/jp/ - Otaku Culture

She...She is black

Needs a few years of papaya soap and whitening pills then finally korean plastic surgery.

Would do.

it's funny because arc is black

Black weeaboos are the scariest of their kind

>black

>>8291379
>black

I'm just going to assume that I'm not the only one who finds black women horribly unattractive.
2D and 3D.

>>8291384
The only exception to dark skin is little tan girls...(2D only)

For some reason I find her really unattractive am I racist

she is cute

black meido

hmmmm

I'm not racist and do think she is cute since she is a pretty woman, even though black women are not my type.

Don't worry, I was alredy going away.

>>8291389
Your right.

There is actually only one dark skinned 2d girl that I found a little bit attractive.
But she looks more Arab than African.

Fucking coons. The world will be better off without them.

Not that bad.
The cutest black women are the ones who look almost like white ones facial features-wise, but have really dark skin. Shit's rare as fuck but looks damn good.

I'm racist and I think she's cute.

Reported for raping my eyes

superior

Post black Rozalin, she's the best.

Why /jp/ has images of black con-goers in their PCs is beyond me.

>>>/cgl/

>>8291347
Anymore of her?

>>8291364
>>8291369
>>8291372
>>8291377
>>8291379
>>8291384
>>8291394
>>8291434
Slav ren: The thread.

>>8291661
More like SLAVE Ren, am I right?

Because she's black.

gooks are obsessed with master race loli

>>8291667
You are right, slav ARE slaves.
And, aren't white.

>>8291347
Awww *^^*

HUGS!

>blacks

>>8291719
wassup

I am black and also slav and I feel like I need to post in this thread.

>>8291347
She looks like a filthy monkey

>slavs

>>8291737
Your slav is showing.

Delicious.

>>8291743
Sorry but I'm French.

>>8291678
In order of the electromagnetic light spectrum (red = hottest).
Unmarked is would not bang.

SPOGRO SPARO :---DDDDDDD

I'm down with the swirl.

That's fucking moe. Saved for all eternity.

Filthy nigger.

Am I the only one who thinks there's nothing unusual about a black maid?

>>8291772
Fuck yes, I love young boys. The fat one on the right kinda ruins it, though.

>>8291813
He isn't fat ^^;

I'd fuck her

>>8291772
Is this CP or not im confused....

the only reason we find black women unattractive is because of their personality, most of the time Black women are well, "niggers" in the fact that they whore around are loud and obnoxious, and are utter retards

however you take that terrible personality and put something like otaku and cuteness, they become attractive. therefore, I think she is very cute and I wouldn't mind meeting her in real life to discuss animu

She's cute.

>>8291813
Just think: they probably compared dicks or something in a childish attempt to be adult and alpha. They maybe even touched each other to see what it was like.

>>8291849
Those are all boys, I think.

>>8291870
Don't worry, I think about that pretty often.

>>8291857
I find black women unattractive because they're black. I even make threads about it on /tv/ every other week because Merlin cast Guinevere as a nigger.

FUCK YOU BBC. LET ME ENJOY MY KID'S SHOWS IN PEACE.

>>8291880
Your slav is showing.

http://www.gossiprocks.com/forum/plastic-surgery/103991-lil-kim-successful-revision-botched-plastic-
surgery.html

What does /jp/ think of Lil Kim

I'm a white as snow Finlander, and I find OP's girl cute. And I don't even have a thing for maids!

>>8291506
Also very cute.

She looks good and by "good" I mean average and it is because of her maid outfit.

>>8291899
fuggen nigars X-----DDDDDD

>>8291899
Seriously where did you get those pictures?

I'd employ her.

