your skill at trolling is this atrophied?

Rustle rustle.

>>9491298

I like mine 2000+ years old.

>>9491374
If you can't accept that being attracted to drawings(which these are) makes me a LOLICON and not a pedophile, maybe you should leave this board? Lolis are allowed here.

>>9491395

>>9491413
Epic reaction image.

>>9491395
Well it's true that I am not a true pedo if I find her attractive.

>>9491427
Just when I thought /a/ had finally left..

>>9491433
What I am stating is fact which can be cited by sources.
By the way, funny how you are accusing everyone of being from /a/ when you resorted to that pathetic attempt of "trolling". It was like someone yelling "LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU".

Let's share some music with each other, since we are all lolicons and all so obviously we have good taste(not disgusting taste like sicko pedophiles).

Here's what I'm listening to right now

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58ozSif13MU

Bottom left.

>>9491459

That's a photo. It's not a drawing.

This is making me laugh, even as a non-pedo lolicon.

>>9491473
Nope, I am only attracted to drawings not actual children. Real kids are gross 3DPD.

>>9491485

But you posted a photo.

>>9491492
That's a drawing. Trust me, if it was a photo I would not find it attractive because I'm not a pedophile, I'm a lolicon.

This guy is making me laugh, even as a non-pedo lolicon.

>>9491497
>non-pedo lolicon.

Yeah alright, and I jack off to yaoi and I'm heterosexual.

>>9491495

It's obviously a photo.

>>9491505
Can you stop projecting your sick pedophile fantasies onto other people? I'm STRICTLY into drawings only, real kids are fucking disgusting.

What is so hard to understand?

>>9491492
You know how you take one side of an issue and then act retarded so you can prove that the other side is better? Yeah, he is doing that. It's just like how when people quote and type obnoxiously in capslock with "XDDDS and le's".

>>9491503
You aren't even a true pedo, why do you go so far to defend it?

>>9491503
Very few gay men like yaoi.

Was that the joke?

>>9491520
Who do you think gets more aroused by yaoi, gay men or straight men?

Roasted, nerd.

>>9491518
You have been here like 6 hours, when will you go back to your home board? It's a firmly established fact here that lolicons are pedophiles.

>>9491503

Just keep at it my friend.

>>9491531

Women. The answer is women.

This is the problem with irony. I don't know if you're just being dumb or what.

>>9491542
Do you think straight men are aroused by two men fucking, yes or no?

The answer is no, and a man who finds yaoi arousing is gay. Just like a man who jacks off to loli is a pedophile. These are facts. If you need me to educate further, just ask.

>>9491543
You have been here like 6 hours, when will you go back to your home board?
>It's a firmly established fact here that lolicons are pedophiles.
All pedophiles are lolicons while not all lolicons are pedophiles. I am just trying to help a regressed pedophile a.k.a a child understand his own self-diagnosed illness.

>>9491557
If you aren't a child inside, you don't belong here.

>>9491543
>>9491553

But this is my home board and the numbers say that child abuse declined with the rise of loli.

You have two tactics: to restate your opinion but louder, and to pretend that everyone agrees with you.

Neither of them work here.

"loli = pedo" is a forced meme

>>9491565
>child abuse declined with the rise of loli.

Doesn't this prove my point? That people who like loli are also interested in kids. Also you're dodging the question like usual.

Is a man who is aroused by yaoi heterosexual?

>>9491564
Don't get me wrong, I am a regressed pedophile as well, it's just that I understand what I am unlike you. I don't know why you think that I think of pedophiles negatively.

>>9491523
>real kids are fucking disgusting.

You got that right!

>>9491579

>>9491592
What, you are going to argue that you are a fixated pedophile? Only 7% of pedos are fixated pedos, I doubt there are any of those here in 4chan.

>>9491572
my dick in ur ass is a forced meme

"loli = pedo" is a forced meme

"'loli =/= pedo' is a forced meme" is a forced meme

>>9491601
Yeah 4chan is the last place pedophiles would hang out.

