[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 66 KB, 850x600, quoting.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8419858 No.8419858 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.8419865

fuck you dude, I do what I want.

>> No.8419864

Stop posting.

>> No.8419874
File: 69 KB, 626x348, 9_smcd.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8419874

>> No.8419872

>>8419864
>I am a huge faggot please rape my face

>> No.8419873

Who are you to say what's right and what's wrong?

>> No.8419876
File: 67 KB, 225x244, 1322581122134.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8419876

>implying 2011
>2012

>mfw that feel

>> No.8419881

Knock knock
Who's there
Quoting
Who are you, Quoting?

>> No.8419892

WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU FUCKING QUOTING YOU FUCKING MOTHERFUCKER FFFFFFFFFFFF

>> No.8419895

>>8419874
y-you have a cock?

>> No.8419898
File: 86 KB, 1303x231, die1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8419898

Looks like this guys is tired of spamming by himself and wants to get others to use his meme "correctly". Don't combat a meme with a meme. Go die you piece of crap.

>> No.8419913

implying
2011
mfw
that feel

right, now everyone below me can use greentext for these words

>> No.8419923
File: 69 KB, 626x348, canvas.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8419923

>>8419895

>> No.8419926

What about stupid catchprases that don't misuse the quote function?

>> No.8419927

The question is not who, but why.
Why, OP?

>> No.8419932

>>8419913
>implying that isn't cheating.

>> No.8419935

>>8419926
That's not part of today's topic, Tokiko.

>> No.8419966
File: 76 KB, 376x624, sage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8419966

Why do saged posts look like this?

>> No.8419984

>>8419966
Probably something to do with your Web 2.0 JavaScripts.

We all browse vanilla here, ``casual''.

>> No.8420000
File: 871 B, 80x19, (0) -jp- - Anonymous_1326660388897.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8420000

>>8419966
Looks like your stupid style is trying to add misencoded text .commentpostername:before. I recommend getting a proper web browser or style.

>> No.8420021

>>8419881
I just peed my pants.

>> No.8420074

But the last 2 ones are completely wrong, faggot.

>> No.8420090

>>8420074
In my opinion, the last one is fine. Seeing as the poster would be quoting and paraphrasing the referred post.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action