/jp/ - Otaku Culture

Fuck off, SHAFTard

>>6247597
worst fanbase ever

>>6247601
You're thinking of the Touhou fanbase.

>>6247597
Is that you Janitard? You're a fucking idiot you that.

>>6247606
Nah, it's the Sonicfags.

sage for shaft shit

Why is the meido so jelly of other meidos

SHAFT makes the best OPs.

Raw fucking where?

>>6247606
You know, Sudo, you can still enjoy K-on even if you admit it's the worst fanbase.

>>6247642
The Touhou fanbase is much worse, if only because of sheer numbers.

>>6247648
>The Touhou fanbase is much worse
understatement

>>6247648
Keion is much more popular than Touhou. Touhou is only well known among otaku.

The worst fanbase is the fanbase of god.

Be it chistian muslim or something else.

>>6247653
Touhou has been around much longer than K-ON! and has more fanart and doujins made of it than anything else lately. K-ON! is mostly popular among otaku as well, they're the ones buying all the BDs and figures.

I propose that all fanbases are equally retarded. The only difference is quantity.

Can't you guys enjoy things without worrying about what other types of people like it?

>>6247648
For once I agree with you, however k-on is still much more awful than touhou.

>>6247661
On 4chan? Not possible.

>>6247653
That's not true actually, ZUN has been on enough TV shows to make it pretty well known in Japan.

>>6247668
Known != Popular

And Shaft hasn't made anything terrible yet as far as I know.

>>6247670
Vampire Bund is pretty terrible

>>6247670
bakemonogatari and hidamari sketch would like a word with you.

40%

Went into the OP

>>6247695
How dare you! Both of those anime were average.

>>6247695
>Ghostory
>bad

>>6247702
No. Fuck you both.

>>6247670
Tsukuyomi was pretty bad(though if you consider how bad the source material is, it's actually almost a masterpiece)
>>6247695
ohohohoho

>>6247685
What's the matter, not moe enough for you?

>>6247695
Both of them are masterpieces, shame on you.

>>6247727
Vampire Bund was a disappointment for me.
The first episode got my hopes up for something completely different than the manga, but it ended up pretty close.
And since the manga is so... mundane? the presentation of the anime didn't really work well with the story.
And actually, the moe factor was pretty big - Mina was adorable.
Oh, and by the way - is there a specific name for the formal/archaic/hell if I know Japanese she was using? Because apparently I have fetish for that.

>>6247744
>The first episode
...was the only bad thing about the anime. And you can call the manga bad (lol opinions) but it's certainly not mundane. Nice try.

And Mina speaks archaic/imperial Japanese.

>>6247755
Are you one of the morons who think that the adaptation must be always faithful to be good?
And no, I don't think the manga is bad - it's just about as deep as a puddle, though.

>>6247779
>Are you one of the morons who think that the adaptation must be always faithful to be good?
Now where did you get that one from? The fact that it deviated was irrelevant to the fact that it could have been better.

>it's just about as deep as a puddle, though.
Are you one of the morons who think that a story must have a DEEP underlying message to be good? It's not that kind of story, it doesn't presume to teach you anything, it's a fictional political intrigue. It's assumed that the viewers are above the age that needs simple moral lessons.

ITT : SHAFTard circle jerk

>>6247797
see
>>6247779
>And no, I don't think the manga is bad

It's simple, predictable and devoid of any substance(which does NOT equate moral lessons, I have no clue where the fuck did you get that from), but it's pretty enjoyable, in an action movie sorta way.
It doesn't fit the presentation it was given. While sometimes unique presentation might add another layer to a simple story, here it detracted from my enjoyment of it.

>>6247817
>It's simple, predictable and devoid of any substance
You're losing credibility here. It's not NGE DEEP, but it's not shallow either.

>here it detracted from my enjoyment of it.
Opinions.