If loli is illegal, why not drawings of murder?

What makes cute girls worse than a man having his head exploded?

>>9491611
How many times do I have to explain to you? 4chan is a place for regressed pedos, not fixated pedos. Regressed pedos are attracted to older women and children while fixated ONLY fap to children.

>>9491625
Nobody ITT wants to make loli illegal, buttlicker. I'm just educating lowly /a/ plebeians, and relaying to them established facts like that all lolicons are pedophiles.

>>9491640
>established facts
lol

>>9491640
>Nobody ITT wants to make loli illegal, buttlicker.

Lots of them do. This is an American site, after all. Many of us are retarded.

>>9491640
You have no clue what pedophilia, lolicon, fixated pedophilia, regressed pedophilia or the criteria of pedophilia.

I am pretty much agreeing with you but you make it so difficult because you keep going on about gays, posting pictures of little girls and acting retarded about it and just redirecting everyone to other boards when it's you who is acting like a kid. Actually study what you are arguing about before coming into the thread you fucking retard. Peace, I am going to sleep.

>>9491633

I'm not attracted to either, only drawings.

>>9491675
I'm glad we established that lolicons are pedophiles, good debate.

This is still going on? Real child porn gets you vanned most of the time while 2D is legal in most places. If you like 3D, seek help instead of arguing about it here, seriously.

>>9491703
I'm been in this thread for 6 hours and I won't leave until every lolicon accepts he is a pedophile.

Pedophile stuff is not allowed on 4chan, please leave.

>>9491717
No pedophile images were posted in this thread, they are all drawings for us lolicons to enjoy.

>>9491711
No one will change their mind because some pedo said so. The law considers 3D material illegal while 2D is safe. You can post 2D lolis in /b/ but you can't post real child pornography.
>Is a man who is aroused by yaoi heterosexual?
A homosexual 3D drawing is different then a 2D one. Both are gay but the one who likes 2D gay version doesn't have to like the one. Just like how you don't have to like 3D just because you like 2D.

>>9491748
>Both are gay

Just like both 2D and 3D loli is pedophilia. I'm glad we agree.

>>9491753
That's like saying male homos like flat chests, pedophiles like flat chest, therefore male homos are pedos.
Pedophilia is a common term to refer to people who like 3D while lolicon is a a term refered to people who like little chinese cartoons girls. The law sees the difference in them, I don't know why you can't.

>>9491774
The law sees them different because 2D porn doesn't ruin the lives on little girls.

Liking 2D men makes you gay. Like 2D little girls makes you a pedophile. These are established facts, there's really no point in arguing.

>>9491774
>Pedophilia is a common term to refer to people who like 3D while lolicon is a a term refered to people who like little chinese cartoons girls

Not in Japan.

>>9491785
>The law sees them different because 2D porn doesn't ruin the lives on little girls.
I know, that's the difference between pedophilia and lolicon.
>Liking 2D men makes you gay. Like 2D little girls makes you a pedophile. These are established facts, there's really no point in arguing.
Liking 2D men doesn't mean you like 3D men. Just like how liking 2D girls means that you have to like 3D girls.

And lolicons don't want people to refer to them as pedophiles because they put the 2D and 3D child lovers under the same label. In 3D cp, there is a real child involved and lives are hurt, and it's also illegal while in 2D, no child is involved and it is legal, so no, they aren't the same thing.

It just comes down to one is legal and isn't real while the other is real and illegal. Argue all you want but I am not the same as you.
>>9491788
Production, distribution and possessing for sale or distribution of real child pornography is illegal while it's not the same for 2D. So yes, there is a clear distinction but I was referring to the word usage in general because wikipedia says that that's how the word is used and it's rarely used out of japan.

This is getting boring, I am gonna go watch some anime. I'll be back if this thread is up and OP hopefull doesn't delete this thread.

>>9491870
>It just comes down to one is legal and isn't real while the other is real and illegal.
3D pedophilia isn't necessarily illegal though. Having sexual intercourse with children or real pornographic materials that depict such acts are. Pedophilia refers to the attraction, and that itself isn't illegal.