°★。˛ °.★** *★* *˛.
˛ °_██_*。*./ \ .˛* .˛.★*REPOST IF YOU A STRONG BLACK SANTA WHO DONT NEED NO PRESENTS*★ 。*
˛. (´• ̮•)*˛°*/.♫.♫\*˛.* ˛_Π_____. * ˛*
.°( . • . ) ˛°./• '♫ ' •\.˛*./______/~＼*. ˛*.。˛* ˛. *。
*(...'•'.. ) *˛╬╬╬╬╬˛°.｜田田 ｜門｜╬╬╬╬ .
¯˜"*°••°*"˜¯`´¯˜"*°••°*"˜¯`¬´¯˜"*°´¯˜"*°
••°*"˜¯ ` ´¯˜"*°•­

>>8292008
northpole.fi

What's up with all this 'hurr slav' shit in /jp/?

Pic related.

>>8292105
It's the same on /int/ and /pol/.

As a Slavic guy, I'm very disappointed by this. I'm a WN, and I thought that we all agreed that all whites are equal, but apparently most westerners disagree with this, for some reason.

>>8292112
Most of the guys on /int/ aren't even WN, they're liberals. Especially the Swedes. I remember when SD won some seats in the Swedish Parliament and all the Swedes ran on to /int/ to rant and rave about how rayciss SD were and how much they loved immigration.

They don't call it stockholm syndrome for nothing.

>>8292119
Damn, I hate liberals.

That doesn't explain why people on /pol/ (and /new/, also) think like that, though. They say horrible things about Slavs, especially Russians. And I know for a fact that those are WN, because they claim that non-slavic whites are superior.

>>8292112
The guys here are just shitposters unlike the haters on /pol/ and on /int/.

>>8292105
Slavs always bring up the "hurr master race xD" so we just do the same.
>>8292112
>/int/
Go back to it.

I pretty much hate everything but I can't understand this anti-slav shit, and I'm not even slav.
Did something happened?

>WN
Whoa whoa whoa, stop using your shitty terms outside your shithole.

>>8292126
I don't get it either. I think with a couple of them, it's just Germanic Nationalism?

Anyway, from an outsider's perspective to Slavdom. I think there are some things wrong with Slavic societies, like elements of the Russian diaspora, but in the large part Slavs seem to be way more race conscious than Western Euros. And they seem to be actually, you know, protecting their borders and stuff. Also, I like stuff like Russian folk art and Cossack Choirs.

Also, doesn't Poland have an average IQ of 102? That's the highest in the West.

>>8292140
see
>>8292130

>>8292126
They think you are 'mongols' poor Saxon wankshit

>>8292158
Meant 'or some Anglo saxon wankshit'

Only 3d blacsk with huge asses are hot, and 2d blacks/dark skin/tan lines are always hot.

>>8292150
>IQ
Stop retard.

When will you learn that IQ tests doesn't mean the country average at all?
See Hong Kong and the rest of China.

Slavs are pretty moe.

>>8292150
Hating Slavs is just a 4chan inside joke just like claiming that Argentinians aren't white.

>Slav Ren

It's funny to me because I am slavic and my name starts with "Ren"

What the fuck is WN and what is with the Russian hate, i thought they were the only country left with almost 100% white people. Also on 4chan i thought everybody liked putin.

>>8291964
>>8291880
>>8291857
>>8291801
>>8291737
>>8291719
>>8291512
>>8291440
Go back to /b/ or /pol/ you fucking faggots, all of you

She doesn't look bad for 3D.

She doesn't look bad.

>>8292166
HK = 107.
China = 106.

You're aware in Lynn's original estimations. He actually that China's rural IQ was lower than actually was. We know now it's higher, and it averages out at 105/106.

1.5 billion people with an average IQ of 106 means we are fucked basically (the West collectively).

>>8292172
I think it's just a way of these really racially atomized types on 4chan, who don't have any understanding of common ancestry to pretend they're anthropologists or something.

>>8292182
Putin is the best of the current crop of western leaders, though I prefer Lukashenko.

Russia is also only about 85% ethnic Russian, although European Russia is obviously much higher. The tensions there are between Caucuses people and ethnic Russians.

>>8292182
>i thought they were the only country left with almost 100% white people
And so that's why it's so rich and full of intelligent people, right?

