/jp/ - Otaku Culture

What? Not allowed? Since when? That's not in the rules.

>>88886
win sticky

mai waifu

So, no more uniform threads?

You can keep the uniform threads, provided its not stuff like Sayaa Irie shit.

And the rule on child models has always been in effect across the site. 3 guesses on why, and the first two don't count.

Hmm... Worksafe, legal (hell it's more legal than ecchi in places like parts Europe or Canada), awesome...

I give up.

>>89021
Because what happened on /a/ a few days ago?

>>89104
No that can't be right. And the child model thread on /jp/ earlier lasted a few hours without any CP or CP models being posted.

>>89144

>>89366

Fine, I'll spell it out for you then. No child models of any kind. No uniform threads, nothing like Sayaa Irie shit, and no creepy pedo shit.

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK.

In b4 b&.

Since the mod is watching this thread, someone suggested earlier it might be a good idea to have a sticky dedicated to learning Japanese, since there are around 60 threads a day in /jp/ on the subject.

I'm guessing that, since there's already a foreign language discussion board, it won't be kind of superfluous, though.

Since the mod is watching this thread, someone suggested earlier it might be a good idea to have a sticky dedicated to learning Japanese, since there are around 60 threads a day in /jp/ on the subject.

I'm guessing that, since there's already a foreign language discussion board, it would be kind of superfluous, though.

I was one of the people who were bitching about the mods who were banning people for posting idols (even though it was not stated in the rules). But now that it has been listed in the rules I have no problem with it. Next time *tell before banning. I received a ridiculous b& for making a "child modeling thread." The thread was about drawing idols yet some how the mod saw it as porn and/or pedo.

In my opinion, you're the "pedo creep" if you see an idol video as porn.

>>89401
/r/ing for more mod post. There has been a bad relationship between mods and Anons for the following reason:

How can you like someone, when you only know the person as an enemy. The only time we come into contact with a mod is when we get banned. So our brains associate anger with mods.

>>89807

Lol, so much for freedom of speech. "THE INTERNET IS SERIOUS BUSINESS." The more legit 4chan becomes the more shittier it becomes. Remember when 4chan was a porn site that pleased everybody's fetishes. 4chan is starting to become like "animenewsnetwork." I came to 4chan to do shit that would get me banned on other sites. But with mods like you, I'm better off at said shitty sites. Stop taking the Internet so seriously and get into the old spirit of 4chan.

I like the first post of this thread about the sticky.

Ogiue is awesome.

wha...

What's the matter? Too DEEP for you?

>>88896
at least point to what you're talking about.

>it's not allowed you pedo creeps.

Underage mods, in my 4chan?

>>88903
OP's picture reminds me of the Big Dogs picture with that text.

Whats the matter? Too NIPPON for you?

it says junior idols not allowed. so teen idols are still okay.

What's the matter, too yaio for you?

>>88886
Ship da Whip

/jp/ - PEDO CREEPS

fail sticky is FAIL. pedophelia is the best thing in the world.

>>88957
It's in the sticky, posted by a mod.

Therefore, it is a rule.

Enjoy your ban.

>>88957
Since the mod started banning you for it you fucking pedo.

I don't think you know the rules.
Enjoy your ban.

>>88957
lol, man face in the mirror.

your all pedos, the one who are banning just haven't come out of the closet yet......

>>88957
since today. probably see a rule page update pretty soon.

thank god i was tried of that shit being here

>>88983

>you're all <societal group>, the ones who are hating on us just haven't come out of the closet yet...

Same line of reasoning is used for fucking everything. Shitty logic is shitty.

>>88983
3d makes my stomach roil.... even if it IS a loli.

>>88992
We're all illogical, the ones complaining about it just haven't come out of the closet yet.

>>89021
Because mods = fags?

>>89021
because it's against the rules of 4chan to enjoy something on any given board?

>>89030
No, because Mods = Awesome.