Yes, there might be a distinction between 3D and 2D materials in law, but that doesn't mean there should be distinction as far as the attraction itself is concerned. You can be a 2D-only feet fetishist, but you're still a feet fetishist. You can be only attracted to 2D men as a man, but that still makes you a homosexual. You can only like 2D asses, but that still means you like asses. So the only reason to differentiate between 3D and 2D attraction to little girls is the negative association with the term pedophile. But I don't see how that's relevant in an anonymous image board or /jp/ in all places. People who try too hard to prove that "2D loli isn't pedo" just seems like -well- they're trying too hard. It doesn't even matter. Nobody here should care if you're a "pedophile" or not and there's no reason to be afraid of being referred as such.

>So the only reason to differentiate between 3D and 2D attraction to little girls is the negative association with the term pedophile
Exactly, and it should be treated as such because a real child involved but I don't want to get in a debate over that.
>But I don't see how that's relevant in an anonymous image board or /jp/ in all places.
Because the label pedophile instantly brings up 3D child lover and people don't want to associate with that, plus, it has no place in /jp/ anyways.
>People who try too hard to prove that "2D loli isn't pedo" just seems like -well- they're trying too hard.
You are doing the same, in fact, you even said that you have been here for 6 hours.
>Nobody here should care if you're a "pedophile" or not and there's no reason to be afraid of being referred as such.
I don't like being put under the same label as people who indulge in illegal activites. Plus, I think it's sick.

>>9491959
>3D pedophilia isn't necessarily illegal though. Having sexual intercourse with children or real pornographic materials that depict such acts are. Pedophilia refers to the attraction, and that itself isn't illegal.

It is considered a disorder. Being a pedophile isn't illegal but the term IS used for those who do indulge in these activities. The term child molester is used for those who actually molest so we are left with the word pedophile and people who like 2D don't want to be labeled as that.
>but that doesn't mean there should be distinction as far as the attraction itself is concerned.
Why not? Looking at real child pornography is illegal. You can't make everything so general, you have to be specific because it's a matter of law. One like 2D children where there isn't a real child involved while the other like it when there is a real child involved.

>You can be a 2D-only feet fetishist, but you're still a feet fetishist. You can be only attracted to 2D men as a man, but that still makes you a homosexual. You can only like 2D asses, but that still means you like asses.
If liking real asses, liking real gay men, and liking real feet were illegal, people who like the 2D version would try to separate from them just like how they are doing with this whole pedophilia and lolicon thing.
There is the law, that's why.

Conflict is humanity's primal instinct. Eliminating it would mean eliminating humanity itself.

>>9492058
>If liking real asses, liking real gay men, and liking real feet were illegal, people who like the 2D version would try to separate from them just like how they are doing with this whole pedophilia and lolicon thing. There is the law, that's why.
So you're agreeing with on the part where the distinction arises not from a technical fact, but from superficial reasons. In a purely technical sense where we in a world completely isolated from social connotations, 2D loli is a pedophiliac attraction.

When you factor in the law, I guess there's some justification to the whole "lolicon - pedo" distinction but it's mostly the attitude that's the problem here. If it's based on law related reasons, there's absolutely no reason to get particularly angry when you're called a pedophile when you fap to loli manga. You don't commit an illegal fact, police won't come knocking down your door, law doesn't even matter. But instead of ignoring it, going along with it, or having a "who gives a fuck" attitude, people who make the loli-pedo distinction seem to fill threads with retarded arguments about how they aren't pedos while seeming awfully nervous about it. If you understand the distinction as not being based on technical facts, you shouldn't be doing that. If someone calls you a pedo for loli, all you have to do is saying "I'm not doing anything illegal, who are you to judge me?". But that hardly common among "lolicons".

(continued)

>>9492232
In the end, even if we agree on differentiating between 2D and 3D as lolicon and pedophilia, it seems "lolicons" aren't able to comprehend the implication behind such reasoning. Instead they try to claim a moral high ground by being "2D-onry". I don't even fap to 3D children, but this is just retarded, that's all.

