/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Last thread still here.

His extraordinary appetites for pornography and manga comics gave the Japanese media its first example of a “killer geek”. Since then, it is a label that has been repeatedly applied to any murderer who appears to share those tastes – last week’s stabbing frenzy in Tokyo’s Akihabara electronics district was carried out by a man instantly branded in the public eye as a killer geek.

They killed a guy that drank blood. And they're getting criticism?

JAPAN IS SUPERIOR COUNTRY

What if he really was a vampire with the mind of a child?

>>839721

Looking kinda sex there, Flan.

A voracious sexual predator, he kidnapped girls aged between four and seven years old, molested and murdered them. In some cases he ate parts of their bodies, in others he slept next to their corpses.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article4156285.ece

Japan is simply superior!

>>839708
>rising criticism
Yeah, from the nutters at Amnesty International. Not so much from within Japan, though. The death penalty has a 90%+ approval rating in Japan.

Thus ends the story of the "otaku murderer," at any rate. Hanging was too good for this guy, besides which he should have been executed years ago. Nearly twenty years is far too long for anyone to get keep living for after crimes that horrific. Even if you take into account that his trial was held up over psychiatric concerns for seven years, he still got over a decade after sentencing before they finally dropped his ass. He appears never to have shown the least bit of remorse.

Are there pics of his hands? I'm curious.

Although it's extremely, EXTREMELY old news, let me just say... FUCKING FINALLY.

>>840483
so let me get this right. You are OK, you got NO problem with executing a person who was obviously mentally disturbed?

>>840532
Even in today's world, I fail to see how this is "extremely, EXTREMELY old news," as he was just executed TODAY (well, yesterday U.S. time).

The "FUCKING FINALLY" I wholeheartedly agree with, especially since there have been others since him given the same sentence, who had it carried out well before now.

>>840558
Unfit human is unfit.

>>840560
I've even seen this in /x/, and they're slowpokes. Old news is old, although relevant.

>>840560
so you have NO problem killing people who are mentally sick and calling it justice? You ARE actually no better.

>>840572
I see tons of people, who are unfit. I'd say 80% of people on 4chan would be considered unfit. Should we exterminate anyone who is unfit? You being on 4chan are most likely unfit.

>>840558
There's a difference between being mentally disturbed and being legally insane. Miyazaki was clearly the former (no one commits these kinds of crimes without being a bit off in the head), but he does not appear to have been the latter.

>>840575
Shitty troll is shitty.

>>840575
See >>840580

If he had actually BEEN clinically insane, then it would be different, IMO, but he doesn't appear to have been so.

>>840580
playing semantic games I see. Are you qualify to judge the mental fitness? Most likely NOT. Obviously from his actions alone he was as insane as he can be. The system obviously didn't want to classify him as such so he can be killed.

so this is what will happen to all in /jp/ in future, thanks for the heads up

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 ／￣￣＼
　　　　　　　　　　　　　／⌒　　⌒　＼　 　　　＿＿＿
　　　　　　　　　　　　　|（ ●）（ ●）　｜　　／⌒　　⌒ ＼
　　　　　　　　　　　　　ｌ:: （__人__）　:: | 　／（● ）:::::（　●）＼
　　　　　　　　　　　　　ｌ　　｀⌒´　　｜／ :::::⌒（__人__）⌒::::: ヽ　　　）　）
　　　　　　　　　　　　　{　　 　 　 　 ｜|　　　　　|r┬-|　　　　　|　　（ :.(
　　　　　　　　　　　　 　ヽ　　　　　ノ　＼ 　　 　` ー‐'　　　,-､-､　　) ﾉ
　　　　　　　　ｌ^i^l　／￣/ヽ　　　ｌ^ i＾l　 ＼　　　　　　　　　ヽヽニニ#
　　　　　　　　| | .ｌ__　 　⌒ ヽ. 　 ｌ　i　l／ヽ＼　　　　　／　　ヽ `､ヽ
　　　　　　　 <　　　ﾌ　　　　　Y　|　|　| -,-,　　ヽ　　／　　　(⌒　　|
　　　　　　　　ヽ　ノ　　　　　(^ヽ､ｊ ＾ ＾　　ｲ　　　　　　　　　　ヽ
　　　　　　　　/　|　　　　　　　＼ ;　　　　 ｌ

Anyone who commits crimes is mentally disturbed, so obviously we shouldn't punish anyone!