>>8292172
No it is not it is amlong history of germans migrating, using and shitting on slaves for centuries in eastern Europe. The nastiest incarnation was Nazi Germany's plans to deport, enslave and exterminate all slavs from European ussr and poland

This is /jp/, 3d talk of any kind is not allowed here.
please leave and delete this thread.
thank you and merry Christmas.

>>8292194
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_largest_projects_in_the_Russian_economy#2012

>>8292191
>1.5 billion people with an average IQ of 106 means we are fucked basically (the West collectively).
HAHAHAHA oh wow.
You are fucking retarded.
Or maybe, having a high IQ doesn't mean you're intelligent, because the average Chinese is pretty fucking dumb.

>>8292182
Russia is 80 per cent Slavic Russian, what you would consider 'white' remaining 20 per cent is Caucasian groups, native siberians and Turkic peoples - and I as a non white would call Caucasian peoples 'white' as well as some turkic groups. the WN o storefront or whatever would t.

Also WN = white nationalist. the wankers going about race mixing and all that

>>8292194
Russia was always a proud country full of really intelligent and inventive people - and still is today. Low GDP is due to collapse, and then rich people who abused the system to steal even more money from other people.

>>8292194
Actually its because they lost all their money when they changed from the soviet union and it fucked them up.

>>8292213
Wait so are there black russians or something? or are they still white but you just dont call them that? I only always see only white people everywhere in the streets on the news when its about russia.

>>8292212
>Or maybe, having a high IQ doesn't mean you're intelligent

In respect to what processes or mechanisms is it that persons who perform well on anyone test, in general, also perform well on many other tests, even on tests that are highly dissimilar in content and sensory and motor modalities?

The concept of intelligence depends not on the fact that people can be ranked by this test or that, but rather on the fact that, whatever the test, so long as it is cognitive in the broadest sense, a positive correlation emerges between the ranks for any two tests. If an IQ test were just a rag- bag collection of subjective cognitive tasks that did not all measure a common factor, there could be no positive manifold.

>because the average Chinese is pretty fucking dumb.

Except they're not. Wherever they go, they prosper. Southeast Asia, North America, Africa, Central Asia...

>>8292202
>projects
You sure are predictable and biased, athens.

Also, I am talking about the average person.

>>8292232
>Except they're not. Wherever they go, they prosper. Southeast Asia, North America, Africa, Central Asia...
The Chinese who emigrate are the hardworking, intelligent, and ambitious ones.

The rest stay home.

>>8292239
>The rest stay home.

LOL ok.

Then explain China's PISA results. They sure as shit don't have any problem completely outperforming niggerfuxated America.

Don't be ridiculous.

>>8292239
your retarded, please go back to /b/.

>>8292244
Chinese students work hard and American students are lazy.

>>8292232
>Except they're not. Wherever they go, they prosper. Southeast Asia, North America, Africa, Central Asia...
LOL

Why don't you take a quick look at the most of China?
They are, pretty much in the same situation of most African countries.

>>8292257
No, IQ is the most strongly predictive measure of academic achievement.

And no matter how hard some nig with an IQ of 80 works. He's not going to manage to master further mathematics.

>>8292262
>No
So Chinese students don't work hard, or American students aren't lazy?

>>8292258
Are you really this dumb? China has double digit or very high single digit growth. It has huge, burgeoning manufacturing industries in pretty much every sector. Look at the size of Chinese SOEs.

Western leadership is laughable compared to the quality of Chinese leadership too. But hey, keep on making retarded image macros about how 'cool' Obama is on Reddit.

>>8292264
American students just aren't as intelligent.

It's NOT all down to 'hard work'. Innate intelligence matters more.

>>8292271
Well, if you say so, it must be true.

>>8292231
There are black Russians, mainly africannand US origin immigrants to the USSR and their descendants for education or fleeing oppressive governments. numbers are small lime 100k I think.

I meant that the non Russian groups are not considered 'black' (African) just that they are not considered white if not Slavic.