>>9492059
>You are doing the same, in fact, you even said that you have been here for 6 hours.
Actually, that was my first post in this thread.
>I don't like being put under the same label as people who indulge in illegal activites. Plus, I think it's sick.
See, this is what I mean by "claiming a moral high ground". There's nothing "sick" about being attracted to children. Stop being brainwashed by media and "ethics" of the modern world.

>>9492232
A drawing of a girl is completely different from a real child being used and hurt for others pleasure. Even if there wasn't a law against it, there is a clear distinction, one whole dimension.
>If it's based on law related reasons, there's absolutely no reason to get particularly angry when you're called a pedophile when you fap to loli manga.
It's that and I am being grouped under the same people who fap to real children being used for their pleasure.
>You don't commit an illegal fact, police won't come knocking down your door, law doesn't even matter. But instead of ignoring it, going along with it, or having a "who gives a fuck" attitude, people who make the loli-pedo distinction seem to fill threads with retarded arguments about how they aren't pedos while seeming awfully nervous about it.
I know I don't but I don't want to be grouped under subhumans who think that they are the same as me just because I like drawings.
>If you understand the distinction as not being based on technical facts, you shouldn't be doing that. If someone calls you a pedo for loli, all you have to do is saying "I'm not doing anything illegal, who are you to judge me?".
No because I think pedos are sick and are not the same as me, they should be lynched if they do fap to real children.
>Instead they try to claim a moral high ground by being "2D-onry".
And that's the way it should be. They aren't on the same level.
>See, this is what I mean by "claiming a moral high ground". There's nothing "sick" about being attracted to children. Stop being brainwashed by media and "ethics" of the modern world.
It is a disorder and if you act on those urges, you deserve to get lynched.

Human trafficked children≠ Drawings

>>9492420
Good thing that I'm not affected by shitty propaganda with feminist origins. I really hope society will get over this "pedo-hunting" period soon.

>No because I think pedos are sick and are not the same as me, they should be lynched if they do fap to real children.

Fuck off, /abv/ scum.

>>9492450
Yeah I am sure this whole human trafficking business is all propaganda. I am sure they ask for the childrens consent when they ask to penetrate them.

Kill yourself for even sympathizing with them.
>>9492471
Now you're just being edgy but it's adorable too. Throw in the word normalfag in there while you're at it.

I have a dream.. that one day this board will rise up and rid itself of /a/ subhumans.

>>9492490
Well you are obviously normal if you are honestly this offended by being grouped with pedophiles on 4chan of all places and /jp/ of all boards. Whether you accept it or not, you are attracted to idealized representations of prepubescent girls and you are a pedophile.

This is a fact, and your denial will not change that. Le deal with it, sperglord.

I love thick hard 2D cocks and hot sweaty men, but I'm not gay because they are drawings.

>>9492490
"Human trafficking" isn't restricted to children, and it's not wrong because it's children that are being traded, but because humans are being traded. Same can be said about rape.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with love between adults and children, with love being the keyword here. It has been an inseparable part of humanity for thousands of years until people like you decided to shit retarded morals into existence.

>>9492517
Being a pedophile and acting on your urges is illegal, being a faggot is not.
If there was a law against being a 3D gay lover, then the 2D faggot lovers would also speak out against it. I don't know why you think that 2D=3D.

>>9492511
One is illegal and the other isn't, try again. On top of being a pedophile, you seem to be confusing your dimensions. Seek help.

>>9492520
You're right, it isn't restricted to child. But the child born business mostly thrives from it and comparing that to drawings is just absurd.

Comparing the old times to new times, what a fucking joke. Did you know what the average life span was back then?

>>9492561
Child sex trafficking and prostitution numbers are raised considerably by fifteen year olds who run away from home and sell their bodies to get the money to keep moving and stay alive.

>>9492561
>Being a pedophile and acting on your urges is illegal, being a faggot is not.