Kill them all.

>>840585
Yeah, I'm not sure I'd say "unfit human" - that's a dangerous road to go down. He was, however, culpable for some particularly heinous acts, and sometimes justice demands that the perpetrator die for his actions.

If he actually been truly insane, then he should not have been considered culpable, but the evidence doesn't seem to bear out the insanity claim.

>>840592
According to WHOME he wasn't clinically insane? The Japanese gov? I wouldn't trust them in a case such as this. Too much politics involved.

The penal system always revolved around the idea of revenge. Eye for an eye, etc. But somewhere in the history of mankind a faggot came along and said:

"No more of this barbarian business! We are a civilization built on the principles of forgiveness, love, and faith in the good of our neighbors. So we will not seek revenge on those who do us wrong anymore. Instead we will reform and reintroduce them into society again so they can be reliable and productive citizens."

But then the badasses said:

"Fuck you and your naive hopes. We want the blood of criminals spilled so we can feel better about our own losses, and set up an example so fuck-ups will think twice before doing the same thing".

>>840585
I'd be willing to bet against that, considering how I actually contribute to society and what not. Not all of us are NEETs, figures cost money you know. Plus, I don't go around kidnapping little kids so I can eat them.

>>840593
>>840602

Are you any more qualified to make that determination than I am? I doubt it, therefore all we can do is trust that the doctors and judges got it right.

[also, there is no "e" in "whom"]

I'd make sure to be classified as clinically insane BEFORE I ever commit a crime to be sure to have a loophole, hehe. That was his mistake.

I have no mercy for the insane either, this man himself through his own actions had proven himself a detriment to society, and in doing so, signed his own death warrant.

Someone called?

>>840605
exactly, you JUST proved my point. You wouldnt go as far as he did because you are sane and understand. he didnt. Thanx.

>>840602
True. FucKKK dem fukken psychologists and gub'ments all in cospiracy to weed out sweet child lovers from our God's green Earth!

Fuck you for getting this upset over something like this. The world is full of examples of absolutely horrible justice systems and innocent people killed. Hey! Even in good old USA that has happened plenty of times. Who the fuck cares, right? Goddamn for executing a child killer/rapist! Fuck you japs! How can I EVER feel safe in Japan?!?!

>>840607

To me his mistake was not becoming an hero sooner, before the execution.

>>840615
But the problem lies in that you think that he should live because he is insane.

>>840603
On the other thand, that doesn't work so well either. Why not go down all guns blazing is you already know that when you get caught you'll be killed?

>>840603
Yeah, but the death penalty isn't always about revenge. There are plenty of philosophical systems (including classical Christian ones) which reject revenge, but allow the death penalty, maintaining that the punishment should fit the crime for the sake of JUSTICE, not revenge.

>>840621

Faggot

>>840616
No, I think he shouldn't have been killed. Notice I said killed not executed.

>>840626
Haha. You might want to actually research your stuff instead of parroting worthless talking points meant to make people feel better about what's going on. And seeing that Christians came up with a few of the most barbarious justice systems ever in "civilized" world, it's not really a surprise that "Christian justice systems" (Vatican's? Where are those ones anyway?) would be hypocritical.

>>840615
By that standard, no one who does something wrong is ever guilty of it, because a sane person wouldn't have knowingly done something wrong.

The fact is that sane people sometimes do unspeakable things, too. It's not sanity which keeps us from doing these things, it's our conscience. An insane person doesn't have one (at least not a properly functioning one), but sometimes even sane people don't listen to theirs. That's where the difference lies:

* Insane person lacks conscience, therefore is NOT culpable
* Sane person IGNORES conscience, therefore is guilty

Only the latter should be punished, because it would be a miscarriage of justice to punish the former.

>>840668
Can you give an example?

>>840616
You are trying to show higher moral standing. I will tell you this: You WILL break the law at some point in the future (even speeding will be enough to prove my point) and will get caught and then you WILL remember this thread and then admit I was right.

>>840638
>I'm a fag defending a serial killer. I also suck cocks.