>>89038
Junior idols are more awesome and mods are deleting them and thus mods = fags.

>>89043

sage for creepy pedo. holy hell, just what is the fucking appeal.

>>89043
But what if the mod happens to be a junior idol?

>>89050
8 year olds, dude.

>>89050
Don't ask me. It's not like I've made a thorough scientific study of why things make my penis hard. I just accept that they do.

>>89055
What happened on /a/ a few days ago? I stopped going there after the split.

Junior idol thread degenerated to CP?

>>89050
Girls at that age are the cutest, bog boobs are for lactants, DFC is for real men.

Liking little girls is genetic. Scientists said that a male contains the gene that is said to theoretically make any male penis to erect at the sight of CP.
Search it in google, there's an article there somewhere.

>>89050
I'm surprised you're not a hardcore pedophile yourself; you're on /jp/.

>>89075
Wouldn't be the first time there was cp on /a/.

Liking little girls is genetic. Scientists said that a male contains the gene that is said to theoretically make any male penis to erect at the sight of CP.
Search it in google, there's an article there somewhere.

>>89021
Because it is of dubious legality in the U.S. (and since the site is hosted in the U.S., that's what matters), and furthermore it leads to definite CP being posted.

Do I win anything?

>>89075
CP.

HAY WHAT'S NOT4CHAN'S IP ADDRESS THESE DAYS?

One more pigdisgusting 3D banned.
One more steps towards Utopia.

>>89075
Board was flooded with promotions for half the day and eventually CP.

>>89104
No, it's of definite legality in the US (especially the fully-clothed stuff /jp/ posts mostly), and there's no reason it has to lead to definite CP being posted any more than any other thread must lead to porn of its subject matter being posted.

>>89021

aside from the inevitable decline to CP, junoir idols are legal. Non nude, and not in blatently sexual poses.

That thread was a lot more tame, and less naked than the old GRAY AREA threads in /b/ with naked borderline underage girls.

I dont think banning those threads as a preventative measure against CP really really stop the problem because if someone wants to post CP, they'll post CP.

Let the creeps have their j idols, they arnt hurting anyone.

>>89112
wow not4chan is pretty set against cp and 3d. there's even a sticky about realistic art not being welcomed

>>89121
probably because a mod didn't find it until someone reported it.

i feel so guilty fapping to those junior idol vids
like when they eat ice cream
or have all that liquid soap on them in the shower
or suck on a banana until their saliva turns it into a pasty white liquid
glad i don't fap to that anymore

>>89112
66.207.165.176

>>89125
>>aside from the inevitable decline to CP, junoir idols are legal.
you don't get it so you. legal by law - yes. LEGAL ON THIS SITE - NO. live with it or leave.

>>89121
The first part is right, believe it or not. Even clothed pictures can be CP if the focus of the picture is deemed to be sexual in nature (the flip side is that non-sexual nudes are not CP). Read up on the law. Furthermore, the police usually take an extremely liberal interpretation of the law.

The second part is essentially paraphrasing what moot himself said about JB back at /b/day. It doesn't mean it happens every time, it just means it makes the mod's jobs to hard.

>>89125
I think the mod in this case was acting out of personal distaste. Apparently since school uniforms are alright, it's okay to have children modeling for images, but not professional models. This is ironic, because I always see more images likely to be labeled "pornographic" and "obscene" (basically, illegal) from the candid photographers; professional photographers don't make that mistake, or if they do, they don't release the image.

Basically, the material that the mod has OK'd at this point is more likely to cause problems than professional junior idols.

>>89161
If it's not allowed on this site, explain >>89021

>>89124
Teenage girls deliberately flashing their panties at the camera (as we had in the most recent thread) is borderline at best. Arguably, that places the focus of the picture on the genitals (and it doesn't matter that they are clothed), which would make it CP. A cop is going to see it that way, anyhow. It doesn't matter that you might win in court, either: try getting your reputation back after being arrested for CP.