I honestly wonder if you are clinically retarded. So you admit the only reason you are dividing the two is because you don't want to be "grouped" with them, and not because there is actually a difference?

>If there was a law against being a 3D gay lover, then the 2D faggot lovers would also speak out against it.

Sure, they would pretend they don't like 3D as to not be associated with the 3D homos, but in the end they are still all fucking homos just like you're a pedophile. Accept it, it'll be ok I promise.

>>9492589
You can't tell the difference between a drawing and real life, you are so fucking retarded. A real life human being is used for child pornography while color pencils are used for cp. If you are a pedophile and don't fap to cp, that's cool but if you do, fucking die.
>Sure, they would pretend they don't like 3D as to not be associated with the 3D homos, but in the end they are still all fucking homos just like you're a pedophile. Accept it, it'll be ok I promise.
Oh so they are only pretending not to be a sick fuck like you. Stop projecting your pedoness and faggotry onto others. The whole fapping to 2D only doesn't even apply to lolis, so there goes that argument.

>>9492639
Why do you keep bringing up legality? What the fuck does that have anything to do with this? It seems your basing your sense of morality of what your government tells you is wrong and right.

If having sex with children and CP was made legal tomorrow, would lolicons finally admit they are pedophiles? Because all that is holding you back it seems is the supposed "divide" created by the law.

>>9492639
>Oh so they are only pretending not to be a sick fuck like you. Stop projecting your pedoness and faggotry onto others. The whole fapping to 2D only doesn't even apply to lolis, so there goes that argument.

No, learn to read. If 3D homosexuality was made illegal tomorrow and shunned by society, gays would turn to 2D porn. But I think we can agree it would be ridiculous to claim that these men aren't still gay because the men they are attracted to are drawings instead of the real thing.

Same situation with pedophilia.

>>9491601
Your doubts are misplaced. We don't talk about it much here on /jp/, but other boards do, and given the size of /a/v/b/, there are probably many (but I'm not going to go check, do your own dirty work).

>>9492649
It seems we are branching off. Weren't we originally arguing about how drawings are not the same as real children?
If they lowered the age of consent tomorrow, I would still think that it's sick.
>>9492677
No one is claiming that they aren't gay, just like no one is claiming that lolicons don't like drawings of children.
We have already established that but it's the type of children. One is two dimensional and the other is three dimensional. In one there is someone being used while in the other, no one is.

2D lovers can love 3D. 3D lovers can love 2D. But that does not mean that all 3D lovers
must be 2D lovers or vice versa.

Attention please! An important public announcement is about to take place.

If you like 3D men , you're gay. But there are people like us who only like 2D men, we don't want to be grouped with those people. We aren't "gay", we are "daowkamsl". From now on you should refer to us as daowkamsls, or else! We aren't sick fucks like those gays, we're ultra super cool.

The end.

BUMP LIMIT GET

Slip peacefully off page ̶1̶5̶ 10 now.

>>9492744
>No one is claiming that they aren't gay, just like no one is claiming that lolicons don't like drawings of children.

Like I said, if homosexuality was made illegal THESE 100% GAY MEN who are attracted to 3D would turn to 2D to satisfy their urges. They are still gay and still attracted to 3D, sure some might be conditioned enough by society to believe they aren't really attracted to 3D, but they are still homosexuals.

This parallels to the pedophilia situation. Sex with children is illegal so the only way to express their urges legally is through 2D, and some might actually convince themselves they are not attracted to 3D because they find it morally reprehensible or whatever, but it doesn't change their sexuality.

I'll restate this again for clarity. If gay men tomorrow were not allowed to express their urges with 3D, they would turn to 2D. Pedophiles are not allowed to express their urges with 3D, so they have 2D. But if you are fucking attracted to 2D drawings of kids you are still just as much of a pedophile as a homosexual who is jacking off to 2D men because he's not allowed to fuck 3D ones. FACT.

>>9492792
How about I slip my cock into your ass?

captcha: ssfacial

No pedo threads on /jp/

>>>/jp/9491979

This thread is not gay, because the men are 2D.