I'm not a Russian btw

>>8292262
>In respect to what processes or mechanisms is it that persons who perform well on anyone test, in general, also perform well on many other tests, even on tests that are highly dissimilar in content and sensory and motor modalities?

Studies have shown that those who exercise live longer, and have healthier mind sets, than their sedimentary counter parts. Now this is obvious, and the implications on 'mind set' is awfully biased, but this does show that improvement towards exercise is more important on the individual level, as oppose to actually logistics.

I for one though, believe conscious effort is more important than subconscious 'smarts' not only because it takes much longer to develop a conscious thought process, and a lot more mental effort, but in the end helps one understand a situation more so than just on instincts themselves.

>>8292276
I know.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15651931

http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/mp201185a.html

>>8292281
If you want to overcome the baser elements of instinct, just encourage the highest fertility amongst the most intelligent and lowest fertility amongst the least intelligent. At the moment, the reverse is true.

>>8292292
Neither or your articles claim that the reason China outscores the US is because Chinese average IQ is higher and not because the average Chinese student spends ten hours doing homework a day to the average American student's fifty minutes.

>>8292271
>Are you really this dumb?
No, YOU are fucking dumb.

Average Chinese citizen is as poor as an African.
Their growth is unequal.

Now go be a fucking retard in /int/.

>>8292301
>IQ/g is best single predictor, mental or non-mental.

>IQ/g usually predicts major life outcomes better than does any other single predictor in broad samples of individuals. For example, whether IQ predicts strongly (educational performance) or weakly (law-abidingness), it predicts better than does social class background.

http://livearchive.org/2011/pdf/2004socialconsequences-groy/

Also see:

Ian J. Deary, Steve Strand, Pauline Smith and Cres Fernandes: Intelligence and educational achievement

http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/01/iq-academic-achievement.php

>>8292304
>Average Chinese citizen is as poor as an African.

Actually their per capita GDP is $8k. Higher than virtually all African Nations.

It's funny how your only rebuttals are basically that China hasn't overtaken everybody yet.

Just goes to show how short termist most Westerners are, that's what democracy encourages, short term retard thinking.

>their growth is unequal

Actually, their growth is remarkably well balanced between rural and urban areas compared to other developing Nations like India.

>>8292301
Okay, the actual numbers are something more like seven hours to two hours.

>>8292309
Source?

In any event, it's not incongruent with the fact Chinese are more intelligent than Americans.

More intelligent people are usually better at delaying gratification.

>IQ and race comparison faggotry

>>>/sci/
>>>/int/

Seriously, fuck off.

>>8292307
Your first link doesn't work.

Your second link correlates intelligence to success but somehow intelligence is about as correlated with physical education success as it is with everything else.

Neither of these claim that the .4 standard deviations between Chinese students and American students in IQ as measured by some test is the primary driver of the differences in PISA scores.

>>8292307
>GDP
lol
You trully are retarded.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_Human_Development_Index

>>8292315
It's because Chinese parents push their children and American students don't. How many hours a kid spends studying is more dependent on his parents than his own ability to delay gratification.

You can claim whether parents value education is primarily determined by IQ rather than by upbringing but that's stupid.

>>8292361
>American parents

>>8292336
Working link:

www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/2004socialconsequences.pdf

>Your second link correlates intelligence to success but somehow intelligence is about as correlated with physical education success as it is with everything else.

No it isn't. PE's correlation is still significant but not as substantial as others.

>Neither of these claim... primary driver of the differences in PISA score

Are you retarded?

>"International cognitive ability and achievement comparisons stem from different research traditions. But analyses at the interindividual data level show that they share a common positive manifold. Correlations of national ability means are even higher to very high (within student assessment studies, r = .60-.98; between different student assessment studies [PISA-sum with TIMSS-sum] r = .82-.83; student assessment sum with intelligence tests, r = .85-.86). Results of factor analyses indicate a strong g-factor of differences between nations (variance explained by the first unrotated factor: 94-95%)."

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/per.634/abstract

Read the damn links.

