/jp/ - Otaku Culture

I'm sure the scientist who goes on to invent those will be persuaded by a certain magical girl angel into not doing that.

I bet they will be able to but moralfags with cockblock

>>6224891
That makes no sense. Dangerous pedos could abuse the bot all they want instead of actual little girls. Everyone wins.

>no tits
>no thighs
>no ass
>too small to clean high places
>Can't lift heavy things
Why would I want a useless pile of rubbish?

>>6224898
But what about the poor robot?

>>6224909
What about it indeed

>>6224898
They don't care about logic, they're still cockblock

>>6224894
Maybe the robotic abilities will include extending legs and overall strength.

>>6224909
Well, it's just a robot. It's not a person. Personally I'd feel horrible abusing a realistic robot, but what it comes down to is that it's a machine with simulation software. Any trauma given to it could instantly be removed with a reset button.

so, as I pray

unlimited imouto works

>>6224891
Why do the long pieces have 5 squares?

>>6224915

Exactly. Logic is useless when you're dealing with people who don't base their views on anything logical in the first place.

>>6224953
Hate to admit that you're right..

They don't understand you either. Get off your butt and go invent a lolibot instead of browsing 4chan.

>>6224941
>>6224935
This manga didn't actually seem that "wrong" until she entered high school.

>>6224975
I'm in the wrong industry, it's way too late. Maybe after I'm done with school and I've got some free time on my hands.

1:1 lovedolls already exist.

People already impose morals on their plastic bodies.

>>6224926
>it's just a robot. It's not a person
but cartoon lolis have human rights, why wouldnt robots?

I'll call on robot rights you sick fuck!

They'll make the argument that since the AI is so advanced that its intelligence is on par with, surpasses or even approaches a human child's, they should be treated as human and all AI should have human rights

>>6225064
About the picture thing......What's the big deal about naked pictures of children(I'm not a pedo but they are just pictures)

>>6225080
and then they stop making robots, because they are useless since you cant make them do work

>>6225083
because it can make you feel the need of doing it on 3d world. That's what they say.

>>6225083
well obviously some poor child was hurt to make those pictures... especially drawn pictures

>>6225064
>but cartoon lolis have human rights
lolwat
I thought lolicon was free and legal in the USA.

>>6225090
It is both legal and illegal in America at the same time.

One law says it's legal, and another says it's illegal.

The Supreme Court needs to rule to be sure.

They won't, though.

>>6225083
The argument is that every time you look at CP you are abusing the child depicted.

>>6225090
I read somewhere that some store chain stopped selling megami because it might be thought of as "child porn".

>>6225090
does someone have the wiki article with laws regarding drawn loli in different countrys

Think of that question, if a robot is self aware and has free will, does it have rights?

But the interesting thing, I think anyway, is in that case how would we be different from a robot? We are just flesh sacks with chemicals bouncing around in a brain anyway right?

>>6225095
I see.
I've lolicon hosted with Dreamhost, any chance of it being take down?

>>6225117
If it does, you can sue, because the law does say it is legal.

>>6225103
Really...?What has the world come to.Also I would have thought that with as many bible pushers as we have in the US that young girls would be snatched already.

>>6225103
Obligatory

You know I really do want to be an eroge artist but I might actually give up on art and try to create robot children.(not for sex but for lonely people who need friends.)

>>6225080
>>6225113
someone should post this on /sci/ guaranteed 300 posts 75 image replies ommited

>>6225136
>not for sex but for lonely people who need friends
sure, i know what you mean
i'd buy one

sauce?

>>6225157
Omase de Gomen! by Gomennasai and translated by Biribiri.

>>6225157
google it

>>6225113
The thing is, a robot cannot be self-aware in our sense because it functions on a completely different system, that being one that uses software, while we on the other hand function on a biological system. A robot's self-awareness would only be simulated, assuming it's a program that is used to express the self-awareness.

>But the interesting thing, I think anyway, is in that case how would we be different from a robot? We are just flesh sacks with chemicals bouncing around in a brain anyway right?

That IS the only difference between a human and a robot with AI that is on par with the human mind. This does not change the fact that the super intelligent robot is no different than a girl in a visual novel, besides the obvious grand gap in complexity.

>>6225162
lmao ur butt is literally mad

>>6224975
The problem with robots is that they always end up looking creepy, kind of like how computer generated 3D does. It's really hard to get a natural looking robot and may be impossible.

>>6226630
It's people with your mindset that will make it impossible.

>>6226630
>imply you wouldn't fuck it..

>>6226630
I've seen some decent looking dolls, but putting them into motion would be exceptionally difficult, huh?