>>840668
Both should be punished you liberal pussy. If once cannot get justice, then one must take revenge.

>>840638
Christians didn't come up with most of those systems, actually, they were relics of systems already in place in pagan times (the most severe methods: breaking on the wheel, drawing and quartering, impalement, burning at the stake, etc., all predate Christianity, and some of the most barbarous methods, like flaying alive, were largely abandoned by Christian rulers). At the very least, while we may or may not agree with the forms of punishment, they were NOT motivated by revenge, and it was the motivation, not the methods, I was referring to.

>>840680
Aww, aren't you butthurt that someone calls your stupid lie a lie. Sorry, just because people don't drool over your nonsensical "classic Christian justice" doesn't mean they defend killers. Please start learning about these things by finding out what "justice" means. It's always about revenge, making sure the offenders won't offend again and sending a message. Too bad you seem to be too stupid to understand that. Now please go jack off to your "justice" under "classical philosophy" unf unf.

>>840678
Yes. Speeding with a car and having deluded conspiracy theories about evil governments killing people by making them rape children are absolutely one and same. Good job champ.

>>840672
Probably not to your satisfaction, as you are taking it for granted that anyone who does something horrible must have been insane. Ted Bundy seems to have been pretty sane, though.

>>840685
How does that work? It's not justice to punish someone who isn't guilty, and a system based on revenge leads to anarchy. You kill my relative, so then I kill you, and then your family kills me, and then my family kills them, etc., etc. Where does it stop?

>>840699
Of course Christians didn't invent those ones, but due to the wide spread of Christianity, the scale of the terrible barbaric systems was completely on a different level than with the small communities they were lifted from. All I'm saying is that by simply saying "classical Christian ones" means nothing in the context it was used. The concept of "justice" always has "revenge" as a component, it's not always the main reason, and sometimes it isn't a reason at all, but you can't talk about "justice" in general terms if you exclude "revenge" from it. There has never been any justice system in place that is completely unaffected by revenge, seeing that revenge is pretty much coded inside humans. Individual decisions can be unaffected, depending on who and how they are made.

>>840725
It wasn't the spread of Christianity so much as the spread of the Greek and Roman empires.

Besides that, in APPLICATION, of course there tend to be rulers and political figures who insert the element revenge into the system (they're human after all), but the philosophy behind it (and this is largely true under Buddhist systems in the East, as well, not only in Christian ethics) rejected revenge as a motivation. Read Aquinas some time.

I hope UNICEF won't bitch about this.

>>840714
How exactly do you differentiate the sane from the insane?

>>840752
Why would they? Isn't their domain feeding hungry kids?

>>840764
A doctor scribbles something on a sheet of paper.

>>840764
I suppose clinical psychiatry is the best method we have. Let the doctors do their work.

Anyways, I've got to go, because I haven't had lunch yet.

>>840765
feeding hungry kids so that african pedophiles have something for desert

Goddammit, everyone in this thread is getting trolled, HARD.

>>840744
I'm having some real hard time understanding this. Which Greek empire? Byzantine or? Because that's the only real Greek empire that had any real influence (I wouldn't call the city states or Diadochi "empires" since they weren't influential in any way at their time). Then again, Byzantine was a Christian empire. The Roman Empire ended really early, so they didn't have time to get the barbarism in perfection, unlike Holy Roman Empire, which again was a Christian rule with no real connections to Rome at all.

Like you said, you can talk as much as you want about Aquinas or other philosophers saying revenge isn't a motivation. Too bad that never carries to real world. That's exactly what I meant by mentioning talking points to make people feel good. They had no real world applications at all, the politicians were the ones who made the rules. The rules don't "introduce elements" to system, their words ARE the system, no matter what some Dominican friar theroized in his home.

Oh. And Aquinas' was pretty reviled at the time he was alive, even by his mother church. Only after his death they started to say he was okay guy. Far easier to talk good about someone when they can't spout their ideas anymore.

>>840765
Because they want to ban loli in Japan.

I have the urge to stab children... With my penis.

>>840800
I wanna stab your penis... with my mouth

>>840714

>Ted Bundy seems to have been pretty sane, though.

