/jp/ - Otaku Culture

because autism

*Lights go on*

Teacher: Now that, children, is why you don't go into stranger's houses, especially when they look like dolls you had when you were a child,

Children: O.O

Thread reported.

Why do Alice and Cirno both have exactly 5 letters in them?

>>8544359
who?

KoG is a Zionist hoax.

Can somebody tell me who KOG is??

every post in this thread that isn't using the sage function is kog samefagging his thread

Alice in Spaceland is a pun on Japanese ZUN's "Alice in Shanghai Land".

>that feel when this thread is leading up to KoG getting the quint 4s

>>8544370
>>8544374
Normally I wouldn't say this because I hate pseudonymity and e-penis, but
Get the fuck out and/or lurk more.

kog is a jew

what? what?! WHATT!?!? I NEVER LOSE!! I NEVER DO!! T^T i lost.. i never lose >:(

>>8544379
KoG_foreshadowing_his_own_posts.jpg.exe

>>8544382

Or maybe both are a pun on Alice in Wonderland?

If you change Cirno's hair from blue to yellow, she looks a ton like PC-98 Alice...

>>8544387
I think he's the one posting the vocaloid and random posts in order to speed up the process.

You know what this means dude. H0mu for 444 GET.

GUYS

HEY GUYS

WHAT IF

WHAT IF KOG

WHAT IF HE WAS SPACELAND

zunbar_plays_alice_in_spaceland.jbcs

>>8544397

jbcs?

>>8544399
Jamaican bride conjuring SAGE

>>8544394
Actually that was me. Was just bored and thought they were funny. Copy paste comments since I'm not that creative to make something so autistic.

I hate GETs, but I will use my script and take KoG's 4s just to piss him off.

I don't see why KoG bothers when he's friends with a mod who has access to #reserve

>>8544414

>#reserve
>twitter hash tags

Get out.

incoming autism

>>8544419
No, it's a command like the various capcodes.

They probably pre-date Twitter, actually.

Eye can has asperger?

>KoG

>>8544444
Epic win!

>>8544444
>>8544445

And all is right with the world.

>>8544426
The autism is already here

>>8544444

>>8544445
>>544445

H0mu GET.

>>8544445
22 kB > 3 kB you baka.

>>8544445

Why is our janitor so shitty?

I know he's here since he just deleted my shit thread. So why is he leaving shit threads made by his IRC buddies up on the front page?

I'm e-mailing moot about this shit.

>>8544444
kog's autism is unbeatable

>>8544455

>>8544462
that doesn't even make any sense

You have to think: If Alice is KoG's TRUE waifu, wouldn't it make sense to hide her as much as possible why making everybody else think that Cirno is his waifu?

>>8544466

>>8544466

It does if you're autistic.

Just look at KoG's blog page:

nonoba.com/kog

Cirno lives by a LAKE, not a FOREST.

In Alice in Wonderland, where does Alice go to?

A FOREST.

It all makes sense.

It is a basic tenet of psychology that humankind is not meant to be divided. Man, generally speaking, cannot in good health live a solitary life. Invariably, he will either crumble from the loneliness or reach out to another human being. It is why prostitution and religion, the two oldest industries, are still thriving today. They offer man the same service—companionship. The belief that one is not alone, that one shares something with another gives man the feeling of acceptance, which he desires above all else after his survival is ensured. This has been written out in Maslow's hierarchy of needs, as well as being something of an inborn knowledge that most everyone understands without having to explicitly define it. So let us explore further.

Prostitution and religion, most would argue they could not be further removed. As they pertain to this topic, their greatest difference is the greatest proof of the legitimacy of 'waifu'. It can generally be agreed that religion offers most people a longer-lasting sense of joy than fornication with a harlot. Yet, why is this? Should not man fulfilling his biological imperative give him the highest sense of joy? No, because man is not merely a machine who must solely spread his seed. Man is also emotion, which gains no long-term satisfaction from empty lust and must supplement it with religion to achieve the sense of belonging he requires to continue living. This is why the priesthood, who may never indulge in carnal desire their entire life, are generally a fulfilled collective. To top it off, religion is even convenient enough to give them a sense of purpose, that they are serving in martyrdom to complete some grand deist orchestration that is indisputably their life's work.