>>8292347
So? China was under Maoist totalitarianism until the 1980s and the opening up period. The fact is they've only really had three decades of some degree of free enterprise growth.

Put it this way, Africa in the 1950s upon decolonization was in a much better shape than China in the 1980s.

>>8292361
>It's because Chinese parents push their children and American students don't.

I'm honestly sick of hearing this argument. Do you believe g factor intelligence doesn't exist or something? Do you believe someone with an IQ of 80 can be a brain surgeon?

Why do you continue to deny reality? Intelligence is highly heritable, g is the primary driver of academic success. Deal with it you butthurt pleb.

>>8292373
>PE's correlation is still significant but not as substantial as others.
Why is it correlated at all?

>Are you retarded?
The study by Rindermann was not linked to in your second link.

>Read the damn links.
I'll just reach into your head across the internet and pull out the links you haven't posted. I can achieve this magically because I have a high IQ.

Also your conclusions are predicated on the idea that the g behind international assessment tests cannot be affected by upbringing.

>I'm honestly sick of hearing this argument.
Leave.

>Do you believe g factor intelligence doesn't exist or something?
No.

>Do you believe someone with an IQ of 80 can be a brain surgeon?
No.

>Why do you continue to deny reality?
Why are you such a cunt?

>Intelligence is highly heritable, g is the primary driver of academic success. Deal with it you butthurt pleb.
Okay.

>>8292383
>Why is it correlated at all?

No idea.

>Also your conclusions are predicated on the idea that the g behind international assessment tests cannot be affected by upbringing.

No they aren't. Environment does play a role, it just doesn't play the dominant role you think it does.

>Why are you such a cunt?

Wut?

You're the one who has been getting mad about this and insulting me. Not the other way around.

>>8292390
>No idea.
Maybe there's a magical w-factor indicating a child's eagerness or willingness to work hard or learn, partially due to upbringing and partially heritable, which underlies a large portion both academic success and performance on intelligence tests.

>>8292390
>>8292401
>No they aren't. Environment does play a role, it just doesn't play the dominant role you think it does.
I didn't say it was dominant. I disputed whether the primary difference in PISA scores of China and the US was due to racial differences.

>>8292390
>You're the one who has been getting mad about this and insulting me. Not the other way around.
>Are you retarded?
>fucking retarded
>fucking retarded
200+ IQ right here, people.

>>8292390
>>8292407
Part of this post was tripping the wordfilter, which is why its tripartite in the first place.

>>8292409
Stop bumping the thread, you retard.

>>8292401
>magical

You mean like g factor intelligence? It exists. We've already been through this. No, it isn't 'magical', see Spearman's Positive Manifold.

>>8292407
Well, let's turn this around. Do you think Ghana could have the same level of academic attainment as China given the right policies?

>>8292373
>China was under Maoist totalitarianism until the 1980s and the opening up period. The fact is they've only really had three decades of some degree of free enterprise growth.
Another excuse?

Hint:
China ALWAYS had a unequal economy, it wasn't bacause of Mao.

she can burn in HELL. that is if she can still burn

>>8292429
You mean a pre-industrial, Qing Era economy had inequality? That's hardly surprising, all agrarian economies are unequal.

>>8292439
See:
USA
Germany

>>8292428
If (big if) one demands that g be purely a measure of mental intelligence, then it should not contribute to PE grades. Therefore if one demands that g be such a measure this indicates that another variable underlying academic success has been confounded with g.

>>8292450
Or alternatively cognitive ability can influence or be linked with other physiological factors that affect performance at PE?

>Therefore if one demands that g be such a measure this indicates that another variable underlying academic success has been confounded with g.

That's something of a non-sequitur. We have no reason to believe this any more than my reasoning

>>8292449
Yes, pre-industrial North America and pre-industrial German States all had a high level of stratification of wealth. What's your point?

I'm racist and I think he looks cute.

>>8292450
>another variable

And when they don't find it... they keep searching and searching? Then they go on a quest to the holy land in search of some variable which could explain the racial achievement gap without regards to human biodiversity?