It's about time the mods did something like this. Kudos, Moot!

>>89214
That's what I (>>89169) am referring to. That happens all the time with candid modeling, whereas professional models don't do things like focus images on the chest or crotch, and don't allow things like purposely exposing panties.

>>89169
Um, I'm pretty sure this is a case of "moot agreed, don't bother him." This type of material has always been prohibited, and especially since /b/day. Anyone whose been here any length of time knew this already (though we might have enjoyed the show while it lasted).

>>89226
>professional models don't do things like focus images on the chest or crotch, and don't allow things like purposely exposing panties.
HAHAHA OH WOW!

>>89265
Russian child models are shit, Russia basically doesn't care if she's nude and showing off her pussy, we're talking /jp/ related here.

>>89309
You sir, lie. Lie like a fly with a stye in your eye. But I can't post pics to prove it.

i don't understand why these people insist on quoting real law. that doesn't matter. the law on this site is what the mods/hostmaster/webmaster says they are. don't like it, start you own board.

>>89326
Once again, if you say that they're not allowed, explain >>89021

>>89331
there's nothing the explain. if you don't get it. you need to leave, now.

eh, whatever already. keeping posting what you want and i'll keep reporting them if they break any rules. end of discussion.

>>89352
You're retarded aren't you?

He said child models are allowed if they're not professional, that's what it sounds like to me.

>>89309
I actually was talking about Japan, not Russia. The Japanese are generally more discreet than the Russians (now, anyway, as opposed to the era of Rika Nishimura), but there is still a fair amount of stuff coming out of Japan that is very, very dubious under U.S. law.

>>89326
Because I have always understood that the desire to avoid legal trouble is part of moot's motivation in not allowing Child Models/Junior Idols to be posted. Certainly he has the right to set whatever rules he wants, but as I understand it, in this case legality factors into it.

>>89401
Alright, that's a decision that stands up to logic at least. I'm willing to back anything logical.

>>89401

THE GOD HAS SPOKEN

>>89366
Nice going, fuckwit. We could have still had uniform threads, but no, YOU had to be a moron.

Let's all end the thread while we can still have adult Japanese women.

considering that this shit is some of the easiest to find shit on the internet, i don't see why anyone's bitching.

>>89419
No, what was going to happen is a uniform thread would be posted and there would be tons of bannings by mods deciding things are too borderline.

>>89430

lol yeah just look what happened to /toy/ when it first came out.

Mark my words, /jp/ was never good. If some newfag a few years from now decide to act like he knows /jp/ saying that /jp/ was once good. Remember my words during its conception that /Jp/ is and will never be good.

i think a ban of all real-life girl pics is needed. guys are okay tho.

>>89436
lol, I got banned in /toy/ on the first day for asking where I can purchase a fleshlight.

>>89436
>>89436
you mean the delicious figs that were posted?

>>89444

yeah,

oh i almost forgot about the hotglue that appeared in /sp/erm

awesome, maybe there will be less 3d pig disgusting threads now

>>89437
but /jp/ is good.

>>89526
Certainly is about to be better without the 3D shit. Well, at least a good portion of it.

>>89462
It's not like /jp/ isn't slow enough as it is...

>>89730
see global rule 11.

>>88888

>>89401
Define Jr Idol. Ages 5-16 or...?

>>89730
Agreed. More mod/user interaction would be nice, however I don't know how feasible it is for them.

>>89772
global rule 11. mods don't need to explain themselves. so shuddap already.

/r/ing for an apology for all of the people who received bans for "Jr Idol threads" and/or "Child modeling threads."

>/jp/ - Japan/General
>1. All things Japanese welcome!
>By moot

So Jr Idols != Japanese.

/r/ing that you update the /jp/ rules page. Oops, I forgot that you goons can't edit pages.

>>89807
As other posters have said, look at global rule #11. No CM is a site-wide rule, anyhow, not a /jp/ rule. Is it explicitly stated in the site-wide rules, no. It shouldn't have to be.