So, after mankind's needs of the body are met, we have boiled the remainder of his desires down to three core principles: fornication, belonging and purpose. Yet fornication we have already proved superfluous when overwhelmed by a proliferation of the other two points. If one has significant belonging and purpose, fornication can be considered excess. However, by the same token it can also be seen in society that a lack of belonging and purpose breeds an excess of fornication, supplemented by a mockery of those who forgo it. Those souls who reside in every niche of humanity who are deprived of their happiness by a lack of these points ridicule those fulfilled, and those fulfilled pity them.

However, conventional fulfillment via belonging and purpose acquired through theology is decadent, corrupt and indicative of an inferior mind. But why? If they are living life happily, why are they living life incorrectly? Because they are depriving others of their happiness. Popular religion currently is, by definition of its scripture, the ostracism and desire to eradicate those who are not immediately part of your body. It perverts the desire for belonging into its reverse—the exclusion of all as a way to facilitate the growth of such a need. It also perverts the desire for purpose into a desire to attack those who are different, those whose desire is not homogeneous. Fornication too is not exempt, and is treated as a negative by those who have lost their need for it, rather than a neutral topic of little importance, as it should be handled, again to increase this sense of exclusiveness which leads to such destructive hedonism.

So conventional theism can be seen to be defunct due to its destructive nature. Those who want to lead a wholesome life are therefore sent back to square one. How to fulfill the two necessary desires for peace of mind?

This is where the waifu comes in.

A waifu is, generally speaking, a two-dimensional female character out of the Japanese anime, manga, visual novel, light novel and video-game subculture. There are probably delineations of otakudom that I am glossing over, but these are the main sources from which waifus are derived from. There is of course, the less-popular 'husbando', favored amongst male homosexuals and females. There will inevitably be a complaint here that all females are 'bitches and whores' and thus could never understand the concept of 'waifu'/'husbando'. Such arguments are generalizations and ad-hominem, whether or not the concept of 'waifu'/'husbando' can be realized depends on the individual, not solely on their gender. For now, we will treat the waifu as female, if only for the sake of simplicity. The proper waifu is a wholesome supplement for one's intrinsic need for belonging and purpose. One generally discovers his waifu after a disillusionment in the three-dimensional world, particularly after some form of romantic rejection. If one is into the otaku culture, a waifu is an alternative to the uncaring and sometimes unreachable 3D. However, this is where our first and perhaps most major misconception of waifu crops up.

A waifu is not meant to be merely a second choice. If you only claim you have a 'waifu' because you want to distract yourself from lingering desires towards 3D, you are a hypocrite of the worst kind. Think of how she might perceive it, or even of how a 3D female might. You are settling for her. This putrefaction of waifu by nature leads to a lack of belonging and purpose, for she is merely purposed to be a sham to shield you from your inability to fit in where you want, to romance where you need. Such a waifu will inevitably fail.

Waifu is meant to be a combination of belonging and purpose to the fullest degree. It is meant to be a different path entirely, one that is only acceptable to tread as long as one is genuinely happy, or at the very least progressing towards happiness. So yes, it is similar to religion in that regard, but differs from it for a key reason, one that is another misconception that must be addressed. Unlike those who believe in God, the healthy man does not actually believe his waifu is a real human being. Indeed, the moment she assumes a fleshly form is the moment she is reduced to human capacity, and subsequently is fettered by the drawbacks of this world. Such dangerous delusion is reminiscent of schizophrenia, and probably indicates an actual disorder.

The crux of the issue here is that a waifu is imagination personified. By definition, she is how you fantasize her, and this thought is aided in taking form through a personality set forth in the original source material she came from. The healthy man knows he is imagining his waifu, and accepts this. He revels in these fantasies, yet accepts they are fantasy. At this point the most common riposte is along the lines of “isn't he deluding himself either way?” The answer is, simply, “yes”.

