/jp/ - Otaku Culture

HAHAHA thanks for posting this.

>>9136835
The look on the guys face after the video was priceless.

This is worth bumping.

So why was that gachimuchi video used?

It took me like 10 seconds to fully comprehend what I was seeing

fugg yeah japan is so randumb :---------D

>>9136848
Np dude

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7TH28LJ8s0&feature=plcp#t=22m51s

So much /jp/.

Every single post in here is mine.

As for Greg's claims about the so-called "Old Testament atrocities", I will say this. God is under no moral obligation to keep us alive. It is His prerogative to do what He wants with our lives. If he wants to strike us all downright now, that's His prerogative. The problem here is that Greg seems to think that it is Christian doctrine that God's ultimate purpose for creating us is for us to be happy in this life. That's simply not Christianity.

God's commands, which stem from His perfectly good nature, constitute our moral duties. In this way, they are objectively true. That means they don't change. That being said, that doesn't mean that they ignore circumstances. For example, killing someone is wrong in certain circumstances and right in others. In the exact same way, some of God's commands to Israel, if applied to day, may have consequences which aren't helpful.

I've already kind of covered this, but Greg asserted that it's obvious that not everything in the Bible is right. I highly doubt Greg understands what the implications of God's commands in the Bible were, and so it seems this comment is baseless (or at least lacks any justification). He also asserts that certain things in the Bible don't hold true today. This seems to be a misunderstanding of moral ontology.

>>9137008
You forgot this one:
>All of that being said, the fact that Greg and Andy tout themselves as libertarians, yet think the government should be involved in the religious institution of marriage is shameful. True libertarians wouldn't want the government involved in religious institutions like marriage. They'd want the government to stay out of the matter and leave it to the churches and private individuals.
She doesn't seem to be aware of the fact that the US government issues marriage licenses.

>>9137043
She's right, though. She's saying they should say government SHOULDN'T issue marriage licenses IF they were true libertarians. Which they apparently aren't.

>>9137043
I don't understand why people think marriage is a religious thing. Marriage is not exclusive to the Abrahamic. religions. Every culture in the world has some form of marriage - it is cultural. It is more in tune with contract law than anything. Which is precisely the reason why fags can and should marry.

>>9137048
See above. The reason some libertarians are of the opinion that government should be involved with marriage is because it has to do with contract law not religion.

>>9137059
Ask yourself why the government rewards marriage in the first place.

That's why gays shouldn't be issued a marriage license. Their marriage produces nothing and is of no value.

ing4 "BUT I WANNA FEEL SPECIAL HURR"

>>9137074
Then why do they let sterile couples marry? That's hypocrisy and you are aware of it.

>>9137084
Sterility can often be cured and/or reversed, and checking every married couple for their sterility is not worth the cost.

guys, neither of you are ever going to get married or even have sex ever so why have an opinion?

Is the video saying that last week when the host was on a flight the person next to him was watching a gachimuchi video?

>>9137074
Why bother recognizing marriage? Why not just reward couples by the number of children they have?

>>9137108
Because they would have to track and update that shit which would cost mondo dineros.

>>9137112
Children's births are already tracked by the government. It's nothing they're not doing already.

>>9137109
You're never going to be President so why even vote?

>>9137121
>You're never going to be President
Speak for yourself.

>>9137121
A better reply would have been that a single vote is insignificant so why even vote.

which /jp/er woul d you gay marry

>>9137121

>>9137118
I was talking more about updating the benefits and such costing money rather than the raw tracking data.

>>9137130
All of them :3

>>9137108
>Why not just reward couples by the number of children they have?
I'm pretty sure they already do, in addition to tax deductions for households with married couples.

>>9137132
It was supposed to be stupid, genius.

>>9137136
Yeah, you get deductions and credits or something, but what I'm asking that if it's children that the government intends to reward, why bother rewarding marriage itself?

>>9137133
The cost of updating the number in some government database is tiny compared to the cost of actually dispensing those benefits (and it happens already anyway).

>>9137141
sure so can we take the politics of marriage to another, more appropriate board now?

>>>/pol/
>>>/b/
>>>/soc/
>>>/bizzarrojp/

>>9137108

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bavou_SEj1E

China a shit but I wouldn't mind a similar child policy in America, maybe 2 kids per family. All the world's problems can be traced to shitty parents.

>>9137148
whc 2hu wud u fuq

>>>/jp/

>>9137153
>All the world's problems can be traced to shitty parents.
This is absolutely true.

>China a shit but I wouldn't mind a similar child policy in America
China's child policy has proven disastrous.

>>9137153
China's policy is retarded because it results in parent's killing their own daughters or resenting them.

A more sensible plan is to require an income of ~$30k per child.

>>9137153
You could diminish returns for every child beyond the second.

>>9137162
That's mostly just a gender balance problem, isn't it?

which 2hu wud u wait till marriage to fuq

>>9137159
>waaaaaah! people dont want to read my irrelevant bullshit that has probably been said a million times before!

>tiem to SHITPOST, that will prove my point! XD

>>9137169
/jp/ was created for shitposting according to moot himself.

Deal with it, nerd.

>>9137184
according to moot you have to suck my dick.

moot agrees dont bother him about it.

>>9137188
Well?

Whip it out.

>>9137184
You do realize that post is swathed in /jp/-style irony, right?

>>9136835
i dont get it

>>9137198
You do know that post never happened, right?

>>9137198
You do realize you're a turbonerd, right?

>>9137217

>>9137230
HOW THE FUCK IS THAT ICE CUBE ON FIRE? PLEASE RESPOND

>>9137238
Someone used a lighter.

Does anyone have that image describing the difference between "trolling" and jokes?

Hello everyone I am a woman though I identify as a male lesbian. I sleep around a lot and I will happily admit to being a slut although slut is just another word for sexually liberated women. Speaking of women, gender pay gaps are horrible and women should get paid more because we can do jobs better than men. Anyway my question is, I want to divorce my husband and accuse him of raping me so I can get money. He treated me badly by having a circumcised penis and those are worse because fuck America, Europe is the best country. Also the Holocaust never happened and I hope Sharia law takes over the world. I feel the homosexual community of /jp/ would most know how I feel.

Please respond.

>>9137261
you know friend, there is being subtle, and there is wearing a suit made of firealarms and fireworks while jumping into a volcano.

guess which one you did

>>9137261

Try reddit.com/r/srs

Yeeeeeeeeah.... I'm gonna go ahead and demand a response here.

So, if you could, you know, get on that right away it would be great. Thanks.

Yeeeeeah............. I'm still waiting on that response.

Any time is good, but you're probably busy right now. If you could just get on it as soon as possible I'd appreciate it.

Thanks again.

>>9137359
Response on what?

>>9137371
Thanks, buddy.

>>9137326
> it would be great

that's suposed to be ``that would be terrific''

>>9137450
I wasn't trying to quote his lines.

>>9137470
You were still pastiching the way he speaks, faglord, stop making excuses.