/jp/ - Otaku Culture

It worked! You are now posting on the internet!

>>7084392
すごいいいいいいいいいい

Master of the internet!

THIS IS THE GREATEST THING TO EVER EXIST IN THE HISTORY OF EXISTENCE.

sticky this shit moot

What's the story behind that image?

>>7084385

Best thread on /jp/ all week.
Yet I'm still saging it

>>7084430
Of course. The more smart people browse a thread, the more sages you're bound to get. At least on /jp/.

>>7084430
>I'm still saging it
But you weren't here for even a week and should get out.

>>7084430
I still laugh at how 4chan doesn't understand what sage means.

If only I knew moon so I wouldn't have to spend time on a board that imports foreign concepts and then DOES IT WRONG all the time.

Using sage as a way to "insult" someone's post or thread is just completely wrong and a retarded misuse of a good feature that is so popular in sites like 2ch and Futaba. Fuck, iichan and 4-ch do it right. It's just 4chan and 4chan's lame knockoffs that fail at using sage.

The true meaning of sage means that YOUR POST isn't worthy enough to bump the thread. It's ironic, because you think that you're insulting others while you're just, in fact, insulting yourself. Yes, sage can be used when posting a derogatory comment in a thread that you don't want to bump, but posting with just the word "sage" accomplishes nothing but contribute to spamming the board. The trend of replying with the name of a tripfag and sage is even worse, as it accomplishes nothing and only serves to increase the e-penis of whoever you're "attacking".

The sage feature was never meant to serve as an implied insult or general disagreement! Why people started using it that way is beyond me. There are plenty of reasons why one would choose not to bump a thread with his reply. For example, bumping threads with stupid one liner replies should be discouraged and those people should be coerced into using sage instead.

I want to use sage, yet I almost never do it on 4chan because people will jump on me thinking I'm insulting their post or something.

also

>>7084385
sadfrog?

>>7084441
aCTUALLY SAGE DOWNVOTES THREADS

>>7084441

Because a lot of retards think it's an anti-bump, probably confusing it with "sage bombing" which they'd still be misunderstanding.

There was once an anon who said that they wanted to be the hat.

This is for that anon.

>>7084514

>>7084516

>>7084520

>>7084521

>>7084441

It's a way to help keep the pace going on very slow boards like /jp/, so you won't have the same two or three shit threads cluttering the front page constantly.

On faster boards like /a/ and /v/ it doesn't matter because the threads disappear from the front page in half a second anyways.

>>7084525

>>7084480
Only if you assume that a non-sage post has a bump value of 1 and sage having a value of -1.

>>7084528

>>7084533
The End

>もう一人じゃない
Suwako and the Hat lived happily ever after...

>>7084480
The only thing sage does is not bumping a thread on the front page. It doesn't stop the thread from bumping.
Sage is a good way to stop the excessive traffic on the front page and it's also a good way to respect other [new] threads.

>>7084514
I remember that anon.
This is the fate that awaits you as the hat.