>>9492779
Now you're comparing pedophilia to being gay.
Seek help. Normal gay porn involves consent. Pedophile porn doesn't.
>>9492794
Are those gay men still fapping to 3D? Is 3D gay porn being made with those gay mens consent? How long has society banned this? Is 3D gay loving a disorder? Is there a word to refer to people who only like 3D gay and 2D gay?
>This parallels to the pedophilia situation. Sex with children is illegal so the only way to express their urges legally is through 2D, and some might actually convince themselves they are not attracted to 3D because they find it morally reprehensible or whatever, but it doesn't change their sexuality.

>This parallels to the pedophilia situation. Sex with children is illegal so the only way to express their urges legally is through 2D, and some might actually convince themselves they are not attracted to 3D because they find it morally reprehensible or whatever, but it doesn't change their sexuality.
2D lovers can love 3D. 3D lovers can love 2D. But that does not mean that all 3D lovers
must be 2D lovers or vice versa.

And pedos do express their urges with 3D you fucking retard, or else it wouldn't be such a big deal. But I am sure that's another setup by the brainwashing media that's out to get you, them damn kikes.

>>9492878
>>9492878
There is obviously no getting through to you. You clearly think that sexuality is influenced by morality or that you can legislate sexuality or something like that, because you keep bringing up these arguments from a moral highground that are totally irrelevant. You are grasping at straws and you know it. I could not have been any more clear with what I said.

If gay 3D porn was fucking illegal, and it has been banned by society forever, and 3D gay love is a disorder, then it would be exactly like pedophilia. And gay men would turn to 2D would still be fucking gay just like people that masturbate to 2D are still pedophiles.

>And pedos do express their urges with 3D you fucking retard, or else it wouldn't be such a big deal.

Just like in a society where homosexuality and all form of 3D sexual love and porn is banned, some men would still do it and be locked up like pedophiles are. But most would stick to 2D, maybe some would even invent new words for themselves so they aren't associated with the ones doing illegal things.. homocons.

>>9492856
Liking 2D gay is not considered a disorder.
Liking 3D gay is not considered a disorder.
Liking 2D little girls is not considered a disorder and it's not considered illegal if you fap to drawings because consent doesn't apply to them.
Liking 3D little girls is considered a disorder and is illegal if you fap to them because a real child is used and the age of consent does apply.

>>9492931
You're seriously fucking stupid, I mean it. I fear for the future of humanity.

>>9492878
>Now you're comparing pedophilia to being gay.
>Normal gay porn involves consent. Pedophile porn doesn't.
Sexuality need not involve pornography.

>>9492931
HOLY SHIT.

Laws have nothing to do with sexuality. We're talking about sexual fucking attraction. If a law was passed saying all men must be attracted to dolphins it doesn't all of a sudden create a new human sexuality. Following that same train of thought, if a society decides that 2D is legal, while 3D is not, it doesn't create a new human sexuality either you fuckhead. There is no such thing as 2D-sexual as much as /a/ would have you believe so, the only reason such a concept even exists is because the government drew a line between what is acceptable and what is not. Morality has fucking nothing to do with sexuality and neither do laws. Fuck you, die ``please".

You clearly think that anyone who isn't a closet pedo like you must be in denial because there is no way that everyone isn't sick as you, they are just holding back, that is all. And morality doesn't matter when even the law fucking agrees with me.


>If gay 3D porn was fucking illegal, and it has been banned by society forever, and 3D gay love is a disorder, then it would be exactly like pedophilia. And gay men would turn to 2D would still be fucking gay just like people that masturbate to 2D are still pedophiles.

Which goes back to my previous fucking statement that I have already repeated two times.
2D lovers can love 3D. 3D lovers can love 2D. But that does not mean that all 3D lovers
must be 2D lovers or vice versa.

Those people who are pedophiles and resort to 2D to express their urges legally are still pedophiles. You think that because lolicon and pedophilles clash, that they are the same thing which is quite the opposite. This applies to your last paragraph as well.