Ted Bundy was a complete fucking sociopath. Maybe that doesn't fit your "lol random XD" cartoon vision of insanity, but you'll find most people who have any clue at all will agree it's pretty fucking insane.

This thread is so bad. Fucking /n/ in /jp/ again. How many reposts a day will I have to endure before this one passes?

>>840838
Here's an idea: Don't read it.

Someone's been reading too much deadman wonderland

>>839708
Good. He was an eyesore.

fucker died

I read this in the Asahi and it made me sad.

;_;

I know that the line that separates Miyazaki and many residents of /jp/ is not very thick and swiftly breached. Society demands a monster to kill for comfort and entertainment.

>>841011
If you actually feel bad for the guy, you belong in /b/

>>841011
The obvious difference being that we don't rape and murder schoolgirls, which seems like a pretty thick line.

>>841011

My hands aren't mangled, I can't operate a telephoto lens, I think people taste disgusting and dislike the taste of blood, I prefer healthy (and most importantly 2D), and I have much better taste than he did.

I'd say there's a lot that separates us. I still would've loved to have a drink with the guy, though.

The girls he raped would probably turn into filthy pig disgusting whores belittling people like him whose lack of luck and genes turned into a freak worthy of their ridicule and scorn.

Japan <1% believe in any of your gods.
Death is justice. Insane? Doesn't matter.

とにかく誰かそんなたくさん人殺したら当たり前この結果w

As I see it, that isn't that big a difference.

I mean, I don't play football or have sex, or like fucking dogs either, so what?

The execution is a homicide by the nation.
Never forgive.

If justice is anything it is to teach that those actions are wrong, to set an example for others not to follow such a path, yet most still follow Hammurabi's Code of revenge sadly.

I see nothing wrong in getting revenge at the one that caused much harm to the people around him/her, it is human nature, but it is never the real answer to the problem. Violence upon violence only continues the cycle of destruction.

I must be some sort of a bleeding-heart liberal to think that the basis of any sort of fair justice system must be that punishment exists as a deterrent, not as revenge.

All of you are idiots. The man took away the lives of others. In doing so, he lost the right to his own.

If the motherfucker was'nt caught, then he would'nt have gotten killed in the first place.

But since he was caught, it means that he was'nt clever enough to avoid getting caught.

for doing something that he did, it's either do it, DONT GET CAUGHT or DONT DO IT IN THE FIRST PLACE. he did it and got caught, thats a no no

law of perservance, bleaching gene pool, etc.

>>841140
Not all of the accused are guilty.

motherfucking idiots "OHH HES RETARDED YOU SHOULDNT EXECUTE HIM"

Why not? If someone like that got caught in your country would you just let that person rot in jail/mental hospital while leeching your tax money?

oh wait, summer, etc. /jp/ people does'nt have jobs

>>841177
Stop it.

baaaaawwwwww

People are actually feeling sorry for this guy? HE IS A CHILD-RAPING SERIAL MURDERER. FUCK HIM, YOU GODDAMN CRYBABIES.

>>841167
He was, though.

>>841191
Cheer up, kiddo

Everyone in this thread is incredibly dumb.

No you faggots who think you're just pretending to be dumb are not exempt. The moment you decided to participate in this fucking thread the game became real.

>>841213
Guess that includes you, then.

I lost the game.

>>841213
If I die in the game, will I die for reals?

I WON'T LET THIS THREAD DIE!

>>841193
It's less feeling sorry him and more thinking the government has no business killing people. It's philosophy. You'll understand when you get older.

>>841273
If you honestly believe that, you must be underage.

>>841280
Bawww more.

>>841295
Nobody's crying. Go ahead, be as naive as you like.

this thread will die just like he did
you all will forget him because he isn't worth remembering except to the people who's lives he ruined.

>>841273
Yes, its a philosophy with no basic in logic.

The confused logic of ppl like you causes immense suffering in western society.

By not punishing criminals adequately more people fall victim to criminal acts.

Your the brutal cruel person here, your happy for people to fall victim to the acts of criminals who beause they know they can get away with it.

How many ppl have died or worse for your philosophy?

>>839708
/jp/ - /n/

>>841534

>ppl
>i'm talking about philosophy and i use ppl
>this is fucking hilarious
>oh did i forget to mention the your