>>89822
Global Rule #11 isn't child model specific, all it says is that mods reserve the right to ban you as they see fit.

>>89401

Let me get this straight, we can't even have pictures of girls in uniforms, the kind that you can see in the fucking schools of japan, on the fucking streets of japan, in the fuckin country of japan.

Or are all female students in japan walk around censored or something?

>>89852

It would be time for banning /cgl/, they were posting stuff like that for a while now.

so /jp/ lost the only good thing that it had..back to /a/ now. At least there we can have pedo threads.

Good riddance, 3Dfags. This board was never meant to be /childmodels/. That shit wasn't tolerated on /a/, and it shouldn't be tolerated here. The carry-overs from /a/ were visual novels, Touhou, and figurines.

>>89838
I didn't say it was CM-specific. If you could READ you'd know I said it WASN'T specific, but that IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE SPECIFIC BECAUSE OF GLOBAL RULE #11.

>>89861
>Stop taking the Internet so seriously and get into the good old spirit of *old 4chan.

FIXED

>>89852
SPOILER: We are not currently located in Japan, so your comparison falls flat.

There's a billion sites on the web that deal with uniform girls. Go there.

>>89407
GOD IS A FAG

>Remember when 4chan was a porn site that pleased everybody's fetishes?

Not really. I remember a site that was all about freedom of speech, yes. but not porn.

>>89852
>>Let me get this straight, we can't even have pictures of girls in uniforms, the kind that you can see in the fucking schools of japan, on the fucking streets of japan, in the fuckin country of japan.
yeah thanks to the dumbasses pedos in this thread.

>>89884

How do you know I'm not located in Japan?
And if we would be here only for the pictures then why not just replace 4chan with google?
And even then, does japanese men have builtin censorship so they cant see females under 18 or what?

>>89852
Yes, because faggots and fucktards couldn't distinguish posting random pictures of girls in school uniforms from posed junior idols, when they were given the chance, forcing the mods to ban it all.

This is why we can't have nice things.

>>89891
then a few months later pedos came here and posted cp. then the rules appeared.

And what exactly is the problem with child mdels as long as they are completly clothed?
I would understand it would've been some swimsuits crap or something, but school uniforms and such are hardly over the line for anyone.

>>89876

Well I hope the mods enjoy doing futile work because Anons failed to care about the non-specific rule. For example:

1.Are 15-17 year old Idols allowed?
2.Are young girls in general allowed to be posted here?

Because Anon lacks the specifics, the mods are going to have to be handing out bans left and right, till Anon gets it.

>>89921
Or Anon could just save everyone the aggravation and take that stuff to 12chan.

>>89921
faggot, anon never forgive or submits to the mods.

fuck this shit, lets take the issue to the higher supreme court and bother moot about it

Call me a newfag, but where in the rules and/or global rules does it say no pictures of young girls? I don't think it's fair to ban someone for a rule that they broke that wasn't listed until today.

Global rule #1 has the following:

>Do not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to, anything that violates local or United States law.

But Idols a) are not breaking any laws, and b) are a legal trend in pretty much every nation that I know.

>>89959

The Mod's are fags. Moot agreed,dont bother him about it.

>>89968
seconded

>>89954
Indeed. This mod could have at least updated the rules page before banning people.

The rules said "/jp/ - Everything Japan is welcomed" not "/jp/ - Everything from Japan except Jr Idols is welcomed."

>>89921
Why must you continue to push it? Don't you get it yet? These rules were left unwritten and vague for a reason: to allow for leeway. They don't want to have to impose a flat "no pics of anyone under 18, EVAR" rule site-wide, but you're going to give them no choice. USE COMMON SENSE when posting. If you get b&, you crossed a line: don't do that next time. Unless you seriously fucked up, you won't be permab&.

the cp flood HASNT happened because of tolerance by anonymous. mods keep acting like nazifags and maybe they'll be staring down a double barreled CP flood. maybe they'll ban every IP on tor. who gives a fuck?