There is a difference between someone who likes 3D children but resorts to 2D children and someone who likes 2D children after being exposted to 2D women but can't grasp this concept and project your closet pedoeness onto others.

>>9492996
>2D lovers can love 3D. 3D lovers can love 2D. But that does not mean that all 3D lovers
must be 2D lovers or vice versa.

Men who jack off to hot meaty 2D cocks can also love 3D cocks. Men who love 3D cocks can love 2D cocks. All men that like 3D cocks do not like 2D cocks, and all men that like 2D cocks do not like 3D cocks. But they are still all fucking gay, and lolicons are still fucking pedophiles.

End of story. Debate over.

>>9492991
Once you start to understand that everyone who faps to 2D girls isn't a closet pedo like you, then you'll get it.

>Men who jack off to hot meaty 2D cocks can also love 3D cocks. Men who love 3D cocks can love 2D cocks. All men that like 3D cocks do not like 2D cocks, and all men that like 2D cocks do not like 3D cocks.
Yes this is true, I am glad that you are finally getting to get it.
>But they are still all fucking gay, and lolicons are still fucking pedophiles.
You are comparing one thing to two different things. This argument would've worked if you said that they both like children without specifying 2D or 3D(which by the way matters if you didn't know)

Not all pedophiles are lolicons and not all lolicons are pedophiles. Get this through your head.

>>9493125
>You are comparing one thing to two different things.

No I'm not. Explain how they are different without referencing the law or how it's "morally wrong".

>Not all pedophiles are lolicons and not all lolicons are pedophiles. Get this through your head.

You can keep repeating this but it doesn't make it true.

>>9493125
>This argument would've worked if you said that they both like children without specifying 2D or 3D(which by the way matters if you didn't know)

No it does not matter. If you remove morality from the situation, the difference is just a line drawn by the government. See>>9492991

"im attracted to childlike features in drawins lol id fuk that little loli girl in her tight puffy vulva! real kids? ew lol thats gross im no pedophile."

-Anonymous 8/1/2012

"Lolicons" are beyond delusional.

>>9493190
Hint: Don't act like a newcomer to a thread when it is already autosaging.

Has Troll School become a degree mill these days or what?

>>9493216
I bet you're one of those people who only browses page 0. Try to not reveal that you're from /a/ so easily.

Also "troll school", seriously? Is this /b/ or something?

>>9493152
The process of being gay does not equate to liking 2D or 3D.

We are arguing over two topics(pedophilia and lolicon) and to equate that, you need two topics as well. "Being gay" is one topic. Jesus I can't believe I have to do this.
>>9493171
It does matter. They are two huge different things. One is a drawing without a real person and one is.
Everyone who faps to 2D is a closet pedos in your eyes though, so there is no getting through you.

Look I understand that people who are pedophiles resort to 2D drawings, that doesn't mean everyone is a pedophile because of that. That just means that they have a shared interest. The reasons why they are fapping to them are quite different. One faps to them because it reminds them of 3D and one faps to them because they naturally find them arousing.
>>9493190
There is no helping you.

>>9493253
There is exactly one person who would want to post that, and he has already been posting. You should take my advice.

>>9493283
So being gay encompasses both 2D and 3D but when it comes to being attracted to children there are two distinct sexualities apparently because of a line your government drew.

You will just keep saying that wanting to fucking drawings of kids and in many cases exact body traces of actual 3D children(rustle and many others) does not make you a pedophile, and I will keep saying you are fucking stupid.

Anyway, I'm done. Have a nice day.

There is tons of real legal porn right? So why is it that some people only fap to 2D porn? According to your logic, people who fap to 2D loli only do it because they can't fap to 3D. So what is this weird phenomenon? People who like real porn with 3D women are the same as the people who like 2D women in the sense that they both like women but are actually quite different. So you can say that they both like women but according to your "all lolicons are pedohpiles logic", all 2D women lovers are 3D women lovers". Which is in fact quite bullshit. See ya.