/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Wow, what a great thread. Treating a human like a fucking sex object and trying to cloak it as a ``joke.'' Go away.

>>9472732

>cartoon
>human

You're either trolling or ugly.

>>9472732

>human being
Don't you mean intellectual property?

Best file name of the day, good job, OP!

>>9472732
Is this your first time on 4chan?

...or the internet for that matter?

>>9472787
Why is it that /jp/ hates normalfags because their mainmotivation is sexual satisfaction but at the same time they are such repressed perverts?

>>9472732
>>>/cgl/

>>9472775
>>9472778
>>9472787
>>9472792
/jp/ is untrollable.

>>9472787
>>9472792
It's his gimmick. He does this a lot.

>>9472797

It's all about what's popular to believe at the moment.

>>9472778
Intellectual Property is a word you should not use. Intellectual property is used as a combonation of trademark, patent, and copywrite which is confusing. This is not good as each system has different problems and solutions. Intellectual property is only used by those who are trying to confuse the people, or by those that are already confused. Please do not use the word.

Someone that uses ``faggot'' quotes can't be that dumb.

>>9472821
Proof that people using faggot quotes can be arbitrarily dumb.

>>9472804

I'm just using that term because to classify it as it would in a court of law, instead of a person, as Sweden or Commonwealth countries do, as that causes problems. It's a messy umbrella term, but works to describe the franchise.

If you made comments non-stop about a person's non-sexual physical features being remarkable, ignoring everything else about them as a person, that would be terrible: it would imply that the person is only ``worth'' the sum of their long running legs or keen ears or whatever. Why is it any different if you do it with sexual features?