>>89959
You're a newfag. One of the things that comes with posting on 4chan is that you can often get b& without explicitly violating a rule. So what, though? Learn from the ban rather than whining about it.

>>89977
SOMEONE seems unfamiliar with the classic W.T. Snacks permaban.

>>89990
What if said ban was a permaban?

>>89977
$10 says a girl is the /jp/ mod. girls are always strictfags when they're in power. it's like their one chance to prove their equality with men and they shit all over it.

>>89979
LURK MOAR.

The CP flood HAS happened - many times.

let them post what they want. they will get reported. mods will delete and ban. repeat. repeat. repeat. mods complain to moot. /jp/ vanishes. and you can only blame yourselves.

>>89977

Are child models accepted anywhere else in 4chan? No? Then why the fuck did you think this would be any different?

>>89998
Then you probably deserved it.

>>90000
all this yelling and screaming, no one noticed.

Who even gives a shit, 3d is pig disgusting.

>>90002
Then I can go back to a restored /a/. Win-win.

>>89992
Amen, another reason why I hate women. She's probably that female mod who went down on moot. He gave her a mod job just for a Bjay. I'd pay moot money to let me suck his cock, yet you don't see me asking for a mod job. Why do women receive such special treatment?

>>90014
Fuck. After two and a half years on 4chan, I finally post a GET and it's text-only.

>>89998
See post directly above yours.

Snacks used to hand out global permabans as if he were getting paid by the number of banned IP's.

No rhyme or reason, just the HAMMER.

>>90004

That's because Jr Idols are too weeaboo for /b/. If they knew about it they would be posting it. Same thing goes for Touhou. And can we please stop refering to it as Child modeling. Nice try, but Jr Idols != child modeling. Idols (in general) are a big part of Japanese culture. The Jr Idol industry is almost bigger than Japan's music industry. Your argument is looking pretty weak.

>>90002
KEIKAKU DOORI.

>>90023
Yeah, it almost makes you wonder why moot gave him the boot. Note the sarcasm.

>>90029
Part A

Jsut because it's relevant in Japanese culture doesn't change the fact that it's no different from child modeling

Part B

NOTHING is too weeaboo for /b/. The fact that you HAVEN'T seen either Touhou or "Idols" on /b/ means you're skirting DANGEROUSLY close to "Just got here when /jp/ formed" newfag.

>>90023
Along the same lines (no specific rule violation), though not a permaban: I was b& for a week once by moot himself for posting an archive request (my first ever ban). That was on /b/, though.

>>90029
/b/ has gotten soft. posting pedo shit gets a bunch of newfags yelling about morality and how anonymous is now the morality avenger of the internets.

>>90037
because moot is a faggot..and he only hires other faggots in denial as mods..don't you get it? If you didn't realize this..you're a newfag.

>>90029
Now I KNOW you're a newfag. Junior Idols and CM used to be fairly common on /b/, though they were always ban-worthy. Saya Irie was a minor meme for a long time. After the enforcement was tightened up (i.e., after /b/day), they became far less common.

>>90049
Are you kidding? Theres at least one faggot every day who posts real child pornography in /b/.

snacks's history is overhyped. he permbanned camwhores & the fags that got all pissy because the camwhore threads were deleted.
moot & snacks both have a habit of banning "for the lulz". newfags always find a b& funny because they're naturally brown-nosers.

>>90043
Yeah, when CP started eliciting vociferous complaints rather than "FUKKEN SAVED" was when I left /b/ forever.

dang, hope that uniform ban is lifted. that's all i've got. otherwise there's nothing interesting to post....

>>90057
It used to be at least one or two per HOUR, though.

>>90057
someone hasn't been to /b/ in a few months. go post some loli pics and see what happens.

better yet, post the AWWWWRIGHT scene from mai-chan's daily life. you'll get saged to hell & back by the /b/tard censors.