How many more decades do you need to continue your search? I am a patient man.

>>8292463
>What's your point?
They were/had
- More rich than China
- More developed (HDI) than China
- A population that mostly didn't live in misery.

In other words, your argument that China having a higher IQ than some other country means it's more successful, is incorrect.

best thread
on /japoo/

>>8292485
>- More rich than China

Were they? I'm unsure about that. My understanding is China had the highest GDP on Earth until the 19th century. Although historical estimates of GDP are usually of low quality.

>HDI
>Pre-industrial societies

You're conflating two things here.

>- A population that mostly didn't live in misery.

Marco Polo certainly didn't think so, and that was during the Yuan Dynasty.

People are seriously debating with athens?
What the FUCK, /jp/.

She's pretty moe.

Then again I'm one of the 5 people on 4chan who finds all races equally attractive.

>>8292490
>My understanding

>You're conflating two things here.
Not really, the methodology can still be used.

>Marco Polo
lol.
Also, you were talking about the Qing Era.

>>8292428
It's nonsensical to think that something as trivial as government or social policy could profoundly transform a country in any reasonable timeframe, but if somehow one were transported to a magical world where Ghana could be completely socially and culturally re-engineered into China with black people, I believe they could achieve levels of national development comparable to that of China's. It doesn't take a nation of geniuses to make $8,000 a year.

>Or alternatively cognitive ability can influence or be linked with other physiological factors that affect performance at PE?
Maybe it's physiological (or other, willingness to work hard or other mental but not precisely "intelligence") factors that also explain success in other fields.

>That's something of a non-sequitur. We have no reason to believe this any more than my reasoning.
If two variables are correlated without any casual mechanism then there's some hidden variable linking the two. That's not a non sequitur at all.

>And when they don't find it... they keep searching and searching?
This is what scientists generally do all day.

>>8292502
>Not really, the methodology can still be used.

How so? How on earth would you quantify it?

>Also, you were talking about the Qing Era.

And? China had the highest GDP on earth until the 19th century according to historical GDP estimates.

You leftists are going to have to come to terms with the fact China's growth isn't going to trail off like Japan's did. You can call them racists and bigots all you want, but you're impotent to do anything about it.

>>8292508
Ok, it doesn't take a nation of 106 IQ to make $8k per capita GDP. But it does take a higher GDP than 70 to build huge and advanced manufacturing industries of the kind China has.

>If two variables are correlated without any casual mechanism then there's some hidden variable linking the two.

There's no reason to believe this variable is inconsistent with the premise of g factor intelligence however.

>This is what scientists generally do all day.

Most social "scientists" are committed to egalitarian dogma. Hence Boas, Gould, Rose etc were all revealed to be liars eventually.

They are opposed to the idea of intelligence, as you most likely are, because it conflicts with your totalitarian blank slate tendencies to 'remake' societies through mass social engineering policies.

I find it funny people keep trying to find ways to hold on to their believe that blacks are not less intelligent than whites/asians on average, simply because they want to believe everyone is equal. It's like, even if God himself came down and told them "NO." they'd keep denying it.

>>8292529
>How so? How on earth would you quantify it?
>China had the highest GDP on earth until the 19th century according to historical GDP estimates.
Why are you so retarded?

>>8292534
see
>>8292281

>>8291347
I dunno she seems like she'd be alright to go drinking and eat yakisoba.

>>8292537
You're referring to the Human Development Index. I'm talking about Historical GDP. You do realize that the former metric is incredibly more complex than the latter, right?

>>8292534
Yes, egalitarianism is faith based. It doesn't matter though, leftism is self limiting as people who practice it basically wipe themselves out as distinct groups in their own homelands.

These people WANT to believe in equality. That's why they believe in it. It has nothing to do with scientific erudition because they're basically denying divergent evolution exists.

>>8292554
>people who practice it basically wipe themselves
The problem is that they take all the other people living in their country with them.

I've never seen anything quite like it before, so I'm a bit off-put by it. It's like seeing Lord Kelvin in a maid outfit.