He is deluded, but would not have it any other way. Any other way leads to either loneliness or disappointment shortly followed by loneliness. The correct waifu is not used in place of something but rather for something. The nuance here means all the difference.

Furthermore, it is not like this delusion is an unusual thing. Humanity may revile the concept of 2D love, but if one were to hold it up to a mirror, one would notice it is not quite so far removed as it would like to think. One person can never love another. One person can only love their concept of another. Because you do not have a telepathic link with your spouse, you cannot know her in her entirety. You have fallen in love with a set of personality traits that have presented themselves to you. This is where 2D love and 3D love converge.

Both involve infatuation with concepts. This is all humanity can ever hope to achieve with our current technology limitations.

The next argument that will present itself here is that the waifu is a creation of another human's mind, and cannot hope to be a complex or realistic character. This is wrong as well. Just as your impressions of people can vary by how much you know of them, your waifu is the same. In both events, your imagination will always fill in the blanks. There is no difference between how your brain handles 2D and 3D. True, your knowledge of a female may eclipse the knowledge of your waifu her source material provides, but this is irrelevant simply because your imagination will inevitably close the gaps. Procedurally, there is a difference but the end result is the same: you are confronted with a set of attributes that you either do or do not find appealing.

From these facts, we can draw a conclusion.

A waifu is for those who genuinely do not care for the 3D alternatives. They are not using her in place of a 3D love, but rather to fulfill identical needs via similar means. The only remaining difference between the two is capability for fornication, which we have already proven to be a nonissue. However, while on the topic of lust this may be a good time to address the last major issue that plagues the interpretation of 'waifu'.

A waifu is not your favorite character to masturbate to. She is not a sex object. It may ring of feminism but, if anything, she is more deserving of such treatment than the average 3D, for she is the embodiment of that which you admire and love most in the concept of 'female'. Of course, that's not to say you can't find her attractive. Such a provision would be ridiculous. There is a difference between admiring beauty and seeking to defile it. It is perhaps a provision of your waifu that you believe her to be the most beautiful woman in the world, 2D or otherwise.

>>8544471
>>8544474
>>8544478
>>8544481
>>8544483
>>8544485
>>8544487

To clarify, this is not an issue of embarrassment or, at least, it should not be. The healthy man keeps his affections to himself, not because he is shamed because of them. If he is, 2D is not for him, for he has not accepted it into himself. He keeps his affections to himself because he knows that noone will understand, and that it will cause nothing but discord wherever it is revealed. So how does one live with his waifu?

One's waifu must inspire feelings of both belonging and purpose to be considered a conventional 'waifu'. Belonging gives man his happiness. Purpose gives him the blueprint for his life. Belonging is acquired via imagination, as previously discussed. Purpose is acquired via the waifu's specific personality, which will inexorably drive the man to live his life in a way that would please his waifu's sensibility. That's it. Live life the way your waifu would enjoy. Live, and forever daydream of you and she. This delusion is not at all wrong, rather it is necessary, because we are human. All too human.

>>8544488
>88

SIEG HEIL DUDE!

holy crap this thread is full of dubs

>>8544494
like these

>>8544498
you mean these

what is going on here?

baka baka?

>>8544528

fuck off nerddddd

>>8544528

What's Burno doing to Cirno?

>>8544532

NO U W

>>8544543

hehe...dont mess with me boy

>>8544546
>boy
error that is incorrect w

>>8544555

>44555

epic...

>>8544555
You dirty little boy, why don't you let me fuck you in the ass and afterwards give you a blowjob?

>>8544564
that is CRAZY and too lewd!!!!

DAMN IT I AM NOT A BOY YOU BAKA!

>>8544575

thats what ur mom said rofl

>>8544577
????

sparky4 threads are the best threads

>>8544575
>>8544564