>>90057
And shit goes unnoticed too now it's so fucking common. A year and half ago 4chan would literally explode of some one posted CP. Threads reaching /cu/ and /mu/ would have at least four threads on the front page saying "SUM 1 POSTED CP IN /b/!!!!!!111!1"

>>89992

This board has had some of the most *questionable modding I have ever seen. Never before in my almost 3 years of lurking 4chan have I had so much problems with the moderation. On /jp/, the mods seem to be making up rules as they go along. They don't seem to be doing enough for the important issues, yet they are doing too much for the lesser issues. Is there a new mod on the block, or are the mods finally starting to reveal their nazi colors?

I dont get it. If it's Japanese media and isnt CP, why ban it in /jp/? I'm not stupid enough to think free speech applies to the internet (though /b/ is about as close as it gets), but uniforms and idols and all this shit doesnt violate any laws I'm aware of (4chan's whois points to texas) so that means the reason is something completely different.

So is this there an actual basis on which this rule has been imposed, or is it just a power trip by someone who doesnt want us to experience all the rich culture and media Japan has to offer?

>>90065
What /b/ has become makes me want to cry. Where did we go wrong, anon?

>>90076
twelve year old girls dude.

I wish to be the little girl ;_;

>>90079
New fags come in, don't know the rules of /b/, fuck shit up. No one blames ebaumsworld anymore, newfags don't even know we used to let alone why.

>>90080

So? A school uniform looks the same whether it's on a 12 year old or 95 year old, though size is variable.

>>90041
Well moot clearly said: /jp/ = Worksafe stuff from Japan that doesn't belong on /a/.

Next time say "no Jr Idols, no young girls in uniforms, and whatever random bullshit impulses that came to this mod's head."

>>90043

children always start to resemble their parents when they grow up, so this shouldn't come as a surprise

>>90069
Newfag. That's all time since /b/day. Before /b/day there were threads with real CP that lasted nearly two hours (TWENTY MINUTE may have been the meme, but it was surpassed on many occasions). People rarely took notice, but then there was the big crackdown and people started paying attention because it was no longer something that happened on an hourly basis.

I think this is just some reactionary fags expanding the definition of "child porn" to "any god damn picture of a child, whether it's actually porn or not".

Seems to me they're projecting their own dirty minds on other people.

>>90096

But those are worksafe =.=;

>>90088
I know, there were always newfags, though; but they used to be manageable (hell, I was a newfag once, so were you - we all were). What did we do to get overrun?

The Habbo raids?

It was the goddamn Habbo raids, wasn't it?

Right now,
/b/tards are crying about some beaners setting a dog on fire like it's the most horrible thing on /b/ EVAR.

>>90090
/jp/ Is not here to expand our horizons and teach us of the culture of the far east. /jp/ is here for us to masturbate while we pretend we were anime characters with harems and japanese girlfriends who dig our flabby pale round eyed bodies and patchy beards. If people post little japanese school girls, then people will masturbate to them and people will post more until this becomes one gigantic weeaboo/pedophile haven.

>>90104
>reactionary fags expanding the definition of "child porn" to "any god damn picture of a child, whether it's actually porn or not".
In America we call those people "cops." Also "social workers."

>>90119
Has anyone posted zippocat in reply yet?

I agree, this mod is a sanctimonious female. The worst type of scum and villain that ravage through our tubes.

>>90116
No, thats when I came here. Prior to that I used to just steal gifs for ytmnds. I've abandoned ytmnd and I n0 longer steal gifs.

>>90049
Sorry if I failed to pass my /b/ history test. I am (and always have been) a 24/7 /a/sshole.

And to the mod (if you're still lurking this thread).

>creepy pedo

Takes one to know one. I truthfully don't know what you're talking about when you say Jr Idols are pedo. I've been drawing Jr Idols since I was a kid, and I've never seen it as a sexual thing. The older Idols, on the other hand, I've always fapped to.