You know, I wouldn't mind seeing Lord Kelvin in a maid outfit. His huge flowing beard might look a bit odd, but otherwise he'd make a fine maid.

>>8292534
Because society is working fine and people are afraid that admitting that egalitarism is wrong it would transform this society. Blacks would be ressentful and wreck chaos all around the western world and ultimately would serve against their interests.

>>8292554
>I'm talking about Historical GDP
No, you're talking about estimative.
>You do realize that the former metric is incredibly more complex than the latter, right?
Exactly.

>>8292590
>Because society is working fine
Bu.. bahahahahaha

>>8292602
Fine enough for them to not want to see it changed radically, you nigga.

>>8292595
>No, you're talking about estimative.

Yes, that's what Historical GDP is.

>Exactly

So you understand that estimates of 'Historical HDI' don't even exist?

>>8292610
For the time being, but this leftist society is unsustainable.
Sooner or later it's going to come crashing down.

>>8292614
He just wants you to use it because he knows you can't back your facts up with historical HDI data. He basically admit he lost.

>>8292602
You are fucking retarded.

I gonna help your dumb mind a little,
Compare your country's nowadays society with the society from 200 years ago.
Now see the diference between life expectancy, quality of life, illiterate rate or education.

>>8292622
So just because it used to be way worse, we should be complacent with the current level of the development of our society?

Idiot.

>>8292614
>So you understand that estimates of 'Historical HDI' don't even exist?
You are talking estimative, and I repeat, the methodology can still be used.

>>8292642
>the methodology can still be used

Alright, what specific metrics are you talking about here? How are you quantifying them? What primary sources are you using? etc.

>>8292622
>Now see the diference between life expectancy, quality of life, illiterate rate or education.
Society is more than just technology.

I could do the same thing you just did and reaffirm my points that society is failing.
>Compare your country's nowadays society with the society from 200 years ago.
Now see the diference between suicide rates, divorce rates or depression rates.

>>8292632
>we should be complacent with the current level of the development of our society?
Yes, since it's the best development rate since renaissance.

>>8292652
>Now see the diference between suicide rates, divorce rates or depression rates.
You can't seriously think that this actually helps your case.

>>8292649
>Alright, what specific metrics are you talking about here?
Life Expectancy Index
Education Index
Adult Literacy Index
Gross Enrollment Index
GDP
>How are you quantifying them? What primary sources are you using?
As you said, it's an estimative.

>>8292668
>Life Expectancy Index

What leads you to believe life expectency in 19th and pre 19th century Europe was any better than 19th and pre 19th century China? What are your sources for these claims?

>Education Index

Likewise for this metric.

>Adult Literacy Index

Likewise for this metric.

>Gross Enrollment Index

No idea what this one even is, but it doesn't sound like it has much relevance to pre industrial societies with comparably smaller states.

Athens is all over 4chan lately. He's made like 12 anime fan slut threads over the last couple days

What's brought you back buddy?

Adorable. A lot of meido and lolita outfits don't always look quite right on dark skin tones, but sometimes in an endearing kind of way.

I think it depends on the colour, more earthy colours work better on black/brown skin. I guess black girls could do Mori pretty well.

>>8292700
I've grown to associate 4chan with christmas festivities over the years.

>>8292676
>What leads you to believe life expectency in 19th and pre 19th century Europe was any better than 19th and pre 19th century China?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution#Causes_for_occurrence_in_Europe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution#Japan

>>8292700
>Athens
>No life

As expected.

>>8292720
Did you just completely ignore the fact we're talking about

>pre industrial

Economies here?

>>8292726
No, not really.

>>8292725
>Not going out over Christmas time
>No life

I'm not sure about you, but I'm fairly certain a whole bunch of people like to stay in over Christmas.

>>8292740
>12 anime slut thread
Besides being a no-life, has bad taste.

>>8292720

What you linked is completely irrelevant to what he asked.

>>8292747

Oh, and gtfo normalfag.

It's like I'm on Krautchan.